General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (grasswire) on Fri Sep 20, 2013, 04:25 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)no, providers will not have more time to spend with patients. If they don't have time now, how will adding millions of potential patients make it easier for them?
No, they won't have less burn out. See above.
No, patients will most likely not be able to access "more and better care" - one, because of demand on the system and two, because health insurance does not equal health care. Whether or not the costs are "reasonable" remains to be seen.
LiberalLoner
(11,467 posts)Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)but my wife's a doc, and she spends hours now entering data into the computer, whereas before she did everything on paper charts and that she could do while seeing the patient. We all understand why the electronic records are needed, and it will make things better for the patient, but the whole system is going to get a lot bigger now, just because of the volume of work that will be - and is being - created by this kind of thing.
My wife is all for Obamacare, but most doctors aren't. No doctor I know of likes the new electronic records.
Which means doctors even now have less time to spend with patients, by the way, just because of the electronic records systems. A new influx of patients, should that result from Obamacare, obviously isn't going to improve that situation.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)My NP types on the computer all the time while talking to me. And my cardiologist's assistant types on the computer while the doctor is talking to me.
So maybe your wife's place of work will facilitate that for her.
NMDemDist2
(49,314 posts)he does the exam, we walk down to his office and chat while he types up his notes and any prescriptions he's giving me (which he sends to the pharmacy electronically while we're sitting)
then he goes into the next patient. he's always on time, never makes me wait and it gives us that extra few minutes for me to ask questions etc.
i love his system!
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)but some cases are more complicated, so she winds up having to do them afterwards. A typical morning in our house finds me on my computer doing my thing, and her on hers entering charts from the previous day.
tkmorris
(11,138 posts)I'm sorry that I cannot join you in thanking him for it. Yes, the discussion needed to be had but it still does. A thread on DU changed nothing; the same issues still exist.
I'm hoping no one came away with that fearful of bringing up things with their doctor. And the OP isn't even a doctor. DU needs to bring back the no medical advice rule.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)I didn't see any.
kcr
(15,522 posts)to keep their complaints at their doctors offices to one. That could have serious medical consequences.
anneboleyn
(5,626 posts)discussions of symptoms when visiting the doctor. This was "advice" in the sense that the OP's post read: "I am a medical professional, and I think that you should do "x" when visiting your physician." This is obviously not the same as say diagnosing a disease over the Internet or advising on medications, etc., but it was still "advice" in the sense that the OP, citing personal expertise as a medical professional, proposed that a particular course of action was the best course when visiting the doctor.
As many posters noted, the proposal is a potentially dangerous one, as a person taking this to heart may indeed limit what he or she discusses with the doctor -- and a crucial issue might be missed or a cluster of symptoms ignored because only a "primary" symptom is being discussed.
leftstreet
(40,683 posts)Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)to be good Insurance Consumers? Self important, surly and utterly unconscionable screed.
REP
(21,691 posts)Of course, most people - especially poor, desperate ones - are polite to authority figures who can choose to help them or not, so I'm sure it seems as though they like him very much.
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I imagine perceiving medical staff as "authority figures" may be a condition too (or rationalizing it by restating that one meant merely the poor and desperate see them as authority figures-- digging that hole even deeper...).
Good luck with that!
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Did you eat gravel for breakfast? Stuck in your craw, did it?
You said your piece yesterday. It was mean then, and it's mean now.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)anneboleyn
(5,626 posts)"I don't care if you have a cluster of symptoms -- don't trouble your doc with this -- just decide which symptom is the most important and only discuss that symptom!" (many problems with that OP as many posters pointed out).
madinmaryland
(65,729 posts)I thought you had been beheaded?
mucifer
(25,667 posts)I realize it's a touchy subject. But, if we can't discuss difficult issues why have DU at all? Why was it closed?
REP
(21,691 posts)The Hosts of GD did not lock the thread; the Original Poster deleted his post himself.
mucifer
(25,667 posts)I'm a hospice nurse and I'm lucky that I work for a non profit hospice and have lots of time with my patients.
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)madinmaryland
(65,729 posts)help the most. He realizes that mistake now.
There was some discussion about the state of medical care, but it was sort of a by-product and not what his attitude came across as.
Just my 2-cents.