Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Segami

(14,923 posts)
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:05 AM Sep 2013

AGGRESSIVE California U.S. Attorney Says SHE'LL KEEP PROSECUTING On Marijuana





In the past few years, as some medical marijuana business people have been made into criminals in states with their own laws, no state has been more center stage than California. The state saw the first marijuana law, so the medical marijuana industry has had longer to develop. And crackdowns have been vigorous, particularly at the hands of U.S. Attorney Melinda Haag, who covers the Northern District of California.



It is Haag who is pursuing seizure of two major Bay Area dispensaries that even the cities that host them have considered crucial to public health and defended in court. It is Haag who played a key role in the raid of a dispensary that was the model for a county program to police pot. And it is Haag who recently threatened some seemingly state-compliant dispensaries with as much as 40 years in jail. In its latest guidance, the Department of Justice made explicit that the size and commercial nature of a dispensary was no longer reason enough to prosecute. And Haag has been equally explicit that size and commercial nature played a role in her crackdowns, saying, “The larger the operation, the greater the likelihood that there will be abuse of the state’s medical marijuana laws, and marijuana in the hands of individuals who do not have a demonstrated medical need.”



Nonetheless, Haag said Friday that she does not expect a “significant change” in her approach, adding, “for the most part it appears that the cases that have been brought in this district are already in compliance with the guidelines.” There are a number of grounds on which Haag might be able to justify this comment. The guidelines leave significant leeway to determine what constitutes a “strong and effective regulatory system,” when there is “exacerbation” of drugged driving or “other public health consequences,” and when a dispensary is considered to be marketing to minors. But Haag’s explicit professed targeting of dispensaries because they are large and commercial would make such justifications particularly suspect.



Her response is an early demonstration of how the DOJ’s announcement will require the cooperation of the regional U.S. attorneys to change the legal landscape.





