General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe overselling of bombing Syria demonstrates how stupid the admin thinks
the American people are. Maybe they're right and the public is that stupid, but it's still infuriating and repugnant.
The language employed by Kerry is so over the top that it almost seems like parody. All the cliches in the book are tossed together for our consumption. It sounds not only overwrought but desperate. In its attempt to get the Congress and the people to support bombing Syria, the administration has demonstrated that there are no rhetorical lengths they won't go to.
jsr
(7,712 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Nor does it seem to apply to Syrian rebel's use of chemical weapons.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)Just look around you on DU.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Too many people are trying to make a joke of this, and trying to deflect from a discussion of the facts. Instead, people are resorting to personal attacks and name calling.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Did you believe the same bullshit when it was used to justify Bush's Iraq War?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)No, I'm smart enough to know the difference between this situation and the claims "used to justify Bush's Iraq War."
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Only difference is which president has a poster on your wall.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Saddam had WMD's of all sorts. So now he is selling the same thing he sold last time. He was not smart enough to know discern the problems with invading Iraq.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)By Ed O'Keefe
Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted Wednesday to approve a resolution authorizing U.S. military action against the government of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.
<...>
Final tally: 10 to 7, with one senator voting present.
Who voted yes?: Committee Chairman Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) (by proxy was absent due to the Jewish holiday), Benjamin Cardin (D-Md.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Christopher Coons (D-Del.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.). Ranking member Sen. Bob Corker (R-Tenn.) and Sens. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.).
Who voted no?: Sens. Tom Udall (D-N.M.), Christopher Murphy (D-Conn.), James Risch (R-Idaho), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.)
Who voted present?: Sen. Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.).
- more -
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2013/09/04/who-voted-for-the-syria-resolution/
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)Tells us more about them than whether this is the right thing to do or not.
G_j
(40,370 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)the administration in every possible circumstance and to parrot their rhetoric. It's what you do without fail.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"You? Who on earth would expect you to do anything but support the administration in every possible circumstance and to parrot their rhetoric. It's what you do without fail. "
...is that you think being dismissive is an argument. You called Kerry a "liar" because you disagreed with him.
This debate is not a joke, and Senators are giving serious consideration to what is being presented.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023602771
Dawgs
(14,755 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)not because I disagree with him but because he lied.
I'm hardly the only one who has noted that. Articles in the New Yorker and numerous other periodicals say the same thing- albeit more diplomatically. I was very specific about what he lied about.
John Kerry lied and lied by omission.
That's a fact.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Makes me think that's all you got. Name calling and baseless criticism without any support for your assertion. Sick of it.
cali
(114,904 posts)I was quite specific about what Kerry lied about. Why don't you respond to the op I posted where I pointed out specific examples, kitty? c'mon, kitty. Instead of a demonstration of petulance, let's see you actually post an argument as to why those weren't lies, kitty.
As usual the ugliest and dimmest shit comes from people who are only interested in defending the administration.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)When I listen to him, I am reminded of why he's President. He should address the public more thoroughly if he believes this is a worthy cause.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)And, the most of the rest of the world.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But the public still recognizes it as a Yugo.
Junkdrawer
(27,993 posts)we better strike NOW so the strike will be the news and not the evidence.
Time is of the essence.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)"By the way, we're going to go invade Syria now. For the Children."
Precisely
(358 posts)Precisely
(358 posts)People turn away, in larger numbers, the deeper the deception and disconnect from leaders.
Chaco Dundee
(334 posts)This Administration is a 3 ring circus just like under bush.only a few clowns,players have changed.that does not mean they are better clowns.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)some of their savviest erstwhile critics, walking back every promise in favor of GOP policies while subtly managing the reactions (either diluting a reaction, or just insisting that we got the best deal we could within the limits of plausible deniability), their fingers literally on the pulse of communications--and half a week later it's all in shambles and they're smashing hard drives with little pieces flying around
such a fall causes individual and collective mental backlash, and hence equally-large actions to compensate
this is actually the same pattern Reagan followed: media fawning (it's different with Obama, but replace "media" with "Bush critics" or what-have-you) and partisan bickering over big issues, then the mask falls off with Eugene Hasenfus late in Year Six and the cult figure leaves in disgrace and with ratings freefalling toward 40%
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Over the last 2 years or so...how many hundreds of thousands estimated dead?
And what about the TWO MILLION that have fled the country? How about asking them if they would like
Assad's military (and him) taken out?
I hear 99.99% screeching NO to any action...but what is the solution to Assad? Nice genteel talking to him?
I'll be waiting for the brain surgeon solution DU!
leftstreet
(36,112 posts)How the FUCK is it the responsibility of the US and UK?
Union Scribe
(7,099 posts)I hope it's better than "bomb Syria" because that isn't going to do shit all about the threat of chemical weapons, civilian deaths, etc.
cali
(114,904 posts)One thing I'd certainly like to see happen is a much more robust plan for helping the refugees. btw, not all the refugees support Assad.
I support more pressure on Assad from the U.N.
Approximately a hundred thousand people died before the chemical attack. And not just by the Assad regime. It's a nasty civil war that's turned sharply sectarian.
The reason that a solution is so elusive is that the realistic options are all horrible: The rebels win and get rid of Assad? What happens after that? The civil war continues as the various factions fight one another for power, a potential genocide of the Alawite people and ethnic cleansing of Christians?
U.S. intervention, particularly unilateral intervention- and we stand functionally alone on this with the possible exceptions of France and Turkey- is fraught with peril. It could make the whole bloody mess even bloodier, not to mention further fraying U.S. relations and serious blowback.
sendero
(28,552 posts).. is that favored by a solid majority of Americans who are beginning to WISE UP.
Leave them the fuck alone, there is nothing we can do about their civil war.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)become more desperate if the U.S. attacks.
oh, and I never said Obama was stupid. try reading for comprehension, kitty.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)And all that talk about mushroom clouds bugged me too.
And then ... that commercial he did with the little girl and the daisy ... then POOF.
Way, way over the top.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... reminds me of a used car salesman trying to get me to buy a car that he knows and I know is a piece of shit.
If they had a good reason that they were willing to share with us for hitting Syria, they wouldn't have to bark and croon like Kerry is right now.
I've never seen him get so worked up, not when people were claiming his entire military service history was a lie even. But he can sure put on the Thespian on Steroids act right now.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)We are no longer adults engaged in conversation with our representatives about important issues that affect our lives. Not in their view, anyway.
We are targets of incessant advertising, an obvious imagined audience of half-witted, highly emotional children. The rhetoric appears to employ the same assumptions about us that are used to sell sugared breakfast cereal.
I think people are sick to death of it.
I don't know if you saw the thread with the video clip in which the Prime Minister for Labor (?) in Australia responded to a pastor challenging his support of marriage equality. What struck me in that interchange, beyond the powerful content, was how conversational and mature/adult the response was. There was no use of facile, patronizing soundbites or slogans, and the audience was assumed to be adults capable of intelligent thought and mature moral and ethical considerations.
It was shocking in a way, because we just don't see that here very much, and we forget how political conversations between representatives and constituents *should* sound in a healthier system.