Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Frank Pallone: I will not yield to this monkey court! (Original Post) Dwayne Hicks Oct 2013 OP
And this is why JustAnotherGen Oct 2013 #1
Pallone is right on the mark Zambero Oct 2013 #2
Pallone hysterically blocked a perfectly reasonable line of questioning. proverbialwisdom Oct 2013 #3
What? Dwayne Hicks Oct 2013 #5
I'd like the question answered in full and any deficiencies fixed ASAP. Do you claim perfection? nt proverbialwisdom Oct 2013 #6
Your concern is noted. truebluegreen Oct 2013 #8
No one is claiming perfection. Dwayne Hicks Oct 2013 #9
As to your second question, for a law as sweeping as the ACA to function truebluegreen Oct 2013 #7
The bill has ~1990 pages, large font, large margins ... 11 billion words, hardly. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #11
I've read the ACA ... that word count is nonsense and only a fool would believe it. JoePhilly Oct 2013 #10
Too bad Dwayne Hicks Oct 2013 #4

Zambero

(9,990 posts)
2. Pallone is right on the mark
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 12:08 PM
Oct 2013

I predict that these hearings and the longstanding anti-ACA GOP hissy-fit will have unintended consequences for the naysayers.

Four things slow-to-learn Republicans should NEVER do (or face the consequences of doing them):

Shut down the government
Impeach
Allow electronic devices into by-invitation-only deep pocket fundraising events
Lie and deceive, lest the truth come back to haunt them

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
3. Pallone hysterically blocked a perfectly reasonable line of questioning.
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 12:11 PM
Oct 2013

Specifically, some 'teabagger' demanded an explanation for the required consent during the application process to "no reasonable expectation of privacy.' Really?

Earlier, some 'teabagger' counted the number of words in the ACA - over 11 billion and wondered why. So do I.

proverbialwisdom

(4,959 posts)
6. I'd like the question answered in full and any deficiencies fixed ASAP. Do you claim perfection? nt
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 12:25 PM
Oct 2013
 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
7. As to your second question, for a law as sweeping as the ACA to function
Thu Oct 24, 2013, 12:27 PM
Oct 2013

it has to revise every single statute it impacts. That said, I have doubts about your "11 billion words" talking point, given that 1 billion seconds is more than 31 years, and 11 billion seconds is 348.576411 years. I wonder how long it takes to "count" to 11 billion.

But that would certainly explain why "nobody read it."

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Frank Pallone: I will not...