Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,901 posts)
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:00 PM Mar 2012

OReilly To Fluke: "You want me to give you my hard earned money so you can have sex?"

Bill O’Reilly’s attack is not only sexist and mean spirited, he has his facts completely wrong. Fluke is advocating for contraception to be covered under Georgetown University’s private insurance plan. Fluke became active on the issue “after her friend developed ovarian cysts and found that the oral contraception she needed to stop the cysts from growing was not covered under the school’s insurance.”

Later in the broadcast O’Reilly said: “So let me get this straight, Ms. Fluke, and I ask this with all due respect, I am: You want me to give you my hard earned money so you can have sex.” He also states that, while he opposes contraception coverage, Viagra should be covered.

video & more:
http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/03/02/437076/bill-oreilly-attacks-sandra-fluke/

82 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
OReilly To Fluke: "You want me to give you my hard earned money so you can have sex?" (Original Post) kpete Mar 2012 OP
Jumping on the Limbaugh meesage, just not as harsh words. liberal N proud Mar 2012 #1
I can't remember who it was. But many years ago Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2012 #9
Bishop John Spong ronnie624 Mar 2012 #47
Thanks. Can't find the video. Maybe the ''Fox Police'' purged it from the intertubes. But I Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2012 #49
Thanks for that G W C. An excellent read! 11 Bravo Mar 2012 #53
Try Shelby Spong quaker bill Mar 2012 #61
Everything boils down to sex with these Regressives. dixiegrrrrl Mar 2012 #2
Sex and violence is all they do or understand. n/t MarkCharles Mar 2012 #4
I don't think they really under stand sex, either. Maine-ah Mar 2012 #80
It's all about control Kookaburra Mar 2012 #12
and race .... don't forget race. Tennessee Gal Mar 2012 #13
if all the flucknuts take up the torch UpInArms Mar 2012 #3
Let me guess. This splotchy ass clown looked at his ratings Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2012 #5
O'Reilly has never worked hard a day in his life. /nt Drale Mar 2012 #6
He seemed pretty dedicated at the whole sexual harrassment Guy Whitey Corngood Mar 2012 #11
True Andy823 Mar 2012 #17
That's right! He calls what he does "work?" liberal_mama Mar 2012 #50
How is YOUR money involved, Mr. O'Reilly? Please explain. Atman Mar 2012 #7
hard earned money ?! Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2012 #8
Its hard being a GOP prostitute on Fox News..,. Historic NY Mar 2012 #19
+1 treestar Mar 2012 #26
I would have been more surprised if O'Lielly HappyMe Mar 2012 #10
It's the women who take the pills, but its so that men can have sex too. Cant trust em Mar 2012 #14
Why should I spend my money to have hard sex with you? Loudmxr Mar 2012 #15
I'm still in stitches about the "hard earned" part. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2012 #16
Bill O'Reilly: Limbaugh with a velvet glove. WI_DEM Mar 2012 #18
There is no government money involved!!!! PA Democrat Mar 2012 #20
Wow...thanks... nenagh Mar 2012 #21
But it's OK to pay for Viagra so creepy old men can still have sex. Odin2005 Mar 2012 #22
With creepy old women? elias7 Mar 2012 #59
In O'Reilly's case it's so he can sexually harass employees csziggy Mar 2012 #64
O'Reilly hasn't worked a day in his life. All he does is go on tirades and talk over people. HopeHoops Mar 2012 #23
How is it wrong though? hfojvt Mar 2012 #24
You couldn't be more wrong. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #34
you couldn't be less convincing hfojvt Mar 2012 #52
You created a position O'Reilly never took, then based an argument on that fabrication. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #54
uhm, the point is that Billo is speaking FOR others. hfojvt Mar 2012 #63
Ask any physician, insurance actuary, or mathematician... childbirth is exponentially more expensive shcrane71 Mar 2012 #70
You are spot on! In my 20s, my health insurance premiums were much higher than that of an elderly shcrane71 Mar 2012 #68
You are in error if you think pregnancy & childbirth are cheaper than hormonal contraceptives. eShirl Mar 2012 #38
I think you are in error hfojvt Mar 2012 #51
Listen to eShirl. shcrane71 Mar 2012 #69
Without access to any kind of BC loyalsister Mar 2012 #67
this is not about a denial of access hfojvt Mar 2012 #73
Two questions loyalsister Mar 2012 #75
Let me count the ways. Sparkly Mar 2012 #71
Well, it so happens that I, myself, ask the same question as Billo hfojvt Mar 2012 #74
Soooo loyalsister Mar 2012 #78
many medical issues are the result of choices hfojvt Mar 2012 #81
"It's a bit harder to engage in unprotected sex without consequences" loyalsister Mar 2012 #82
Humanity's population growth is unsustainable Hippo_Tron Mar 2012 #77
Morons. They are overlooking something treestar Mar 2012 #25
Bill O' the clown... AsahinaKimi Mar 2012 #27
Does he date his left hand Johonny Mar 2012 #28
O Reilly dates a loofah and falafels. Quantess Mar 2012 #72
sure seems to me that very few people actually heard what Ms.Fluke actually said- Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #29
"Billo needs his money to pay off the women he sexually harasses!!!" Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #30
Jesus H. Krishna, dewd! i heart xenu Mar 2012 #31
I wish Andrea Mackris would go public with what she knows aint_no_life_nowhere Mar 2012 #32
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #33
Seriously? ohheckyeah Mar 2012 #37
With all if four posts, doubtful xena has the "credentials" to be posting here Atman Mar 2012 #40
Yes, I certainly do. ohheckyeah Mar 2012 #44
Say "Hi" to Xenu for us. eShirl Mar 2012 #39
enjoy your stay. alphafemale Mar 2012 #41
Am I missing something here? Courtesy Flush Mar 2012 #35
penny wise, POUND foolish. pansypoo53219 Mar 2012 #36
How nice of him to pay for her health insurance Autumn Mar 2012 #42
Let me understand Mr. OReilly's logic Birth Control is something he does NOT want to have to Justice wanted Mar 2012 #43
Fox News viewers were forced to pay old horn dog Bill's... gulliver Mar 2012 #45
I have known 14 year olds on birth control because of Ovarian cysts LynneSin Mar 2012 #46
So, O'Reilly and Limbaugh are personally funding every insurance provider in the country? Matariki Mar 2012 #48
What a horrible man LeftishBrit Mar 2012 #55
he's such a pig. barbtries Mar 2012 #56
"put your pipe down and get my pipe up" Incitatus Mar 2012 #57
So O'Reilly doesn't understand what BC is and/or works either. sakabatou Mar 2012 #58
No, the sex is free quaker bill Mar 2012 #60
'all due respect' my ass. spanone Mar 2012 #62
I have to pay my hard-earned tax dollars so soldiers can get an earful of your hateful misogyny Arugula Latte Mar 2012 #65
The same O'Reilly whose work INSPIRED Jim David Adkisson to massacre Knoxville Unitarians: Faryn Balyncd Mar 2012 #66
putrid porcine puke Whisp Mar 2012 #76
Ah, the old "I've got mine so fuck you" sydrome at work. Initech Mar 2012 #79
 

