General Discussion

Botany

(77,598 posts) Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:19 AM Mar 2012

Up w/ Chris Hayes ..... Come back we have nifty charts

Long technical explanation of the economy, GDP, personal debt, environmental cost,
recession / recovery, and all kinds of stuff by a great smart guest.

Me:

Chris Hayes: "Come back we have nifty charts"

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Up w/ Chris Hayes ..... Come back we have nifty charts (Original Post) Botany Mar 2012 OP

a really good show today Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #1

It is so great to not have the same old faces but new a different ones. Botany Mar 2012 #2

those same old faces are not at work on Saturday mornings Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #6

Those charts could've been better surfdog Mar 2012 #3

I love this program malaise Mar 2012 #4

This Rampell person antinano Mar 2012 #5

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)

1. a really good show today

Reply to Botany (Original post)

Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:27 AM

Mar 2012

Botany

(77,598 posts)

2. It is so great to not have the same old faces but new a different ones.

Reply to Motown_Johnny (Reply #1)

Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:34 AM

Mar 2012

BTW the republican /w the lip gloss looks like she knows she is
in way over her head.

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)

6. those same old faces are not at work on Saturday mornings

Reply to Botany (Reply #2)

Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:42 AM

Mar 2012

but I agree with you, it is nice for a change

surfdog

(624 posts)

3. Those charts could've been better

Reply to Botany (Original post)

Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:36 AM

Mar 2012

The dates on the bottom went from 1947 to 2011 with out any numbers in between

malaise

(297,012 posts)

4. I love this program

Reply to Botany (Original post)

Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:36 AM

Mar 2012

Informed guests are so rare on M$Greedia

antinano

(36 posts)

5. This Rampell person

Reply to Botany (Original post)

Sat Mar 3, 2012, 09:39 AM

Mar 2012

Seems to be a Romney plant. How could she even interrupt Chris while he was trying to give Obama credit for the economy?

Reply to this discussion