General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQatar wants to overthrow Assad to build a pipeline.
Last edited Sat Aug 31, 2013, 04:35 PM - Edit history (1)
In 2009 - the same year former French foreign minister Dumas alleges the British began planning operations in Syria - Assad refused to sign a proposed agreement with Qatar that would run a pipeline from the latter's North field, contiguous with Iran's South Pars field, through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and on to Turkey, with a view to supply European markets - albeit crucially bypassing Russia. Assad's rationale was "to protect the interests of [his] Russian ally, which is Europe's top supplier of natural gas."
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/earth-insight/2013/aug/30/syria-chemical-attack-war-intervention-oil-gas-energy-pipelines
On the face of it, Qatar has been one of the United States's most valuable allies in the Middle East over the last decade. Qatar hosts a large U.S. Air Force base in the Persian Gulf and has often provided political and financial support for U.S. initiatives in the Middle East. Indeed, Washington has often encouraged Qatari activism to legitimize U.S. diplomacy, including its political support at the Arab League of a potential U.S. strike against Syria.
But Qatar's role in the United States's Middle East policy is far more problematic than is commonly recognized. The tiny yet ambitious Gulf emirate has sought to use its immense hydrocarbon wealth to finance and arm civil wars in Libya and Syria, to support Hamas in Gaza, and to mediate disputes in Sudan and Lebanon. Its interest sometimes align with the United States's -- but too often, they do not. The launch of Al-Jazeera America, the news network its government owns, should redirect attention to Doha's goals and means.
http://mideast.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/08/28/the_qatar_problem
TBF
(32,000 posts)It's the natural gas they need to pump out of Iran ...
Catherina
(35,568 posts)wants to overthrow Assad for a pipeline and push his propaganda on US viewers? Say it ain't so. Such a *valuable* ally.
Beat those war drums for Qatar and Saudi Arabia.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Catherina
(35,568 posts)Since the topic du jour is attacking mouthpieces, all mouthpieces should be treated consistently. Personally, I prefer a standard of reliability.
Qatar and Saudi Arabia want their pipeline. Anything they can do to drum up support for the war, no matter how subtle, they'll do it.
Violet_Crumble
(35,955 posts)That OP was done to try to equate Al Jazeera (which despite yr protestations to the contrary, is a reliable source) with RT because yr mad that the LBN hosts locked an OP in GD...
A mouthpiece is a source where the government controls the editorial content. I've asked you questions about this, but you didn't answer, so I'll ask again. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023571682#post99
Now I'll also ask you for proof that the government of Quatar controls the editorial content of Al Jazeera,...
gopiscrap
(23,725 posts)Initech
(100,029 posts)factsarenotfair
(910 posts)I know this for a fact.
Initech
(100,029 posts)factsarenotfair
(910 posts).