General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOReilly To Fluke: "You want me to give you my hard earned money so you can have sex?"
Bill OReillys attack is not only sexist and mean spirited, he has his facts completely wrong. Fluke is advocating for contraception to be covered under Georgetown Universitys private insurance plan. Fluke became active on the issue after her friend developed ovarian cysts and found that the oral contraception she needed to stop the cysts from growing was not covered under the schools insurance.
Later in the broadcast OReilly said: So let me get this straight, Ms. Fluke, and I ask this with all due respect, I am: You want me to give you my hard earned money so you can have sex. He also states that, while he opposes contraception coverage, Viagra should be covered.
video & more:
http://thinkprogress.org/media/2012/03/02/437076/bill-oreilly-attacks-sandra-fluke/
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)But the ignorance spews forth.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,848 posts)one of his guests called him "Rush Limbaugh with perfume". He was spot on.
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)A smiling, soft spoken, dedicated progressive of the Episcopal Church.
"Everything is a spin on this program. There's nothing wrong with that. You do it with great style. You're sort of a Rush Limbaugh with perfume."
I watched the interview. He tied O'Reilly in knots.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,848 posts)did find the transcript.
http://www.oreilly-sucks.com/transcripts/spongoreilly.htm
11 Bravo
(24,308 posts)quaker bill
(8,264 posts)I most often hear of him referred to by that name.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,157 posts)I swear, sex and violence are the underlying issues with them.
MarkCharles
(2,261 posts)Maine-ah
(9,902 posts)Kookaburra
(2,649 posts)They don't care about sex, except that if people have more sex they're usually happier, and people who are happier usually don't vote for republicans, and ... well you see where I'm going here.
Tennessee Gal
(6,160 posts)UpInArms
(54,928 posts)(of burning women) - do you suppose that they will think that makes it all go away?
looks like a duck
quacks like a duck
smells like a duck
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,848 posts)and decided to jump on the bandwagon to get attention.
Drale
(7,932 posts)Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,848 posts)thing. Other than that........
Being an asshole isn't hard work, not for him, it's just what he is!
liberal_mama
(1,495 posts)He's an idiot and a pervert.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Tuesday Afternoon
(56,912 posts)Historic NY
(40,006 posts)he has to go out everyday and put lipstick on a pig.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Thank for for taking the time to make that very appropriate set of smilies.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)didn't jump on the RL bandwagon.
Two old fools running their mouths. It's all they know how to do.
Cant trust em
(10,732 posts)It takes two to tango.
Tango here is a metaphor here for sex.
Loudmxr
(1,405 posts)There is the O'Falafel response.
And you know it!!!!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)WI_DEM
(33,497 posts)I guess these guys feel like real men for attacking a 30 year old college student and personalizing this.
PA Democrat
(13,428 posts)Students at Georgetown pay their own premiums. If the religious institution does not want to cover contraceptives, the insurance company provides it free of charge because...
it saves them money in the long run.
Why is everyone in the media letting these blowhards get away with lying about the use of tax dollars?
nenagh
(1,925 posts)Very interesting...the students pay for their insurance premiums...not O'Reilly ... NB info, thanks again.
Odin2005
(53,521 posts)elias7
(4,229 posts)csziggy
(34,189 posts)Just research his history.
HopeHoops
(47,675 posts)That's not "work".
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)If Billo is speaking for those who are covered under Georgetown's insurance, then they will be paying more so that other people can have sex. For every woman taking birth control for a medical reason, like cysts, there are probably 99 women taking it so they can have sex without getting pregnant.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)You are either deliberately missing the point, or have no clue as to how risk is spread by insurance companies and how that lowers costs for all in that class of insured.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)You are either deliberately missing the point, or have no clue how to make a logical argument based on facts and sans insults.
Ikonoklast
(23,973 posts)Straw Man.
How does O'Reilly's tax money paid to the Federal government end up paying for a Georgetown law student's PRIVATE insurance?
Answer: it doesn't.
Explain to me then how risk is assessed by insurance companies, and spread among policyholders.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Suppose I am a Georgetown student and I have private insurance that does not cover birth control. Now the Government steps in and forces them to cover birth control. What happens to my premiums? Do I, or do I not, end up paying more because of that extra coverage. Sure, the extra coverage benefits some people, but it does not benefit me. Some people are asking other people to buy them stuff that THEY want.
Risk? What is risk? A risk implies something unexpected. There is a chance, hopefully small, that I could get into an accident and get hurt. There is a risk that lighning or bad wiring could start my house on fire. There is no risk that I will have to cut my grass. That is a certainty. Homeowners insurance does not pay for grass cutting. If it did, we would all be paying more.
Which might not be so bad, since we all have to cut our grass. However, there is also a certainty that dandylions will grow in my law. Some people spray poisons on their dandylions to get rid of them. If homeowners insurance covered the cost of spraying dandylions, that would not be "sharing of risk" it would be a subsidy paid to those who spray dandylions by those who don't.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)than birth control. It's that simple.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)mans. Why? Because 20-something women have babies, and that's expensive. Who picked up the costs? Not men, but women in that demographic. Thank you Obama and all the brave Dems who voted for Healthcare reform that spreads the costs of births to the entire population, and not just women.
eShirl
(20,231 posts)hfojvt
(37,573 posts)because even without the insurance company paying for it, most women are going to still use birth control. Sorta like they already do today.
shcrane71
(1,721 posts)loyalsister
(13,390 posts)most of those 99 women will still have sex. BC does not open that door. The difference between having it covered and not is more women get pregnant.
