General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWindmill farm gets permit to kill eagles with their turbines (5 golden eagles over 5 years)
A large wind farm in Solano County would be the first renewable energy project in the nation to be issued a permit to kill eagles under a plan released Thursday by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

The proposal, outlined in a draft environmental report, is to issue a golden eagle take permit to the Shiloh IV Wind Project, on 3,500 acres in the Montezuma Hills between Rio Vista and Fairfield.
The unusual plan would allow the company's 50 wind turbines to kill up to five golden eagles over a five-year period in exchange for a series of measures to protect the big birds, including the retrofitting of 133 nearby power poles to prevent electrocutions.
"The bottom line is a permit will help preserve eagles," said Scott Flaherty, the deputy assistant regional director for the Fish and Wildlife Service. "I think it really does set a precedent. It shows the service can work with wind energy companies ... and ensure that we conserve eagles and other wildlife."
The report, which will now go through a 45-day public comment period, analyzed four alternatives, including the possibility of denying the permit application. In addition to retrofitting the Pacific Gas and Electric Co. power poles, Shiloh, which is an affiliate of EDF Renewable Development, has agreed to use audio or visual deterrence measures to scare away eagles, migratory birds and bats.
http://www.sfgate.com/science/article/Windmill-farm-gets-permit-to-kill-eagles-4847110.php
snooper2
(30,151 posts)should we just shut the windmills down or have somebody stationed under each one and yell "ka kaw ka kaw!" whenever a bird is spotted?
Maybe some 70 foot tall dick cheney scarecrows would work
Stop it, snooper!
and I can't find the hitting you in the head smiley!
XemaSab
(60,212 posts)Good to know.
cynatnite
(31,011 posts)and so is having someone yell "kaw, kaw, kaw".
No where is anyone making fun of killing eagles.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Liberal_in_LA
(44,397 posts)snooper2
(30,151 posts)Don't mess with turtles
TeeYiYi
(8,028 posts)...Well wha.da.ya know.
TYY
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)There is probably some method that can be used to scare them away.
Maybe these measures are already in place?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)It's the LAW OF THE LAND.
Not just people in foreign lands...but Birds, Fish and the rest of civilization.
You were expecting Rainbows...and Ponies? What's wrong with you? A Few Eagles? Who Cares....
(sorry for the snark...it's horribly depressing}..but, it's what it is and we are supposed to be very accepting of this...just more collateral damage...and this time for "Sustainable Energy" while we impose Fracking TCP and invade Countries across the Globe for oil while polluting here at home ....we kill abroad.
Why SOLAR was not the Alternative Choice over Wind Farms..I don't know. I guess big Hedge Fund/Goldman Sachs or JP Morgan liked Wind Farms over Solar...and this is what we get after Citizens United decision by Supremes allowed the money to be donated by those who had the most and so they got the most influence.
What can one say these days to understand any of this.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)But both are also intermittent.
Utilities have to provide exactly as much power as is needed moment by moment.
It's really a modern marvel how they do it, and more complex than people know.
http://www.caiso.com/Pages/TodaysOutlook.aspx#Renewables
KoKo
(84,711 posts)started sooner. Jimmy Carter had Solar Panels placed on Roof of the White House! How long ago was that? Reagan took them off. Someone posted on DU a few weeks back that Obama is going to place them back on the WH...along with pushing the Trans Canada Pipeline for dirty shale to come through US to be EXPORTED! Then there's the Fracking.
We have the whole Southwest where Solar Panels could be placed and run the Grid from there and pick up in other areas on the East Coast with Solar Panels on Roofs in all Industrial/Corporate Buildings.
I've not been so much interested in Wind...because of the destruction of views in in Areas and the Humming Sound which makes some sensitive people sick...plus the possible damage to birds who use "wind currents" as part of their navigation skills.
USA has so much Desert...and in places where we store Nukes and other "things" out in our Southwest. Put Solar there and find a way to get it to CA and Nevada and NM, Texas, Utah...whever you can get it. Invest in ramping up the storage and network for distribution. That and Roof Solar in Cities could be better than Fracking and Tar Sands. We could still find places we could buy oil from FAIRLY...if we didn't invade their countries to supplement what the Solar didn't provide.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I'm proud of a 500kW two acre project I put together for a school district, it was done over existing parking lots, that's a must-do.
Many if not most rooftops aren't useful for solar, most often because of their limited load bearing capacity but other problems like shading or wrong orientation creep in.
When we try to put large solar in the deserts there are always environmental concerns (sigh) and large scale is almost necessarily utility run and more than a few progressives hate big utilities (sigh).