http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2013/09/04/2568071/aggressive-california-attorney-says-shell-prosecuting-marijuana/
90 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
AGGRESSIVE California U.S. Attorney Says SHE'LL KEEP PROSECUTING On Marijuana (Original Post) Segami Sep 2013 OP
Then Holder / Obama need to fire her ass. Scuba Sep 2013 #1
In a functional system, yes, that might happen. MindPilot Sep 2013 #7
In a functional system the legal system would be answerable to politicians?!? Donald Ian Rankin Sep 2013 #53
Yeah, it's a rotten shame they can't just fire her. Shame on whomever appointed this RW zealot indepat Sep 2013 #68
They can order her to direct her assets towards specific crimes (and apparently have done so). Scuba Sep 2013 #69
Then shame on those who order her to direct her assets toward the prosecution of marijuana indepat Sep 2013 #75
They are fanatics. nt bemildred Sep 2013 #2
Prohibition REQUIRES fanaticism. Punisment & Pain is the true objective. nt Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #13
Indeed, Orwell: bemildred Sep 2013 #17
As expected the DAs are all fucknutz insane on WOD and will ignore Holder. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #3
She is not a DA, she's a United States Attorney who serves at the pleasure of Obama Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #73
yeah huge difference. Warren Stupidity Sep 2013 #89
cannabis prosecutions are cheap, easy notches in US Attorney guns.... mike_c Sep 2013 #4
It's more "good cop/bad cop" garbage. Obama been playing this game since 2009. nt Romulox Sep 2013 #5
+1 forestpath Sep 2013 #6
Clinton set the tone. Eleanors38 Sep 2013 #14
Both Clinton and Obama greatly ramped up the Drug war as compared to their Republican predecessors. Romulox Sep 2013 #15
+1 Thank you. nt woo me with science Sep 2013 #86
Disgusting. Fire her ass NOW nt riderinthestorm Sep 2013 #8
What an appropriate name. nt MindPilot Sep 2013 #9
I bet Melinda wants DiFi's chair when she's finally done with it. MNBrewer Sep 2013 #10
If she thinks this is going to gain her points in Le Taz Hot Sep 2013 #11
Why not - Difi voted Republican on every major issue FreakinDJ Sep 2013 #33
DiFi is entrenched with the CDP and an incumbant. Le Taz Hot Sep 2013 #46
Doesn't say much about her abilities. HappyMe Sep 2013 #12
her picture doesn't surprise me olddots Sep 2013 #16
Village of the Damned PTA Member? bobduca Sep 2013 #23
Young Hagg future prosecutors Segami Sep 2013 #24
scary Supersedeas Sep 2013 #56
I know why she is pissed off...Look What I Found! snooper2 Sep 2013 #18
BADA-BING! - LOL! Segami Sep 2013 #20
Excellent. progressoid Sep 2013 #41
i don't think she's going rogue Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #19
who was the USA there before her appointment? librechik Sep 2013 #27
Sad to say, Bush didn't mess with the dispensaries Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #29
So, I guess she thinks she doesn't have to do what her boss says kestrel91316 Sep 2013 #21
Appointed by Obama, would he choose a RWer?..nt Jesus Malverde Sep 2013 #30
To his credit, he does try to be nonpolitical in these matters. But it doesn't serve kestrel91316 Sep 2013 #59
If the federal drug laws were actually rescinded or changed that would definitely end these actions. mulsh Sep 2013 #22
The Controlled Substance Act gives the power to the Executive Branch to unilaterally reschedule Romulox Sep 2013 #26
frankly, i expect the schedule to be changed soon, possibly at end of 2015. librechik Sep 2013 #28
Obama could reschedule cannabis to schgedule 2 today...if he wanted to end the madness TeamPooka Sep 2013 #35
Persecuting, arresting, prosecuting, and imprisoning herb growers, etc, is big business in N. Cal. Zorra Sep 2013 #25
She is the epitome of the type of human closed mindedness that slows humanity's progress. Lint Head Sep 2013 #31
RW IDIOT! heaven05 Sep 2013 #32
Yeah! RW idiot! bobclark86 Sep 2013 #36
Yep,Yeah RW IDIOT heaven05 Sep 2013 #42
A rose is a rose by any other name OnionPatch Sep 2013 #44
Please show me... bobclark86 Sep 2013 #48
Here is what Obama himself promised when he wanted our votes in 2008 Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #82
DINO in both cases. SammyWinstonJack Sep 2013 #54
First off... bobclark86 Sep 2013 #58
Prohibition is a failed public policy...again. But she's too dumb to know it. nt TeamPooka Sep 2013 #34
Eh, who cares if it's the law... bobclark86 Sep 2013 #37
That's the same argument that was used to keep slavery in place...it's the law. Find a new argument. TeamPooka Sep 2013 #38
Breaking the law... bobclark86 Sep 2013 #47
Another low-post-count authoritarian. MindPilot Sep 2013 #50
Aww, I don't post a lot... bobclark86 Sep 2013 #57
Didn't say you were a troll MindPilot Sep 2013 #60
it is the content of your posts that is more revealing than the quantity of your posts TeamPooka Sep 2013 #70
yup. Easy to spot. Always say the same things. TeamPooka Sep 2013 #64
We are a polce state and have more prisoners in jail than any country in the world. TeamPooka Sep 2013 #66
So, what crimes did the slaves commit? bobclark86 Sep 2013 #72
So an argument in favor of the Drug War is...slavery was worse? Romulox Sep 2013 #78
Did you even READ my post? bobclark86 Sep 2013 #79
I gave it the attention it deserved, to be sure. It was standard authoritarian apologia claptrap. Romulox Sep 2013 #80
Your first post to this thread was "Who cares if it's the law", btw. Way to move the goalposts! nt Romulox Sep 2013 #81
I think he was being sarcastic with that one. n/t MindPilot Sep 2013 #85
I was expecting my local one nadinbrzezinski Sep 2013 #39
What I expected. Holder's "policy" is full of weasel words hvn_nbr_2 Sep 2013 #40
She needs to be fired dbackjon Sep 2013 #43
Perhaps if California would legalize cultivation KurtNYC Sep 2013 #45
This is all about merit. JRLeft Sep 2013 #49
This woman is a United States Attorney appointed by Obama and she serves at his pleasure Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #76
I'm from CA, so I know. I am not defending Obama, but there is truth to what JRLeft Sep 2013 #88
Marijuana policy aside, I don't get this.... Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2013 #51
You will notice there are very rarely any arrests. MindPilot Sep 2013 #62
Aside from nasty-grams, I don't see what the government can do Jeff In Milwaukee Sep 2013 #65
Seizeure of assets is a major motivator for law enforcement. As always, follow the money. Scuba Sep 2013 #71
Bill Hicks might shed some light here... deutsey Sep 2013 #52
I bet she's getting paid off Politicalboi Sep 2013 #55
Haag or hog lsewpershad Sep 2013 #61
That's what I thought, healthy looking felix_numinous Sep 2013 #63
Haag is a drug warrior. blackspade Sep 2013 #67
Her actions would indicate that she serves the interests of the cartels which profit Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #83
Exactly blackspade Sep 2013 #84
This little fascist needs to resign her post! B Calm Sep 2013 #74
Hey look it's the C Haag Blue Owl Sep 2013 #77
This is what decades of propaganda and indoctrination lead to. beevul Sep 2013 #87
according to potus Niceguy1 Sep 2013 #90
 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
7. In a functional system, yes, that might happen.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:18 AM
Sep 2013

