European Network of Scientists isssue statement: No scientific consensus on GMO safety
http://www.ensser.org/increasing-public-information/no-scientific-consensus-on-gmo-safety/....
1. There is no consensus on GM food safety
2. There are no epidemiological studies investigating potential effects of GM food consumption on human health
3. Claims that scientific and governmental bodies endorse GMO safety are exaggerated or inaccurate
4. EU research project does not provide reliable evidence of GM food safety
5. List of several hundred studies does not show GM food safety
6. There is no consensus on the environmental risks of GM crops
7. International agreements show widespread recognition of risks posed by GM foods and crops
...
Conclusion
In the scope of this document, we can only highlight a few examples to illustrate that the totality of scientific research outcomes in the field of GM crop safety is nuanced, complex, often contradictory or inconclusive, confounded by researchers’ choices, assumptions, and funding sources, and in general, has raised more questions than it has currently answered.
Whether to continue and expand the introduction of GM crops and foods into the human food and animal feed supply, and whether the identified risks are acceptable or not, are decisions that involve socioeconomic considerations beyond the scope of a narrow scientific debate and the currently unresolved biosafety research agendas. These decisions must therefore involve the broader society. They should, however, be supported by strong scientific evidence on the long-term safety of GM crops and foods for human and animal health and the environment, obtained in a manner that is honest, ethical, rigorous, independent, transparent, and sufficiently diversified to compensate for bias.
Decisions on the future of our food and agriculture should not be based on misleading and misrepresentative claims that a “scientific consensus” exists on GMO safety.
= new reply since forum marked as read
GMO debate here in Belgium is very current, and I contribute to it. Can use this 
The 2nd on the list, Arnaud Apoteker, has a funny name since Apoteker is dutch for Pharmacist, so I was thinking hmm could be a fake name. Went to check, he campaigns against GMOs for the European Greens in Parliament, so legit.
Thanks again! 
Big Ag, Inc., Big Gene, Inc. and Big Chem, Inc. have been performing a massive OCCULT experiment -- with unpredictable results -- on human beings who have not given their consent, and who have not even been accorded the basic respect of being told that they are EXperimental subjects.
Their Mutant chemicalized foodlike "products" will have consequences.
And they are the same whackjobs who say GMO foodlike crapola should remain OCCULTLY unlabeled. What does that tell you?