Then in terms of reducing demand, or reducing the need to burn fossil fuels, we have to use data, install smart meters but guess what? People are afraid of them!
Still, we are making great strides.
Jerry Brown just signed SB43 which allows an entity to use the grid to generate energy in one place and credit their meter in a different place.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)About the solar on roofs. I'm thinking those ultra thin ones and more like NYC sky scrapers and other places which often have flat roofs with sun and no trees.
Also most surburban strip malls have flat roofs with few trees and the Big Box Stores which have large surface.
Maybe the office buildings in the big cities could turn off their inside lights at night leaving just outside security lights and employ extra security patrol guards for the perimeter?
I've never understood why all commercial office buildings have to be lit up all night in every office. That's a huge drain on power right there.
BTW: No way I'd install a "meter" for my electricity. It's just more Spyware and Control.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Right under 2,000 of them, IIRC.
There are lightweight mods that can go on weaker roofs but they don't put out as much energy.
ETA: Meters are totally optional, you only need them if you get your electricity from a utility company, and that is not something required by law...
Unfortunately, self-generation is an option only for the wealthy or really really frugal folks!
KoKo
(84,711 posts)can they be driven over or was the parking lot no longer being used. I'd read about some panels hopefully being used on roads...but, thought it was just something in the works and not viable yet.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Shaded car ports 12 feet off the ground!
At dentist now gotta go.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)Gotta Ask. So, it's Solar Panels placed on car ports 12 ft. above Ground?
Over the parking lot? How do they hold the weight? How do you get the energy from the solar stored?
We need a new roof. Have Southern Location which get's sun most of day...but still shaded a bit by trees. Thinking that if we did Solar Panels on that part...then we do a line...but how to wire it to store it. Would only want to use it for when we have Power Outages and we don't want to buy or use a power generator...but, to have the Solar as some small back up to keep Fridge and Phone a two burner hot plate (in place of full electric stove).
I'm just throwing this out there. I don't think this is what you do...but in case you have some expertise in usage from small amount of Solar Panels installed...it would be helpful to know if you've dealt with any situation like that.
Small Residential Solar just for back up for necessities when many of us live in Hurricane, Storm, Flood Zones...as I've been through the last few years...would at least be something so I don't have to deal with Generator and Gas and all that stuff about fumes.
Whatever...No need to reply if you don't have knowledge of that.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)The system you need is simple.
First though, the answers. The big carport system was over two acres of parking, held up by steel structure, all of it at a cost of $2.5 million. Underground cables take the DC power from the modules to an inverter which puts out AC current, then on to a big building's distribution panels. This is a grid-tied system with a net meter. In times of overproduction, extra energy feeds back into the grid. The grid is the building's battery.
For you, we're going to need about a 500-1000 watt system using something like four modules sending 12 Volt DC power to four deep-cycle solar batteries. Add to that a charge controller to protect from overcharging and an inverter to match your biggest load, maybe 1,500 watts, and you're good to go.
Costco has systems: Grid tied 500 watt: http://www.costco.com/500-watt-Expandable-Solar-Kit.product.11755530.html
But you don't want grid-tied, you want stand-alone battery backed. Try this: http://www.costco.com/Grape-Solar-Custom-Order-Page.product.11755487.html
I did a system on my own in 2004 with four-115 watt panels and four batteries. I think that system would cost $2,500 today for all the parts.
It's not hard to do it yourself. You might not even need that big a system, it depends on your fridge and it's power demand and draw, especially at the moment the compressor comes on.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)had no idea Costco was into selling solar. Will check out. Will also check if any of the roofing contractors might offer that as part of a package in our re-roof. Having it done at the same time might be a less expensive way to go and easier to position the cells.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)It amazes me that people who hate meters also hate Fracking, shale oil and windmills. But do something to measure and save on their energy use? The it's about spyware and unseen mind control by some invisible hand. In the end, it is easier to demand that entities like Walmart and big shopping malls do "something" to save energy. While I agree that big box stores, big shopping and office complexes, businesses and government agencies should install solar panels on rooftops and parking spaces, but that doesn't absorb me from taking reasonable measures to save on my energy usage.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)and there are several hundred turbines, so apparently they are expanding. I am also a local bird watcher. Golden eagles are actually common in this area. Bald eagles are still an exceptional sight.
The rarest bird in North America is probably the California Condor. The severe dangers to it in the wild are electrical lines too close together (less than 3 meters) and lead bullets. I don't see the electrical industry and the lead industry getting any fines or flack from these supposed bird lovers.
