Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mira

(22,380 posts)
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 11:39 PM Sep 2013

Chelsea Clinton- my first exposure to the grown woman

She's on with Jon Stewart, and overwhelmingly I am thinking I'm looking at Hillary. She has the features of her Mom's face, and there's a bit of Bill as well. But the way she uses her eyes is an exact replica of her Mom.
That eye sparkling thing they do is not something I'm fond of watching, so I was not happy she has adopted that for herself.
Oh, well. It's such a treat to see a grown Democratically raised child of substance and breeding, one who was also fortunate to have had the best possible education.

She is of course smart, articulate, brilliant. That first smart does not include her appearance.
The dress is one where I wish the money spent on it had gone elsewhere to feed some poor children, it was way too much of a not so good thing. Had she fed those children there would have been plenty money left to put her into a less ridiculous looking simple dress.

I had fun seeing her and listening to her. After all, I've "known" her since she was about 12.

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chelsea Clinton- my first exposure to the grown woman (Original Post) Mira Sep 2013 OP
I cannot believe that you exposed yourself to Chelsea Clinton Renew Deal Sep 2013 #1
It's at times like this Mira Sep 2013 #3
lol Renew Deal Sep 2013 #7
I watched her, too, and was very impressed Rhiannon12866 Sep 2013 #2
That dress was not flattering. Cleita Sep 2013 #4
Misogyny Renew Deal Sep 2013 #9
This woman thought the dress would be more appropriate for a cut-rate superhero Retrograde Sep 2013 #12
What? If you don't like a woman's dress, it's misogyny? polichick Sep 2013 #19
I saw her in NYC a few years ago, putting money in a parking meter. MannyGoldstein Sep 2013 #5
Sorry not impressed trublu992 Sep 2013 #6
Who are "they"? Renew Deal Sep 2013 #8
the Clinton machine aka her family trublu992 Sep 2013 #35
Thanks Renew Deal Sep 2013 #36
I notice she hasn't hyphenated her last name. Is she embarrased by her father in law? Electric Monk Sep 2013 #10
more likely that she is proud of her own name JI7 Sep 2013 #14
Why should she hyphenate her name? Why if she doesn't do you assume there has to be a reason? cui bono Sep 2013 #30
She must have gone to the same school of health my brother did. Initech Sep 2013 #11
"feeding poor children" JI7 Sep 2013 #13
Good question Mira Sep 2013 #16
What does it say that you brought up how she dresses? longship Sep 2013 #15
Lighten up Mira Sep 2013 #18
Appearance is the least quality that I look for in a person. longship Sep 2013 #21
I understand you fully. Mira Sep 2013 #29
I don't give a fuck what people look like. longship Sep 2013 #33
What's "that eye sparkling thing?" polichick Sep 2013 #17
Have you ever noticed how Hillary's eyes raise Mira Sep 2013 #24
Thanks! I don't think that's being shallow - I'll look for it... polichick Sep 2013 #25
Probably because they're not talking to you. cui bono Sep 2013 #31
People only care because of her father LittleBlue Sep 2013 #20
Hillary worked her backside off for her Senate seat. Beacool Sep 2013 #23
She moved there like one year before the election LittleBlue Sep 2013 #26
she lived in Arkansas and DC because she was married to someone who had a job in those locations JI7 Sep 2013 #27
Yeah, I'm saying she had little connection to the state LittleBlue Sep 2013 #28
But she made up for it by spending time in counties that hadn't seen a senator before Retrograde Sep 2013 #34
So did Robert Kennedy. Beacool Sep 2013 #32
The Clinton Foundation helps plenty of people around the world. Beacool Sep 2013 #22
I like Chelsea madokie Sep 2013 #37
She certainly is more articulate than Caroline Kennedy question everything Sep 2013 #38
"substance and breeding" Cerridwen Sep 2013 #39
Chelsea is super smart and very wonky Bluenorthwest Sep 2013 #40
I've always been impressed with Chelsea Clinton. Warren DeMontague Sep 2013 #41

Renew Deal

(81,844 posts)
1. I cannot believe that you exposed yourself to Chelsea Clinton
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 11:41 PM
Sep 2013

She must have been surprised to say the least

Mira

(22,380 posts)
3. It's at times like this
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 11:46 PM
Sep 2013

I hide behind, and remind folks, that English is actually my second language.
So damn handy!