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,848 posts)
9. I can't remember who it was. But many years ago
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:10 PM
Mar 2012

one of his guests called him "Rush Limbaugh with perfume". He was spot on.

ronnie624

(5,764 posts)
47. Bishop John Spong
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:47 PM
Mar 2012

A smiling, soft spoken, dedicated progressive of the Episcopal Church.

"Everything is a spin on this program. There's nothing wrong with that. You do it with great style. You're sort of a Rush Limbaugh with perfume."

I watched the interview. He tied O'Reilly in knots.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,157 posts)
2. Everything boils down to sex with these Regressives.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:05 PM
Mar 2012

I swear, sex and violence are the underlying issues with them.

Kookaburra

(2,649 posts)
12. It's all about control
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:14 PM
Mar 2012

They don't care about sex, except that if people have more sex they're usually happier, and people who are happier usually don't vote for republicans, and ... well you see where I'm going here.

UpInArms

(54,928 posts)
3. if all the flucknuts take up the torch
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:07 PM
Mar 2012

(of burning women) - do you suppose that they will think that makes it all go away?

looks like a duck
quacks like a duck
smells like a duck

 

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,848 posts)
5. Let me guess. This splotchy ass clown looked at his ratings
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:07 PM
Mar 2012

and decided to jump on the bandwagon to get attention.

