General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn Ugly Rape Case Involving Vanderbilt’s Football Team Could Get Much Uglier
An Ugly Rape Case Involving Vanderbilts Football Team Could Get Much Uglier
This summer, five football players at the elite Southern school were arrested in association with the rape of an undergraduate. The events of the night in question are even more unsettling than had been previously reported.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/bobbyallyn/an-ugly-rape-case-involving-vanderbilts-football-team-could
antiquie
(4,299 posts)msongs
(73,754 posts)antiquie
(4,299 posts)Is that true of theft victims, too? They have to identify and convict the criminal or the crime is only alleged? Times have changed.
Nevernose
(13,081 posts)A gunshot wound to the back probably doesn't need an "alleged" before their pronoun, but without proof of a crime having occurred, then the word "alleged" is fair. As in, "the alleged rapist is innocent until proven guilty." Opposite side of the same coin.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)just not of the alleged perps. This is so hurtful to the alleged victim -- ignore your pain, you weren't really assaulted because we can't prove who did it. I am speaking as a grandmother, not as a feminist.
antiquie
(4,299 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Technically, in any crime there's an implicit "alleged" when one talks about a victim but no-one has been convicted, but most people don't bother to make it explicit.
In most crimes, when someone is caught and charged, they either plead guilty or say "I didn't do it, someone else did". So omitting the "alleged" when referring to the victim isn't actually contradicting anyone.
But men accused of rape not infrequently claim "we had sex, but it was consensual". In those cases, if you omit the alleged, you're explicitly saying "I think the accused is guilty".
Arguably, that's not an unreasonable thing to do - there are no accurate statistics, but very few people claim that anything other than a very large majority of men charged with rape are guilty.
But I think it's worth being aware that if you refer to someone who says "I've been robbed" as a victim of theft, you're unlikely to be taking an implicit stance on the outcome of a court case, whereas if you refer to someone who says "I've been raped" as a victim of rape, you're quite likely to be. You may well *want* to do so, on not unreasonable statistical grounds, which is fine, but it's something to be aware of.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)And only an alleged victim.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)1) Most women who say that they have been raped really have been.
2) The ratio of rape victims to false accusations of rape is *significantly* higher than the ratio of accusations of rape to false accusations of rape, which is already pretty high.
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)We were all encouraged to believe her (and I did, for a time) because victims rarely lie.
Since then, I adhere more strongly than ever to the principle of "innocent till proven guilty." There will be a trial in the present case soon enough, and then we will have access to all the evidence, and how it applies to each of the alleged perpetrators.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Adding an order of magnitude to your error margins, I am pretty confident that at least 0.2% of accusations of rape are false, and not more than 30%. But there just isn't anywhere near solid enough evidence to be sure of much more than that - certainly, stating baldly that you know the number to within 1% cannot be justified.
chervilant
(8,267 posts)"I bought her dinner!"
"She wanted it!"
"We were making love!"
"I didn't mean anything by it!"
"I couldn't help it; she was dressed like a hooker."
"Boys will be boys!"
Wonder which excuse they'll trot out this time...
pnwmom
(110,261 posts)Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)If he did he should be fired. But thus far all I see is more... "lowering academic standards for football allows in riff-raff who commit rape". Hate to break it to everyone, but people with 4.0 GPA's and 1600 SAT scores also commit rape.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)mythology
(9,527 posts)of rapes and other sexual assaults are committed by somebody known to the victim, I would assume that actually most rapists largely share their victims' socio-economic status. I don't have time to research the numbers on this at the moment, but I will try to find something one way or another.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)spoke of. Do you really think money equals brains?
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)I'd expect university to largely control that out.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)I'm telling you from some ugly personal experiences and from friends' ugly personal experiences, that plenty of people with high GPA's and good SAT scores at elite universities commit rape. If you have a study showing that they do it less than football players who were admitted with sub-par grades and scores, I'd love to see it.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)of charges against him. You wait.
Sissyk
(12,665 posts)Charges from whom?
Vanderbilt Security saw something; apparently, something horrendous; while looking at tape for a totally unrelated incident. Security then immediately notified Metro Police. Metro Police took over. Coach Franklin and Vanderbilt almost immediately dismissed the players from the team.
