Here's an idea: Instead of attacking Syria can't we just give the money directly to Raytheon?

[Scuba]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_(missile)



http://www.raytheon.com/capabilities/products/tomahawk/

[DJ13]

1. What, and no fireworks?

What kind of show would that be on the news?

Boring!

[msongs]

2. or do neither and spend the $ on americans in america? or just not spend the $ at all? nt

[Scuba]

3. I was hoping for Baby Steps.

[CanonRay]

4. I think we already do that

but's it not enough. They have expenses, you know.

[devils chaplain]

5. C'mon! Murka already has the popcorn in the popper and Slim Pickens has his cowboy hat on. n/t

[Mnemosyne]

6. Word. nt

[superpatriotman]

7. Ah! A jobs program

NOT a war.

[polichick]

8. We can't leave out the corps that will swoop in to control...

Syria's natural resources.

[dixiegrrrrl]

9. I like the way you think.

Certainly, giving it away has a precedent...look at TARP.