General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsYou know why I like debating other folks here on DU?
Because you have your shit together! I mean, for the most part I have to really think through my positions and do research and understand complexities of an argument when engaging in any kind of policy or other debate here on DU.
Which is great training for when I go into the wider world with conservative lunk heads in person, on FB, or other non-political message boards where politics comes up.
It is SO EASY to spank them silly with facts by comparison because they have done no research and have no critical thinking skills. Of course, if either of those were the case, they would probably run as far from the GOP as they could as fast as they could.
EDITED: To add a big Thank You.
Uncle Joe
(65,089 posts)Thanks for the thread, Pretzel_Warrior.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Live in the real world and despise facts and evidence.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)and how the churches and families used to do it--now it's the goddamm gubmit. I referenced poverty levels of elderly in 1930's vs. today and the policy studies that show this is 99.8% related to Social Security program. A large federal government program that works exceedingly well. I provided a link to AARP data on it.
Thus far...crickets.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)LukeFL
(594 posts)You know when facts are not on their side they scream and call you names. They have called me everything in the book.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)he has gone radio silent since my reply to him
mnhtnbb
(33,337 posts)I have a SIL who is one of them. Some years ago, after I called her out
on checking her facts, she told me she wasn't interested in a history
lesson or facts, she just agreed with the opinion being presented
(based on false 'data', of course).
So, it's worth testing the waters with someone to see if they are interested
in new information, facts, etc., but once you get the kind of response
I did from my SIL, it's not worth beating your head against the wall
any longer with people who are ignorant and proud of it.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)DU has been my #1 source of news for over a decade now. Perhaps all that is posted here is not factual, but if you sift thru the aggregate of info here, you tend to have a much clearer picture of things than if you single-sourced it elsewhere.
DU has made me the smartest guy in the room when it comes to debate outside of DU. Inside of DU, I am a grasshopper (i.e. Kung Fu-speak for "one who is always learning"
.
sheshe2
(97,506 posts)Thanks for the thread P_W.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Poll_Blind
(23,864 posts)PB
liberal N proud
(61,194 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)about any issues that occur. it's mindblowing what a hive mind we have here with so many people sharing links to important news and research.
There is much theoretical research on collective intelligence utilizing the internet and computers to connect groups who are then more intelligent than they would have been.
http://cci.mit.edu/
It would be interesting to see how this could become even more structured at DU than it already is.
Uncle Joe
(65,089 posts)While people have talked about collective intelligence for decades, new communication technologiesespecially the Internetnow allow huge numbers of people all over the planet to work together in new ways. The recent successes of systems like Google and Wikipedia suggest that the time is now ripe for many more such systems, and the goal of the MIT Center for Collective Intelligence is to understand how to take advantage of these possibilities.
Our basic research question is: How can people and computers be connected so thatcollectivelythey act more intelligently than any individuals, groups, or computers have ever done before?'
The Center for Collective Intelligence brings together faculty from across MIT to conduct research on how new communications technologies are changing the way people work together.
Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)are like ideological brothers as compared to the idiot brigade that is so loud a presence within those other venues.
It is good to recognize such things from time to time.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I don't know if you've turned over a new leaf or if you're just scared of the new hidden post rules, but I must admit that ever since I saw your self-deprecating post in that rules thread I've grown a wee bit fond of you.
Just a wee bit.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)which "Rules" thread? The one where Skinner announces new rules? heheh.
I was always this way to a point....and I did get a post hidden because I was wishing ill of conservative house members. oh well.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)When you said "behavior modification" I pictured you wearing a shock collar like those for dogs.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)doc03
(39,075 posts)the other side. It is pointless to debate with a right winger, they believe what the
Republican noise machine tells them and can't be convinced otherwise.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)There used to be a saying in the Science Fiction community, AKICF, All Knowledge Is Contained In Fandom, that's nearly true for DU, there are experts here on a remarkable range of subjects who are willing to share their expertise.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Curmudgeoness
(18,219 posts)or debunk Republican talking points....and I would never have the information that I need to do it without everything that I read here.
This place rocks.
tclambert
(11,191 posts)Regular people (and more so with Republican types) don't debate with facts and subtle complexities. They argue with sound bites, false facts, irrelevancies, and changing the subject if they feel their worldview threatened. Mention Bush's idiocies and they'll bring up Reagan, claiming he cut taxes and created a booming economy while simultaneously and single-handedly dismantling the Soviet Union.
9/11 was all Clinton's fault, by the way, 'cause George W. Bush had barely begun his Presidency when it happened. One guy actually said that to me. I pointed out he took the oath of office on Jan. 20th, 2001, 7 3/4 months before 9/11. He disagreed, claiming Bush took office late, delayed by Al Gore's challenging the election results! And he would not consider looking it up anywhere to check this "fact." He insisted he remembered it himself and didn't need any other reference than his own memory. How do you even hold a discussion with people like that?
valerief
(53,235 posts)Amazing.
mnhtnbb
(33,337 posts)ffr
(23,393 posts)pick a partner who is better than you. That is what we have here on DU. A lot of deep thinking deductive thought process people. You're bound to get smarter by playing up to their level.
And it'll keep your debate skills sharp.
MrScorpio
(73,772 posts)But somehow, that has worked for me
TxDemChem
(1,924 posts)We have no problem fact checking each other and requesting valid sources. I had to get on a coworker about the ACA today. She still doesn't know what hit her. Apparently, she's heard nothing but bad things about the rates people have been getting.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Hoperully our being informed due to DU and our willingness to engage will help others get more factual understanding what is happening around them.
TxDemChem
(1,924 posts)Warpy
(114,595 posts)because he starts to splutter and babble down his ditto list for red herrings and then namecall.
That's when you know they can't cite a source because they know "I heard it on the radio" sounds silly, even to them.
bhikkhu
(10,789 posts)Usually I try to have all my ducks in a row and a handful of references in my back pocket (a good habit I learned in college), but then I still am surprised sometimes, and the conversations are generally informative. Sometimes I find that I'm wrong, or haven't really understood someone's perspective, which are mind-building things to realize. Along with my 8k posts or so, there are probably another 8k times I hit "reply" and began to write, then realized I needed more information to make an effective statement (knowing I'd be called on it), then rushed off in search of back-up, only to find that I was actually wrong. More posts abandoned than posted.
DU can drive me to distraction sometimes, but I believe that it does help to make us all more effective.
On occasion I read other forums elsewhere, and the most striking difference is that lack of real discussion, the lack of critical thinking, and (most discouraging and all too often) the absence of facts.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)K & R
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Buddaman
(503 posts)And yep, there's a lot of political savvy here.
Bluzmann57
(12,336 posts)I know I'm not the most educated man the world has ever seen, but I have learned a LOT here since 2002 or so.