Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:02 PM Oct 2013

This message was self-deleted by its author

This message was self-deleted by its author (darkangel218) on Wed Oct 30, 2013, 02:45 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.

385 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This message was self-deleted by its author (Original Post) darkangel218 Oct 2013 OP
Ah jeez. This is why we need single payer n/t leftstreet Oct 2013 #1
Maybe. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #2
Prostate cancer screenings should be covered as well. Fight for that one. Not against the other. NoOneMan Oct 2013 #96
Not unless the available screening tests improve actual outcomes. pnwmom Oct 2013 #230
Even single-payer systems have to determine what is "necessary" NoOneMan Oct 2013 #85
first, why are you believing the poster that can't even spell pregnancy or maternity correctly? CreekDog Oct 2013 #214
I'm not geriatric so take that off, too!!!! elehhhhna Oct 2013 #3
actually the old pay more dsc Oct 2013 #5
What are your thoughts on my OP though? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #9
I think it normally should be on health insurance policies dsc Oct 2013 #12
Do you not understand that society as a whole benefits when everyone gets health care? Lars39 Oct 2013 #4
Carrying pregnancy to term is not a disease. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #6
Iirc, you're studying to be a nurse...surely you know that pregnant women need to be Lars39 Oct 2013 #13
They CHOSE to carry the pregnancy to term. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #15
My brother died of prostate cancer because he didn't have insurance at a critical time. Lars39 Oct 2013 #18
I'm not dogging anything! my OP was clear, we are talking about the ACA darkangel218 Oct 2013 #19
Sorry, I don't find the topic at all amusing. Lars39 Oct 2013 #21
My topic wasnt meant to be amusing. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #22
I will type slower then. Everyone's medical needs should be covered. Male and female. Lars39 Oct 2013 #23
Term pregnency is done by choice. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #25
And a healthy outcome for both is best for this country. Lars39 Oct 2013 #28
Both dont exist in the current ACA darkangel218 Oct 2013 #32
Then work towards "free" prostate exams instead of advocating sexual discrimination towards women Lars39 Oct 2013 #36
So work to change it and stop being nasty to your fellow DUers. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #259
you're studying to be a nurse and can't even spell pregnancy? CreekDog Oct 2013 #241
and repeatedly misspelling "breasts" as "breats" Heddi Oct 2013 #298
It's covered, and it's optional. I'll be opting out by NOT HAVING CHILDREN. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #258
Looks like she's going to be one hostile nurse Hekate Oct 2013 #240
Her screen name has no bearing to how she will be as a nurse. Arcanetrance Oct 2013 #380
Its not a disease but it IS a medical condition with huge health ramifications. phleshdef Oct 2013 #165
Driving a car isn't a disease, and yet people can get seriously injured pnwmom Oct 2013 #231
When it's a public service and not a consumer product, society as a whole will begin to benefit. 1000words Oct 2013 #7
+1 leftstreet Oct 2013 #8
I agree, but this is what we have to work with at the moment. Lars39 Oct 2013 #14
We all benefit from women having children. Nye Bevan Oct 2013 #10
You forgot the sarcasm tag. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #11
no he didn't forget the sarcasm tag. it's true. CreekDog Oct 2013 #300
Theyll also use our resources and burn oil NoOneMan Oct 2013 #105
Exactly, they can have "our" debt and have to live with "our" mistakes, but they can't take hughee99 Oct 2013 #126
More mouths to feed. More oil to burn. NoOneMan Oct 2013 #137
Leaving aside the impracticality of preventing people from having children GLOBALLY, hughee99 Oct 2013 #211
WHUT? SMC22307 Oct 2013 #16
Whut what??? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #17
Suck up and deal. SMC22307 Oct 2013 #31
Suck it up and deal... darkangel218 Oct 2013 #33
Going for that fifth hidden post? HERVEPA Oct 2013 #38
Alert on it. good luck . darkangel218 Oct 2013 #44
I've been here since January, but thanks. Ooh, lookie... SMC22307 Oct 2013 #42
Well the ACA does allow smokers to be charged up to twice as much as non-smokers. n/t PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #202
No. It is not. Cerridwen Oct 2013 #20
So a percentage of women may not be informed in how to prevent pregnancy. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #24
Would you please type in complete sentences Cerridwen Oct 2013 #34
You know exatly what im reffering to. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #40
No. I didn't. Or I would not have asked. Cerridwen Oct 2013 #49
You need remedial English and/or typing. Probably both. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #260
She's not originally from the US. tammywammy Oct 2013 #269
Well if she's a nursing student she needs to get up to speed, because it's seriously impacting kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #280
oh, it's a logical way to disrupt CreekDog Oct 2013 #303
she spells things right CreekDog Oct 2013 #302
it's really distracting when you claim medical expertise and constantly misspell medical terminology CreekDog Oct 2013 #301
and even then, only to a certain amount of time. Puzzledtraveller Oct 2013 #278
ROFLMAO. Brickbat Oct 2013 #26
ROFLLMAO to the men who die of prostate cancer. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #29
ROFLMAO to your assertion "every full-term baby is a choice." Brickbat Oct 2013 #47
It is a choice. Adults should be responsible for it. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #52
If every pregnancy is a choice, consider the fetus a dependent and that should help you make sense Brickbat Oct 2013 #90
A fetus wasn't always a fetus. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #102
Sounds a lot more like an anti-choice troll than anything else. The only nurses I know that think kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #261
ACA mandates non-discrimination between sexes... Deep13 Oct 2013 #27
Yes it does. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #30
look it up where? nt Deep13 Oct 2013 #35
And that means that medical conditions will be covered pnwmom Oct 2013 #232
so is ruining your liver with drink. I would rather pay for the baby, but accept that stuff bettyellen Oct 2013 #37
DKF MattBaggins Oct 2013 #39
DKF, is that you? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #41
I've heard this kind of story before CreekDog Oct 2013 #305
DKF posted without histrionics... SMC22307 Oct 2013 #51
Im not deleting anything. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #108
Famous last words. SMC22307 Oct 2013 #115
Bye bye. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #119
I *ain't* going anywhere for a while. SMC22307 Oct 2013 #123
oh come on CreekDog Oct 2013 #309
wow. i was born genetically healthy and have continued being healthy all my life not using medical seabeyond Oct 2013 #43
Bullshit!!! Pregnancy is NOT a pre existing condition!! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #46
high risk activity is an option. ergo, we should not have to ever pay for people injured seabeyond Oct 2013 #45
ACA is not covering for men's prostate cancer screenings darkangel218 Oct 2013 #48
wtf does that have to do with you demanding not to pay cost of preg? seabeyond Oct 2013 #50
Everything!!! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #53
that is about stupid. who got the woman pregnant? a ghost? are you really saying men have no part seabeyond Oct 2013 #56
Pregnancy shouldnt override prostate and breast cancer!!!! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #58
in all your brilliance, tell me why they are not (f in fact they are not) paying for prostate and seabeyond Oct 2013 #62
Whaaa back at you, seabeyond! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #64
As pointed out in another thread, prostate exams are done in yearly physicals Lars39 Oct 2013 #67
Further exams are not covered. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #73
Um, no that mammo on a 29 yo breast would not be free or very low cost. Lars39 Oct 2013 #80
That's not a screening mammogram. That's a diagnostic mammogram. I assume it's not free. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #263
It should be a choice but for far too many it is not MadrasT Oct 2013 #54
Are you aware that men dont get free screenings for breast and prostate cancer under the ACA? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #55
Perhaps the American Cancer Society should weigh in on male breast cancer... SMC22307 Oct 2013 #79
This poster and her ignorance are a perfect example of why "a little bit of knowledge is kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #264
I don't watch ESPN on my cable network, but I have to have it regardless. cynatnite Oct 2013 #57
Watching ESPN doesnt prevent you from watching lets say MSNBC darkangel218 Oct 2013 #60
Totally fair analogy... cynatnite Oct 2013 #63
So how you explain then that the ACA does not offer prostate cancer screenings?? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #65
Well, the federal government has changed their guidelines about PSA testing... cynatnite Oct 2013 #70
Are you just talking about the PSA? tammywammy Oct 2013 #71
Oh and one more thing... cynatnite Oct 2013 #66
Well, then lets pay for it. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #69
I haven't read that women only are getting preventative care. n/t cynatnite Oct 2013 #72
Men so far arent getting any free breats or prostate cancer exams. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #75
Let me make this clear... cynatnite Oct 2013 #82
You are wrong about that. Lars39 Oct 2013 #86
A simple exam cant determine / diagnose cancer. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #92
The PSA does more harm than good. cynatnite Oct 2013 #95
No, but that exam can find a mass, at which point diagnostic testing IS covered, dipshit. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #267
Men get a free annual physical the same as women. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #265
And it's a bad system that will eventually end, as more and more people will be able to just buy PoliticAverse Oct 2013 #204
On paper, yes. In terms of the law, yes. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #59
Whats fair is fair. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #61
Men have the same chance for health care. pnwmom Oct 2013 #234
Take it up with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on the prostate screening tammywammy Oct 2013 #68
EVERYTHING that requires medical care should be covered. PERIOD. Blaukraut Oct 2013 #74
So far is not. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #77
I know, and it sucks. My personal ideal would be the equivalent of NHS in Britain Blaukraut Oct 2013 #89
Useless tests that are proven statistically to have no value are OF COURSE not covered. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #270
Tell me about the history of breast cancer research. Cerridwen Oct 2013 #76
Women's prostate cancer??? when did i ever say that?? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #84
You mentioned prostate cancer as exclusive to men. Cerridwen Oct 2013 #106
I'm reading this thread and just shaking my head... Mother Of Four Oct 2013 #219
You're comparing apples and oranges. cyberswede Oct 2013 #78
1) No, not in a lot of cases LadyHawkAZ Oct 2013 #81
Prostate screenings and mammograms are covered Pab Sungenis Oct 2013 #83
No they are not. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #87
You clearly do not know what you are talking about. Lars39 Oct 2013 #91
I know VERY WELL what im talking about. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #93
You are ignoring the facts. n/t cynatnite Oct 2013 #98
No, you don't know what you're talking about. n/t tammywammy Oct 2013 #100
Sorry, I think feeding time is over for now. Lars39 Oct 2013 #104
YES THEY ARE! cynatnite Oct 2013 #94
Yes, they are. tammywammy Oct 2013 #97
How much does that cost, vs a mammogram??? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #111
you have some serious issues that have nothing to do with ACA Skittles Oct 2013 #210
According to Web MD what preventive tests get covered by insurance dflprincess Oct 2013 #362
They are with the insurance that I am buying from the exchange. phleshdef Oct 2013 #169
Depends on your insurance policy. mwooldri Oct 2013 #337
Recommended screenings are covered. LeftyMom Oct 2013 #88
Any further tests than the actual palpal exam done ONCE a year darkangel218 Oct 2013 #99
Well, when it's necessary because of the willful ignorance... n/t cynatnite Oct 2013 #101
Hey, you know what, if my pap smear comes back abnormal - not considered preventative tammywammy Oct 2013 #103
Pap smer is pretty clear, when a regular prostate exam is not. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #107
Your regular prostate exam is covered tammywammy Oct 2013 #109
BS!!! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #112
Men don't get breast cancer at nearly the same rate as women... cynatnite Oct 2013 #113
Not anymore, theyre not. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #122
Rates are still substantially lower for men... cynatnite Oct 2013 #132
So does testing for cancer. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #136
I was in the trenches for a lot of years... cynatnite Oct 2013 #140
ahem.... Lars39 Oct 2013 #142
You are failing to mention that it was determined to do more harm than good darkangel218 Oct 2013 #143
No, you said people "choose" to become pregnant in your OP. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #134
Some dont choose it. Most do. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #151
Let's focus instead on disingenuous statements ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #161
Is PSA testing covered?? yes or no? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #166
Prostate exams are covered. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #172
Not BS. I'm sorry you don't understand the facts. n/t tammywammy Oct 2013 #117
Im sorry you seem to be ignoring the facts. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #133
Mammograms for men: the recommendation is to NOT perform them. Chan790 Oct 2013 #238
There is not a discrepancy... cynatnite Oct 2013 #110
Thank you for spelling it out so clearly. n/t tammywammy Oct 2013 #114
I wish I had a chalkboard. LOL. n/t cynatnite Oct 2013 #118
The PSA levels is the ony test so far for prostate cancer!!!! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #116
That's not how insurance works... cynatnite Oct 2013 #121
No they are not. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #124
This is more than just costs... cynatnite Oct 2013 #128
The primary test for prostate cancer is the Digital Rectal Exam. LeftyMom Oct 2013 #129
Err, nope. Core biopsy is the definitive test for prostate cancer. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #274
You are usually retested to be sure of the original result. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #130
When the doctors feel something abnormal in the prostate, any diagnostic tests to evaluate it ARE kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #272
nice spelling CreekDog Oct 2013 #281
Please define "palpal exam". And please provide an explanation for your use of the kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #271
I don't believe for a second that prostrate exams aren't covered BainsBane Oct 2013 #120
The PSA, which is eqiluivalent of mammo, is not covered. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #131
Why don't you look up the facts about PSA testing? cynatnite Oct 2013 #135
Thats BS they came up with a year ago or so. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #139
Some do opt for the testing and some don't... cynatnite Oct 2013 #145
No. Nor should they. They get a rectal exam, and if there is a mass they get appropriate diagnostic kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #275
So you would prefer no human beings be born? BainsBane Oct 2013 #144
I shouldnt be forced to pay for maternity care. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #147
You already are paying for other people's health care... cynatnite Oct 2013 #149
The diference is They are getting the care, while my dad, brother, so, doesnt. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #153
You just fucking love all this, don't you? cynatnite Oct 2013 #167
No, im not a nurse. Im a nurse student. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #171
You are manipulative and disingenuous... cynatnite Oct 2013 #175
Up-thread this poster stated she had already done all her rounds... Mother Of Four Oct 2013 #220
...and then she refused to answer my direct question on it. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #253
That's "nursing student". And I am calling BS on that. You are far too ignorant to have kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #277
Nailed it! RiffRandell Oct 2013 #250
I thought your family was in Europe and you are here by yourself? n/t tammywammy Oct 2013 #150
My dad and brother are here. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #155
You are kinda embarrassing yourself now. cyberswede Oct 2013 #152
Then if a person made a choice to drive a car and got into an accident... Whisp Oct 2013 #195
You're a woman ? steve2470 Oct 2013 #384
Hell yes, prostrate exams should be covered! kiawah Oct 2013 #290
Are you also mercuryblues Oct 2013 #125
We need social health care. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #127
Oh mercuryblues Oct 2013 #154
These are no fucking misleading claims!!! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #157
"Prostate exams are not covered." ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #168
you are claiming mercuryblues Oct 2013 #209
This thread was entertaining for me. Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #138
Glad youre not a male darkangel218 Oct 2013 #141
I'm a male. Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #146
How great for you. please post more rabbit pics. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #148
Here's a rabbit with a wooden duck on its head: Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #156
I dont know. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #158
Deleted posts is a regular occurrence with this poster. n/t tammywammy Oct 2013 #160
Yes. Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #162
Not gonna happen! SMC22307 Oct 2013 #163
Don't be too sure... Make7 Oct 2013 #385
Of course pregnancy should be covered fishwax Oct 2013 #159
No they are not. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #164
No, you do your fucking homework... cynatnite Oct 2013 #170
You have no clue what you are talking about!! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #180
Did I ever say it was not being done? cynatnite Oct 2013 #182
My post is accurate. You've basically admitted as much. So do your own homework. fishwax Oct 2013 #174
She calls herself a nursing student... cynatnite Oct 2013 #176
Oh FFS. Warren DeMontague Oct 2013 #173
so, you are wrong on this thread. you have been told a number of times, a number of ways how wrong seabeyond Oct 2013 #177
Being told " wrong" by the same 2-3 people. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #181
keep telling yourself, or else how do you continue on with this facade. seabeyond Oct 2013 #185
How many links to qualified scientific research do you want? cynatnite Oct 2013 #193
This is the dumbest post on ACA and healthcare Whisp Oct 2013 #178
It's about time to count down to the self delete and whiny post in the lounge. LeftyMom Oct 2013 #179
Lol. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #184
I think I missed that part. n/t Whisp Oct 2013 #187
Sure. Same like months ago when you were calling me out. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #194
see ya in the funny papers! Whisp Oct 2013 #197
See you there rather darkangel218 Oct 2013 #198
You're digging in your heels after many people have pointed out where you're wrong. cyberswede Oct 2013 #190
+1. Uninformed, illogical, misogynistic... Nine Oct 2013 #186
And NEVER wrong, just like Sarah Palin. SMC22307 Oct 2013 #191
You must be refering tp yourself. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #196
Double down some more D... SMC22307 Oct 2013 #199
I think we need to keep playing with this one wherever she pops up. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #279
+1 gollygee Oct 2013 #248
Uh oh, now you've done it LittleBlue Oct 2013 #183
Enjoy your popcorn darkangel218 Oct 2013 #188
I'm joking about your cardinal sin LittleBlue Oct 2013 #200
as long as it is anti woman, you have your popcorn, dontcha.... what a man. seabeyond Oct 2013 #189
My OP wasnt anti women, btw. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #192
Ignore this person LittleBlue Oct 2013 #201
Self deleted. cyberswede Oct 2013 #205
I'll change it LittleBlue Oct 2013 #206
Thank you - that was very considerate. cyberswede Oct 2013 #207
The best current evidence is that prostate and breast cancer screenings are walletectomies MannyGoldstein Oct 2013 #203
For one thing, you're wrong about the screenings being covered as has already been pointed out. kcr Oct 2013 #208
Looks like the use of a purposefully oblique phrase instead of "SUCCESSFULLY HAVING A BABY" Turborama Oct 2013 #212
Oh yah? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #218
This reply is as disingenuous as your OP. Turborama Oct 2013 #222
Which is? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #223
Here... Turborama Oct 2013 #226
Im asking to prove that that my OP is disgebious by facts darkangel218 Oct 2013 #227
! Turborama Oct 2013 #235
you try to pit prostate cancer against pregnancy and then attempt to... CreekDog Oct 2013 #244
"disgebious" ? Sheldon Cooper Oct 2013 #245
Here's the definition: NealK Oct 2013 #297
Thanks for the translation. Sheldon Cooper Oct 2013 #307
Lol, it sure does. NealK Oct 2013 #310
Duzy! missingthebigdog Oct 2013 #334
LOL! Bobbie Jo Oct 2013 #341
single payer, single payer, single payer. We must have single payer. liberal_at_heart Oct 2013 #213
You win the thread LittleBlue Oct 2013 #216
Self-delete is a choice. I recommend it. n/t winter is coming Oct 2013 #215
No thanks. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #217
i guess the upside is 220 posts, 221, lol. not a single rec. not one recommend. do you know how seabeyond Oct 2013 #221
Awwww!!! im not here for recs!! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #225
then you came to the right place CreekDog Oct 2013 #246
What's the polite way to say "go fuck yourself"? Oh right... killbotfactory Oct 2013 #224
Somebody has issues. bravenak Oct 2013 #228
I think I love you JustAnotherGen Oct 2013 #256
Why thank you! bravenak Oct 2013 #284
Driving a car is a choice in this country, is it not? pnwmom Oct 2013 #229
Women's health issues has become big business in this country...so that's one cause of it davidn3600 Oct 2013 #233
For the record, before this is self-deleted: Heidi Oct 2013 #236
in before the self delete Change has come Oct 2013 #237
Well, aren't you special Hekate Oct 2013 #239
No. In state after state, it's no longer a choice. cali Oct 2013 #242
What a shamefully embarrassing thread. n/t myrna minx Oct 2013 #243
Be happy someone *chose* to continue carrying you to term. moriah Oct 2013 #247
luckily you don't have to worry about ACA once one enters the spirit world snooper2 Oct 2013 #249
How about overeating as a choice? Smoking? Drinking? Not exercising? Arugula Latte Oct 2013 #251
I would like to think this thread has corrected and educated you further. NCTraveler Oct 2013 #252
Unfortunately, I don't think so... ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #254
Spot on. nt. NCTraveler Oct 2013 #255
+1, excellent post. tammywammy Oct 2013 #266
About her nursing program Heddi Oct 2013 #304
That was pretty informative... Mother Of Four Oct 2013 #381
What kind of nursing student thinks that women's medical insurance should NOT cover pregnancy?? kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #257
one that can't spell pregnancy CreekDog Oct 2013 #276
And she invented something called a "palpal exam". That one's new to me. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #282
maybe it's a paypal exam? or a papal one, yeh that's the ticket! Whisp Oct 2013 #283
I was referring to tactile examination. Typed it in my native tongue by accident. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #289
Are you asking a question? Because here in the US we put a question mark at the end of a question. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #292
What the living FUCK is going on here at DU? PeaceNikki Oct 2013 #262
ever since Skinner allowed the mens group, unabashed misogyny La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2013 #286
This message was self-deleted by its author CreekDog Oct 2013 #308
The OP is not making sense to me. Not credible at all. I can't even keep the story straight. CreekDog Oct 2013 #311
Q to OP: Is a Fallopian tube a part inside a TV??? Yes or no? Manifestor_of_Light Oct 2013 #326
i think sometimes things dont make sense because they are nonsensical La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2013 #329
What an utterly repulsive and unDemocratic point of view. Whisp Oct 2013 #268
All I can say is... stevenleser Oct 2013 #273
you win this thread La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2013 #287
I obviously need more caffeine--took me two whole seconds to see that. niyad Oct 2013 #363
You may be right about this. Under the surface of that one I always suspected a true psycho lurked. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #371
being a woman is not a choice and medical care should cover all aspects of healthcare. nt La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2013 #285
Being a woman doesn't immediately means pregnancy or giving birth. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #312
one is part and parcel of healthcare of the other. just like prostate related issues are healthcare La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2013 #328
Not to get all Meta, but admins: DU would be a much better place without this poster. RiffRandell Oct 2013 #288
You gave up on attacking me in the Lounge and started here?? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #313
Not attacking, just stating the truth. nt RiffRandell Oct 2013 #333
I agree 100%. Dear Admins: DU would be a MUCH better place without this one. kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #372
truth. nt La Lioness Priyanka Oct 2013 #383
FFS ... SINGLE PAYER NOW. nt TBF Oct 2013 #291
Did you hatch from an egg Aerows Oct 2013 #293
And how does it all work? I seem to remember something about a *gasp* man being involved... Arugula Latte Oct 2013 #299
Our dads and brothers require care too. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #314
your dad and brother are covered!! missingthebigdog Oct 2013 #342
Moon bombing. nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #294
.... tammywammy Oct 2013 #295
It works on a few levels...check out the avatar. nt msanthrope Oct 2013 #322
LOL! n/t tammywammy Oct 2013 #325
So you're against maternity care, and FOR GUNS. How about taxes? DevonRex Oct 2013 #296
Im not against maternity care. I just think it should be optional since there is no free coverage darkangel218 Oct 2013 #315
So there has to be free coverage for every single kind of cancer screening gollygee Oct 2013 #319
No its not! blood tests are fairly inexpensive , and a lot cheaper darkangel218 Oct 2013 #321
Many cancer screening tests are free, including a screening for prostate cancer gollygee Oct 2013 #324
Prostate cancer is very prevelant among men, FYI. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #330
Prostate cancer screening is free gollygee Oct 2013 #331
Diagnostic testing is covered, toots. It's not automatically FREE, but it is subject to kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #373
But you said men shouldn't pay for maternity care since carrying to term is a choice. DevonRex Oct 2013 #379
This might be the craziest thread OP ever duffyduff Oct 2013 #306
I want women to have children. How did you get to the conclusion that i didnt??? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #317
The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few or the one. Rex Oct 2013 #316
What do you mean the needs of the many? darkangel218 Oct 2013 #318
WTF??????????? retread Oct 2013 #320
Yah Thats what i said when i found out ACA is not covering prostate cancer screenings. darkangel218 Oct 2013 #323
Post #298 fully explains why PSA is *not* recommended Lars39 Oct 2013 #327
and you're a nursing student who doesn't know why the screenings aren't recommended anymore CreekDog Oct 2013 #332
Yes it is. I think it's time for you to close up shop on ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #339
Dark. Texasgal Oct 2013 #335
hey texas. good to see you. and do you KNOW, that symptoms for a womans heart attack is different seabeyond Oct 2013 #338
it's CRAZY!!! Texasgal Oct 2013 #340
Post removed Post removed Oct 2013 #343
Here's the flameout! Phentex Oct 2013 #344
no thank you, you just are not my type. bye bye..... seabeyond Oct 2013 #345
Bye byw to you hater. Go insult someone else! darkangel218 Oct 2013 #349
You aren't a nurse. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #350
In one post she's a nursing student, and in others she is working in various kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #369
I thought you were getting ready for your 12 hour shift: demmiblue Oct 2013 #352
rollin eyes. byyyye. seabeyond Oct 2013 #355
Ummm..okay? Texasgal Oct 2013 #348
No, seabeyond, don't push that button! NuclearDem Oct 2013 #351
ya know... i had to push it. boom. nt seabeyond Oct 2013 #356
I'm surprised this train wreck hasn't been self - deleted yet. Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #336
Post removed Post removed Oct 2013 #346
You need to take a break. n/t tammywammy Oct 2013 #347
Yah? alert on my every single post like Heddi does :) darkangel218 Oct 2013 #353
Nevermind tammywammy Oct 2013 #354
i have to say that I am glad that Texasgal Oct 2013 #357
Passing bad medical info is really bad. tammywammy Oct 2013 #358
Word. Texasgal Oct 2013 #360
She is not. ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #361
What has happened here: ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #359
I'd like to set straight some of the lies this poster has told Heddi Oct 2013 #368
no you did not alert on her. i have never alerted on her. i have never cared about her. this is seabeyond Oct 2013 #374
I am hopeful that darkangel truly is "with the angels of DU" now... ScreamingMeemie Oct 2013 #375
I alerted on post #346. tammywammy Oct 2013 #376
What are you? Twelve years old?? kestrel91316 Oct 2013 #378
Well, she had three hidden posts today so her account is flagged for review. Vashta Nerada Oct 2013 #365
She deleted the spin off, I'm sure this one is next. LeftyMom Oct 2013 #366
She already did. Texasgal Oct 2013 #367
Her account has been flagged for review. tammywammy Oct 2013 #370
I really hate to be tacky and put this into a dollars & cents argument. dflprincess Oct 2013 #364
This message was self-deleted by its author lostincalifornia Oct 2013 #377
WTF? Are you stupid? If you are really a nurse, I hope I'll never be in your care :( tandot Oct 2013 #382

