General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKrugman: If republicans really believed Obamacare will be a disaster, they "should be happy to let
Obamacare come into existence, then collapse."
On one side, as Jonathan Cohn points out, inside the right-wing bubble its taken as gospel that Obamacare will be an utter, obvious disaster:If you sincerely believe Obamacare will bankrupt the country, violate personal liberty, raise costs or ruin insurance for most Americans, and generally destroy American health care, then its easy to believe that its only a matter of time before the rest of the country demands repealforcing both Senate Democrats and the president to go along. Its particularly easy to believe this if you live in the right-wing media bubble, where all of the reports about Obamacare focus on the laws shortcomings and failuresinsurance premiums going up, people losing coverage, part-time workers losing hours, and so on.
The last thing Republicans should want is to let Democrats snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by provoking confrontations over the budget and the debt ceiling before the American people get to experience the nightmare of expanded insurance coverage.
In fact, politically the right is acting as if it fears that Obamacare will, in reality, be highly popular that once the exchanges and the Medicare expansion go into effect, people will decide that they like the new system, and strongly oppose efforts to reverse course. (This is almost surely the more realistic view.) So the law must be stopped at any cost before it goes into effect, and people learn first-hand that the anti-Obamacare propaganda was false.
So which is it? Are Republicans sure that disaster looms, or are they terrified because they suspect that things will be OK? My guess is, both: clear thinking is not exactly a hallmark of the modern GOP, and may indeed be a positive disqualification for career success.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/13/obamacare-doublethink/?_r=1&
WillyT
(72,631 posts)liberal N proud
(60,332 posts)The health care lobby.
DJ13
(23,671 posts)zbdent
(35,392 posts)and Mitt Romney signed the beta test into law ...
babylonsister
(171,036 posts)I will, too. Thanks!
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Around under a Cadillac insurance and do not think they should be in a class with the rest of us. Very good point on this post, the GOP is more concerned with the fact Obamacare is an improvement and just may be successful.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)can make things better. That is why they are fighting so hard, because if the post-Reagan generations actually learn that, it could / will start a revolt against the "government is the problem" mind-set.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)have figured out that St Ronnie Lied when he said "Government is the Problem"
The Truth is Bad Government is the Problem!!!
The kinda government that the GOP has given us for the last 30 years!
quadrature
(2,049 posts)we all know that.
(the fun and easy stuff is behind us,
ahead is all pain and no gain)
Republicans are happy to let it happen.
but they want to look like the good guys
by trying to repeal or delay.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)All the people who remain on their employers policies.
All the people who remain on Medicare and Medicaid.
All the people who newly qualify for Medicaid.
All the people who will qualify for subsidies/tax credits on the exchanges.
All the people who haven't been able to buy individual insurance because of preexisting conditions but can now.
All the people who have been kicked off their old insurance because they developed a costly illness but can now get a policy on the exchange.
All the babies who won't be denied coverage because they were born with a "pre-existing" condition.
All the young people who can stay on their parents' policies till they're 26, whether or not they're in college.
All the people who no longer have to fear annual or lifetime limits.
Compared to the "system" it replaced, very few people will get "screwed" under Obamacare.
antigop
(12,778 posts)People whose MAGI is 1 penny more than the FPL, especially pre-Medicare empty nesters who are in their 50s and 60s.
Those who can't afford the deductibles/co-pays/ max out of pocket. It doesn't do you any good to buy insurance you can't use.
.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)would have had trouble getting individual insurance at any cost, due to preexisting conditions -- and now they will all be fully eligible; and subsidies and tax credits will help most people pay for their premiums. Also, they will be eligible for expanded Medicaid if their income is low enough, which currently is only available to parents with minor children.
antigop
(12,778 posts)You don't get subsidies if you're MAGI is over the 400% FPL limit.
Older people can be charged three times what a younger person is charged (depending on your state).
Take a look at the premiums for a married couple in their late 50s/early 60s if they don't qualify for subsidies and they make 1 penny over the 400% FPL for a couple. Add onto that the max out of pocket -- they're screwed.
It doesn't matter if they can now get a policy. What matters is if they can afford the premiums and if they can afford to get sick.
I"ve tried to explain this on DU before. I'm sorry if you don't get it.
Have a great evening.
pnwmom
(108,959 posts)is much less than their health care costs (and a much smaller difference than pre-ACA). Younger people are actually subsidizing people in the pre-Medicare age group.
antigop
(12,778 posts)pnwmom
(108,959 posts)That is the kind of issue that, in a normal Congress, would have been taken care of in a subsequent amendment. Unfortunately, the Republicans are determined not to fix anything about the bill; they'd rather torpedo it.
In the meantime, is there anything you can do to slightly reduce your income so that you aren't just slightly over the limit?
quadrature
(2,049 posts)my observations SO FAR...
are ...
Rates are going up,
except in a few states ( such as Cal and NY, these states have very high rates),
and except for people who qualify for
the bigger(that average) individual subsidy.
other non-losers are the currently uninsured that
have pre-existing condition
............
losers include the 29 hour bunch,
and others I will write about
some other time
Schema Thing
(10,283 posts)pnwmom
(108,959 posts)but they're going up more slowly now. The cost curve has been bent down.
All the data coming in shows that the rates are lower than they were originally expected to be.
What some people don't understand is that average rates pre ACA were for policies that offered much less coverage than under the ACA. So comparing those rates without accounting for the differences in coverage (between the old bare bones policies and those with the Essential Benefits) is comparing apples and oranges.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)all most everybody that has looked at the ACA exchanges that coming online are impressed by what ACA is going to offer!
quadrature
(2,049 posts)what states are they talking about?
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)If so you would be in include in that "everybody"
I defined that in my post..... geez
CA is leading the pack,,,
cacovered.org
Response to Cryptoad (Reply #15)
Cryptoad This message was self-deleted by its author.
Grateful for Hope
(39,320 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)Grateful for Hope
(39,320 posts)sheshe2
(83,668 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)that ACA will be the last nail in their coffin!
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)They were wrong. Perhaps they remember that. The same goes with Social Security.
Hekate
(90,565 posts)gopiscrap
(23,726 posts)they just want to see Obama fail