The fact is that golden eagles do quite well around wind turbines. I've actually seen them doing it, as well as all the other birds. I still see dozens of birds on each outing dead at the bottom of old wooden electrical poles.
Salviati
(6,059 posts)How many birds will die due to climate change?
Rex
(65,616 posts)nt.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)The Germans use them extensively....but, folks complain about the "low grade humming" in populated areas and I worry about the wind patterns causing problems with migrating birds.
daleo
(21,317 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Fan covers for wind turbine farms.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)The Blade span is huge, so enclosing it would look pretty terrible and maybe disrupt wind that keeps the blades turning.
I don't know really...why ...just speculating.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)in exchange for the FWS agreeing not to sue them for whatever eagles still wind up getting killed.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Wind power per Megawatt hour is so much cleaner and benign to the environment than coal, oil, natural gas, but turbines are the evil plague. Yeah. Gotcha.
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)So I wouldn't blame the OP.
It's also accurate, though I'm 100% with you on the benefits of wind, even at the expense of wildlife numbers.
Lesser of evils.
mike_c
(37,051 posts)Sigh. She's always liked birds more than insects, LOL. The goal here is to offer the power generator incentives to mitigate against harming eagles, and everyone knows that the risk is not zero, so a limited take permit is a powerful incentive.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)One is that wind turbines kill a lot of birds, relative to other human activities.
The other is that windbaggers give a damn about birds.
New York State Energy Research and Development Authority:
There are many ways to classify the impacts of electricity generation on wildlife. Effects can be direct and/or indirect; acute or chronic; individual or cumulative; and local, regional, or global. Each type of effect was explored in this study. Acidic deposition, climate change, and mercury bioaccumulation are identified as the three most significant and widespread stressors to wildlife from electricity generation from fossil fuels combustion in the NY/NE region.
Risks to wildlife vary substantially by life cycle stage. Higher risks are generally associated with the resource extraction and power generation stages, as compared to other life cycle stages. Overall, non-renewable electricity generation sources, such as coal and oil, pose higher risks to wildlife than renewable electricity generation sources, such as hydro and wind. Based on the comparative amounts of SO2, NOx, CO2, and mercury emissions generated from coal, oil, natural gas, and hydro and the associated effects of acidic deposition, climate change, and mercury bioaccumulation, coal as an electricity generation source is by far the largest contributor to risks to wildlife found in the NY/NE region.
Journal of Integrative Environmental Studies:
..wind farms are responsible for roughly 0.27 avian fatalities per gigawatt-hour (GWh) of electricity while nuclear power plants involve 0.6 fatalities per GWh and fossil-fueled power stations are responsible for about 9.4 fatalities per GWh. Within the uncertainties of the data used, the estimate means that wind farm-related avian fatalities equated to approximately 46,000 birds in the United States in 2009, but nuclear power plants killed about 460,000 and fossil-fueled power plants 24 million.
To recap, about 46,000 avian mortalities were associated with wind farms across the United States in 2009 but nuclear plants killed about 458,000 and fossil-fueled power plants almost 24 million, estimates illustrated by Figure 2. Figure 2 also reveals how the number of absolute birds killed by wind energy pales in comparison to other causes such as
windows and cats. Regardless of where the wind turbines are located, by minimizing reliance on fossil fuels and nuclear power, they prevent the death and injury of wildlife that would otherwise occur across the worlds coal mines, uranium tail
ponds, oil refineries, natural gas facilities, uranium acidified forests, polluted lakes, and habitats soon to be threatened by climate change.
National Academy of Science:
Although most evaluations of the beneficial effects of wind-generated electricity, including the present one, have addressed the degree to which they reduce (through displacement) atmospheric emissions, other important effects are potentially displaced as well. For example, obtaining fossil fuel through mining, drilling, and chemical modification of one form to another (e.g., gasification of coal) has a variety of environmental effects including loss of habitat for terrestrial and aquatic species.
Operation of thermal (energy generation units), which generate heat to drive turbines, produces heated water, either from cooling or in the form of steam to drive the turbines, or both. If the energy from the heated water is not recovered, the water is usually discharged into the environment; in closed cooling systems, its heat is discharged. All forms of generation have associated life-cycle emissions and wastes along with other environmental effects that are affected by the design, materials provision (including mining), manufacture, construction, transportation, assembly, operation, maintenance, retrofits, and decommissioning of the generators and their associated infrastructure. Some of these stages of the life cyclemost notably, mininghave adverse effects on human health as well.
uppityperson
(116,020 posts)makes it read completely opposite
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)so maybe that headline did the trick? Got me to click on a quick visit to DU?
B Calm
(28,762 posts)about wind energy. . .