General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI think we should take the short term deal now that cuts to Obamacare is off the table ..
We have already given everything up we can - so there isn't much more that pukes can get ...
So I think this is really a face saving maneuver for them and we should let them.
If they act smart -then we are back to where we currently are and the ball will be back in their court.
Agree?
wilt the stilt
(4,528 posts)I think they are caving. now play hardball. 1 year cr and budget ceiling.
Buddha_of_Wisdom
(373 posts)No. I want a full term deal and 95% cut on both of the Republican porks - MIC and Oil & Gas. Divert the funds to social programs and jobs creation.
And then I want the Republicans to resign en-masse creating vacancies that can give the gavel to Pelosi. The replacements will be about 75% Democratic.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Little Star
(17,055 posts)and they can figure their own way out. Dumb asses they are.
But the president knows more than I do and I will support any decision he makes.
Response to Little Star (Reply #3)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
displacedtexan
(15,696 posts)Hell, no. No deals with these assholes.
Response to displacedtexan (Reply #20)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
jberryhill
(62,444 posts)Yeah, let's do this again in a few weeks instead of running a country and growing an economy.
How about R's actually negotiate the freaking budget itself over the next year, eh?
cali
(114,904 posts)House Republicans gathered Thursday morning to discuss a plan to lift the governments statutory borrowing limit temporarily to allow for negotiations on a package of deficit reduction and tax reform proposals that could lead to a reopening of the government and an end to the threat of government default.
House Republican leaders jumped on the plan, presented on Wednesday by Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, chairman of the House Budget Committee. Meantime, a group of Republican senators has begun meeting with Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the Republican leader, to find a bipartisan solution to the twin fiscal impasses.
The senators are examining a year-long resolution funding the government at levels that reflect automatic spending cuts known as sequestration, but with added flexibility to help government agencies and departments deal with the tight budgets. The debt ceiling would also be raised.
A repeal of a tax on medical devices would lend a face-saving fig leaf for conservatives trying to take a bite out of the presidents health care law. And Republicans are eying new income verification procedures to limit access to the health exchanges under the new law.
<snip>
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/11/us/politics/debt-limit-debate.html
Response to cali (Reply #5)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)WhAt do you mean cooling off period. Geeeeez
lostincalifornia
(5,431 posts)without telling me to "grow the fuck" that says very little for your persuasion skills.
After listening to the rethugs press conference I have reconsidered that extension is futile. The only solution is demand a clean bill period. You cannot deal with dishonest people
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Where? Anywhere in my post did I fuckin address YOU.
Response to seabeyond (Reply #29)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)Response to seabeyond (Reply #36)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)But if they offer a straight up short term debt limit increase with no strings, Dems/Obama should take it even if there is no clean CR passes to open the government.
trumad
(41,692 posts)ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)boston bean
(36,944 posts)I would prefer he not accept. but if he doesn't, the blame could easily begin to shift to dems.
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)We would face the identical problem soon, and by then they would come up with a whole new attack that would potentially be even worse.
walkerbait41
(302 posts)On Oct. 17 we may lose the other haft NO DEAL NO WAY NEVER
Response to walkerbait41 (Reply #11)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
BumRushDaShow
(170,766 posts)which was NOT included in the "deal"? Where hundreds of thousands of us are not getting a fucking paycheck?
Response to BumRushDaShow (Reply #21)
lostincalifornia This message was self-deleted by its author.
Myrina
(12,296 posts)n/t
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)No.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)It staves off default but does not open the government.
jsr
(7,712 posts)BumRushDaShow
(170,766 posts)AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)Extortionists should never be allowed to save face.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)That's the only way.
They have the votes to do it. So, DO IT!
ZRT2209
(1,357 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)so I think its a done deal... if no strings.
TBF
(36,881 posts)Repeat after me:
I WILL NOT NEGOTIATE WITH TERRORISTS
No deal.
Blue Owl
(59,332 posts)I say ZERO sympathy for these treasonous criminals and their evil plans.
ZERO.
Kablooie
(19,115 posts)It gives the Republicans the upper hand because they still hold all the guns to the country's head and it guarantees at least a month more of world financial unease over the repeat of this whole debacle.
TroglodyteScholar
(5,477 posts)The ACA was always off the table. Just because House thugs wanted it there...well, that means squat. It. Is. Law.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)onyourleft
(726 posts)We really don't need to have this scenario again in a few weeks.