Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 06:44 PM Sep 2013

Juan Cole agrees/disagrees with Putin's OpEd.

Putin is correct that a US missile attack on Syria could have unpredictable effects.

He then says that there are few champions of democracy in Syria, depicting the struggle as one between the ‘government’ and al-Qaeda extremists. He does not characterize the ‘government’ but surely it should have been termed a one-party dictatorship with a brutal and vicious secret police. Given that Putin sided with Boris Yeltsin against the Communists in the early 1990s, you would think he’d be a little more sympathetic to Syrians desiring the end of their own police state. The ways in which Putin himself has cracked down on press freedom and moved away from democracy make one suspicious about his inability to see Syrian democrats. He doesn’t seem able to see Russian ones either.

Putin is wrong that there are no democrats involved in the struggle. Most Syrian oppositionists support a move of the country to free and fair parliamentary elections. It is true that Jabhat al-Nusra and a few other extremist organizations favor Muslim theocratic dictatorship, and they have had the big victories on the battlefield. But that doesn’t make them representative of the opposition. They just have more battle experience (many fought US troops in Iraq). By erasing the democratic opposition, Putin has done away with perhaps a majority of Syrians, and made it easy for his readers to side with a brutal secular government against a brutal set of al-Qaeda affiliates. It is a false choice.

Putin is correct that US military intervention in Iraq did not go well. But as for Afghanistan, it was the Soviet invasion and occupation of that country that destabilized it in the first place. Putin’s old organization, the KGB, was hardly blameless in such actions.

http://www.juancole.com/2013/09/arguing-president-putin.html
1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Juan Cole agrees/disagrees with Putin's OpEd. (Original Post) pampango Sep 2013 OP
He's right, Putin is right and wrong, but Cole is also right and wrong... joeybee12 Sep 2013 #1
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
1. He's right, Putin is right and wrong, but Cole is also right and wrong...
Fri Sep 13, 2013, 06:48 PM
Sep 2013

Can't blame Afghanistan entirely on Russia...we sure as phuck never knew how to deal with that country...

http://www.google.com/url?source=imglanding&ct=img&q=&sa=X&ei=1ZUzUvDYHOWKjAKnvYH4Cg&ved=0CAkQ8wc&usg=AFQjCNE_GPQCLl2KW5RX8fY7C8uzK_7HMQ

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Juan Cole agrees/disagree...