leftstreet

(40,681 posts)
1. Ah jeez. This is why we need single payer n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:06 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
2. Maybe.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:09 PM
Oct 2013

But its not fair to cover maternity care and not regular prostate cancer screenings for men.

Are they not important??

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
96. Prostate cancer screenings should be covered as well. Fight for that one. Not against the other.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:45 PM
Oct 2013

But then it also comes down to a question: is the efficiency at improving health outcomes with early or abundant screenings (at the cost of allocating funds from other services) cost-effective? Also, did you know that more men die with prostate cancer than from it? That's a strange thing to think about.

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
230. Not unless the available screening tests improve actual outcomes.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:35 AM
Oct 2013

It shouldn't be a matter of gender, but of how useful the screening is in terms of improving outcomes.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
85. Even single-payer systems have to determine what is "necessary"
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:41 PM
Oct 2013

Some systems deem gender change surgery and in vitro as necessary (I think Alberta has). Some do not. Here in BC guys can have their nuts tied up for free (I did). We can't have cavities filled for free, but tooth pulls are covered.

I don't have any issue deeming maternity as necessary personally; especially when the alternative to a 9 month term pregnancy is a risk of death (and illegal in many places)

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
214. first, why are you believing the poster that can't even spell pregnancy or maternity correctly?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:18 AM
Oct 2013

second, just because regular screenings aren't part of the minimum coverage, that doesn't mean no screenings would be covered if they are warranted, just that unnecessary screenings aren't covered, but screenings for breast cancer are needed based on the prevalence and seriousness of the disease.

