General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumslet's be clear. Americans Elect is a front group for the GOP.
They are run by former PUMAs and republicans.
Their 'goal' is to nominate a third party candidate to take more votes from Obama than from the GOP nominee.
That's why they are floating names like Bernie Sanders and Ralph Nader around.
Their goal is to elect a republican president. Their method for doing that is to split the anti-republican vote.
It should be American Select, not Americans Elect.
If we democrats are still listening to ANYTHING Nader has to say, then shame on us.
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
liberal N proud
(61,195 posts)annabanana
(52,804 posts)protection from both stark raving mad fringe repub and a 2nd term for The Prez.
CorpoCandidate© will be very very popular with CorpoMedia©.. You can count on it.
MADem
(135,425 posts)annabanana
(52,804 posts)yourself as long as you don't rock the corporations" party...
Initech
(108,857 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)first I've heard of American Elect and I would be interested in some facts. Who are the "former PUMA's and republicans"?
ProSense
(116,464 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)that they're full of shit. They're old wine in a new bottle, is all.
TheWraith
(24,331 posts)Doug Schoen, one of the three partners in Penn Schoen and Berland, aka the most disgustingly corrupt and evil set of political consultants in the known world.
Etcetera.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Don't forget Poland...
libinnyandia
(1,374 posts)Mr Nader would never advocate for a third party candidacy.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)I guess it would "depend on the candidate" as Nader said.
Rectangle
(667 posts)cut that in half --or more!!
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)Of course! That's the ticket! As clear as mud! So which Republican candidate do you think this Republican party controlled group will wind up running as a third-party candidate to split the Republican vote?
Oh .... you might want to provide a credible link on their funding and backers.
Most Supported
Ron Paul
3260 Supporters
Jon Huntsman
1708 Supporters
So people can either visit the actual website to find out what they are about or depend on you for accurate information.
Just in case here's the website link:
https://secure.americanselect.org/candidates
SidDithers
(44,333 posts)Sid
white_wolf
(6,257 posts)You don't see those enough around here.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"Thank you for posting actual facts. You don't see those enough around here."
...a fact: Nader mentioned two candidates, Buddy Roemer and David Walker.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002364725
If you're searching for facts, there's some information on them at the link.
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)Hardly a tool organizing a front group for the Republican party!
Les Francis
Principal/Senior Advisor, Washington Media Group; former Executive Director of the Democratic National Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
This seems to be mainly a group of well off "moderate" bi-partisan" Democrats and Republicans who aren't satisfied with Obama or the Republican contenders, but hardly a front group for the right-wing loony tunes Republicans.
I'm not familiar with most of the names.
But, DU'ers should check out the published list of backers and not depend on political talking points for their information.
Here's the list:
http://secure.americanselect.org/who-we-are
ProSense
(116,464 posts)"The former Executive Director of the DNC, Les Francis, is listed a leading backer. "
So? Ben Nelson is a Democrat.
I mean, do you agree with Nader on the two candidates he cited: Buddy "Thank God for Paul Ryan" Roemer and David Walker?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002364725
DonCoquixote
(13,966 posts)How can anyone on the remote left support a group that is backed by Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild? That woman makes Grover Norquist look like a busboy, and has often stated that Obama "demonizes the rich." As far as Ron Paul, he would gut the EPA, Department of interior, department of education, minunum wage, and the civil rights act of 1964. This is not conjkecture, he has said these things very clearly, and while Huntsman might be nice enough, he wants war with Iran. Yes, that one issue is enough for me to reject him, as it was the issue that made me reject Clinton in 2008.
If Nader wants to make a case, he had better use better evidence. If the whole point ios to get a candidate we like, who is to the LEFT of OBAMA, folks like Paul, Huntsman, or whoever Rothschild anoints won't cut it.
gulliver
(14,004 posts)Why take a chance on voting for something even one Republican is behind? Just vote Democratic and be sure you aren't handing power to nuts.
It seems obvious. I don't get how any genuine Progressive could even think of voting for any candidate from any group that has any Republican backing it. Too risky. Republicans have lost their minds and failure to consign their current politics to the dustbin of history is a moral and intellectual failure.
Better Believe It
(18,630 posts)gulliver
(14,004 posts)It is very helpful. Those who see through it immediately probably find it either amusing or maddening. Those who are persuaded by it need to shore up their intellectual defenses a bit.
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)So it doesn't surprise me that you'd defend Americans Elect.
You and they have the same goal: peel left-leaning voters away from the President this fall.
Your slip is showing.
DonCoquixote
(13,966 posts)"I would ultimately back Romney over Obama," she said, if she were forced to choose
Asked who her wish-list candidates might be, de Rothschild named CIA Director David Petraeus, former Washington D.C. Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee, and David Walker, a former comptroller general of the United States under Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
"The polls show we as a nation are fiscally conservative and socially tolerant," de Rothschild said, "and neither party is offering a candidate on that platform."
eridani
(51,907 posts)IMO, that's even worse.
GeorgeGist
(25,570 posts)madokie
(51,076 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)what bugs me about them the most is how phenomenally stupid and gullible they think we are.