 

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,848 posts)
11. He seemed pretty dedicated at the whole sexual harrassment
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:12 PM
Mar 2012

thing. Other than that........

Historic NY

(40,006 posts)
19. Its hard being a GOP prostitute on Fox News..,.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:28 PM
Mar 2012

he has to go out everyday and put lipstick on a pig.

HappyMe

(20,277 posts)
10. I would have been more surprised if O'Lielly
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:11 PM
Mar 2012

didn't jump on the RL bandwagon.
Two old fools running their mouths. It's all they know how to do.

Cant trust em

(10,732 posts)
14. It's the women who take the pills, but its so that men can have sex too.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:21 PM
Mar 2012

It takes two to tango.

Tango here is a metaphor here for sex.

Loudmxr

(1,405 posts)
15. Why should I spend my money to have hard sex with you?
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:23 PM
Mar 2012

There is the O'Falafel response.

And you know it!!!!

WI_DEM

(33,497 posts)
18. Bill O'Reilly: Limbaugh with a velvet glove.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:26 PM
Mar 2012

I guess these guys feel like real men for attacking a 30 year old college student and personalizing this.

PA Democrat

(13,428 posts)
20. There is no government money involved!!!!
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 12:33 PM
Mar 2012

Students at Georgetown pay their own premiums. If the religious institution does not want to cover contraceptives, the insurance company provides it free of charge because...

it saves them money in the long run.

Why is everyone in the media letting these blowhards get away with lying about the use of tax dollars?

nenagh

(1,925 posts)
21. Wow...thanks...
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:08 PM
Mar 2012

Very interesting...the students pay for their insurance premiums...not O'Reilly ... NB info, thanks again.

csziggy

(34,189 posts)
64. In O'Reilly's case it's so he can sexually harass employees
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 03:21 PM
Mar 2012

Just research his history.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
23. O'Reilly hasn't worked a day in his life. All he does is go on tirades and talk over people.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:19 PM
Mar 2012

That's not "work".

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
24. How is it wrong though?
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:20 PM
Mar 2012

If Billo is speaking for those who are covered under Georgetown's insurance, then they will be paying more so that other people can have sex. For every woman taking birth control for a medical reason, like cysts, there are probably 99 women taking it so they can have sex without getting pregnant.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
34. You couldn't be more wrong.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:39 PM
Mar 2012

You are either deliberately missing the point, or have no clue as to how risk is spread by insurance companies and how that lowers costs for all in that class of insured.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
52. you couldn't be less convincing
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 04:21 PM
Mar 2012

You are either deliberately missing the point, or have no clue how to make a logical argument based on facts and sans insults.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
54. You created a position O'Reilly never took, then based an argument on that fabrication.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 04:41 PM
Mar 2012

Straw Man.

How does O'Reilly's tax money paid to the Federal government end up paying for a Georgetown law student's PRIVATE insurance?

Answer: it doesn't.

Explain to me then how risk is assessed by insurance companies, and spread among policyholders.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
63. uhm, the point is that Billo is speaking FOR others.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 03:16 PM
Mar 2012

Suppose I am a Georgetown student and I have private insurance that does not cover birth control. Now the Government steps in and forces them to cover birth control. What happens to my premiums? Do I, or do I not, end up paying more because of that extra coverage. Sure, the extra coverage benefits some people, but it does not benefit me. Some people are asking other people to buy them stuff that THEY want.

Risk? What is risk? A risk implies something unexpected. There is a chance, hopefully small, that I could get into an accident and get hurt. There is a risk that lighning or bad wiring could start my house on fire. There is no risk that I will have to cut my grass. That is a certainty. Homeowners insurance does not pay for grass cutting. If it did, we would all be paying more.