 

elehhhhna

(32,076 posts)
3. I'm not geriatric so take that off, too!!!!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:11 PM
Oct 2013


lol

dsc

(53,397 posts)
5. actually the old pay more
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:15 PM
Oct 2013

which I take it doesn't bother you.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
9. What are your thoughts on my OP though?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:18 PM
Oct 2013

dsc

(53,397 posts)
12. I think it normally should be on health insurance policies
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:23 PM
Oct 2013

I do think that for the very small subset of people who are too poor for subsidies, they should get to forgo covering maternity on their policies. But otherwise, I do think pregnancy should be covered. I do agree with you on the other things that encourage children.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
4. Do you not understand that society as a whole benefits when everyone gets health care?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:13 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
6. Carrying pregnancy to term is not a disease.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:17 PM
Oct 2013

Prostate cancer on the other hand is. And the ACA does not cover prophylactic prostate screenings as they do with women's mammograms.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
13. Iirc, you're studying to be a nurse...surely you know that pregnant women need to be
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:27 PM
Oct 2013

medically monitored for all sorts of things so that they will have a healthy pregnancy. A healthy outcome for the mother and baby benefits society.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
15. They CHOSE to carry the pregnancy to term.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:30 PM
Oct 2013

That's not a disease!!! Its a choice , and it should be COVERED but optional!!

What about the MEN who will die if prostate cancer because their insurances doesn't offer free screenings???
Are you worried about them at all???

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
18. My brother died of prostate cancer because he didn't have insurance at a critical time.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:35 PM
Oct 2013

Of course it should be covered. You're dodging the truth that society as a whole will be healthier when everyone's, even pregnant women, health needs are taken care of.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
19. I'm not dogging anything! my OP was clear, we are talking about the ACA
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:38 PM
Oct 2013

Not an utopic health care system which may happen or not.

So.. Are you still okay with men not getting free prostate cancer screenings, but all women having maternity care covered? Lol.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
21. Sorry, I don't find the topic at all amusing.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:41 PM
Oct 2013

Medical needs of all people should be met. Period. Any thing else and we have become a country of selfish gits deciding we don't want to cover medical care because of race,sex, religion or orientation.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
22. My topic wasnt meant to be amusing.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:44 PM
Oct 2013

So you care about women getting pregnancy care but not about men getting free prostate screenings??

I'm trying to understand you.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
23. I will type slower then. Everyone's medical needs should be covered. Male and female.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:46 PM
Oct 2013

Can't get much plainer than that.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
25. Term pregnency is done by choice.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:48 PM
Oct 2013

In this country.

Cancer isn't.

How can I be more clear than that? You tell me.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
28. And a healthy outcome for both is best for this country.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:50 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
32. Both dont exist in the current ACA
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:54 PM
Oct 2013

That's why it needs to be changed.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
36. Then work towards "free" prostate exams instead of advocating sexual discrimination towards women
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:56 PM
Oct 2013
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
259. So work to change it and stop being nasty to your fellow DUers.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:10 PM
Oct 2013

Stop trying to make a boys vs girls fight out of something that should cover every person's medical needs.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
241. you're studying to be a nurse and can't even spell pregnancy?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:08 AM
Oct 2013

please. we weren't born yesterday.

also, it's not called "meternity" --you did that one in my thread.

oh and you spelled pap smear wrong too.

and you were already looking for nursing jobs you say?

oh well, i digress, as i was saying, yesterday, we weren't born then.

Heddi

(18,312 posts)
298. and repeatedly misspelling "breasts" as "breats"
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:39 PM
Oct 2013

I know when I was in and fresh out of nursing school I "knew it all" and had this insight into the world of medicine/healthcare that no one else in the world was privileged enough to have...but that kind of thinking generally sorts itself out sooner rather than later when you're being precepted for your first nursing job and you put your foot in your mouth and get your ass handed to you not kindly by an instructor, but quite nastily by an MD or more knowledgeable RN.

Anyone in a nursing program has, through their school, access to nearly every medical journal out there. And anyone who spends 2 minutes doing a literature search can see that the PSA is not part of routine preventative care for men because it has an incredibly high rate of false positives.

Physical exams for men over 60 or 65 include a digital rectal exam for enlarged prostate. If the man is having signs or symptoms of enlarged prostate, or if the MD detects an enlarged prostate, then further testing is done.

Ordering a PSA as a diagnostic tool for prostate issues is not recommended

http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/260087.php
Members of the American Urological Association (AUA) recently got together and made a series of new recommendations concerning prostate cancer screening. They now discourage screening men who are at average-risk under the age 55.

Urologist H. Ballentine Carter, who chaired the panel that wrote the new guidelines, said: "There really was no high-level evidence supporting the use of screening with PSA."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-204_162-57582847/
Urologists no longer recommend routine PSA testing for prostate cancer

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/detection/PSA
Some advisory groups now recommend against the use of the PSA test to screen for prostate cancer because the benefits, if any, are small and the harms can be substantial. None recommend its use without a detailed discussion of the pros and cons of using the test.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/47505948/#.UnA4hJSDQ1I
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force gave the prostate-specific antigen test a grade of D, saying that the risks of population-wide screening outweigh the benefits.

http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/story/2012-05-21/psa-test-questions-answers/55120916/1
Q: Why not get a PSA just in case it helps?
A: Because the PSA can cause harm, Moyer says. Up to 13% of men getting a PSA will have a "false alarm," in which the results signal a possible cancer when men are actually cancer free, according to a review published in October in Annals of Internal Medicine, which the task force used to make its decision. Those false alarms can lead to stress, as well as invasive needle biopsies. Over 10 years, up to 20% of men who get a PSA screening will have a biopsy. One-third of men who undergo biopsies experience pain, fever, bleeding, infection, problems urinating or other effects that the men consider a "moderate or major problem," according to the task force.

http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-help/about-cancer/cancer-questions/why-isnt-there-uk-psa-screening

Why isn't there UK PSA screening?


PSA alone is not recommended for screening in the UK, as the evidence of its reliability is still very unclear. At the moment the NHS policy is that if a man asks for a PSA test, the doctor should give information about the advantages and disadvantages of having the test and discuss this with him.

PSA is a protein produced by both normal and cancerous prostate cells. A high level of PSA can be a sign of cancer. But your PSA level can also be raised in non cancerous (benign) prostate conditions. There is no one PSA reading that is considered normal. The reading varies from man to man and the normal level gets higher as men get older. But a value less than 4 is generally considered to be in the normal range.

A PSA reading higher than 4, but less than 10 is usually due to a benign enlarged prostate. A reading higher than 10 may also just be a non cancerous prostate disease. But the higher the level of PSA, the more likely it is to be cancer. We now also know that the critical reading for the PSA level can vary depending on your ethnic background. Black men are more likely to have prostate cancer with a lower PSA reading than white men. So having one cut off point for PSA is unlikely to work for a whole population.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
258. It's covered, and it's optional. I'll be opting out by NOT HAVING CHILDREN.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:08 PM
Oct 2013

See how that works.

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
240. Looks like she's going to be one hostile nurse
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 05:10 AM
Oct 2013

Dark Angel ? There's a message right there.

Arcanetrance

(2,670 posts)
380. Her screen name has no bearing to how she will be as a nurse.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:46 PM
Oct 2013

The goddess Hekate has been associated with things such as magic and necromancy as well as other things. But if we just focused on name should we assume things about you. If you wish to disagree with someone that's one thing but to often I see people use personal attacks to refute points they disagree with.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
165. Its not a disease but it IS a medical condition with huge health ramifications.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:42 PM
Oct 2013

And one of the biggest cost drivers for families.

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
231. Driving a car isn't a disease, and yet people can get seriously injured
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:36 AM
Oct 2013

as a direct result of that CHOICE . . . and the ACA will pay.

And the ACA will pay for tightrope walkers and racehorse riders and people who like to swim with sharks. All CHOICES.

 

1000words

(7,051 posts)
7. When it's a public service and not a consumer product, society as a whole will begin to benefit.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:17 PM
Oct 2013

Capitalism means someone is walking a way a loser.

leftstreet

(40,681 posts)
8. +1
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:18 PM
Oct 2013

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
14. I agree, but this is what we have to work with at the moment.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:27 PM
Oct 2013

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
10. We all benefit from women having children.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:19 PM
Oct 2013

They will grow up to contribute to society and will be paying our social security when we are old.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
11. You forgot the sarcasm tag.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:20 PM
Oct 2013

Right?

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
300. no he didn't forget the sarcasm tag. it's true.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:46 PM
Oct 2013

are you planning on giving up your Social Security and Medicare when you get older?

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
105. Theyll also use our resources and burn oil
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:49 PM
Oct 2013

We need another 8 billion children.


I think humanity is at the tipping point where we can admit not every precious new soul is some great benefit to the human race and the environment we depend upon

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
126. Exactly, they can have "our" debt and have to live with "our" mistakes, but they can't take
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:07 PM
Oct 2013

OUR resources (Which incidentally used to be our ancestors resources until they had children).

Perhaps our society is at a tipping point where we should admit that not every precious EXISTING soul is some great benefit to the human race and the environment we depend on.

I can just imagine people deciding that someone else's 40 years on this planet should have been long enough to justify one's existence, and since they're not pleased with their contribution, it's "time to move on" and give someone else a chance to prove they are a more "worthy" person.

 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
137. More mouths to feed. More oil to burn.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:15 PM
Oct 2013

Whatever floats your boat. If you have a good idea to make it not "more", than I'm all ears. 40 years? Im more open to that than the shit we are running towards now (though there are better options)

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
211. Leaving aside the impracticality of preventing people from having children GLOBALLY,
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:10 AM
Oct 2013

If no one had any children, the current population would be in really bad shape in 20 years. I'd hate to be in the hospital with heart trouble only to find my doctor is in the bed next to me with the same issue because they are the same age. And, of course, anyone under about 40 can probably forget about retirement since you won't have someone else to take over your job.

Yes, there are better options and perhaps one of those new souls will come up with solutions for problems we (and previous generations) created. Perhaps we (not just you and I personally, but society as a whole) need to do a better job planning for the future and reducing our dependency on the resources we are currently depleting.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
16. WHUT?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:33 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
17. Whut what???
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:34 PM
Oct 2013

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
31. Suck up and deal.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:54 PM
Oct 2013
Preventive health services for adults
https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-preventive-care-benefits/#part=1

Preventive health services for women
https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-preventive-care-benefits/#part=2

Preventive health services for children
https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-preventive-care-benefits/#part=3

There are MANY services offered that I'll never tap into, but hey, the United States is a great fucking country, no? And we all help each other out...

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
33. Suck it up and deal...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:55 PM
Oct 2013

Welcome to DU and good luck.

 

HERVEPA

(6,107 posts)
38. Going for that fifth hidden post?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:00 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
44. Alert on it. good luck .
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:03 PM
Oct 2013

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
42. I've been here since January, but thanks. Ooh, lookie...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:02 PM
Oct 2013
1.Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm one-time screening for men of specified ages who have ever smoked


Smoking. Now THAT'S a choice.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
202. Well the ACA does allow smokers to be charged up to twice as much as non-smokers. n/t
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:20 AM
Oct 2013

Cerridwen

(13,262 posts)
20. No. It is not.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:41 PM
Oct 2013

Not for everyone.

Only for the privileged.

There are young women and women who have no choice due to familial, societal, religious, and economic reasons (to name just the tip of the iceberg) who have no informed, educated, and autonomous choice.



 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
24. So a percentage of women may not be informed in how to prevent pregnancy.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:47 PM
Oct 2013

A percentage , vs 100% if men who are succectible to prostate cancer, yet they won't any screenings ( unless they request/pay out of pocket for them)

How is that fair?

Cerridwen

(13,262 posts)
34. Would you please type in complete sentences
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:55 PM
Oct 2013

so I can reply coherently. I'm not quite sure what you asked.

My apologies if this sounds like snark but I don't know what "A percentage , vs 100% if men who are succectible to prostate cancer, yet they won't any screenings ( unless they request/pay out of pocket for them) " means exactly.

I truly don't. There appear to be some verbs missing and I'm not sure what they are.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
40. You know exatly what im reffering to.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:01 PM
Oct 2013

For the grammatically disabled:
You sugested that some women may lack sex education due to social/religious circumstances. And those women may get pregnant.
At the same time, ALL men are succectible to develope prostate cancer. It happens even at a young age. Yet, they don't receive free prostate cancer screenings, nor free breats cancer screenings. ( yes, breats cancer affects males too)
Am I clear enough, or should I try again.

Cerridwen

(13,262 posts)
49. No. I didn't. Or I would not have asked.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:08 PM
Oct 2013

I said social, religious, and economic circumstances. The economic part here is important. One I left out was educational. Some young women have not been exposed to current science on reproduction. Educational is frequently (and unfortunately) tied to economics.

I was talking specifically about your assertion that pregnancy is a choice in all cases. It is not. I posted those cases in which it was not an informed choice. That lack of informed choice happens far too frequently in "the greatest nation."



 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
260. You need remedial English and/or typing. Probably both.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:15 PM
Oct 2013

Your communications skills are severely deficient.

While you're at it, you might want to take remedial logic, too.

And unless you can get a compassion transplant, I'm thinking your nursing career is going to be extremely short.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
269. She's not originally from the US.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:31 PM
Oct 2013

I think some of her communication skills is due to English isn't her first language I'd guess and also

I've noticed her typing and communication gets worse as a thread progresses.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
280. Well if she's a nursing student she needs to get up to speed, because it's seriously impacting
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:57 PM
Oct 2013

her reading comprehension skills.

And that's still no explanation for the complete lack of logic.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
303. oh, it's a logical way to disrupt
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:52 PM
Oct 2013

there's that.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
302. she spells things right
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:51 PM
Oct 2013

certain times of day.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
301. it's really distracting when you claim medical expertise and constantly misspell medical terminology
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:50 PM
Oct 2013

Puzzledtraveller

(5,937 posts)
278. and even then, only to a certain amount of time.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:49 PM
Oct 2013

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
26. ROFLMAO.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:49 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
29. ROFLLMAO to the men who die of prostate cancer.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:51 PM
Oct 2013


Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
47. ROFLMAO to your assertion "every full-term baby is a choice."
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:07 PM
Oct 2013

And you're training to be a nurse?

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
52. It is a choice. Adults should be responsible for it.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:10 PM
Oct 2013

How are you explaining that ACA is not covering men's prostate and breast cancer screenings???
And you're laughing at my education!!



Sad.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
90. If every pregnancy is a choice, consider the fetus a dependent and that should help you make sense
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:42 PM
Oct 2013

of it all.

And trust me, I'm not laughing at your education.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
102. A fetus wasn't always a fetus.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:47 PM
Oct 2013

Are you against abortions???

Its a zygote that some women choose to keep.

Can you say the same about CANCER?????

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
261. Sounds a lot more like an anti-choice troll than anything else. The only nurses I know that think
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:17 PM
Oct 2013

like this are of the extreme RW variety.

