Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIs James “The Liar” Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, on the way out?
Every once in a while, I like to check the Federal Register. This is a vice I should indulge more frequently, apparently. This evening I indulged, and discovered this:
Designation of Officers of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence To Act as Director of National Intelligence
A Presidential Document by the Executive Office of the President on 09/25/2013
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998, as amended, 5 U.S.C. 3345 et seq. (the Act), it is hereby ordered that:
Section 1. Order of Succession. Subject to the provisions of sections 2 and 3 of this memorandum, and to the limitations set forth in the Act, the following officials of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, in the order listed, shall act as and perform the functions and duties of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) during any period in which the DNI and the Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence have died, resigned, or otherwise become unable to perform the functions and duties of the DNI:...
This couldnt get much hotter off the press if it tried, and it strikes me as a very big deal, indeed. Surely someone in the media caught wind of this, right?
Not that I can find.
A variety of news searches using Google turned up nothing on todays presidential memo on succession for the role of Director of National Intelligence. For that matter, nothing came up about the memo when I search my news sources and blog roll in InoReader (the tool I use now that Googles Reader is caput). That, however, is not to say that there wasnt anything relevant out there.
Marcy Wheelers emptywheel had this fresh, new content today:
Senate Intelligence Committee Open Hearings: A Platform for Liars
So DiFis [Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-CA] idea of an open hearing is to invite two established liars. And for her non-governmental witnesses, one keeps declaring Congress NAKED! in the face of evidence the government lies to them, and the other tells fanciful stories about how much data NSA shares.
Its like DiFi goes out of her way to find liars and their apologists to testify publicly.
I love it. For that matter, Ms. Wheeler starts the piece off strong with:
Pentagon Papers era NYT Counsel James Goodale has a piece in the Guardian attracting a lot of attention. In it, he says the first step to reform NSA is to fire the liars.
Excellent. Ms. Wheeler might not have mentioned todays succession memo, but perhaps Mr. Goodale did over at the Guardian?
To reform the NSA, fire officials who lie
This article is also from today, and its an excellent bit of reportage. Mr. Goodale ends it on this note:
Obviously, if this culture seeps into popular culture, lies and deceits will be easily tolerated and we will all be the worse for it. President Obama should focus on this issue before it is too late. But it is not at all clear that he cares about it any more than Congress or the Justice Department do.
Interestingly, he also makes no mention of the memo hot off President Obamas desk.
If this were a reshuffling of succession rules for just about any other agency, it would probably be among the dullest things ever. With James The Liar Clapper at the center of so much controversy, however, should we see this as just a bit of housekeeping minutiae? Or should we expect to see an announcement of Clappers resignation soon?
I hope so. Part of me will cheer. The dominant, cynical side of me will just wonder who will be signing Clappers checks next. My gut says hell still be an intelligence insider, just on a private contractors payroll.
----
Cross-posted from my blog, Ars Skeptica, with apologies if there are any formatting snafus or if I've run afoul of content/category guidelines somehow.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1208 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is James “The Liar” Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, on the way out? (Original Post)
ArsSkeptica
Sep 2013
OP
They get swapped out pretty regularly. Negroponte wasn't in there that long, either.
MADem
Sep 2013
#1
Probably. The better question would be: will the "reform" stop there? n/t
winter is coming
Sep 2013
#2
MADem
(135,425 posts)1. They get swapped out pretty regularly. Negroponte wasn't in there that long, either.
Three years is a good run in that job--and Clapper got nommed/confirmed in 2010...so far, he's the "longest serving" of the short lot.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Director_of_National_Intelligence#Directors_of_National_Intelligence
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)2. Probably. The better question would be: will the "reform" stop there? n/t
Warpy
(111,417 posts)3. Probably, getting rid of a bad guy
means getting rid of all the problems, or they hope we'll think so.