General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy can't we hate the rich?
I do
I realize they are the problem
Yeah, you have your occasional good rich guy, but they are the exception, not the norm
I think Lenin was onto something by abolishing inheritances
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Grayson was ranked as the 11th-wealthiest member of Congress in 2010, based on financial disclosure forms with a minimum net worth of $31.41 million, according to Roll Call.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Grayson
DrDan
(20,411 posts)definitely worth hating
ForgoTheConsequence
(5,186 posts)His companies treat their employees like garbage. Not to mention the amount of outsourcing that asshole has done.
DrDan
(20,411 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Oh wait, DU already hates the shit out of him!
Vox Moi
(546 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 24, 2013, 01:27 PM - Edit history (1)
... but it's not very productive to hate people.
We can hate policy, we can hate elitism, we can hate privilege but being poor and hating rich people is kinda like being rich and hating the poor.
I hate is the tendency in our culture to see wealth (or the lack of it) as a sign of moral virtue (or lack of it).
I hate the vernacular that is associated with the social and cultural gap between rich and poor such as 'welfare queen' and 'job creator'.
Thorensen Veblen might agree that social stability in the face of vast inequality is based on the fact that most poor people don't want equality: they want to be rich too. The poor want to preserve the elite class and in doing so, preserve the hope of joining it.
handmade34
(24,017 posts)I hate the system that made them obscenely rich... and I am really angry at all of us who allow it to continue...
Tikki
(15,140 posts)learn and take action on what they can do to afford change.
Tikki
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)Except the players are sometimes well worthy of hatred. Ultimately though, it doesn't do anything to change the game. it's another distraction to focus on people rather than the system.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)leftstreet
(40,680 posts)
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)to enrich themselves understanding that they are hurting others, but do it anyway?
The system is the tool. Without the hand to use it, it is nothing. Evil is as evil does.
Like taking candy from a baby, is the baby the problem, or is it the willingness of the thief to take the candy?
Iggo
(49,927 posts)They obviously never met me.
jsr
(7,712 posts)
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)I believe it's something far worse . . . it's that they just don't CARE one way or another. We mean as much to them as a stepped-on ant in their lives.
polichick
(37,626 posts)to be rich, and who wants to think of him or herself as a bad guy?
Socialism never took root in America because the poor see themselves not as an exploited proletariat but as temporarily embarrassed millionaires.
-- John Steinbeck
polichick
(37,626 posts)get the people to identify with each other more than they identify with their oppressors.
Divide and conquer tactics used by our one-corporate-party-with-two-faces work. Even with all that's happened, Dems identify more with the corporate tools associated with beloved politicians like Clinton and Obama than they do rank and file Republican voters.
Hydepier
(21 posts)government a society chooses.
The question and issue becomes one of degree, and how a society and a system of government can most effectively encourage and enforce a mechanism for the rich to contribute what the society determines is a fair portion of that wealth to the common need of the society as a whole.
Focusing our negative mental energy upon the rich folks themselves traps us from finding more equitable and just economic solutions we face as a society. As with any despised group of people, drug dealers, gangsters, con men, gun-huggers, cigarette smokers, focusing too much upon the inidividuals impedes our quest for reasonable and efficient solutions to the problems they all have created for the rest of us.
The2ndWheel
(7,947 posts)It's not just the rich, and it's not just capitalism.
cali
(114,904 posts)another content free random thought OP from you.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)... but knowing his/her posts in the past, he/she may have meant something similar along the lines of what I've posted:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3722010
Of course, he/she may correct me if I'm wrong.
Dreamer Tatum
(10,996 posts)Dude, no one gives a fuck who you hate.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)Keeping it in check is why they invented politics.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts). . . but nowadays, with "the game" rigged (purchased) and beyond repair, I think not so much.
rrneck
(17,671 posts)DrDan
(20,411 posts)then be sure to include the Obamas in your hate fest.
Fantastic Anarchist
(7,309 posts)If we had a more egalitarian system, where people are free from need and want, there would be no antagonism towards the more wealthy.
It's the fact that we have literally people with 7 homes, of which they can't be possibly in use 100%, and others are sleeping on park benches, that creates and cultivates the "class antagonisms" which exists in societies like ours. No one will hate the rich for the sake of being rich. People despise the rich in context of their position relative to the sea of poverty that exists all around them. They hate the rich that, unfortunately with wealth comes political power, and when they use that power to make themselves wealthier at the expense of those already scrounging for bread. That's the antagonisms that will remain in existence until there is reform or revolution.
When 400 people own more wealth than 150 million people combined, the result, of course will be, envy and hate. As a result, you have a deformed society.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)Crosby Stills Nash and Young - America's Children.
Bryant
GalaxyHunter
(271 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(135,713 posts)In fact I respect those who started with little and were able to succeed. What I don't respect are those who have wealth and are willing to shit on others who have less in the pursuit of more wealth.
I tend to agree with you per inheritances. Nothing worse then the entitled who've never had to work for anything. Yes I'm talking about you Koch bros.
Yet there are those like the Kennedys and the Roosevelts which are wealthy families responsible for many of the progressive laws and programs in this country. As such I'd back away from a blanket statement such as "hate the rich."
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)And give a lot to charity.
I personally couldnt hate anyone based on how big their bank account is. That would be ignorance, imho.
But you go ahead and do whatever you want.
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)the 1% at the expense of the 99%"
Hating Alan Grayson and Warren Buffet makes no sense.
Dawson Leery
(19,568 posts)graywarrior
(59,440 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)In every respect.
Arkana
(24,347 posts)It's your choices, far more than your lot in life, that determine who you are. Would you really condemn FDR and JFK just because they were born rich?
How can you talk of people being born rich and of choices in the same sentence? People are also born poor and fall into depravity. People are born with genetic predispositions for goal attainment as well as sociopathy. We're all just actors here.