Deep13

(39,157 posts)
27. ACA mandates non-discrimination between sexes...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:50 PM
Oct 2013

...so it doesn't.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
30. Yes it does.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:51 PM
Oct 2013

Go look it up.

Deep13

(39,157 posts)
35. look it up where? nt
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:55 PM
Oct 2013

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
232. And that means that medical conditions will be covered
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:38 AM
Oct 2013

without excluding penis cancer because it only occurs in men, or pregnancy because it only occurs in women.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
37. so is ruining your liver with drink. I would rather pay for the baby, but accept that stuff
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:57 PM
Oct 2013

doesn't always work out that way.

MattBaggins

(7,948 posts)
39. DKF
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:00 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
41. DKF, is that you?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:02 PM
Oct 2013

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
305. I've heard this kind of story before
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:55 PM
Oct 2013


conservative posts, Men's rights nonsense, drunken posts.

i was going to tell you a story about where i see them the most. but maybe later.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
51. DKF posted without histrionics...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:10 PM
Oct 2013

IIR. And wasn't a master of self delete. For posterity:

Star Member darkangel218 (7,962 posts)





Carrying a pregnancy to term is a choice in this country.






Last edited Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:10 PM USA/ET - Edit history (1)

Is it not?

ACA should not demand all females to pay for maternity coverage when we don't want it/need it.

I hope in the future they change that.
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
108. Im not deleting anything.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:55 PM
Oct 2013

You are trying to create drama were there isn't any.

ACA is not perfect and needs to be amwnded.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
115. Famous last words.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:02 PM
Oct 2013

Delete, don't delete... no skin off my nose.

This has been an informative thread... I've actually learned something about prostate exams during regular check-ups v. PSA tests. Perhaps you should do the same, rather than doubling down.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
119. Bye bye.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:03 PM
Oct 2013

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
123. I *ain't* going anywhere for a while.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:05 PM
Oct 2013

I fucking LOVE these types of threads, so thank you for that.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
43. wow. i was born genetically healthy and have continued being healthy all my life not using medical
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:03 PM
Oct 2013

care.

ergo, i should not par for all those people born with issue and a lifetime paying medical bills. not fair. waaaa. i dont wanna. waaaa.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
46. Bullshit!!! Pregnancy is NOT a pre existing condition!!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:05 PM
Oct 2013

Whaaaa all you want. Pregnancy is a choice.


PROSTATE AND BREAST CANCER ARENT.

That's where ACA needs to be amended.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
45. high risk activity is an option. ergo, we should not have to ever pay for people injured
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:04 PM
Oct 2013

in his risk activity.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
48. ACA is not covering for men's prostate cancer screenings
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:07 PM
Oct 2013

Or breasts cancer screenings. So I guess we are A OK.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
50. wtf does that have to do with you demanding not to pay cost of preg?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:09 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
53. Everything!!!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:12 PM
Oct 2013

Why shouldn't?? Its all interchangable! Men's health matters just as much as women's !!

And cancer is not something you can take a birth control pill for , or go to a clinic and end it!!!

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
56. that is about stupid. who got the woman pregnant? a ghost? are you really saying men have no part
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:15 PM
Oct 2013

or are you fuckin coddlin male privilege that they can be a part of the conception and NO responsibility beyond that? really? that is the fuckin limited thinking we are seeing here?

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
58. Pregnancy shouldnt override prostate and breast cancer!!!!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:21 PM
Oct 2013

Cancer and pregnancy are not one the same!!! So ACA pays close to 10k or more for matternity coverage , but cant pay a few hundred bucs for prostate ans breast screenings!!!





I'm nor really laughing. Rather crying. Who cares about men's helath , right. Sorry.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
62. in all your brilliance, tell me why they are not (f in fact they are not) paying for prostate and
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:26 PM
Oct 2013

breast cancer screeening and how does that get interpreted as women being cared for and men not?

never mind. you do not know wtf you are talking about, and seldom do, so i am leaving you in your tears. like i said, waaa.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
64. Whaaa back at you, seabeyond!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:28 PM
Oct 2013

You are the one who doesn't know what they're talking about rather. A simple reading of the ACA summary should clarify it for you.


Lars39

(26,540 posts)
67. As pointed out in another thread, prostate exams are done in yearly physicals
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:31 PM
Oct 2013

and yearly physicals *are* covered by ACA.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
73. Further exams are not covered.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:36 PM
Oct 2013

Lets say a obgyn feels a lump on a 29 y old female's breast. The mammo is free or very low cost.

If a man needs further prostate exams/ blood tests, is not covered under preventive care.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
80. Um, no that mammo on a 29 yo breast would not be free or very low cost.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:39 PM
Oct 2013

A base line mammo is recommended at a much later age, 40 or 45, unless family history or a lump, etc indicates one earlier.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
263. That's not a screening mammogram. That's a diagnostic mammogram. I assume it's not free.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:22 PM
Oct 2013

If a man has a prostatic mass and needs further testing, those are DIAGNOSTIC tests and not screening tests.

I realize that the difference between screening and diagnoses is a very difficult concept for you, but please do try to bone up so you don't continue to make a complete fool of yourself in your little temper tantrum here that is clearly designed to attack the concept of reproductive choice for women anyway and probably has nothing to do with any concern about men's health.

MadrasT

(7,237 posts)
54. It should be a choice but for far too many it is not
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:13 PM
Oct 2013

Abortions are severely restricted in many states. Birth control is not always 100% effective.

I am an infertile woman due to a medical condition and I am OK with it.

I want single payer... otherwise I want same rates for everybody, regardless of gender, age, smoker status, whatever. It should be one big pool. You can't slice and dice it.

Everybody needs to chip in for the public good.

This talk does not belong on DU.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
55. Are you aware that men dont get free screenings for breast and prostate cancer under the ACA?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:15 PM
Oct 2013

You're ok with that? Lol!!!!! Good to know.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
79. Perhaps the American Cancer Society should weigh in on male breast cancer...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:38 PM
Oct 2013
Because breast cancer is so uncommon in men, there is unlikely to be any benefit in screening men in the general population for breast cancer with mammograms or other tests.

http://www.cancer.org/cancer/breastcancerinmen/detailedguide/breast-cancer-in-men-detection


And the Mayo Clinic on PSA tests:

Cancer screening tests — including the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test to look for signs of prostate cancer — can be a good idea. Prostate cancer screening can help identify cancer early on, when treatment is most effective. And a normal PSA test, combined with a digital rectal exam, can help reassure you that it's unlikely you have prostate cancer. But getting a PSA test for prostate cancer may not be necessary for some men, especially men 75 and older.

Professional organizations vary in their recommendations about who should — and who shouldn't — get a PSA screening test. While some have definitive guidelines, others leave the decision up to men and their doctors. Organizations that do recommend PSA screening generally encourage the test in men between the ages of 40 and 75, and in men with an increased risk of prostate cancer.

Ultimately, whether you have a PSA test is something you should decide after discussing it with your doctor, considering your risk factors and weighing your personal preferences.

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/prostate-cancer/HQ01273


But, hey, you're the expert!
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
264. This poster and her ignorance are a perfect example of why "a little bit of knowledge is
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:24 PM
Oct 2013

a dangerous thing". She knows just enough to form an opinion, but far too little for that opinion to be rational.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
57. I don't watch ESPN on my cable network, but I have to have it regardless.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:19 PM
Oct 2013

I don't care. I'm paying for it, but not watching it.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
60. Watching ESPN doesnt prevent you from watching lets say MSNBC
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:22 PM
Oct 2013

Does it.

Not quiet fair analogy.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
63. Totally fair analogy...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:28 PM
Oct 2013

I have several channels, mostly sports, that I don't watch and I don't want that I am paying for. It's what's in our package. Those channels are not a choice...even in a basic package...many of them are a part of it whether or not we want them.

Maternity care is part of many insurance plans...along with mental health. While you or I may not be doing any baby making, other women with the same plan will.

I have no problem in this because I want women to have the care they need. My insurance plans has many things I won't be using, but I'm fine with that.

Our insurance plan has been that way for many years. It's normal and not an issue.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
65. So how you explain then that the ACA does not offer prostate cancer screenings??
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:30 PM
Oct 2013

Or I shouldbt care because I don't I've a prostate ( and already got all I need )

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
70. Well, the federal government has changed their guidelines about PSA testing...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:34 PM
Oct 2013

last I heard.

Preventative colon and rectal exams are covered.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
71. Are you just talking about the PSA?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:35 PM
Oct 2013

Because a regular finger up the butt would still be covered under your physical.

The PSA isn't considered preventative since it isn't that great and can actually cause more issues than it resolves. See my post below.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
66. Oh and one more thing...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:30 PM
Oct 2013

We are paying for old people, veterans, poor people and so on.

We are shouldering them so that they can have what they need...what we all will need at some point. Just because I don't have a penis doesn't mean that I don't want to help pay for a man to have a prostate exam.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
69. Well, then lets pay for it.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:33 PM
Oct 2013

ACA should be amwnded. Those are our brothers, fathers and husbands.

They should get adequate preventive care too. Don't you think?

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
72. I haven't read that women only are getting preventative care. n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:35 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
75. Men so far arent getting any free breats or prostate cancer exams.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:37 PM
Oct 2013

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
82. Let me make this clear...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:39 PM
Oct 2013

Men do get diagnostic mammograms if there is a reason for them. They do get prostate exams.

The PSA's...no. The guidelines for those changed because the testing did more harm than good.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
86. You are wrong about that.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:41 PM
Oct 2013

Prostate exams are included in yearly physicals(which are "free&quot when the man reaches a certain age.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
92. A simple exam cant determine / diagnose cancer.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:43 PM
Oct 2013

Anything further ( including blood tests is not covered )

While a $9k maternity care is.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
95. The PSA does more harm than good.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:45 PM
Oct 2013

That's why it's not covered. Scientists figured this out over 2 years ago.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
267. No, but that exam can find a mass, at which point diagnostic testing IS covered, dipshit.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:31 PM
Oct 2013

Keep digging that hole, though. I'm finding your ignorance highly amusing.

Of course, considering that you want to be a nurse, it should be terrifying.

Stop trying to play doctor.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
265. Men get a free annual physical the same as women.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:29 PM
Oct 2013

There is no rational basis for doing routine mammograms on men because breast cancer in men is so very rare. The cost far outweighs any benefits.

There is no rational basis for doing routine PSA testing in men because the test is flawed methodology that again does not result in improved outcomes for men overall.

Why do you want expensive, useless tests done? You own stock in a lab or diagnostic radiographic provider?

Stop trying to outsmart medical experts. You ain't one.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
204. And it's a bad system that will eventually end, as more and more people will be able to just buy
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:23 AM
Oct 2013

the shows they want to watch.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
59. On paper, yes. In terms of the law, yes.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:21 PM
Oct 2013

In reality? No.

I did not choose to carry a pregnancy to term in this country; it was the only choice I had.

I also did not choose to become pregnant, but that is another story for another time.

I was 19, broke, with no other options.

I love my daughter more than life itself. I can no longer have kids, but I will gladly help shoulder the burden for her and others like her.

Have a good evening, darkangel218.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
61. Whats fair is fair.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:23 PM
Oct 2013

Men should have a chance to helath care too.

Just sayin.

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
234. Men have the same chance for health care.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:39 AM
Oct 2013

And the same opportunity for screenings that research has shown improve outcomes.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
68. Take it up with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on the prostate screening
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:32 PM
Oct 2013
Prostate cancer screening not necessary for most men, government advisory board says

It turns out that many men—perhaps a third of those between the ages of 40 and 60 and most of those 85 and older—have some cancer cells in their prostate gland. But most of those cancers are not aggressive and remain confined to the gland. And the PSA blood test, as well as follow-up biopsies, can’t identify which of those cancers are aggressive and which are not. As a result, millions of men get treated unnecessarily with surgery, radiation, or hormones—and end up experiencing complications from those procedures, sometimes devastating ones. The test might not even benefit men who do have fast-growing cancer, since it’s still unclear whether early treatment works against such disease.

Indeed, a number of recent studies have failed to find that routine PSA screening saves lives, but do show that it often prompts treatments that lead to a large number of serious complications.

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/news/2011/10/prostate-cancer-screening-not-necessary-for-most-men-government-advisory-board-says/index.htm

Blaukraut

(5,998 posts)
74. EVERYTHING that requires medical care should be covered. PERIOD.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:37 PM
Oct 2013

That goes for all available cancer screenings, maternity, pre- and post natal care. In short, unless you decide you want elective surgery, your insurance should cover it.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
77. So far is not.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:38 PM
Oct 2013

Blaukraut

(5,998 posts)
89. I know, and it sucks. My personal ideal would be the equivalent of NHS in Britain
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:41 PM
Oct 2013

But we're a long way away from that, and the ACA is only the beginning. But at least now we're arguing WHAT is covered, as opposed to WHO is covered. It's progress.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
270. Useless tests that are proven statistically to have no value are OF COURSE not covered.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:32 PM
Oct 2013

It's a good thing we have INTELLIGENT, INFORMED medical experts in charge of these decisions and not ranting loons.

Cerridwen

(13,262 posts)
76. Tell me about the history of breast cancer research.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:37 PM
Oct 2013

Tell me what you know about the history of breast, or as you would type, breats cancer research.

I am now of the opinion you are on the wrong board. Alert this to the jury. Hello, Jury. My apologies to the Jury for being called on this. Hide; don't hide. Y'all have a great evening/morning. I'm not sure of your time zone.

Tell me what you know of the medical history of breast cancer research. Tell me what you know of the female version of prostate cancer.



 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
84. Women's prostate cancer??? when did i ever say that??
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:40 PM
Oct 2013

Copy and paste where I said women anything about " women's prostate exams "



Good luck



Cerridwen

(13,262 posts)
106. You mentioned prostate cancer as exclusive to men.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:49 PM
Oct 2013

You're wrong. Go learn then get back to us on this board reading your...assertions.

Now respond to my other request.

Tell me what you know of the history of medical research of breast cancer.

Mother Of Four

(1,722 posts)
219. I'm reading this thread and just shaking my head...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:41 AM
Oct 2013

The OP is answering numerous posts with throwing up icons, laughing icons and is just being an all around pita.

