Close the N.S.A.’s Back Doors - The Editorial Board/NYT

[WillyT]

Close the N.S.A.’s Back Doors
By THE EDITORIAL BOARD - NYT
Published: September 21, 2013

<snip>

In 2006, a federal agency, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, helped build an international encryption system to help countries and industries fend off computer hacking and theft. Unbeknown to the many users of the system, a different government arm, the National Security Agency, secretly inserted a “back door” into the system that allowed federal spies to crack open any data that was encoded using its technology.

Documents leaked by Edward Snowden, the former N.S.A. contractor, make clear that the agency has never met an encryption system that it has not tried to penetrate. And it frequently tries to take the easy way out. Because modern cryptography can be so hard to break, even using the brute force of the agency’s powerful supercomputers, the agency prefers to collaborate with big software companies and cipher authors, getting hidden access built right into their systems.

The New York Times, The Guardian and ProPublica recently reported that the agency now has access to the codes that protect commerce and banking systems, trade secrets and medical records, and everyone’s e-mail and Internet chat messages, including virtual private networks. In some cases, the agency pressured companies to give it access; as The Guardian reported earlier this year, Microsoft provided access to Hotmail, Outlook.com, SkyDrive and Skype. According to some of the Snowden documents given to Der Spiegel, the N.S.A. also has access to the encryption protecting data on iPhones, Android and BlackBerry phones.

These back doors and special access routes are a terrible idea...

<And...>

Representative Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey, has introduced a bill that would, among other provisions, bar the government from requiring software makers to insert built-in ways to bypass encryption. It deserves full Congressional support. In the meantime, several Internet companies, including Google and Facebook, are building encryption systems that will be much more difficult for the N.S.A. to penetrate, forced to assure their customers that they are not a secret partner with the dark side of their own government.

<snip>

Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/22/opinion/sunday/close-the-nsas-back-doors.html?_r=0

[LuvNewcastle]

1. I'll call my teabagger Rep. and tell him to support Holt's bill.

Some teabaggers hate the NSA, so it doesn't hurt to try.

[bvar22]

2. Thank You, NY Times & Edward Snowden!

At least some people still remember the Constitution,
personal privacy,
and the democratic necessity of Whistle Blowers.

DURec!

You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS.[/font]

[WillyT]

3. Hear... Hear...

[jsr]

4. Recommend

[randome]

5. We would never want organized crime and child pornographers to have their secrets exposed.

What is it about LE agencies being able to crack codes that gives some a passion for anarchy? We have laws and rules to prevent LE from going berserk with their authority.

That doesn't mean abuses never occur, of course. Anytime human beings are involved, there will be abuses.

But to act frightened of LE being able to do their jobs is just paranoid nonsense, IMO.

Worse, it's more Libertarian nonsense.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Treat your body like a machine. Your mind like a castle.[/center][/font][hr]

[PowerToThePeople]

6. If a back door exists.

It will be discovered and used for nefarious purposes. Vendors should be held liable in civil court for fraud if they sell purposely compromised software.