Which might not be so bad, since we all have to cut our grass. However, there is also a certainty that dandylions will grow in my law. Some people spray poisons on their dandylions to get rid of them. If homeowners insurance covered the cost of spraying dandylions, that would not be "sharing of risk" it would be a subsidy paid to those who spray dandylions by those who don't.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
70. Ask any physician, insurance actuary, or mathematician... childbirth is exponentially more expensive
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 06:27 PM
Mar 2012

than birth control. It's that simple.

shcrane71

(1,721 posts)
68. You are spot on! In my 20s, my health insurance premiums were much higher than that of an elderly
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 06:23 PM
Mar 2012

mans. Why? Because 20-something women have babies, and that's expensive. Who picked up the costs? Not men, but women in that demographic. Thank you Obama and all the brave Dems who voted for Healthcare reform that spreads the costs of births to the entire population, and not just women.

eShirl

(20,231 posts)
38. You are in error if you think pregnancy & childbirth are cheaper than hormonal contraceptives.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:57 PM
Mar 2012

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
51. I think you are in error
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 04:18 PM
Mar 2012

because even without the insurance company paying for it, most women are going to still use birth control. Sorta like they already do today.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
67. Without access to any kind of BC
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 05:47 PM
Mar 2012

most of those 99 women will still have sex. BC does not open that door. The difference between having it covered and not is more women get pregnant.
People who have children they do not want or can not afford to support is not good for any of those parties.
The claim that BC increases sex is bull. The truth is, it reduces the likelihood of problems that conservatives also love to rant about.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
73. this is not about a denial of access
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 08:52 PM
Mar 2012

it is about a subsidy. If BC is not covered under insurance, people can (and will) still get it on their own. In the latter case, those who want it will be the ones paying for it, instead of having other people help pay for it.

But the other thing is true as well. For most of them, if they are not having sex, they would not need the pill. They need the pill not for some medical condiditon, but so that they can have sex without worrying about the consequences.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
75. Two questions
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:22 PM
Mar 2012

Are you a man?
Are financial limitations beyond your experience?

If you are not or have not been a woman with financial limitations who has had to strenuously argue with a trusted husband\boyfriend to use a condom to avoid pregnancy, you have no clue what it means to have access to affordable birth control.

Not all but many women have had those experiences. BC is not about a social life or even an intimate relationship. It's about avoiding the reality of difficult decisions.

Sparkly

(24,885 posts)
71. Let me count the ways.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 06:33 PM
Mar 2012

1. It does NOT mean people's insurance premiums will go up. If anything, costs associated with the results of NOT having access to healthcare/birth control are higher.

2. Women pay for health insurance.

3. People have sex. So what if women WERE using birth control to avoid getting pregnant? Why is that seen as a "recreational" frill rather than NORMAL human functioning??

4. It's nobody's business why women are taking ANY prescribed drugs. It's their health, their bodies, their choice.

5. Billo said "Why should *I* pay..." It's been framed as a matter of taxpayers giving FREE stuff away to people who aren't paying, which is the big emotional hot button for right-wingers. Now added to the stereotype of the Lazy Welfare Queen, we have the Oversexed College Coed.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
74. Well, it so happens that I, myself, ask the same question as Billo
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:12 PM
Mar 2012

Why should "I" pay?

1. The other obvious question is this - if covering birth control means that insurance company costs will go down, then why aren't insurance companies ALREADY doing it in order to increase their profits. Why does the government have to step in and force the issue? Is that because insurance companies hate making money?

2. So? What else are you gonna tell me that is obvious? The sun rises in the East? Water is wet? Their insurance currently does not provide them with $1200 in automatic benefits, but it does cover them if they break an arm, need and EGD or knee surgery or an appendectomy. I am sure they will be happy to pay another $10 a month to get their $1200 in automatic benefits. However, what do I get out of it?

3. Not everybody has sex. Not everybody has the opportunity, and unlike catching pneumonia or getting banged up in a car accident - normal diseases and injuries - having sex is a choice. It doesn't happen to you like an injury or illness (except in cases of rape obviously) you choose to do it.

4. See above. I am not butting into their business. The question is - should I pay for things they choose to do? If they choose to drink Mt. Dew, should Mt. Dew be covered by their health insurance? I personally am pushing for that since I drink lots of Mt. Dew. If people object, I will tell them to mind their own business. It's my choice if I want to drink Mt. Dew and clearly they should help me pay for it, unless they are some sort of control freak.