I seriously doubt the OP has any clue that women can be at risk as well, and that they've been looking into it since at least 2000.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10668204

For instance this poor lady who was diagnosed at 88 years old.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14668555

They are simply shooting off at the hip without learning anything before hand. I'm really hoping I never get them as a nurse with that kind of attitude. (If they pass that is)



cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
78. You're comparing apples and oranges.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:38 PM
Oct 2013

It seems like you're trying to imply that maternity care being covered is somehow responsible for prostate screening nit being covered. The two things don't really have anything to do with each other.

If I recall correctly, PSA tests are notoriously unreliable and possibly harmful, so maybe that's why they're not covered?

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-57438590-10391704/u.s-panel-recommends-against-psa-tests-for-screening-prostate-cancer-in-men-of-all-ages/

http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/prostatecancerscreening.htm

LadyHawkAZ

(6,199 posts)
81. 1) No, not in a lot of cases
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:39 PM
Oct 2013

2) Yes, they should; I would go farther and say they all ought to all cover abortion procedures as well as maternity and contraceptives. But that's an argument for another thread.
3) This isn't a zero sum game. Maternity coverage is not the reason prostate screenings aren't covered; nor will removing it suddenly make them available.
4) Again, not a zero sum game. Both matter; both should be covered.

 

Pab Sungenis

(9,612 posts)
83. Prostate screenings and mammograms are covered
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:40 PM
Oct 2013

as part of regular preventive check ups.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
87. No they are not.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:41 PM
Oct 2013

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
91. You clearly do not know what you are talking about.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:42 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
93. I know VERY WELL what im talking about.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:44 PM
Oct 2013

Read up.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
98. You are ignoring the facts. n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:45 PM
Oct 2013

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
100. No, you don't know what you're talking about. n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:46 PM
Oct 2013

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
104. Sorry, I think feeding time is over for now.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:48 PM
Oct 2013

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
94. YES THEY ARE!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:44 PM
Oct 2013

People have tried to explain this to you over and over and over.

It's like you're a repub with selective hearing. You only want what you agree with despite the facts.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
97. Yes, they are.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:45 PM
Oct 2013

You are wrong. A prostate exam is covered. The PSA is not, because it is not considered preventative because it's usefulness is in doubt. The PSA can actually end up causing more issues than it resolves.

Your annual prostate exam would be part of your annual physical - when the doctor feels the prostate for abnormalities.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
111. How much does that cost, vs a mammogram???
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:59 PM
Oct 2013

0 $!!
Oh, and what about breats cancer?? Men get it too. Are they screened for it after the age of 40 like women do?

Skittles

(171,716 posts)
210. you have some serious issues that have nothing to do with ACA
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:02 AM
Oct 2013

is therapy covered?

dflprincess

(29,341 posts)
362. According to Web MD what preventive tests get covered by insurance
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:07 PM
Oct 2013

and what preventive tests get covered are based on recommendations from the The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)

Per Web MD regarding PSA tests:
[div class = "excerpt"]
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force is an independent agency. It's made up of experts in preventive or family medicine who serve a four-year term on the panel.

Their recommendations are made for primary-care doctors. Many doctor groups that establish guidelines for patient care use the USPSTF recommendations. Agencies that fund health care -- Medicare and private insurers -- often set their policies based on USPSTF recommendations.

Health care reform -- the Affordable Care Act -- will require Medicare and insurance plans to cover preventive services recommended by the USPSTF. However, they may choose to cover preventive services not recommended by the USPSTF.

Will Medicare still cover PSA tests?

Because the USPSTF did not recommend PSA screening -- in fact, the panel recommended against it -- Medicare is not forced to pay for the screening tests.

That's up to the Department of Health and Human Services. And this week, after the USPSTF report came out, HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius said [b[Medicare would continue to pay for PSA screening for men who want it.


Because breast cancer remains relatively rare in men, the USPSTF does not recommend routine screening for it for males.

Here is a link to the preventive tests the ACA currently mandates:
https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-preventive-care-benefits/#part=1

Interestingly, it does cover a one-time screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in men "of specified ages who have ever smoked".

Abdonminal aneurysms are more common in this group - my uncle (a former smoker) had one but gee, one of my aunts did as well (caught in time) and she never smoked. Let's all have a fit because they're not automatically covered for women or non-smokers of either sex.

 

phleshdef

(11,936 posts)
169. They are with the insurance that I am buying from the exchange.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:45 PM
Oct 2013

I haven't finalized the purchase yet because of website problems, but I got far enough to see the coverage info for the plan I'm likely to buy and those items are in fact covered.

mwooldri

(10,818 posts)
337. Depends on your insurance policy.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:03 PM
Oct 2013

Last edited Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:40 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: https://www.healthcare.gov/what-are-my-preventive-care-benefits/

Prostate screening isn't on that list of "must cover" preventive procedures. Having a mammogram, as long as you're female and at least 40 years old... that preventive procedure is on the list.

Some employer self-insured plans cover for a proper annual physical, as opposed to a wellness check.

So unless your insurance does cover it, you'll have to pay to drop your pants and have your doctor stick a gloved finger up your backside. That is, if that is a prostate screening.

On edit: since it's the first time I weighed in on this posting.... I think a whole boatload of procedures should be delivered to anyone free of charge at the point of delivery.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
88. Recommended screenings are covered.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:41 PM
Oct 2013

Recommendations change all the time based upon the best evidence and the technology available. For example a change was made recently to reduce the frequency of PAP testing for women over 30 with no history of abnormal tests, largely because of the previous changes that instituted routine HPV testing and their effect on cervical cancer screening. The recommendations about mammograms and when to start them, how often to get them, how that varies if you have a family history, seem to change every ten minutes based on improved data, changes in mammography techniques, etc.

Wait a minute, weren't you claiming to be a newly minted nurse a few months back? I call shenanigans.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
99. Any further tests than the actual palpal exam done ONCE a year
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:45 PM
Oct 2013

Is not covered.

You should get your post hidden for taking shots at my educations.

Not surprised though.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
101. Well, when it's necessary because of the willful ignorance... n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:47 PM
Oct 2013

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
103. Hey, you know what, if my pap smear comes back abnormal - not considered preventative
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:48 PM
Oct 2013

That's the comparable to your prostate exam. If my pap smear comes back abnormal further testing would not be covered under the 100% preventative coverage. That would include biopsies, follow up paps, etc.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
107. Pap smer is pretty clear, when a regular prostate exam is not.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:52 PM
Oct 2013

When you get an abnormal pap, you are scheduled for a colposcopy usually. Its pretty clear you have some abnormal cell growth.
When the doctors "feel" something abnormal, any further test is NOT covered.
So you have your pap lab covered but men don't.
See the discrepancy??

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
109. Your regular prostate exam is covered
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:57 PM
Oct 2013

It's part of the physical when you get a certain age to have your prostate palpitated for abnormalities. That is covered. My regular pap smear is covered as preventative as well.

The PSA test has doubtful utility - this is why it's not considered preventative since it can cause more issues than it resolves.

If my pap came back abnormal follow up testing would not be considered preventative. If a mammogram came back abnormal follow up is not considered preventative. If your prostate exam detected abnormalities your follow up would not be considered preventative.

Your whole argument is bunk.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
112. BS!!!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:00 PM
Oct 2013

What about breats mammograms?? Men get breast cancer too!!!!

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
113. Men don't get breast cancer at nearly the same rate as women...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:01 PM
Oct 2013

They are miniscule compared to women.

My father-in-law had a series of diagnostic mammograms for a lump in his breast. They were covered 100%.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
122. Not anymore, theyre not.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:05 PM
Oct 2013

So do pregnancies, not everyone has them. Did I mention pregnecies are usually elective??

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
132. Rates are still substantially lower for men...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:14 PM
Oct 2013

The National Cancer Institute estimates in 2013 there will be 232,340 female and 2,240 male cases of breast cancer.

http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/breast

Pregnancies are always complicated. They deserve as much coverage as we can give them.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
136. So does testing for cancer.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:15 PM
Oct 2013

I'm sorry you are not seeing the facts.

I did my rounds in onco. It wasn't pretty.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
140. I was in the trenches for a lot of years...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:21 PM
Oct 2013

I've worked almost every specialty. I've been in nursing homes, hospital wards, clinics, ER's, delivery rooms, OR's, and much more. I've watched a lot of people die and many didn't have to.

The difference between you and me...I don't ignore science and facts.

The fact is that the PSA testing is not covered because it's not a good test. It does more harm than good. This was determined over 2 years ago. It was major news at the time.

Also, another fact...Men get breast cancer at substantially lower rates. Hundreds of thousands of women get this disease which is why preventative mammograms are covered for them.

It is not feasible in any way to give men preventative mammograms when they get the disease at a substantially lower rate. It would be like testing every single person for diabetes. It's not feasible if there is no reason to test them.

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
142. ahem....
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:24 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
143. You are failing to mention that it was determined to do more harm than good
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:24 PM
Oct 2013

In patients over 70 y old.
What about younger patients?? What about screenings for breast cancer as well???

Please, spare me.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
134. No, you said people "choose" to become pregnant in your OP.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:14 PM
Oct 2013

That simply isn't true.
Just as it simply isn't true that all women "choose" to carry a pregnancy to term.

This is disingenuous. And disheartening. We understand you don't like ACA. I did not either for a long time, until I realized many of the things being reported about it simply were not true.

But please don't say that you said something you didn't.

You never brought "usually" into the conversation at all.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
151. Some dont choose it. Most do.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:30 PM
Oct 2013

Now tell me how many men choose to develope breast or prostate cancer, and if the the answer is none, why is that their healrh is ignored in those circumstances, while something which most of the time is elective, isn't?

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
161. Let's focus instead on disingenuous statements
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:37 PM
Oct 2013

and how wrong they can be. You made a blanket claim that is untrue. Not only with pregnancy but also with men's preventative care.

Prostate exams are covered.

That said, when did they start allowing first year core curriculum nursing students to actually round? Things have certainly changed a lot.

As I have stated, this has nothing to do with anything but the fact that you don't like ACA and have been misinformed as to what is covered when it comes to a prostate... And also how PAP smears are handled.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
166. Is PSA testing covered?? yes or no?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:44 PM
Oct 2013

Are routine mammos for men covered??

The answer to both is NO!! So while us women receive free anual mammograms and papa, men don't receive at least a simple PSA test.

In the meantime, I have to pay for everyones maternity costs.

O..k

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
172. Prostate exams are covered.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:46 PM
Oct 2013

Please answer the rounding question.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
117. Not BS. I'm sorry you don't understand the facts. n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:02 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
133. Im sorry you seem to be ignoring the facts.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:14 PM
Oct 2013
 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
238. Mammograms for men: the recommendation is to NOT perform them.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:36 AM
Oct 2013

Even if you have insurance that would cover them, the recommendation is to not have one. Male breast cancer is so rare that it's not worthwhile to screen for unless you have a family history or have found a lump in self-examination. The best preventative measure for men for breast cancer is self-examination, not mammography.

In addition, even in cases where cancer is present, mammography for men yields poor results; it yields false results (both positive and negatives) at an alarming rate. If you want to make a difference, rather than pushing for unnecessary and fruitless testing to be covered, why not teach your male patients how to self-examine correctly for breast cancer?

Unlike male mammography, that would save lives. It's also a cost-efficiency practice and would lower medical costs for both patients and insurers/taxpayers.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
110. There is not a discrepancy...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:58 PM
Oct 2013

A woman goes for her regular exam. She has a pap smear. It's sent to the lab. It's abnormal. The regular exam is covered as preventative. The abnormal part of that in addition to the care afterwards is not preventative.

A man has his exam. It's all preventative. If the doctor discovers something, further testing is required. Men do not have the equivalent of a pap smear. The PSA is not considered reliable.

Precancerous growth can be detected in women. It cannot be detected in men the same way.

The fact is that men and women are different. That is the only discrepancy there is and medically speaking there is nothing science can do about it at this time.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
114. Thank you for spelling it out so clearly. n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:01 PM
Oct 2013

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
118. I wish I had a chalkboard. LOL. n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:02 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
116. The PSA levels is the ony test so far for prostate cancer!!!!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:02 PM
Oct 2013

If we pay close to or more than 10k for maternity care, we should pay for further prostate cancer exams!! That simple!!
Older men deserve to live too.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
121. That's not how insurance works...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:05 PM
Oct 2013

That's not even how OBGYN works.

And no, it is NOT that simple. This is apples and oranges.

You can't call maternity care equal to prostate cancer exams. They aren't even in the same galaxy.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
124. No they are not.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:06 PM
Oct 2013

One , which costs close to 10k is not close to a $100 test.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
128. This is more than just costs...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:09 PM
Oct 2013

Rectal exams are a part of doing a physical. PSA testing is not covered because of how problematic it is.

Maternity care involves not just the mother, but also a fetus which adds a host of potential issues that all has to be addressed.

They should not even be in the same sentence when it comes to costs and care. If you know this, then you should let it go.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
129. The primary test for prostate cancer is the Digital Rectal Exam.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:11 PM
Oct 2013

Always has been. The PSA has never been anything more than a complementary screening tool of highly debated utility, at best.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
274. Err, nope. Core biopsy is the definitive test for prostate cancer.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:42 PM
Oct 2013

PSA is statistically useless.

You got a prostate mass, you need first an aspiration (needle) biopsy and then if there is any question, you need a core biopsy.

There is a very good reason why you don't get to call yourself a doctor, dearie.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
130. You are usually retested to be sure of the original result.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:12 PM
Oct 2013


The colposcopy is a "further test" for women.
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
272. When the doctors feel something abnormal in the prostate, any diagnostic tests to evaluate it ARE
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:39 PM
Oct 2013

covered.

Since you are adamant that this is incorrect, please provide a link to the portion of the ACA that specifically excludes diagnostic tests on prostatic masses from coverage.

I'll be waiting..........

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
281. nice spelling
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:57 PM
Oct 2013
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
271. Please define "palpal exam". And please provide an explanation for your use of the
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:37 PM
Oct 2013

plural of education. That one is unique and innovative, to say the least.

BainsBane

(57,757 posts)
120. I don't believe for a second that prostrate exams aren't covered
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:04 PM
Oct 2013

And why you should resent coverage for the propagation of the human species defies comprehension. This is about shit stirring.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
131. The PSA, which is eqiluivalent of mammo, is not covered.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:13 PM
Oct 2013

Go look it up for yourself.
Resent coverage for propagation of the human species huh?? What about our males cancer screenings?? Do they matter at all??

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
135. Why don't you look up the facts about PSA testing?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:15 PM
Oct 2013

It's not covered because it does more harm than good. Scientists have discovered this.