If people condemn it is the system that persuaded them to do so. You can change their mind perhaps, if you are so inclined, but just do not condemn condemning.
Its only natural
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)They're not a protected group, last I heard.
I'm not sure what hatred gets you, but be my guest.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)They only own most of the wealth and resources in America, not to mention that such patriotic job-creators like the Koch Brothers (to name a few) can literally buy elections these days; or, on the other hand, "liberal" rich people like Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, and Mark Zuckerberg donate significant sums of money to the education privatization "movement."
Rich people have the options of living in the best neighborhoods-some of them in MULTIPLE best neighborhoods! Their kids go to the best schools, disproportionately get into elite colleges and universities, which allows them much greater access to high-paying jobs in the businesses and corporations that their parents and other rich people own and manage.
Rich people have gotten their taxes lowered time and again; meanwhile, the share of taxes paid by the rest of society (the non-rich) has gone up, if you include payroll taxes, sales taxes, etc. Rich people are doing better than ever, enjoying being on the winning side of record-breaking income and wealth inequality, while the rest of us are on the losing side!
Let's not forget the wars that rich people profit off of-Halliburton, Xe, Raytheon, etc., you can bet that those companies are controlled by very rich people! They've made a lot of money in recent years.
But yes, other than that, rich people aren't protected by anything or anyone, and I can't imagine why anyone would even mildly dislike them, let alone hate them!
MineralMan
(151,269 posts)For example, people with disabilities are a protected group. Rich assholes aren't. They need no protection. They can afford their own.
YoungDemCA
(5,714 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Free country etc..
Orsino
(37,428 posts)And if they are not kept at arm's length from political influence, they make inevitable another French Revolution.
We should help them avoid this course.
GeorgeGist
(25,570 posts)pedophiles, terrorists and war criminals.
Downtown Hound
(12,618 posts)Just most of 'em. Heh heh.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)laundry_queen
(8,646 posts)a good portion of them have these issues, I'm sure of it. It's a more socially accepted form of OCD type illnesses. Think about an OCD clean freak. More acceptable socially than a hoarder right? Hoarding money is ok, and even seen as somehow virtuous. I disagree with society, but I can't hate these kinds of rich people.
However, mix that in with psychopathy or sociopathy, and a total disregard for those less fortunate and I would have no problems conjuring up a little hate. Unfortunately, I think the vast majority reside in this category, instead of the former one.
But it's not a productive hate. I hate Kevin O'Leary (pompous Canadian rich asshole who is proud of being a greedy pig) with the burning heat of a thousand suns, but it does nothing but make my stomach sick, so I try to avoid him on TV. Instead I smile every time I vote NDP knowing how much that pisses him off.
I think it's better to concentrate on designing a system where people are fed, have access to health care, schooling, shelter than it is to spend my time hating the rich. I'd prefer a more progressive form of taxation, with the highest rates at the top return to 50% or more, not because I hate rich people, but because I think they should be forced to give back to the society that helped create them, whether they admit it or not.
BTW, I don't think it's just 'the rich'. It's the system that enables them that is the problem. That's where we need to focus our attention.
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)Seeking Serenity
(3,322 posts)I choose not to, and won't, since hate only eats away at the hater from within like a cancer while having no measurable affect of the target of such hate.
Throd
(7,208 posts)Oh, and fuck Lenin, I would like to leave something to my daughters after I croak.
Democracyinkind
(4,015 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Maybe Tony Benn's?
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)The useful poor-to-middle class idiots who identify with the wants and needs of the wealthy rather than those of their own lot. It's pretty much how the wealthy are continually allowed to game the system . . . acceptance laced with Horatio Alger elixir.
"Don't hate the playah, hate the game." Uh, the game created its own ubiquitous "house" of players that always wins.
hunter
(40,690 posts)If they don't like that they can leave and we can sell their stuff.
There ought to be an income, some multiple of minimum wage, where taxes exceed 90%, and there ought to be some wealth where inheritance taxes exceed 90%.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)Greed is the problem, not wealth.
NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)Honestly I don't. Why spend time in life with hate? I'd rather go enjoy a hike
Humans are a tragic species. The rich are created by circumstances and unpersuadable momentum as much as anyone else
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Whereas most of us know WE are.
Mr.Turnip
(645 posts)Obviously I have many issues with the system that allows the exploitation of the poor by the rich and I dislike specific individuals who are Rich but I don't hate the Rich as a social group.
And I will not make a broad moral judgement upon an entire socioeconomic group ether.
TeamPooka
(25,577 posts)ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...and will even admit that, like most people, I would like to become one of them.
OTOH, I do hate the entitled rich, who think they are better than others, and who would begrudge a little help for those who need it. Those people I detest with a white hot passion. There is a good percentage of the rich who are like that and who would sacrifice their "lessers" to promote their so-called principles that are really just a mish-mash of Randian ass-hattery and simple self-serving. So I do hate a good percentage of the rich, not because they are rich, but because they are assholes -- and worse, they are assholes who work systematically to make life worse for 99% of their fellow humans. Which makes them a thousand, a million times worse than the standard issue asshole who merely fights when drunk, or gives the finger when you take too long after the light turns green, that sort of thing.
"Yes, as through this world I've wandered / I've seen lots of funny men / Some will rob you with a six-gun / And some with a fountain pen" -- Woody Guthrie
BKH70041
(961 posts)Is this supposed to be advocating for some type of group activity?
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)Taitertots
(7,745 posts)The problem is they don't produce enough to justify their wealth.
Dick Fuld has over $150,000,000. Does anyone actually think he personally produced $100,000,000 worth in goods and/or services?
reddread
(6,896 posts)insert Forrest Gump menu here please.