5. It may or may not be taxpayers, depending on if it is covered by medicaid, which I think it should be since people getting medicaid, unlike others, cannot afford it on their own. Then there are people who work for the government, now getting this extra benefit, paid for by the taxpayers. But it is people like me paying, who are part of group insurance.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
78. Soooo
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:33 PM
Mar 2012

What about the janitor who chose to play football in HS and winds up needing multiple surgeries to fix damaged legs shoulders, etc?

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
81. many medical issues are the result of choices
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 01:56 AM
Mar 2012

However, not quite as directly. For example, I could catch pneumonia, like my mom always warned, by sitting on the cold basement floor. I could break some bones in a roller skating accident as Lana feared. I mentioned roller skating and she said "I have no insurance, there is no way I am going roller skating". Yet many people can engage in those activities repeatedly with no serious consequences. It's a bit harder to engage in unprotected sex without consequences.

As for the janitor, he probably needs knee surgery, not because of old football injuries, but because he walks 8-10 miles a day at his job, often carrying thousands of pounds of tables too.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
82. "It's a bit harder to engage in unprotected sex without consequences"
Mon Mar 5, 2012, 10:20 AM
Mar 2012

You left out "for women." It's quite easy for men to engage in sexual activity without "consequences." Barring transmission of an STD, real unintended consequences fall ONLY on the woman. Women have to make the difficult decisions (the range of which are being limited more and more), while men can walk away and maybe have to write a check once a month (assuming he is located).
Making BC more available helps to even the playing field when it comes to not only sexual activity but also in having and raising children. Pregnancy does not just result in physical symptoms and a baby, discrimination against pregnant women in the workplace is rampant.

Of course, evening the playing field when it comes to those consequences has been the underlying objection when it first became available and again today.

Hippo_Tron

(25,453 posts)
77. Humanity's population growth is unsustainable
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:31 PM
Mar 2012

I'm more than happy to have my insurance dollars or even my tax dollars going to pay for birth control. This is an instance where if we subsidize something, society as a whole benefits.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
25. Morons. They are overlooking something
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:20 PM
Mar 2012

If she can't have sex, then some men can't either. They're cutting off their nose to spite their face.

Johonny

(26,121 posts)
28. Does he date his left hand
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:29 PM
Mar 2012

Why would a guy not want women either sexual active or sexually healthy? Hmm...

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
72. O Reilly dates a loofah and falafels.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 06:40 PM
Mar 2012

At least, we know he likes to talk dirty about loofahs and falafels.

Bluerthanblue

(13,669 posts)
29. sure seems to me that very few people actually heard what Ms.Fluke actually said-
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:32 PM
Mar 2012

they are all just going on limbaughs twisted non-interpretation of what they thought might have been said.

Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh want people to give them money for vocally masturbating themselves and stroking their enormous engorged egos on air.

That is pretty obscene in itself.

aint_no_life_nowhere

(21,925 posts)
32. I wish Andrea Mackris would go public with what she knows
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:38 PM
Mar 2012

even if it violates the terms of her settlement against O'Reilly and Fox for sexual harassment: Bill O'Reilly using a vibrator on himself and ejaculating while speaking to her on the phone needs to be described in intimate detail before a national audience.

Counts 83 - 86 of her complaint:


83. During the course of Defendant BILL O'REILLY's sexual rant, it became clear that he was using a vibrator upon himself, and that he ejaculated. Plaintiff was repulsed.

84. Immediately after climaxing, Defendant BILL O'REILLY launched into a discussion concerning how good he was during a recent appearance on "The Tonight Show" with Jay Leno: "It was funny, they used a big clip of me...Right after Brokaw and Brokaw was absolutely the most unfunny guy in the world, and the audience got a big charge out of my...It was good."

85. After climaxing, Defendant BILL O'REILLY again boasted that none of the women he'd engaged in sexual relations with would ever tell:

"Nobody'd believe 'em...they wouldn't [tell] anyway, I can't imagine any of them ever doing that 'cuz I always made friends with women before I bedded them down."

86. Defendant BILL O'REILLY concluded stating:

"You know, Mackris, in these days of your celibacy and your hibernation this is good for you to have a little fantasy outlet, you know, just to keep it tuned, keep that sensuality tuned until you know Mr. Right comes along and then you can put him in traction...I'm trying to tell you, this is good for your mental health."