People who have children they do not want or can not afford to support is not good for any of those parties.
The claim that BC increases sex is bull. The truth is, it reduces the likelihood of problems that conservatives also love to rant about.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)it is about a subsidy. If BC is not covered under insurance, people can (and will) still get it on their own. In the latter case, those who want it will be the ones paying for it, instead of having other people help pay for it.
But the other thing is true as well. For most of them, if they are not having sex, they would not need the pill. They need the pill not for some medical condiditon, but so that they can have sex without worrying about the consequences.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)Are you a man?
Are financial limitations beyond your experience?
If you are not or have not been a woman with financial limitations who has had to strenuously argue with a trusted husband\boyfriend to use a condom to avoid pregnancy, you have no clue what it means to have access to affordable birth control.
Not all but many women have had those experiences. BC is not about a social life or even an intimate relationship. It's about avoiding the reality of difficult decisions.
Sparkly
(24,885 posts)1. It does NOT mean people's insurance premiums will go up. If anything, costs associated with the results of NOT having access to healthcare/birth control are higher.
2. Women pay for health insurance.
3. People have sex. So what if women WERE using birth control to avoid getting pregnant? Why is that seen as a "recreational" frill rather than NORMAL human functioning??
4. It's nobody's business why women are taking ANY prescribed drugs. It's their health, their bodies, their choice.
5. Billo said "Why should *I* pay..." It's been framed as a matter of taxpayers giving FREE stuff away to people who aren't paying, which is the big emotional hot button for right-wingers. Now added to the stereotype of the Lazy Welfare Queen, we have the Oversexed College Coed.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)Why should "I" pay?
1. The other obvious question is this - if covering birth control means that insurance company costs will go down, then why aren't insurance companies ALREADY doing it in order to increase their profits. Why does the government have to step in and force the issue? Is that because insurance companies hate making money?
2. So? What else are you gonna tell me that is obvious? The sun rises in the East? Water is wet? Their insurance currently does not provide them with $1200 in automatic benefits, but it does cover them if they break an arm, need and EGD or knee surgery or an appendectomy. I am sure they will be happy to pay another $10 a month to get their $1200 in automatic benefits. However, what do I get out of it?
3. Not everybody has sex. Not everybody has the opportunity, and unlike catching pneumonia or getting banged up in a car accident - normal diseases and injuries - having sex is a choice. It doesn't happen to you like an injury or illness (except in cases of rape obviously) you choose to do it.
4. See above. I am not butting into their business. The question is - should I pay for things they choose to do? If they choose to drink Mt. Dew, should Mt. Dew be covered by their health insurance? I personally am pushing for that since I drink lots of Mt. Dew. If people object, I will tell them to mind their own business. It's my choice if I want to drink Mt. Dew and clearly they should help me pay for it, unless they are some sort of control freak.
5. It may or may not be taxpayers, depending on if it is covered by medicaid, which I think it should be since people getting medicaid, unlike others, cannot afford it on their own. Then there are people who work for the government, now getting this extra benefit, paid for by the taxpayers. But it is people like me paying, who are part of group insurance.
What about the janitor who chose to play football in HS and winds up needing multiple surgeries to fix damaged legs shoulders, etc?
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)However, not quite as directly. For example, I could catch pneumonia, like my mom always warned, by sitting on the cold basement floor. I could break some bones in a roller skating accident as Lana feared. I mentioned roller skating and she said "I have no insurance, there is no way I am going roller skating". Yet many people can engage in those activities repeatedly with no serious consequences. It's a bit harder to engage in unprotected sex without consequences.
As for the janitor, he probably needs knee surgery, not because of old football injuries, but because he walks 8-10 miles a day at his job, often carrying thousands of pounds of tables too.
loyalsister
(13,390 posts)You left out "for women." It's quite easy for men to engage in sexual activity without "consequences." Barring transmission of an STD, real unintended consequences fall ONLY on the woman. Women have to make the difficult decisions (the range of which are being limited more and more), while men can walk away and maybe have to write a check once a month (assuming he is located).
Making BC more available helps to even the playing field when it comes to not only sexual activity but also in having and raising children. Pregnancy does not just result in physical symptoms and a baby, discrimination against pregnant women in the workplace is rampant.
Of course, evening the playing field when it comes to those consequences has been the underlying objection when it first became available and again today.
Hippo_Tron
(25,453 posts)I'm more than happy to have my insurance dollars or even my tax dollars going to pay for birth control. This is an instance where if we subsidize something, society as a whole benefits.
treestar
(82,383 posts)If she can't have sex, then some men can't either. They're cutting off their nose to spite their face.
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)Always was..always will be ...

Johonny
(26,121 posts)Why would a guy not want women either sexual active or sexually healthy? Hmm...
