General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFeinstein: "Totally Opposed" to spying on world leaders, wants "total review" of intel programs
The revelations require a "total review of intelligence programs," Feinstein said in a statement.
Unlike NSAs collection of phone records under a court order, it is clear to me that certain surveillance activities have been in effect for more than a decade and that the Senate Intelligence Committee was not satisfactorily informed," she said. "Therefore our oversight needs to be strengthened and increased."
Feinstein added that it was "a big problem" that President Obama was not aware of the surveillance. The administration has assured Feinstein that the surveillance would not continue, she said.
Unless the United States is engaged in hostilities against a country or there is an emergency need for this type of surveillance, I do not believe the United States should be collecting phone calls or emails of friendly presidents and prime ministers. The president should be required to approve any collection of this sort."
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/feinstein-i-am-totally-opposed-to-surveilling-foreign-leaders
SamYeager
(309 posts)BluegrassStateBlues
(881 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Now you know they over reached
TDale313
(7,820 posts)That the NSA was likely spying on veryimportantpeople like, oh I don't know, Senators and Congresscritters and their spouses and not just us peons?
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Yup
Uncle Joe
(59,570 posts)in the late 60s and early 70s they would have known this.
There could no national security reason for doing this but for political black mail purposes.
This same will take place with the meta data collection of us peons.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)That very little of this is about keeping us safe. It's about political power and it's about a national security apparatus that's making some people a hell of a lot of money.
DURHAM D
(32,771 posts)AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)been authorized by her and her Senate Committee while knowing that the NSA would used such funds to spy upon us?
Does she and her fellow Senators on her Committee perceive that the United States is engaging in hostiliities towards us? Is this what justifies such expenditures?
Rex
(65,616 posts)It doesn't make for good PR.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)She will make them eat their lunch money, in front of her!
Mass
(27,315 posts)mike_c
(36,281 posts)Just keep the NSA's mits of the ruling class.
Hekate
(93,385 posts)as I said in another thread.
And yes, when DiFi wakes up, you've gone way too far. I believe the consolidated intelligence systems were set to run on autopilot (why Obama really didn't know -- his opinion and input were not deemed important, right?).
My other post. I'm really furious.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=633743
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Did she talk to Clapper at all?
Ron Wyden was trying to warn them for several years. Why didn't she release him from the gag order they are all under? She never asked questions, just 'trusted' a Republican to do the right thing. Well he did do the 'Right' thing as could be expected.
Sounds more like it is the world wide repercussions she is trying to handle rather than the spying.
As for the 'allies' they were spying on, some of them deserve it for the way they treated truth tellers on behalf of the US. Now maybe they have learned that being puppets hoping for 'special relationships' with a Major Super Power wasn't such a good idea after all.
Rex
(65,616 posts)THAT should be what worries voters...that the NSA was monitoring Congress and not the other way around!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)If that turns out to be true, that is a serious problem.
Rex
(65,616 posts)If you give no oversight, then expect not to be informed about anything of real importance imo. We de-regulate the markets and D.C. and THIS is what we end up with. Kabuki theater in Congress.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)Congressional oversight of the NSA is a joke. I should know, I'm in Congress.
I've learned far more about government spying on citizens from the media than I have from official intelligence briefings.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/25/nsa-no-congress-oversight
fredamae
(4,458 posts)was this so epitomizes the depth of own their intentional ignorance...She Supports having the peasants monitored.
Why do we allow them to continue holding Us to a much higher standard of law than they are willing to hold themselves?
This arrogance is rampant in both parties.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)But leave Merkel alone.....
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)if the NSA is spying on us. When she finds out they are spying on the elite, she has a fit. She needs to be primaried.
markpkessinger
(8,514 posts)woo me with science
(32,139 posts)kentuck
(112,188 posts)She can't make up her mind. They have no idea what the NSA is doing. A total bunch of incompetents.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)purporting to rein the spying in, while actually granting new spying powers in the fine print.
She has already shown who she is. Believe her.