Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIndependent NSA Spying Review Not So Independent - AP/CBSNews
Independent NSA spying review not so independentAP/CBSNews
9/22/13
<snip>
WASHINGTON - Stung by public unease about new details of spying by the National Security Agency, President Barack Obama selected a panel of advisers he described as independent experts to scrutinize the NSA's surveillance programs to be sure they weren't violating civil liberties and to restore Americans' trust.
But with just weeks remaining before its first deadline to report back to the White House, the review panel has effectively been operating as an arm of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, which oversees the NSA and all other U.S. spy efforts.
The panel's advisers work in offices on loan from the DNI. Interview requests and press statements from the review panel are carefully coordinated through the DNI's press office. James Clapper, the intelligence director, exempted the panel from U.S. rules that require federal committees to conduct their business and their meetings in ways the public can observe. Its final report, when it's issued, will be submitted for White House approval before the public can read it.
Even the panel's official name suggests it's run by Clapper's office: "Director of National Intelligence Review Group on Intelligence and Communications Technologies."
Its meetings in recent weeks with technology industry and privacy groups have been closed to the public even though no classified information was discussed, according to participants. Attendees told The Associated Press they raised concerns about the NSA's spying programs. During one session, two participants said, panel members said the group might hold a separate classified meeting soon with technology executives to discuss details of secret surveillance programs.
<And...>
Obama described the panel an Aug. 9 speech as an "independent group" and said its members would "consider how we can maintain the trust of the people, how we can make sure that there absolutely is no abuse in terms of how these surveillance technologies are used."
The formal White House memorandum days later -- effectively the legal charter for the group -- does not specify anything about its role being independent of the Obama administration. It directed the panel to emphasize in its review whether U.S. spying programs protect national security, advance foreign policy and are protected against the types of leaks that led to the national debate in the first place. The final consideration in the White House memo told the panel to examine "our need to maintain the public trust." There was no mention of the panel investigating surveillance abuses.
<snip>
More: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57604056/independent-nsa-spying-review-not-so-independent/
15 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Independent NSA Spying Review Not So Independent - AP/CBSNews (Original Post)
WillyT
Sep 2013
OP
questionseverything
(11,846 posts)1. clapper overseeing nsa "review"
makes me feel as confident as chinese chicken inspectors
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)2. Just like the FISA Court. Only debate one side.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)3. outrageous nt
TheKentuckian
(26,314 posts)4. Who could have seen it coming???
Octafish
(55,745 posts)5. Secret Laws and Secret Government are un-American.
No oversight. No accountability. No responsibility. No democracy.
Uncle Joe
(65,163 posts)6. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, WillyT.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)8. Anytime... Uncle Joe, Anytime...
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)7. I'm so surprised!
Um...
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)10. Do they expect people to take this seriously? Clapper running the show
is almost funny, if it were a comedy skit.
Unbelievable! They really do think we are stupid.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)11. I Believe That Back In The Day... They Called It A "White-Wash"...
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)12. K&R
More theater.
furious
(202 posts)13. Color me surprised.
Just more of the same. It's gotten to the point where I just don't trust govt. to keep it's word anymore.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)14. kick
WillyT
(72,631 posts)15. Last Kick From Me...