Quantess
(27,630 posts)At least, we know he likes to talk dirty about loofahs and falafels.
Bluerthanblue
(13,669 posts)they are all just going on limbaughs twisted non-interpretation of what they thought might have been said.
Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh want people to give them money for vocally masturbating themselves and stroking their enormous engorged egos on air.
That is pretty obscene in itself.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)i heart xenu
(4 posts)How many threads do you start in one day?!
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)even if it violates the terms of her settlement against O'Reilly and Fox for sexual harassment: Bill O'Reilly using a vibrator on himself and ejaculating while speaking to her on the phone needs to be described in intimate detail before a national audience.
Counts 83 - 86 of her complaint:
83. During the course of Defendant BILL O'REILLY's sexual rant, it became clear that he was using a vibrator upon himself, and that he ejaculated. Plaintiff was repulsed.
84. Immediately after climaxing, Defendant BILL O'REILLY launched into a discussion concerning how good he was during a recent appearance on "The Tonight Show" with Jay Leno: "It was funny, they used a big clip of me...Right after Brokaw and Brokaw was absolutely the most unfunny guy in the world, and the audience got a big charge out of my...It was good."
85. After climaxing, Defendant BILL O'REILLY again boasted that none of the women he'd engaged in sexual relations with would ever tell:
"Nobody'd believe 'em...they wouldn't [tell] anyway, I can't imagine any of them ever doing that 'cuz I always made friends with women before I bedded them down."
86. Defendant BILL O'REILLY concluded stating:
"You know, Mackris, in these days of your celibacy and your hibernation this is good for you to have a little fantasy outlet, you know, just to keep it tuned, keep that sensuality tuned until you know Mr. Right comes along and then you can put him in traction...I'm trying to tell you, this is good for your mental health."
Response to kpete (Original post)
Post removed
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)Poisonous and toxic? Why because it allows women to make their own decisions about reproduction?
I doubt seriously you have the credentials to declare them poisonous and toxic.
Atman
(31,464 posts)If ya know what I mean.
ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)Seems I've heard comments like xena made before elsewhere. Xena had a very short stay.
eShirl
(20,231 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)go the fuck away.
Courtesy Flush
(4,558 posts)I think maybe they're just re-framing the dialog to fire up their base, but as understand it, nobody is asking for anybody else to pay for their contraception.
Aren't they just asking that it be covered by insurance... which they will pay for themselves?
pansypoo53219
(23,031 posts)i had the same arguement w/ a more conservative epal on paying for abortions. i tthink i opened her mind a little. IF you pay for birth control/abortion, you ar not paying for more schools, social services, especially for a mother who does not WANT her kids. kids are expensive + they use resources. everybody should just grow up.
Autumn
(48,952 posts)Whats that? he doesn't pay for her health insurance? Then the stupid dumb ass fuck is not giving her his hard earned money so she can have sex.
Justice wanted
(2,657 posts)pay for BUT that little BLUE pill and Snips to keep men from having babies WOMEN SHOULD HAVE TO PAY FOR?!
JERK
gulliver
(13,952 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 3, 2012, 04:34 PM - Edit history (1)
...sexual harassment lawsuit bill. Limbaugh's many orc-like listeners were forced to pay for his Oxycontin.
I don't see that these two upstanding Republican representatives have much room to talk.
LynneSin
(95,337 posts)Shame on him for assuming it's all about sex!
Matariki
(18,775 posts)What the hell are they talking about anyway? As far as I can tell they are pushing a lie that the issue is the "government" giving out "free" birth control, when in fact this issue is mandating birth control be covered in health insurance coverage.
I don't get it, are they that knee jerk stupid, or are they lying as usual to cloud the truth?
LeftishBrit
(41,453 posts)All I can say, is I wish his parents had used contraception!
barbtries
(31,301 posts)and always will be.
Incitatus
(5,317 posts)sakabatou
(46,120 posts)What a pig.
quaker bill
(8,264 posts)it is the babies that cost money.
spanone
(141,535 posts)Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)and racism, Rush?
Fuck you.
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2008/jul/28/church-shooting-police-find-manifesto-suspects-car/
"Adkisson targeted the church, Still wrote in the document obtained by WBIR-TV, Channel 10, "because of its liberal teachings and his belief that all liberals should be killed because they were ruining the country, and that he felt that the Democrats had tied his country's hands in the war on terror and they had ruined every institution in America with the aid of media outlets."
Adkisson told Still that "he could not get to the leaders of the liberal movement that he would then target those that had voted them in to office."
Adkisson told officers he left the house unlocked for them because "he expected to be killed during the assault."
Inside the house, officers found "Liberalism is a Mental Health Disorder" by radio talk show host Michael Savage, "Let Freedom Ring" by talk show host Sean Hannity, and "The O'Reilly Factor," by television talk show host Bill O'Reilly.
Apparently, shame has not inspired O'Reilly to cease inspiring hate based on his repetitive lies.
Whisp
(24,096 posts)Initech
(108,692 posts)Classic, O'Reilly, way to take a predictable page out of the GOP playbook. Bravo.