Stop spreading that BS!

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
139. Thats BS they came up with a year ago or so.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:18 PM
Oct 2013

That 70 y old male shouldn't care if they develope a tumour. It does more bad than good if they start trearment. Although I disagree with that, lets say they're right.
What about younger patients?? Lets say 40y old.
Are they getting free PSA screenings??

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
145. Some do opt for the testing and some don't...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:25 PM
Oct 2013

That's because of the problems with the test. The patients are made aware of these issues and they can make a decision with their doctor.

My husband has never been tested even though he does get a regular physical exam by his doctor. There is no reason for him to have the test.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
275. No. Nor should they. They get a rectal exam, and if there is a mass they get appropriate diagnostic
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:45 PM
Oct 2013

testing, ie needle biopsy/core biopsy.

You've been told time and time again that PSA is an unreliable test that is being discarded any yet you persist in demanding it.

You are a disgrace to your profession. Stop acting like you know what you are talking about you are NOT a physician. You aren't even close. And your ignorance is downright dangerous.

BainsBane

(57,757 posts)
144. So you would prefer no human beings be born?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:25 PM
Oct 2013

Last edited Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:20 AM - Edit history (1)

If prostate screenings aren't covered, that's a problem. But to say you don't think child birth should be covered as a result is fucking nuts. It is the most basic aspect of being a human being. An absence of child birth coverage would mean those males would never reach adulthood because they'd die at childbirth. I've seen some fucked up posts, but this takes the cake. There is a kind of hatred for humanity implicit in your argument that defies comprehension.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
147. I shouldnt be forced to pay for maternity care.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:26 PM
Oct 2013

When I don't pay for my dad's or brothers prostate cancer screening (PSA.)

That simple.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
149. You already are paying for other people's health care...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:29 PM
Oct 2013

Whether it's Medicare, Medicaid, VA, private insurance and the uninsured.

You're paying for all that and more. That simple.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
153. The diference is They are getting the care, while my dad, brother, so, doesnt.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:32 PM
Oct 2013

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
167. You just fucking love all this, don't you?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:44 PM
Oct 2013

People who've spent years in the medical field have explained facts to you, but you continually ignore all of this.

I can only come to one conclusion about you. You LOVE the attention. You LOVE rowing discontent.

You could care less about facts, evidence, experience, and everything else that people have shown you to prove that you're mistaken.

No, you're not mistaken. You know exactly what the hell you're doing.

And no, you're not a nurse. I call bullshit.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
171. No, im not a nurse. Im a nurse student.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:46 PM
Oct 2013

You are the one who LOVES ignoring the facts!! Good luck!! And sorry you don't care about prostate cancer. Its sad.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
175. You are manipulative and disingenuous...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:48 PM
Oct 2013

That's not even a nursing student.

Go to your instructors and ask them why men don't get preventative mammograms. Ask them why PSA testing is not covered as preventative.

They will tell you the same exact thing that most of us have been trying to explain to you.

Student nurse, my ass.

Mother Of Four

(1,722 posts)
220. Up-thread this poster stated she had already done all her rounds...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:55 AM
Oct 2013

In Oncology of all places.

But didn't start her core classes until January of this year to become an RN. You're beating your head against a wall

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
253. ...and then she refused to answer my direct question on it.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:31 PM
Oct 2013

And then threw out the word "clinicals" in an odd way. Yeah, she's a nursing student to my male modeling contract (I'm a girl, btw)

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
277. That's "nursing student". And I am calling BS on that. You are far too ignorant to have
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:47 PM
Oct 2013

any medical background whatsoever. And your communication skills are so poor I'm thinking you don't even have a HS diploma.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
250. Nailed it!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:19 PM
Oct 2013

Soon to be self-deleted....

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
150. I thought your family was in Europe and you are here by yourself? n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:30 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
155. My dad and brother are here.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:33 PM
Oct 2013

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
152. You are kinda embarrassing yourself now.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:30 PM
Oct 2013
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
195. Then if a person made a choice to drive a car and got into an accident...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:03 AM
Oct 2013

you would also feel you shouldn't be forced to pay?

what u.t.t.e.r. nonsense.

simple, alright.

steve2470

(37,481 posts)
384. You're a woman ?
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 01:20 AM
Oct 2013

You don't want to help pay for women's maternity care, when the possibility always exists (until menopause is over) that you may need it also ? This is equivalent to me refusing to pay for prostate screening, because I don't have prostate cancer. I don't mind helping out my fellow men with their health insurance, and I sure don't mind helping out women with their maternity care. That's what insurance is all about, until we get single payer.

 

kiawah

(64 posts)
290. Hell yes, prostrate exams should be covered!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:19 PM
Oct 2013

Why should only people that stand get to be treated?!

mercuryblues

(16,413 posts)
125. Are you also
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:06 PM
Oct 2013

one of those people who cry...I don't have any kids in school, why should I pay school taxes!1! me, me, me, me, me.



It has been stated many times that prostrate screening is done during a yearly physical. The PSA test is unreliable. If a DR orders it, it will be covered like any other test. It is not exempt from coverage. Not like the religious groups want to exempt birth control coverage. I can no longer have children, but I am not so selfish to think birth control should not be covered either.

But really, if this offends you so much start a grassroots effort to lobby the government for it to be mandatory coverage.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
127. We need social health care.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:08 PM
Oct 2013

In the meantime, peoples coverage is being canceled because they don't have maternity in their plan.

mercuryblues

(16,413 posts)
154. Oh
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:32 PM
Oct 2013

they can't get a new policy? I understand it is a pain in the ass to shop for insurance. I for one am glad that people who could never afford insurance before can now. Is the ACA the best we can have? No. But it is what we have. We also have more work to do to get single payer. Just because it is not perfect is no reason to dredge up misleading claims against it.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
157. These are no fucking misleading claims!!!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:34 PM
Oct 2013

Tell me how am I misleading anyone or anything????

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
168. "Prostate exams are not covered."
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:44 PM
Oct 2013

"Women choose to carry pregnancies to term."

mercuryblues

(16,413 posts)
209. you are claiming
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:59 AM
Oct 2013

prostate screening is not covered in preventative care. It is. What is not covered is the unreliable PSA test. It is not covered in preventative care because it is highly inaccurate. It is covered like any other lab work the Dr. orders. What you seem to be advocating for is an unreliable test for men to solely base their health decisions on.

Men are not exempt from mammograms, which you are implying. About 2% of breast cancer patients are men. They die at a much higher rate for women because it is often caught in the later stages. Dr's should order that test if they feel it is warranted. If an insurance company charges a man for the test that is not the ACA's fault. There is nothing stopping insurance companies to add it. More men should learn how to do self breast exams and go to the DR when something is not right.

What is done is that the most prominent diseases in men and women; that if caught early have favorable outcomes is what gets mandated.

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
138. This thread was entertaining for me.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:17 PM
Oct 2013

Here's a rabbit with toilet paper on its head:

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
141. Glad youre not a male
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:22 PM
Oct 2013

In need of a free PSA test.

I bet you wouldnt find it so funny then.

 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
146. I'm a male.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:26 PM
Oct 2013

I don't need regular prostate exams for another ten years.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
148. How great for you. please post more rabbit pics.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:28 PM
Oct 2013
 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
156. Here's a rabbit with a wooden duck on its head:
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:34 PM
Oct 2013


I'm actually wondering how long it'll be before this thread is self-deleted.
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
158. I dont know.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:35 PM
Oct 2013

Welcome to DU.



tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
160. Deleted posts is a regular occurrence with this poster. n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:37 PM
Oct 2013
 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
162. Yes.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:37 PM
Oct 2013

This I am aware.

Make7

(8,550 posts)
385. Don't be too sure...
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 01:36 AM
Oct 2013

[div class="excerpt" style="margin-left:1em; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-radius:0.4615em; box-shadow:-1px -1px 3px #999999 inset;"][div style="float:right;"]Tue Apr 9, 2013, 2:14 PMdarkangel218 (8,051 posts)
189. Im not self deleting my OP.

Thanks for tour your pro hatered stance. And don't pm me nonsense anymore please.[font style="font-size:0.8462em;"]


http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2642032#post189[/font]
... but then...

[div class="excerpt" style="margin-left:1em; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-radius:0.4615em; box-shadow:-1px -1px 3px #999999 inset;"][div style="float:right;"]Tue Apr 9, 2013, 12:32 PMdarkangel218 (8,051 posts)

[font style="font-size:1.231em;"]This message was self-deleted by its author[/font]
[div class="alert-box deleted"]This message was self-deleted by its author (darkangel218) on Wed Apr 10, 2013, 12:13 AM. When the original post in a discussion thread is self-deleted, the entire discussion thread is automatically locked so new replies cannot be posted.[font style="font-size:0.8462em;"]
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=2641298#op[/font]
Although I'm guessing a pizza delivery may prevent any action on this particular OP.

fishwax

(29,346 posts)
159. Of course pregnancy should be covered
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:36 PM
Oct 2013

So should prostate screenings. Fortunately, both are.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
164. No they are not.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:40 PM
Oct 2013

Do your home work. An exam without the PSA test can not determine anything. Just like an exam without a mammogram can not determine if a biopsy is needed.
Routine mammograms are covered for women. They are not covered for men. Just like PSA testing isn't.
Please so your homework before posting.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
170. No, you do your fucking homework...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:46 PM
Oct 2013

There is a reason why men don't get a fucking preventative mammogram. There is a reason why the PSA is not covered as preventative.

You are ignorant to the science and to the facts by your own choice.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
180. You have no clue what you are talking about!!
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:52 PM
Oct 2013

PSA testing is still being done, but discouraged in clients over 70 y old !!!

What about the young ones who get prostate cancer??

You can call me any names you want. I'm glad I don't have to work with you in my clinicals!!
Your posts make me puke.

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
182. Did I ever say it was not being done?
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:54 PM
Oct 2013

PSA testing is still offered. It's not offered as preventative care.

You will find a lot of testing that is discouraged for people over 70. Colonoscopies, for one.

I don't have to do anything. Your willful ignorance and trolling is doing all the work for you, honey.

fishwax

(29,346 posts)
174. My post is accurate. You've basically admitted as much. So do your own homework.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:48 PM
Oct 2013

And, while we're offering one another free advice: it doesn't help your credibility to disingenuously tie the PSA testing to the entirely unrelated issue of coverage for pregnancy. If you want to make the case that more forms of prostate screening should be covered, why not just do so ?

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
176. She calls herself a nursing student...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:49 PM
Oct 2013

She's become a parody of herself.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
173. Oh FFS.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:48 PM
Oct 2013
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
177. so, you are wrong on this thread. you have been told a number of times, a number of ways how wrong
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:49 PM
Oct 2013

you are by a number of people. but... facts dont mess with your agenda, does it.

pathetic

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
181. Being told " wrong" by the same 2-3 people.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:53 PM
Oct 2013

You know what's pathetic, seabayond? That you chose to ignore the truth.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
185. keep telling yourself, or else how do you continue on with this facade.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:55 PM
Oct 2013

cynatnite

(31,011 posts)
193. How many links to qualified scientific research do you want?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:01 AM
Oct 2013

I'll get them for you.

A lot of us have the benefit of working in the medical field. We have knowledge and experience that you, a nursing student, might ought to consider rather than outright dismissing it.

I have experience not just clinically, but also in administration. I have worked in medical coding and billing, medical transcription, and medical records. I can explain why some procedures are covered and others are not. I can talk to you about preventative care and what qualifies.

Many of us do know what we are talking about. There are others who are more involved in other aspects of the medical field than I am or work in a higher position than I have. Some have much more experience in these areas than I have.

We can offer a lot, but when you have your mind closed to the facts of these issues you have raised there is nothing anyone will ever be able to tell you...even with a stack of evidence before you. I highly doubt even your instructors can bend your mind even in the slightest.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
178. This is the dumbest post on ACA and healthcare
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:49 PM
Oct 2013

and there have been some real beauts to compete with, darkangel.

Congrats.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
179. It's about time to count down to the self delete and whiny post in the lounge.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:51 PM
Oct 2013

The OP is nothing if not predictable.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
184. Lol.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:55 PM
Oct 2013

I'm bringing up facts.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
187. I think I missed that part. n/t
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:56 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
194. Sure. Same like months ago when you were calling me out.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:01 AM
Oct 2013

Bye bye.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
197. see ya in the funny papers!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:04 AM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
198. See you there rather
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:05 AM
Oct 2013

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
190. You're digging in your heels after many people have pointed out where you're wrong.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:00 AM
Oct 2013

I honestly don't know what you hope to accomplish here.

You're wrong. Many people have explained, yet you're unable to understand.

If you're really studying to be a nurse, you should learn how to understand guidelines, such as the report that points out that the PSA test can cause more harm than good, so it's no longer recommended for men of any age.

Nine

(1,741 posts)
186. +1. Uninformed, illogical, misogynistic...
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:56 PM
Oct 2013

I alerted on the thread. This must be a troll post. No one can really be this thick. If darkangel really is sincere, he/she needs to be banned.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
191. And NEVER wrong, just like Sarah Palin.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:00 AM
Oct 2013

It's fascinating, from an abnormal psychology standpoint.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
196. You must be refering tp yourself.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:04 AM
Oct 2013

Good luck projecting.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
199. Double down some more D...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:11 AM
Oct 2013

it's fascinating to watch one so clearly wrong dig in the way you have.

And no self-delete yet... bra-vo!

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
279. I think we need to keep playing with this one wherever she pops up.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:51 PM
Oct 2013

Could be real fun for a little while at least.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
248. +1
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:14 PM
Oct 2013
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
183. Uh oh, now you've done it
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:55 PM
Oct 2013



 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
188. Enjoy your popcorn
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:57 PM
Oct 2013
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
200. I'm joking about your cardinal sin
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:13 AM
Oct 2013

1) You said something that could be perceived as negative about the US healthcare system post-ACA
2) There is nothing negative about our healthcare system under the ACA
3) No one should have a problem with it
4) If you fail to realize #2 and #3, there is a problem with your education
5) If you have noticed any inconsistency, you obviously don't understand the ACA



I should have made clear I was mocking the reaction, not you dark

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
189. as long as it is anti woman, you have your popcorn, dontcha.... what a man.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 11:59 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
192. My OP wasnt anti women, btw.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:00 AM
Oct 2013

Is that's what you understood from it, I feel bad for you.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
201. Ignore this person
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:17 AM
Oct 2013

And if you engage her, for God's sake don't mention anything relating to men around her.