Renew Deal

(81,844 posts)
7. lol
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 11:57 PM
Sep 2013

I was very impressed with her as well, and in typical Clintonian style she didn't rule out public service in the future.

Rhiannon12866

(204,674 posts)
2. I watched her, too, and was very impressed
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 11:44 PM
Sep 2013

She really has grown into a confident, well spoken young woman.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
4. That dress was not flattering.
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 11:48 PM
Sep 2013

But she should be able to dress well considering she was out in public.

Retrograde

(10,128 posts)
12. This woman thought the dress would be more appropriate for a cut-rate superhero
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 12:16 AM
Sep 2013

Maybe someone who's archnemeses were the Fashion Police. It was eye-scaldingly ugly.

She sounds like an articulate young person, but for someone raised in the public eye she seems to have skipped the lesson on first impressions.

trublu992

(489 posts)
6. Sorry not impressed
Thu Sep 19, 2013, 11:53 PM
Sep 2013

Thought she was very rehearsed and completely unoriginal. I know they are going to try to run her for office but I'm not so sure she'll have that on lock. The generation she needs for votes (my generation) most of us aren't so impressed I know New York has better.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
30. Why should she hyphenate her name? Why if she doesn't do you assume there has to be a reason?
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:29 AM
Sep 2013

That is outdated thinking that a woman is supposed to take her husband's name in some way.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
13. "feeding poor children"
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 12:17 AM
Sep 2013

why is this like always used when people don't like when someone uses their own money to spend on something personal ?

Mira

(22,380 posts)
16. Good question
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 12:45 AM
Sep 2013

the answer I think lies in that banal and hackneyed phrases just come to mind, so we use them.
It's not that she spent her own money on something personal that I was tongue in cheek critical of. Naturally that is not a concern of mine. I was being catty about her having spent what looked like a possibly huge sum on a dress that was unbecoming and over the top. Some of that money could have well been spent in other ways. IMO. And it's none of my business, I was just running my mouth.

What I like about Oprah, a woman of substance and a billionaire, is that she spends tremendous amounts of money on the education (feeding in another way) of girls in South Africa in the school she founded and funds.
I also like that she looked at a purse for herself in a swank store in Switzerland that had a price tag of 38 000 somethings. Euros maybe.

I like that she understands a healthy balance, on a scale I cannot grasp but don't have to.

These aren't and weren't meant as value judgments. Just flowing with what's in front of me, and having opinions. I try to stay lightened up, otherwise it's all so damn hard, isn't it.


Mira

(22,380 posts)
18. Lighten up
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 12:48 AM
Sep 2013

it's what you notice when you are visually oriented and not too bright like myself.

I take it you were not watching. Or the question had not come up.

longship

(40,416 posts)
21. Appearance is the least quality that I look for in a person.
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 12:56 AM
Sep 2013

How they dress rates below that.

I will leave this issue there.

Mira

(22,380 posts)
29. I understand you fully.
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:28 AM
Sep 2013

And I agree with you on many levels, especially the one that may say that the subject is unworthy and irrelevant.

Yet
when a person of importance comes across your radar and all you see is a visual of clothing weird and loud enough to drown out that there is a person in there you want to look at, then something has gone awry.

That's what happened here.
And it does have a voice.

longship

(40,416 posts)
33. I don't give a fuck what people look like.
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:42 AM
Sep 2013

Okay! I confess that a mullet hair cut turns me off. And tattoos all over ones face does the same. Some cultural affectations deserve to be maligned.

But mostly I am tolerant of people's individual taste. This is in spite of the fact that I basically hate Rap, or anything like it. I love opera, and impressionist paintings. I even like Alban Berg opera, but not every day.

