General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat model should the US use to provide universal healthcare?
Beveridge, Bismarck, NHI, or a hybrid? Should private medical care be illegal, like in Canada, or should a private system be allowed like in Australia and the UK?
pampango
(24,692 posts)Since the right to adequate health care should be absolute, it should not be in private hands for the most part.
Private health care is not illegal in Canada thought is a small portion of total health care.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_care_in_Canada
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)system was paid for 100% and they got salaries that allowed them to live comfortable lives.
Bunnahabhain
(857 posts)Please read the Canadian Medicare laws, specifically the definition of "core services" in the Health Act of 1984. If you read the dicta you will see they were designed specifically, and it is stated explicitly, to prevent the formation of a parallel and private system.
Here is an article in the recent evolution but please note the same reference I gave you to the 1984 Health Act. http://www.longwoods.com/content/19340
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)National health insurance ("kokumin kenkou hoken"
is mandatory for everyone, except for those who qualify for the private "shakai hoken" and prefer to join that. Premiums are based on income, family size, and to a certain extent age, but it doesn't matter if one has a pre-existing condition. The insurance pays for 70% of all necessary health care costs and prescriptions, including dental, which are fairly reasonably priced. Some health care for infants and young children is free or at a greatly reduced price, as is some (maybe all) health care for the elderly.
AngryAmish
(25,704 posts)This would work very well in urban/suburban areas. Government pays $x dollars for gall bladder removal for example. You can pay more for things like better food or private room. Some people may even buy insurance if they choose but no tax deduction for this.
So there will be bare bones operations for those less well off with nicer options for those who can pay.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)to promises that they make. The ACA is a good start, with safety nets for people that can't afford health care insurance. I want to see the government provide free medical school training to med students that are going into general practice, with the condition that those newly minted GPs serve in clinics that provide care to low income and lower middle income communities. I want to see regional exchanges where like minded states can group to provide low cost insurance and health care to their citizens, New England, the upper and middle-Atlantic and the West Coast states would likely flourish in such a system.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Insurance companies could still have a role selling policies for higher levels of coverage (much as Medicare recipients can still purchase Medi-gap policies today).
No more "appeals to cover medical bills" when someone gets cancer or is involved in an accident.