I think, in this case, it is being handled properly while protecting the victim at the same time.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)there was dissemination of other media evidence that may have been covered up by the team and its affiliates. with something of this magnitude happen without the coach knowing? I think the prosecution should investigate that thoroughly.
Sissyk
(12,665 posts)I can tell you that Metro Police has said Vanderbilt Security, the Chancellor, Athletic Department, and Coaching Staff have been nothing but 100% helpful.
In addition to the rape charges and sexual assault charges, Vandenberg has been charged with unlawful photography and tampering with evidence. A fifth, has been charged with accessory after the fact for allegedly advising Vanderberg over text message to delete pictures and videos he had taken. Two more, for tampering with evidence. These two are former team mates somewhere in California of Vandenbergs, not at Vanderbilt.
I'm pretty sure the Coach is in the clear on this one. All the ones arrested? If found guilty, I hope they all serve full sentences.
If more rape cases were handled like this one is being handled, more girls and women may come forward in the future. That is my hope.
Sissyk
(12,665 posts)blame for any cover up on Coach Franklin.
Just so everyone knows, all four were dismissed from the football team almost immediately following these allegations. They had not been charged yet, but were dismissed from the team. Not suspended until further notice or action; but dismissed.
There has not been a cover up at all in this case, thank goodness.
The DA's Office, Vanderbilt Security, and Metro Police have made a remarkable effort to protect the victim until the case goes to trial.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)gopiscrap
(24,733 posts)might get away with it.
gopiscrap
(24,733 posts)coldmountain
(802 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)enough to take a plea and run.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Not video of the actual rape.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)professionally than what i have seen in the past.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)of a mere surve.illance video
Sissyk
(12,665 posts)They had enough to charge the players with five counts of rape each and two counts of aggravated sexual battery each. Unless one of them started talking before they were charged, it had to be something on tape. Hopefully, we won't see that tape.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)seabeyond
(110,159 posts)yes. this is the mentality i address.
why?
hm, cant think of a damn reason why.... a victim, unconscious, abused in such a disgusting manner, should not be used to entertain all the sickos that have to get a look.
why, oh why.
you tell me.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)If the prosecution wishes to gag the evidence for the duration of the trial that's really up to the judge then.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)that would be.
as a woman and a woman that speaks for women, not to mention a lawyer, that fact alone so many rapes are not reported, the thought a video like this would be allowed to be viewed by the masses would only reinforce GIRLS and women staying quiet with rape and not reporting.
it is beyond wrong.
but WTF msanthrope. lets fuck the victim all over again to appease our own perverted curiosity.
JustAnotherGen
(38,054 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)you think that the cause of women would be better served by your being able to rationally discuss the disposition of evidence in a rape trial? I think it would be, and I am implore you to do so.
FYI..the victim in this case was not "fucked." She was raped. There's a difference. The former implies a consensual act. The latter is a horrible crime of violence. But the responsibility for that violence is not hers...it should be theirs.
Courts in America do not suppress evidence generally. I don't see a reason for court to do so here.
In reading your response it seems that you have conflated the difference between evidence being available in a courtroom and evidence being available in the media. As I restricted my discussion to the former I would implore that you do so too when addressing me.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)you know, evidence, then my bad. because when you used the term public, i thought you were ACTUALLY referring to public. not court where evidence is presented.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)the public. And the media. I generally find reading the articles helpful.
Stargazer09
(2,205 posts)I hope justice is served.
That poor young woman is heroic for staying at the school to finish her degree.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i thought so, also. yes.
RiffRandell
(5,909 posts)He didn't rape anybody. Assholes.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Dixon
Sissyk
(12,665 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Sissyk
(12,665 posts)I was wrrrrrrrrr........wrrrrrrrrooooo..........wrong!!
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)where cell phone videos and social media are helpful, to the prosecution. If the facts of the case released so far are true, I hope these guys do the maximum time Tennessee law provides.
Response to Jenoch (Reply #36)
Sissyk This message was self-deleted by its author.
Right there with you.