I cannot remember who said it, but I've never heard it said better.

Your taste is in your mouth.

The lesson is that nobody's taste is the same as any other's. There's a lot of art which I do not especially like, which I recognize as worthy of the label great. There's a lot of popular culture which is just total rubbish by any measure.

But then again, my taste is within my mouth.

Mira

(22,380 posts)
24. Have you ever noticed how Hillary's eyes raise
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:08 AM
Sep 2013

in a way that leave the pupils flowing low, the whites of the eyes surround the top of the pupil, and the intent of the exercise is to indicate real focusing in on who she is talking to? And it gives a sparkle to the target she is talking to, albeit short lived, that makes them feel very singled out in a special way.
Hillary uses it when she is in a crowd chosing important folks and additionally pointing a finger at them to elevate they have been recognized.
That's what I noticed Chelsea also does just when she was talking to Jon Stewart, the interviewer.

That's all.
I'm being shallow
Not much that is visual escapes me. And I commented on it.

polichick

(37,152 posts)
25. Thanks! I don't think that's being shallow - I'll look for it...
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:10 AM
Sep 2013

Somehow I've never noticed it with either of them.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
20. People only care because of her father
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 12:51 AM
Sep 2013

Blatant nepotism. She will coast right into a safe congressional/senate seat like her mother, interviews like this are just the prep work.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
23. Hillary worked her backside off for her Senate seat.
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:00 AM
Sep 2013

She campaigned in every single county in NY, returning to them more than once. She didn't coast to anything.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
26. She moved there like one year before the election
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:22 AM
Sep 2013

She's the ultimate carpetbagger. Grew up in Illinois, lived in Arkansas and DC, then moves to NY because Moynihan retired sensing a senate seat she could win.

The Clintons should ride off into the sunset and let someone self-made run. The Clintons are political mercenaries. Guaranteed if a winnable senate seat appears in Connecticut or Massachusetts, Chelsea will follow the script.

JI7

(89,239 posts)
27. she lived in Arkansas and DC because she was married to someone who had a job in those locations
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:24 AM
Sep 2013
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
28. Yeah, I'm saying she had little connection to the state
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:26 AM
Sep 2013

before deciding to buy a house there so she could run for a winnable senate seat.

Retrograde

(10,128 posts)
34. But she made up for it by spending time in counties that hadn't seen a senator before
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 01:47 AM
Sep 2013

As another poster pointed out, she worked her ass off campaigning - and didn't stop once she was elected: she spent more time in Western NY in her first term than her predecessor did in four. The woman doesn't know how to slow down!

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
22. The Clinton Foundation helps plenty of people around the world.
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 12:58 AM
Sep 2013

Chelsea can wear whatever she chooses to wear. I have no clue what she wore as I didn't watch the show, but I'm sure that what she wore is irrelevant to what she had to say. Also, what's with the "sparkly eye" comment? What is that supposed to mean?

question everything

(47,425 posts)
38. She certainly is more articulate than Caroline Kennedy
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 09:23 PM
Sep 2013

I just looked at an old TIME magazine with a story about political dynasties: Bush, Clinton, Gore, Paul, Romney, Cuomo and now Cheney. And one observation was that it is easy for a child of a politician to enter politics since they are used to visit state fairs, march in parades, shake hands of constituents, etc.

So I was reminded of this when Chelsea said how, at the age of six, she helped her dad prepare for a debate by playing his opponent.

Cerridwen

(13,252 posts)
39. "substance and breeding"
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 09:31 PM
Sep 2013

How were her teeth? Good conformation? Toed-in or out? Cow hocked? Short backed? Long backed? Good feet?

History of genetic abnormalities like hip dysplasia? Will she breed well? At all?






 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
40. Chelsea is super smart and very wonky
Fri Sep 20, 2013, 09:32 PM
Sep 2013

I attended an event she was at and I can't remember what she wore but I do remember than she's got a hell of a memory and that she was very unaffected by famous for most of my life standards.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chelsea Clinton- my first...