Response to kpete (Original post)

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
37. Seriously?
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:48 PM
Mar 2012

Poisonous and toxic? Why because it allows women to make their own decisions about reproduction?

I doubt seriously you have the credentials to declare them poisonous and toxic.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
40. With all if four posts, doubtful xena has the "credentials" to be posting here
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:00 PM
Mar 2012

If ya know what I mean.

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
44. Yes, I certainly do.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:25 PM
Mar 2012

Seems I've heard comments like xena made before elsewhere. Xena had a very short stay.

Courtesy Flush

(4,558 posts)
35. Am I missing something here?
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:40 PM
Mar 2012

I think maybe they're just re-framing the dialog to fire up their base, but as understand it, nobody is asking for anybody else to pay for their contraception.

Aren't they just asking that it be covered by insurance... which they will pay for themselves?

pansypoo53219

(23,031 posts)
36. penny wise, POUND foolish.
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 01:42 PM
Mar 2012

i had the same arguement w/ a more conservative epal on paying for abortions. i tthink i opened her mind a little. IF you pay for birth control/abortion, you ar not paying for more schools, social services, especially for a mother who does not WANT her kids. kids are expensive + they use resources. everybody should just grow up.

Autumn

(48,952 posts)
42. How nice of him to pay for her health insurance
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:06 PM
Mar 2012

Whats that? he doesn't pay for her health insurance? Then the stupid dumb ass fuck is not giving her his hard earned money so she can have sex.

Justice wanted

(2,657 posts)
43. Let me understand Mr. OReilly's logic Birth Control is something he does NOT want to have to
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:07 PM
Mar 2012

pay for BUT that little BLUE pill and Snips to keep men from having babies WOMEN SHOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR?!

JERK

gulliver

(13,952 posts)
45. Fox News viewers were forced to pay old horn dog Bill's...
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:36 PM
Mar 2012

Last edited Sat Mar 3, 2012, 04:34 PM - Edit history (1)

...sexual harassment lawsuit bill. Limbaugh's many orc-like listeners were forced to pay for his Oxycontin.

I don't see that these two upstanding Republican representatives have much room to talk.

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
46. I have known 14 year olds on birth control because of Ovarian cysts
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 02:38 PM
Mar 2012

Shame on him for assuming it's all about sex!

Matariki

(18,775 posts)
48. So, O'Reilly and Limbaugh are personally funding every insurance provider in the country?
Sat Mar 3, 2012, 03:03 PM
Mar 2012

What the hell are they talking about anyway? As far as I can tell they are pushing a lie that the issue is the "government" giving out "free" birth control, when in fact this issue is mandating birth control be covered in health insurance coverage.

I don't get it, are they that knee jerk stupid, or are they lying as usual to cloud the truth?

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
65. I have to pay my hard-earned tax dollars so soldiers can get an earful of your hateful misogyny
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 03:50 PM
Mar 2012

and racism, Rush?

Fuck you.

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
66. The same O'Reilly whose work INSPIRED Jim David Adkisson to massacre Knoxville Unitarians:
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 05:19 PM
Mar 2012

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/jul/28/church-shooting-police-find-manifesto-suspects-car/



"Adkisson targeted the church, Still wrote in the document obtained by WBIR-TV, Channel 10, "because of its liberal teachings and his belief that all liberals should be killed because they were ruining the country, and that he felt that the Democrats had tied his country's hands in the war on terror and they had ruined every institution in America with the aid of media outlets."

Adkisson told Still that "he could not get to the leaders of the liberal movement that he would then target those that had voted them in to office."

Adkisson told officers he left the house unlocked for them because "he expected to be killed during the assault."

Inside the house, officers found "Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder" by radio talk show host Michael Savage, "Let Freedom Ring" by talk show host Sean Hannity, and "The O'Reilly Factor," by television talk show host Bill O'Reilly.




Apparently, shame has not inspired O'Reilly to cease inspiring hate based on his repetitive lies.




Initech

(108,692 posts)
79. Ah, the old "I've got mine so fuck you" sydrome at work.
Sun Mar 4, 2012, 09:56 PM
Mar 2012

Classic, O'Reilly, way to take a predictable page out of the GOP playbook. Bravo.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»OReilly To Fluke: "Y...