She doesn't realize the OP is a reproduction DU debate, she thinks it's about woman bashing.

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
205. Self deleted.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:29 AM
Oct 2013
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
206. I'll change it
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:32 AM
Oct 2013

I've seen the term a lot on DU and in GLBT circles.

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
207. Thank you - that was very considerate.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:37 AM
Oct 2013

Much appreciated!

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
203. The best current evidence is that prostate and breast cancer screenings are walletectomies
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:21 AM
Oct 2013

They generate nice income for the medical profession but do nothing to help *us*. In fact, they seem to harm more than they help.

Being born... That's another matter.

kcr

(15,522 posts)
208. For one thing, you're wrong about the screenings being covered as has already been pointed out.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 12:52 AM
Oct 2013

Numerous times. For another, your attitude about pregnancy and maternity coverage is self centered. Everyone has benefited at some point in their life from maternity care, unless you think you sprouted from a cabbage patch. Your view on that is nothing but I've Got Mine Now So Screw Everyone Else mentality. Do you think you shouldn't have to pay for schools now that you've graduated? So even if you were right about the screenings it wouldn't matter. THe answer wouldn't be to gut coverage for something that everyone benefits from. That would be moronic.

Turborama

(22,109 posts)
212. Looks like the use of a purposefully oblique phrase instead of "SUCCESSFULLY HAVING A BABY"
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:13 AM
Oct 2013

Who would be against helping someone to successfully have a baby?

Who would be against helping to make sure a baby survives a pregnancy
?

The phrase in the OP is a technical term used as a misdirection away from the other just as important subject of the topic, a BABY.

Having lost 1 baby through miscarriage, successfully having 1 healthy baby and currently being at the beginning of another pregnancy, you have touched something very personal to me, and the fact there is no mention of the baby makes your OP disingenuous.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
218. Oh yah?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:30 AM
Oct 2013

My OP is disingenuous for stating facts.

I'm sorry you don't like the FACTS.

Turborama

(22,109 posts)
222. This reply is as disingenuous as your OP.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:08 AM
Oct 2013

You are misstating the reasons I gave for it being disingenuous.

The thing is, I love facts and you left out a very important "FACT" in your OP.



(typo fix)

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
223. Which is?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:12 AM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
227. Im asking to prove that that my OP is disgebious by facts
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:19 AM
Oct 2013

Such as the actual ACA law, not emotional personal stories.

My brother and my dad are curently not getting tested for
niether prostate nor breast cancer through. ACA. No such tests available for 2014. Even though my dad needs it yearly...


.

Turborama

(22,109 posts)
235. !
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:52 AM
Oct 2013

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
244. you try to pit prostate cancer against pregnancy and then attempt to...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:06 PM
Oct 2013

make it sound like those who are pregnant or getting mammograms are doing so somehow at the expense of those with prostate cancer.

almost everyone is onto what's going on here and the kind of disruption you are attempting here.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
245. "disgebious" ?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:09 PM
Oct 2013

What the actual fuck does that even mean?

NealK

(7,162 posts)
297. Here's the definition:
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:37 PM
Oct 2013

Disgebious:

adjective

1. not gebious

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
307. Thanks for the translation.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:57 PM
Oct 2013

Makes perfect sense!

NealK

(7,162 posts)
310. Lol, it sure does.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:13 PM
Oct 2013

missingthebigdog

(1,233 posts)
334. Duzy!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 08:51 PM
Oct 2013

Bobbie Jo

(14,344 posts)
341. LOL!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:16 PM
Oct 2013
got me.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
213. single payer, single payer, single payer. We must have single payer.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:14 AM
Oct 2013
 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
216. You win the thread
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:21 AM
Oct 2013

All other discussion is ultimately the noise of a failed and doomed for-profit system.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
215. Self-delete is a choice. I recommend it. n/t
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:19 AM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
217. No thanks.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:28 AM
Oct 2013

Its a discussion board.

Everything I stated is a fact.

I won't delete this thread for the "ACA is perfect" crowd.

I support the ACA , but it needs to be amended.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
221. i guess the upside is 220 posts, 221, lol. not a single rec. not one recommend. do you know how
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:00 AM
Oct 2013

hard it is to get NO recommend. i mean, at least a few people will recommend ANYTHING. and not one.

so

there is that.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
225. Awwww!!! im not here for recs!!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:13 AM
Oct 2013

I speak my mind.

Look what that guy said about me ignoring your posts.. I think I will follow his advice.

.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
246. then you came to the right place
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:11 PM
Oct 2013

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
224. What's the polite way to say "go fuck yourself"? Oh right...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:13 AM
Oct 2013

Bless your heart.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
228. Somebody has issues.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:24 AM
Oct 2013

Without pregnancy we won't have cancer. Cause we won't exist. Male or female.
Do you not understand that most pregnancies aren't planned??
And that everybody has to spend sometime inside a woman's vagina?
And that men put their penises inside the vagina a work it around until climax?
And that's how babies are made?
And that most pregnancies aren't planned?
Since everybody came out of a pregnant woman's vagina, we have all used maternity care?
Even you????? Whether you've been pregnant or not???
Time to Grow up now.

JustAnotherGen

(38,054 posts)
256. I think I love you
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:01 PM
Oct 2013

Huey Freeman as an avatar and brilliance in content - what's not to love?

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
284. Why thank you!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:06 PM
Oct 2013

I'm getting feels for you too now.

pnwmom

(110,261 posts)
229. Driving a car is a choice in this country, is it not?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:34 AM
Oct 2013

And people who drive in cars, or ride dirt bikes -- or just walk across the street -- get in serious accidents every day.

And the ACA will pay to fix all of them. Even though people who have accidents do so as a result of a CHOICE, or series of choices, that they made.

The screenings that are covered under ACA are the ones that research has proven will save lives -- without regard to the gender of the person with cancer.

 

davidn3600

(6,342 posts)
233. Women's health issues has become big business in this country...so that's one cause of it
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:38 AM
Oct 2013

Just look anywhere this month and it's all pink for Breast Cancer awareness. Look at the NFL with players and wristbands and hats and water bottles all in pink.

Charities make big bucks on cancer donations....especially when it concerns women. It's the same with insurance companies.

Last month was Prostate Cancer Awareness month. I wonder how many people were aware of that...

Heidi

(58,846 posts)
236. For the record, before this is self-deleted:
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:01 AM
Oct 2013
darkangel218 (8,021 posts) Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:02 PM

This post has been edited 3 times.

Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:10 PM - Original version with no edits.

Original version with no edits.
0. Carrying a pregnency to term is a choice in this country.
Is it not?

ACA should not demand all females to pay for maternity coverage when we don't want it/need it.

I hope in the future they change that.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 09:10 PM - Unexplained edit.

Unexplained edit.
0. Carrying a pregnancy to term is a choice in this country.
Is it not?

ACA should not demand all females to pay for maternity coverage when we don't want it/need it.

I hope in the future they change that.
Mon Oct 28, 2013, 10:26 PM - Unexplained edit.

Unexplained edit.
0. Carrying a pregnancy to term is a choice in this country.
Is it not?

ACA should not demand all females to pay for maternity coverage when we don't want it/need it.
In the meantime, men's prostate and breast cancer screenings are not covered.
So pregnancy matters, but potential deadly cancer does not?

Change has come

(2,372 posts)
237. in before the self delete
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:12 AM
Oct 2013

Blah Blah Blah

Hekate

(100,133 posts)
239. Well, aren't you special
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 05:08 AM
Oct 2013

edited to add OP in case someone wakes up and shuts down this toxic thread tonight

Carrying a pregnancy to term is a choice in this country. [View all]
Is it not?
ACA should not demand all females to pay for maternity coverage when we don't want it/need it.
In the meantime, men's prostate and breast cancer screenings are not covered.
So pregnancy matters, but potential deadly cancer does not?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
242. No. In state after state, it's no longer a choice.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:09 AM
Oct 2013

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
243. What a shamefully embarrassing thread. n/t
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:23 AM
Oct 2013

moriah

(8,312 posts)
247. Be happy someone *chose* to continue carrying you to term.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:14 PM
Oct 2013

This isn't about men or women, it's about children. As a society, we agree that we should take care of children and the aged -- we were all children, and most of us hope to live long enough to grow old. You were once a fetus, too.

Good prenatal care is essential to our next generation. And since I'm of the "Safe, Legal, and Rare" school of thought on abortion, I firmly support all programs that are designed to assist mothers so that poverty is not a reason for terminating an otherwise wanted pregnancy.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
249. luckily you don't have to worry about ACA once one enters the spirit world
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:16 PM
Oct 2013

I hear Thatcher is doing prostate exams there LOL

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
251. How about overeating as a choice? Smoking? Drinking? Not exercising?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:28 PM
Oct 2013

Maybe those of us who don't do those things shouldn't pay for any health conditions stemming from those things, huh?

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
252. I would like to think this thread has corrected and educated you further.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:29 PM
Oct 2013

Clearly it has not.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
254. Unfortunately, I don't think so...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:34 PM
Oct 2013

She's a first-year nursing student who has already "rounded."
As a nursing student, she didn't realize that prostate exam and PSA are not the same thing.
Also, as a nursing student, she didn't know how a PAP smear is performed (or spelled for that matter) and that most "bad" results are subject to a retest before a colposcopy.
She moved here to the U.S. all by herself and yet her father and brother live here.

----I am pretty sure she doesn't care, has abandoned this thread, and is saving up for next time.
I inadvertently defended her last week on an outburst, but this is indefensible. I now believe her entire persona is a made up bunch of bunk, but I'll probably forget that until next time.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
255. Spot on. nt.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 01:36 PM
Oct 2013

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
266. +1, excellent post.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:29 PM
Oct 2013

I'm just surprised she didn't delete the OP.

Heddi

(18,312 posts)
304. About her nursing program
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:53 PM
Oct 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1018480897#post12

It's an accelerated program. Started in July. Graduates in December. Just buying her first stethoscope in August. Getting job offers to work in Alaska in September to start In January.....

I'm an RN. Been since 2006

I know how nursing schools work
And I don't know of any nursing school that is an RN program that is less than 24 months long.
Most states have provisions for the minimum time a program has to be to be considered an RN.
12 months, including clinicals?

Repeated misspelling pregnancy...and breasts? Doesn't care to use the resources she has via her school to investigate online medical journals for the usefulness of PSA testing, and why it is not recommended?

I am an RN. My husband is an RN. Most of my friends are RNs. Fuck, I work around MDs and RNs and...well...I thnk y'all know where I'm going with this.

Mother Of Four

(1,722 posts)
381. That was pretty informative...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:48 PM
Oct 2013

I'm done with this poster. She's full of it to her eyebrows.

Edited to change because this is a bit of a late post for me in all this. I guess she's under review. Thank goodness. No need for me to get ticked at all
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
257. What kind of nursing student thinks that women's medical insurance should NOT cover pregnancy??
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:05 PM
Oct 2013

Do tell.

Perhaps one who has so little knowledge of public health issues and so little compassion for their fellow humans that they don't care if pregnant women wind up back in the dark ages.

Your name seems aptly fitting when you take it in the context of this thread.

I was wondering about you. I'm not wondering anymore.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
282. And she invented something called a "palpal exam". That one's new to me.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:59 PM
Oct 2013
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
283. maybe it's a paypal exam? or a papal one, yeh that's the ticket!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:05 PM
Oct 2013


Oiy!
The deck is missing a few cards, I'm feeling a bit sorry for the OP right now cuz it's gonna be harsh for her/him to see this OP of theirs in the light of day and hopefully soberness.
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
289. I was referring to tactile examination. Typed it in my native tongue by accident.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:18 PM
Oct 2013

But I'm petty sure you knew what it I was referring to, didn't you.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
292. Are you asking a question? Because here in the US we put a question mark at the end of a question.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:29 PM
Oct 2013

Don't they require basic English and grammar skills in nursing school these days?

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
262. What the living FUCK is going on here at DU?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:19 PM
Oct 2013

Some people really are having a fucking blast trying to stoke the fires to ignite a real gender war.

Present company included.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
286. ever since Skinner allowed the mens group, unabashed misogyny
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:09 PM
Oct 2013

has become really normalized here. everyone can indulge in it, with no consequences. I honestly feel that once you allow something to occur, you then have to rationalize its existence and cannot necessarily vigilantly clean up its aftermath.




Response to La Lioness Priyanka (Reply #286)

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
311. The OP is not making sense to me. Not credible at all. I can't even keep the story straight.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:16 PM
Oct 2013

We're supposed to believe a nursing student, already applying for jobs, constantly misspells common medical terminology.

That a female, nursing student and prospective nurse thinks that maternity and pregnancy related health care shouldn't be covered so that a discredited screening procedure for prostate cancer can be offered, though most doctors don't use it universally because of its unreliability.

I can't keep the story straight because it doesn't make sense.

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
326. Q to OP: Is a Fallopian tube a part inside a TV??? Yes or no?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:51 PM
Oct 2013

Just wondering about the extent of OP's knowledge.

And KOTEX is a radio station in Dallas.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
329. i think sometimes things dont make sense because they are nonsensical
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:55 PM
Oct 2013

like a woman really virulently arguing against healthcare for women. smells awfully fishy

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
268. What an utterly repulsive and unDemocratic point of view.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:31 PM
Oct 2013

I vomit in your direction and look forward to the Hammer getting you.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
273. All I can say is...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 02:39 PM
Oct 2013

I don't know why you felt the need to post an ugly empathy-lacking OP like this.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
287. you win this thread
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:11 PM
Oct 2013

niyad

(132,440 posts)
363. I obviously need more caffeine--took me two whole seconds to see that.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:12 PM
Oct 2013
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
371. You may be right about this. Under the surface of that one I always suspected a true psycho lurked.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:56 PM
Oct 2013
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
285. being a woman is not a choice and medical care should cover all aspects of healthcare. nt
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:08 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
312. Being a woman doesn't immediately means pregnancy or giving birth.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:23 PM
Oct 2013

One doesn't equal the other.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
328. one is part and parcel of healthcare of the other. just like prostate related issues are healthcare
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:54 PM
Oct 2013

issues for me. or getting vaccinations is a healthcare issue for a child.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
288. Not to get all Meta, but admins: DU would be a much better place without this poster.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:13 PM
Oct 2013

I know I'm not the only one that feels that way.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
313. You gave up on attacking me in the Lounge and started here??
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:27 PM
Oct 2013

Pretty pathetic.

