General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThis message was self-deleted by its author
This message was self-deleted by its author (WillyT) on Tue Oct 22, 2013, 09:08 PM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Who the fuck is saying that???
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I don't know, man....
darkangel218
(13,985 posts)Wtf!!!
BluegrassStateBlues
(881 posts)ScreamingMeemie
(68,918 posts)I neither adore nor hate our President, but this is getting nutso. Like really crazy nutso even... I voted for him and only will vote for the D, but come on man.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)The United States on Tuesday defended drone strikes targeting al-Qaida operatives and others it deems enemies, rejecting reports by two human-rights groups questioning the legality of strikes they asserted have killed or wounded scores of civilians in Yemen and Pakistan.
Human Rights Watch alleged that 82 people, at least 57 of them civilians, were killed by the unmanned aircraft and other aerial strikes in Yemen between September 2012 and June 2013 and called such strikes unlawful or indiscriminate. Amnesty International called on the U.S. to investigate reports in Pakistan of civilian casualties, among them a 68-year-old grandmother hit while farming with her grandchildren.
The New York-based Human Rights Watch said such strikes are unlawful or indiscriminate. Amnesty, based in London, said it is concerned that the attacks outlined in the report and others may have resulted in unlawful killings that constitute extrajudicial executions or war crimes.
http://world.time.com/2013/10/22/amnesty-international-and-human-rights-watch-blast-u-s-drone-strikes/
This is what human rights group amnesty international thinks anyhow. Don't shoot the messenger.
Bonobo
(29,257 posts)The US is not "at war".
pa28
(6,145 posts)Can you dismiss the entire record of a president and his legacy through the lens of generally accepted definitions of war crimes?
If you want to make FDR a racist villain while putting president Obama on a pedestal that would seem to be a very tricky balancing act indeed.