But the way things work now, this allows the administration to say one thing, (Of course the federal government will respect the will of the people in states that have legalized or decriminalized marijuana.&quot while actually doing something entirely different, i. e. continuing to go after dispensaries, no matter how compliant they are. And doing so with the cover of "rogue" prosecutors.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
53. In a functional system the legal system would be answerable to politicians?!?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:31 PM
Sep 2013

In a functional system, no elected official would have any ability whatsoever to influence any part of the judicial process, *except* by changing the laws.

Police, prosecutors, judges and the like would be appointed and dismissed by, and answerable to, non-political bodies of public servants, which *in turn* would be controlled by the elected executive, but would be set up to make it impossible for elected officials to influence any specific case, just to change policies for the future. They could say, for example, that the civil servants should permit a wider range of interpretations of these laws, or enforce a narrower one, but *not* to dismiss individuals.

indepat

(20,899 posts)
68. Yeah, it's a rotten shame they can't just fire her. Shame on whomever appointed this RW zealot
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:33 PM
Sep 2013
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
69. They can order her to direct her assets towards specific crimes (and apparently have done so).
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:34 PM
Sep 2013

indepat

(20,899 posts)
75. Then shame on those who order her to direct her assets toward the prosecution of marijuana
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:53 PM
Sep 2013

issues when serious criminal offenses are not being prosecuted.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
17. Indeed, Orwell:
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:36 AM
Sep 2013

"The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power." ~ George Orwell 1984

Huxley:

"Morality is always the product of terror; its chains and strait-waistcoats are fashioned by those who dare not trust others, because they dare not trust themselves, to walk in liberty." - Aldous Huxley

And behind it all lies that fear.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
3. As expected the DAs are all fucknutz insane on WOD and will ignore Holder.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:12 AM
Sep 2013

Somebody should investigate her finances.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
73. She is not a DA, she's a United States Attorney who serves at the pleasure of Obama
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:52 PM
Sep 2013

Big difference.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
89. yeah huge difference.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 08:35 PM
Sep 2013

Melinda Haag is serving her first term as the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California.

http://www.justice.gov/usao/can/meetattorney.html


United States Attorneys (also known as federal prosecutors and, historically, as United States District Attorneys.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney

whatever.

mike_c

(37,051 posts)
4. cannabis prosecutions are cheap, easy notches in US Attorney guns....
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:14 AM
Sep 2013

They're low hanging fruit for racking up conviction rates. Haag is one of the worst, IMO.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
15. Both Clinton and Obama greatly ramped up the Drug war as compared to their Republican predecessors.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:36 AM
Sep 2013

DU as a whole maintains a willful ignorance of this.

MNBrewer

(8,462 posts)
10. I bet Melinda wants DiFi's chair when she's finally done with it.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:23 AM
Sep 2013

Prosecutors such as she often have their sights set higher (e.g., Amy Klobuchar).

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
11. If she thinks this is going to gain her points in
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:26 AM
Sep 2013

California, Oregon & Washington (or whatever her jurisdiction is), she's too stupid to be a U.S. Attorney, much less a U.S. Senator. Besides, we have some GREAT prospects for the DiFi's Senate seat.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
46. DiFi is entrenched with the CDP and an incumbant.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:06 PM
Sep 2013

She won't have either of those advantages. There's too many really good candidates for DiFi's seat, Kamala Harris being one of them.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
12. Doesn't say much about her abilities.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:31 AM
Sep 2013

I would think those are the easiest damn 'wins' to rack up.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
19. i don't think she's going rogue
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:42 AM
Sep 2013

Melinda Haag is serving her first term as the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California. She was appointed by President Barack Obama and confirmed by the United States Senate in August 2010.

She's relatively new to the Job and appointed by the President Obama, it's unlikely she is independent enough to be making her own policy.

librechik

(30,957 posts)
27. who was the USA there before her appointment?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:59 AM
Sep 2013

this has been going on a long time. i suspect Bush involvement, because drug money.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
29. Sad to say, Bush didn't mess with the dispensaries
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:04 PM
Sep 2013

Many of the ones she has closed were open under Bush.


