Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 03:41 AM Oct 2013

Am I getting this right?

Many states (all freaking Red) refuse to take the Medicaid dollars from the Fed in order to provide subsidies for those who qualify for them..

Doesn’t this practically negate much of punch the AHA will have in these states...

And can’t the funds being rejected by those idiots be turned around and poured into the states already receiving them
in order to make their programs even stronger.? And point out the strengths even more adamantly .

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Am I getting this right? (Original Post) busterbrown Oct 2013 OP
yup, all the poor folk in many Southern states won't get any help quinnox Oct 2013 #1
Not an oversight... Wounded Bear Oct 2013 #5
Yeah, southern states like Wisconsinsin! Scuba Oct 2013 #8
hospitals hate this greymattermom Oct 2013 #2
Yes. Republican states have screwed their poor residents. Again. Recursion Oct 2013 #3
Yup Egnever Oct 2013 #4
But Christ this is so transparent and mean- hearted .. busterbrown Oct 2013 #6
I feel for the poor people Politicalboi Oct 2013 #7
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
1. yup, all the poor folk in many Southern states won't get any help
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 03:45 AM
Oct 2013

or benefits, it is a huge oversight. And many of them are poor blacks, by the way. I just read a news article saying that actually.

greymattermom

(5,751 posts)
2. hospitals hate this
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 03:47 AM
Oct 2013

because they still have to supply ER services. The next thing will be hospitals closing in red states, or demanding to charge states for ER services for the uninsured.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
3. Yes. Republican states have screwed their poor residents. Again.
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 03:49 AM
Oct 2013

With the help of the Supreme Court.

This does reduce the number of people who will get coverage (which would include free wellness and preventive care), which kind of undermines the entire point of the law.

 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
4. Yup
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 03:52 AM
Oct 2013

Very short sighted on many levels of these governors. I feel for the people of those states that fall in the gap.

At least people in those states who do fall into the gap are immune from the penalty.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
6. But Christ this is so transparent and mean- hearted ..
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 03:59 AM
Oct 2013

I feel most in these states don’t understand the relationship between the Medicaid infusions and its relationship to the ACA.. If they did I think the people of these states would be in the streets and on their Capitol’s steps..

And sadly the ones who feel comfortable being dumb will just say.”you see it just doe not work”..

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
7. I feel for the poor people
Sat Oct 5, 2013, 04:58 AM
Oct 2013

But a lot of those poor people voted for this, not really knowing they were poor too. Eventually something must and will be done, but maybe this is a good hard lesson come 2014. If some have to wait till next election, maybe they'll think twice about voting for the assholes that denied them health care. We've all waited this long. They may have to reap what they have sown.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Am I getting this right?