General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhoa. I just fact-corrected someone on DU and, instead of digging in deeper, they agreed with me.
I'm a little taken back. I expect more hysterics and rhetorical theatrics from an internet discussion board.
Usually when I point out someone's inaccurate hyperbole, the response is to double down on their factlessness ("Well, I watch a LOT of PBS and I've seen incontrovertible evidence of alien influence on our Bill of Rights in dozens of documentaries--documentaries, might I add, with British-sounding narrators!" or they to try to justify their wild arguments with spurious lines of logic ("Oh really? And do you know just how many people have died of lung cancer since 1960? Far more than Hitler killed in the Holocaust, buddy-boy! And so, objectively speaking, second hand smoking is far worse than Naziism and Stalinism combined." .
Instead, however, one logical DUer today defied all my predispositions and simply conceded the point when confronted with facts. Frankly, I don't know what to do with this moment.
Perhaps I'll cry.
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)Unfortunately, I haven't had the same luck, generally speaking. I don't know what it is about me, really, but, for some reason, it's always been a lot harder for me to win people over with objective facts & reasoned opinions, even with loads of evidence supporting them.
11 Bravo
(23,926 posts)Bucky
(53,997 posts)And I didn't want to spoil the moment.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Enjoy the experience...It may not come again for awhile.
cali
(114,904 posts)yesterday someone called me on something I put in my OP and I, gasp, thanked them for calling me on it and changed it.
Uncle Joe
(58,349 posts)Thanks for t.he thread, Bucky
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I've both seen it and done it before. Glad you have seen it now as well.