Marin Alliance For Medical Marijuana, California's Oldest Pot Club, Closes


Buckling under increased pressure from the federal government, California's oldest marijuana dispensary quietly shuttered over the weekend.

U.S. attorneys began forfeiture proceedings against the Fairfax-based Marin Alliance for Medical Marijuana, in operation since the state legalized cannabis for medical use in 1996, in November. The shop's landlord had already started a similar eviction process earlier this year.

"We are very sorry to announce that we have shut our doors until we can resolve certain legal issues," the club's statement read. "The battle is not over, but we must await further court action that will allow us to reopen, hopefully within a month or two."

Marin Alliance is one of a handful of dispensaries to close in the wake of the Justice Department's renewed crackdown on California's medical marijuana industry. Three San Francisco collectives also shut down this fall after receiving intimidating letters from federal officials.

U.S. Attorney for Northern California Melinda Haag specifically targeted Marin Alliance for closure because of its proximity to nearby Bolinas Park. Under federal law, medical cannabis shops are prohibited from operating within 1,000 feet of a park or school.

http://www.cannabisculture.com/content/2011/12/22/Marin-Alliance-Medical-Marijuana-Californias-Oldest-Pot-Club-Closes

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
21. So, I guess she thinks she doesn't have to do what her boss says
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:46 AM
Sep 2013

when it comes to prioritization of cases?

Wouldn't surprise me if Holder apologized to her and told her to go ahead and do what she wants.

We need to make sure that this woman's career goes NO FARTHER. I smell a RWer with political ambition.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
59. To his credit, he does try to be nonpolitical in these matters. But it doesn't serve
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:49 PM
Sep 2013

him or us well.

mulsh

(2,959 posts)
22. If the federal drug laws were actually rescinded or changed that would definitely end these actions.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:48 AM
Sep 2013

I fully support legalizing pot and medicinal marijuana but I recognize that federal laws trump state laws. According to the article Ms. Haag has found parts of the laws that provide a way to work around the new guidelines. The attorney general can do much to set his department's priorities but until the laws are actually changed we'll encounter determined folk like Ms. Haag.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
26. The Controlled Substance Act gives the power to the Executive Branch to unilaterally reschedule
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:56 AM
Sep 2013

Cannabis.

Please don't believe the excuses.

librechik

(30,957 posts)
28. frankly, i expect the schedule to be changed soon, possibly at end of 2015.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:01 PM
Sep 2013

we'll see.

 

TeamPooka

(25,577 posts)
35. Obama could reschedule cannabis to schgedule 2 today...if he wanted to end the madness
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:38 PM
Sep 2013

But he doesn't.
It will go down as his greatest failure.

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
25. Persecuting, arresting, prosecuting, and imprisoning herb growers, etc, is big business in N. Cal.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 11:55 AM
Sep 2013

Ms. Haag is apparently reluctant to retire her cash cow it seems.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
31. She is the epitome of the type of human closed mindedness that slows humanity's progress.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:18 PM
Sep 2013

She would do well to join a bigoted cult. She is an example of the very person who causes a persons life to be wasted in prison because they smoked one joint.

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
36. Yeah! RW idiot!
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:39 PM
Sep 2013

Go back to your master who appointed you and go scrape out your own party... Oh, wait.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melinda_Haag

She was appointed by President Obama. Oh, and she's a Democrat.

Carry on... RW idiot! YEAH!

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
42. Yep,Yeah RW IDIOT
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:56 PM
Sep 2013

Just because she's a democrat doesn't mean she can't be RW! I read the responses of quite a few on here.....Or right of center to be technical, they are still RW. She needs to get back to what she's good at. Catching criminals.

OnionPatch

(6,328 posts)
44. A rose is a rose by any other name
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:00 PM
Sep 2013

Just wish Obama were a real rose and appointed real roses.

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
48. Please show me...
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:12 PM
Sep 2013

where in the 2012 Democratic National Platform it discusses marijuana -- either the straight-up legalization or the promotion of medical uses.

Go ahead... I'll wait.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
82. Here is what Obama himself promised when he wanted our votes in 2008
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:05 PM
Sep 2013

Would you stop the DEA's raids on Oregon medical marijuana growers?

Obama: " I would because I think our federal agents have better things to do, like catching criminals and preventing terrorism. The way I want to approach the issue of medical marijuana is to base it on science, and if there is sound science that supports the use of medical marijuana and if it is controlled and prescribed in a way that other medicine is prescribed, then it's something that I think we should consider."
http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-9003-six_minutes_with_barack.html
Better things to do. Apparently terrorism is no longer a problem?

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
58. First off...
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:47 PM
Sep 2013

The early 1990s called, and much like this joke, they want their RINO/DINO label back.

Second, please show me in the 2012 Democratic National Platform the discussion about marijuana legalization.

 

TeamPooka

(25,577 posts)
38. That's the same argument that was used to keep slavery in place...it's the law. Find a new argument.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:43 PM
Sep 2013

Unjust and unfair laws are to be protested and changed.
That's what activists like myself are doing here.

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
47. Breaking the law...
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:10 PM
Sep 2013

and pissing and moaning when you get in trouble isn't protesting. It's breaking the law. She's doing her job, to enforce the laws of the U.S. Getting caught moving a few kilos across from Mexico, growing a couple acres on your own, or opening a store selling it AND ADVERTISING IN THE PHONE BOOK ain't the way. Nullifying federal law at the state level ain't the way.

Change the federal law.

Oh, wait. Nobody in elected office with national exposure wants the law changed except Rand Paul. Good luck with that piece of shit.

Truth be told, I'm much more worried about the millions of malnourished children in America, the rising debt of pretty much everyone under the age of 30 just because they wanted to learn something and get a better job, the death of 400,000 Americans A YEAR from smoking-related illness (or the 20,000 killed a year by radon because of low housing standards), and the gassing of civilians by a desperate fucktard within Scud missile range distance of Jerusalem than about somebody being allowed to sell a plant in California. My priorities are different than yours, I apologize.

Oh, and did you REALLY just compare the mass kidnapping and forced labor of MILLIONS to being arrested for smuggling a couple pounds of banned plant across state lines? Great job dropping trou' and shitting on the memories of the slaves who were kidnapped, beaten, raped, and murdered; as well as those who fought and died to free them. Because it's not like slaves were people (they were 3/5th of a person... how much of a person is a kilo of weed?).

 

TeamPooka

(25,577 posts)
70. it is the content of your posts that is more revealing than the quantity of your posts
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:35 PM
Sep 2013

Now head back to the Gun Forum where you authoritarian types all like to hang out.

 

TeamPooka

(25,577 posts)
66. We are a polce state and have more prisoners in jail than any country in the world.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:19 PM
Sep 2013

Just because of our drugs laws.
So yeah I'm making the analogy to slavery because it's a form of it.
Apology accepted.

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
72. So, what crimes did the slaves commit?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:41 PM
Sep 2013

Did they voluntarily buy and sell illegal substances?

Comparing a dude who opened a business on Main Street selling a federally-banned substance (and advertising it in the newspaper and the phone book) to a person kidnapped from their home, taken halfway around the world and set into slavery for the next five generations isn't a fair analogy. The guy with the store (who had enough money to set up a store) made a decision.

Yeah, some drug dealers were kind of forced into it -- previous run-ins with the law, or family issues making so one has to find ways to make money to support a family before graduating high school and college. It's a sign of a horrible system. A society that shits on the lower class, minorities, etc. Yes, drug laws are a part of that. They are a modern day Jim Crow. They need to be changed.

I think states have the right to decriminalize the personal possession of marijuana (A $10 fine like a parking ticket if you're dumb enough to light up in front of a cop), but promoting the manufacture and distribution of a Schedule I drug isn't OK.

Also, the woman being described in the OP is a federal employee who swore an oath to defend the constitution. The constitution was interpreted to give Congress the right to set drug laws (that's a whole other can of worms), and to demand the US Attorney's Office prosecute violations of said laws. Should the laws be changed? Fuck yeah. Should she be allowed to ignore existing federal law? No. She's doing her job.

The administration lacks the balls to ask for changes to federal law. THAT is the leadership we need on the topic. I'm not holding my breath, though.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
78. So an argument in favor of the Drug War is...slavery was worse?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:58 PM
Sep 2013

Truly, a stunning argument.

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
79. Did you even READ my post?
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:00 PM
Sep 2013

I take it no. Apparently you missed the bit about how I compared drug laws to Jim Crow and I think drug laws need to be changed -- in fact, I think the drug war is a colossal waste of time, money and lives. I just had a problem with the particular analogy.

<Ignore>

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
80. I gave it the attention it deserved, to be sure. It was standard authoritarian apologia claptrap.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:03 PM
Sep 2013

with an admittedly bizarre (e.g. "slavery was WAY worse than the drug war&quot red herring.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
81. Your first post to this thread was "Who cares if it's the law", btw. Way to move the goalposts! nt
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:04 PM
Sep 2013

hvn_nbr_2

(6,793 posts)
40. What I expected. Holder's "policy" is full of weasel words
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 12:50 PM
Sep 2013

The "policy" is camouflage lipstick on a wallowing Prohibition pig.

KurtNYC

(14,549 posts)
45. Perhaps if California would legalize cultivation
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:05 PM
Sep 2013

of say 40 plants or less for personal use it would:

- take big money out of the equation
- minimize the high profile dispensaries which are the targets of federal enforcement
- stop people who are hiding grow operations in the national forests (which are now on fire), and
- provide the state with a bargaining chip in the on-going alignment of state and federal laws.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
49. This is all about merit.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:18 PM
Sep 2013

Some prosecutors see big drug busts as a way to get their name out. They may have ambitions of being a judge, a municipal, county, state, or federal DA. Police see the same opportunity, as a way to gain rank, or to eventually become Chief of Police or Commissioner.
And some on both sides see that as an opportunity to run for political office such as; congress, mayor, city council, etc.

Take away the merit and that will eliminate motivation for a lot of them.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
76. This woman is a United States Attorney appointed by Obama and she serves at his pleasure
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:55 PM
Sep 2013

Her actions are wildly unpopular in CA where voters oppose what she's doing.

 

JRLeft

(7,010 posts)
88. I'm from CA, so I know. I am not defending Obama, but there is truth to what
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 06:39 PM
Sep 2013

I am saying.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
51. Marijuana policy aside, I don't get this....
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:26 PM
Sep 2013

The owners say that they're complying with the law and make weed available only to people by prescription.

Haag seems to be saying that, "You're so big, you must be doing something illegal"

How can she do this without any specific violation of the law?

 

MindPilot

(12,693 posts)
62. You will notice there are very rarely any arrests.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:59 PM
Sep 2013

No, it is all about coercion. The landlords of the buildings used for marijuana operations receive letters threatening them with property seizure if they don't give the dispensary the boot.

Surely if the operations were that illegal, all these raids would result in arrests, charges, trials, and convictions.

It is just the jackbooted thugs of government making sure we the people know who is in change.

Jeff In Milwaukee

(13,992 posts)
65. Aside from nasty-grams, I don't see what the government can do
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:16 PM
Sep 2013

If the dispensary is operating outside the law (which I highly doubt), then charge them with illegal distribution and shut the place down.

If they're within the law, what the hell?!

 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
71. Seizeure of assets is a major motivator for law enforcement. As always, follow the money.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:36 PM
Sep 2013

deutsey

(20,166 posts)
52. Bill Hicks might shed some light here...
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:28 PM
Sep 2013

"I think it's interesting the two drugs that are legal, alcohol and cigarettes, two drugs that do absolutely nothing for you at all; and the drugs that might open your mind up to realize how badly you're being fucked every day of your life? … Those drugs are against the law. He-heh, coincidence?"


 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
55. I bet she's getting paid off
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 01:39 PM
Sep 2013

By the police so they can still confiscate businesses and homes. She may have a chip on her shoulder because even though her name isn't spelled the same way she sure looks like a hag. Fuck you Hag.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
63. That's what I thought, healthy looking
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:00 PM
Sep 2013

-but when she or the ones she loves gets sick, and finds that pot is the only relief, then maybe a lightbulb will go on.

Sometimes people need to be taught by personal experience. Or not.

But Karma is a bitch.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
67. Haag is a drug warrior.
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 02:26 PM
Sep 2013

In other words, someone used to being able to abuse their power without consequences.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
83. Her actions would indicate that she serves the interests of the cartels which profit
Wed Sep 4, 2013, 03:07 PM
Sep 2013

from the prohibition she enforces against the will of the people.

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
90. according to potus
Thu Sep 5, 2013, 05:08 AM
Sep 2013

The clinics must follow local and state laws. The ones in my area that were shut down (and theynlostbin court when they sued) were blantently violating CA's mwd mj laws....for kne they were making profits. .obscene ones at that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»AGGRESSIVE California U.S...