Yah, I hope the Administrators see this thread too. This is a discussion board, not an echo chamber. And FYI, I support the ACA, I just don't think one condition should precede or exclude another. Everything should be covered, STARTING WITH FREE COMPREHENSIVE CANCER SCREENINGS.

RiffRandell

(5,909 posts)
333. Not attacking, just stating the truth. nt
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 08:04 PM
Oct 2013
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
372. I agree 100%. Dear Admins: DU would be a MUCH better place without this one.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:58 PM
Oct 2013
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
383. truth. nt
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 12:27 AM
Oct 2013

TBF

(36,669 posts)
291. FFS ... SINGLE PAYER NOW. nt
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:19 PM
Oct 2013
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
293. Did you hatch from an egg
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:51 PM
Oct 2013

or were you born? Because last I checked, all of us required maternity care at some point in our lives since we were ... you know, born.

 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
299. And how does it all work? I seem to remember something about a *gasp* man being involved...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:46 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
314. Our dads and brothers require care too.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:29 PM
Oct 2013

Why cover one but not the other?

And to answer your Q, no I wasn't hatched from an egg. Were you?

missingthebigdog

(1,233 posts)
342. your dad and brother are covered!!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:24 PM
Oct 2013

The tests they require are covered to the same extent that pregnancy is. Should a (free) physical exam reveal that there is some symptom or sign of prostate cancer, the Dr. will order tests to confirm or rule out cancer. Those tests will be covered, subject to copays and deductibles. This is identical to pregnancy- maternity care is covered, but not free- you have to cover your deductibles and copays.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
294. Moon bombing. nt
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:53 PM
Oct 2013

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
295. ....
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 04:56 PM
Oct 2013
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
322. It works on a few levels...check out the avatar. nt
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:44 PM
Oct 2013

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
325. LOL! n/t
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:48 PM
Oct 2013

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
296. So you're against maternity care, and FOR GUNS. How about taxes?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 05:28 PM
Oct 2013

How about voter ID? How do feel about unions?

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
315. Im not against maternity care. I just think it should be optional since there is no free coverage
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:31 PM
Oct 2013

For so many types of cancer screening.

Include all, they are just as important.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
319. So there has to be free coverage for every single kind of cancer screening
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:37 PM
Oct 2013

before any level of insurance coverage at all should be considered for pregnancy/childbirth?

That's just plain crazy.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
321. No its not! blood tests are fairly inexpensive , and a lot cheaper
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:40 PM
Oct 2013

Than treating or trying to treat an advanced stage.

Money wise is actually a smart thing to do.

Look it up online if you dint believe me. Treating early stages of cancer over advanced /terminal ones.

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
324. Many cancer screening tests are free, including a screening for prostate cancer
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:47 PM
Oct 2013

the one you're talking about isn't, but to expect every test for cancer anyone has ever come up with to be free before health costs every single person alive has had to deal with, at least from the baby being born side, and a really large percentage of people deal with from the parent side, is not reasonable.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
330. Prostate cancer is very prevelant among men, FYI.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:56 PM
Oct 2013

And to enlighten you.. cancer screenings actually are not all free even for women. Routine mammos are, but screw you if you found a lump!!! I just paid $75 for a diagnostic mammo. Done in the hospital where I do my practicum.

Diagnostic screenings are hardly covered. The insurance companies are making an aweful amount of dough off us. Shouldnt we care that we get at least preventive care covered???

gollygee

(22,336 posts)
331. Prostate cancer screening is free
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:59 PM
Oct 2013

the specific test you are talking about isn't, because the medical community finds it to be unreliable and that it causes harm more than it helps. You've read this and seen links so you know this at this point. I'm not sure why you keep saying the same thing over and over again as you didn't know. And I'm aware that prostate cancer is prevalent. My father-in-law was just diagnosed, with the test that is recommended by the medical community.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
373. Diagnostic testing is covered, toots. It's not automatically FREE, but it is subject to
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:02 PM
Oct 2013

deductible/copays until you reach your out-of-pocket cap, at which point EVERYTHING is completely covered aka FREE.

Please in the name of Gawd don't tell me that you, a nursing student, don't understand this most basic aspect of how insurance works. Good lord.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
379. But you said men shouldn't pay for maternity care since carrying to term is a choice.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:38 PM
Oct 2013

Now you're doing a switch to another argument. I'm calling bullshit straight up. You have no fucking clue what you're talking about.

 

duffyduff

(3,251 posts)
306. This might be the craziest thread OP ever
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 06:56 PM
Oct 2013

You do know that if women don't have children, society won't continue. It is in society's interest that women get maternity care.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
317. I want women to have children. How did you get to the conclusion that i didnt???
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:34 PM
Oct 2013

If the ACA is covering the maternity costs, it should cover all cancer screenings too. Don't pick and chose what you cover.

Do you have someone dying if cancer as we speak? I do.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
316. The needs of the many, outweigh the needs of the few or the one.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:34 PM
Oct 2013

nt.

 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
318. What do you mean the needs of the many?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:37 PM
Oct 2013

Are you saying men are in minority or less important than women?

Wtf...

retread

(3,922 posts)
320. WTF???????????
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:38 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
323. Yah Thats what i said when i found out ACA is not covering prostate cancer screenings.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:45 PM
Oct 2013

Lars39

(26,540 posts)
327. Post #298 fully explains why PSA is *not* recommended
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 07:53 PM
Oct 2013

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
332. and you're a nursing student who doesn't know why the screenings aren't recommended anymore
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 08:02 PM
Oct 2013

seriously. why don't you know?

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
339. Yes it is. I think it's time for you to close up shop on
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:07 PM
Oct 2013

this one. I hope, if you ever do decide to go to nursing school, you pay better attention to your studies.

Texasgal

(17,240 posts)
335. Dark.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 08:54 PM
Oct 2013

As a nursing student you should have learned or perhaps will learn that more medical research is done for males and not women in general.

Women have been fighting long and hard to get basic medical research done. I think we are all concerned about prostate cancer, it is generally a male issue... however there are PLENTY of womens health issues that never make the cut and never get researched appropriately.

Did you know that heart disease is the #1 killer of women? Have you seen any good decent research in the name of women? NO. That's because we studied heart disease in men for a very long time! We are NOW just NOW researching women and heart disease. A little late if you ask me.

I hope you study lady. You may never pass your RN if you don't.

Good luck.

( oh and seriously, carrying a baby till term is a choice that shouldn't be covered eh? I guess I should have thought about that damn cancer huh. )

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
338. hey texas. good to see you. and do you KNOW, that symptoms for a womans heart attack is different
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:04 PM
Oct 2013

than a mans. all these years, women dying from a heart attack being told the mans symptoms when we had our own unique symptoms.

of course you know

but, dark does not seem to know.

thank you for your post. and always good to see you

Texasgal

(17,240 posts)
340. it's CRAZY!!!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:13 PM
Oct 2013

same as many issues regarding research and womens health, although a heart attack is the most common.

Women also suffer from auto immune, strokes, HIV etc... all medical issues that have been researched heavily in men.

It's a big problem.

Good to see you too! Thanks for the post!

Response to seabeyond (Reply #338)

Phentex

(16,709 posts)
344. Here's the flameout!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:36 PM
Oct 2013

Ibtsd

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
345. no thank you, you just are not my type. bye bye.....
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:36 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
349. Bye byw to you hater. Go insult someone else!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:39 PM
Oct 2013

You have no respect for nurses! We know nothing!!

You make me sick to my stomach

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
350. You aren't a nurse.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:41 PM
Oct 2013
 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
369. In one post she's a nursing student, and in others she is working in various
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:50 PM
Oct 2013

nursing capacities such as surgery or oncology or whatever.

Nurse Waltermitty! Nurse Waltermitty! You're needed in the Psychiatric Department!!

demmiblue

(39,720 posts)
352. I thought you were getting ready for your 12 hour shift:
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:44 PM
Oct 2013
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1018507392

I don't think you will be saving many lives in your condition, though.
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
355. rollin eyes. byyyye.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:47 PM
Oct 2013

Texasgal

(17,240 posts)
348. Ummm..okay?
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:39 PM
Oct 2013

Calm down. We are having a debate. It's what message boards are all about.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
351. No, seabeyond, don't push that button!
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:44 PM
Oct 2013
 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
356. ya know... i had to push it. boom. nt
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:50 PM
Oct 2013
 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
336. I'm surprised this train wreck hasn't been self - deleted yet.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 08:58 PM
Oct 2013

Response to Vashta Nerada (Reply #336)

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
347. You need to take a break. n/t
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:39 PM
Oct 2013
 

darkangel218

(13,985 posts)
353. Yah? alert on my every single post like Heddi does :)
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:45 PM
Oct 2013

Why not, pile ups rule!!!

I have to go to work, but all this shit sucks. Happy living in your echo chamber, since no alternate thoughts are welcomed!

PS: even the most hard ass physician would listen to us as opposed to attacking from the begging! I guess bullies on here rule it all.

To Heddi
Karma will sort it all out. I don't know you, never done anything wrong to you, but you hate me.

You are sick.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
354. Nevermind
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:46 PM
Oct 2013

Since you can't reply to this, there's no need for my question to remain.

Texasgal

(17,240 posts)
357. i have to say that I am glad that
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:55 PM
Oct 2013

she was shut out if this thread.

I AM an RN and I am damn proud of it. DK needed to be deleted. Passing crappy info sucks especially in our profession!

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
358. Passing bad medical info is really bad.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 09:58 PM
Oct 2013

You know I'm always willing to be proven wrong, but I just don't understand people that have the facts laid out in front of them that continue to ignore the facts. Sigh. I can only hope that she's paying attention to her professors and whatnot since she's a nursing student (which is a scary thought, indeed).

Texasgal

(17,240 posts)
360. Word.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:04 PM
Oct 2013

ASA is a tough thing for people to understand. Spreading disinformation is bad. Agreed.

It's hard for me to believe that she is indeed a nursing student.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
361. She is not.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:07 PM
Oct 2013

No core curriculum nursing student would be "rounding in onco" in her first year.

My niece (she is going to be an AMAZING nurse) just started nursing school, and it's all book work. In her words, she had more patient contact in high school vocational classes.


On edit: I DO think she (darkangel) is addicted to Grey's Anatomy however...

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
359. What has happened here:
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:01 PM
Oct 2013

You have made a collection of untrue statements,
others have tried to educate you on those statements,
you have gotten more irritated,
you made up a story about "rounding" in oncology when you are only doing core study at this point,
I began to doubt you were a nurse,
Last week you stated (and I defended you in that thread) that the U.S. was the best, and you lived here on your own--without family,
Now...all of a sudden...you have a dad and a brother who live here (did they move in the last few days??),
You cannot possibly be passing any nursing type classes because you don't know what happens with a Pap smear (or how to spell it), the difference between a prostate screening and a PSA test, and any number of other things,

Now you are sad and angry because you were called out on it, so you are accusing others of attacking you.

All I wanted was information on how one can "round" less than a year into nursing school... and you conveniently stopped talking to me.

I'm sorry, but that is the definition of trolling. You are only upset that you were caught. No offense, but I don't respect those who lie to try to prove a point that isn't true.

Heddi

(18,312 posts)
368. I'd like to set straight some of the lies this poster has told
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:49 PM
Oct 2013

1) I have not alerted on a single post of darkangel 218. Not in this thread, not in others. Certainly not in one where I'm participating. I can handle arguments on my own without alerting a jury or moderator (back in the mod days)

2) In this now hidden post, http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023946225#post31 DA states:
Do you remember the call out thread in the Lounge where you said you hated me and couldn't wait for me to be gone?? Even though I never talked to you before. Then you apologized to Skinner and said that's the last. You think the admins aren't seeing this?

The above is a flat out lie. I never made such a post in the lounge, about this or any other poster. There was no apology to Skinner or any other Admin because the above never happened. She either has me confused with someone else, or she's fabricating an issue from whole cloth. Either way, it's a lie.

I am an RN. Several DU'ers are friends with me on facebook. They know my real name, and they know I"m an RN. THey know my husband is an RN. They know the name of the school I attended for my ADN and the one I am currently attending for my BSN.

This poster is lying about me. SEarch my posts and you will see that I have never made such a post about her, or anyone, in the lounge or anywhere else. Not just on DU3, but from my initial and original registration on DU in October 2011 under the name I still have, "heddi".

Again in this post, now locked, http://www.democraticunderground.com/1018507392 she accuses me of alerting on her. Firstly, alerts are anonymous. Secondly, I have not ever knowingly alerted on her posts, certainly not one in a thread where we were both particpating.

I would ask her to retract her lies, or show proof of her claims, but I believe she's been locked out of this thread, possibly locked out of DU as her account is now up for review for having more than 5 hidden posts in 90 days, so I don't expect a retraction or a posting proving her claims

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
374. no you did not alert on her. i have never alerted on her. i have never cared about her. this is
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:03 PM
Oct 2013

the first time i have really interacted with her, i believe, cause it was a big enough deal...

you did not alert. nor i. nor kali. but wtf, right.

i had someone pm me telling me they alerted on both posts. just a passer by'er. it really does not behoove us to guess who alerted on a post. inevitably we will be wrong, i have learned in the past. i do not even try to figure out who. or guess. or make unfounded accusations.

ScreamingMeemie

(68,918 posts)
375. I am hopeful that darkangel truly is "with the angels of DU" now...
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:06 PM
Oct 2013

She was dangerously misinformed, and the majority of her background has been proven to be a fib at least, an outright crazy-assed lie at worst.

I wouldn't worry about it Heddi, it's pretty obvi that she'd gone round the bend.

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
376. I alerted on post #346.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:12 PM
Oct 2013

Other than that I've never alerted on her. She deserved the hide.

Regardless, her post misinformation regarding medical care and digging her heels in deeper when people pointed out she was wrong is what had people "ganging" up on her. No one on this board should be surprised when they post junk info and get called on it. I'm worried about her lack of logic and understanding of the medical field if she really is a nursing student.

Besides this her normal behavior of PWI, lashing out and then trying to delete her posts to cover her actions is what makes DU suck.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
378. What are you? Twelve years old??
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 11:23 PM
Oct 2013
 

Vashta Nerada

(3,922 posts)
365. Well, she had three hidden posts today so her account is flagged for review.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:18 PM
Oct 2013

That one really needs to chill out and quit spreading misinformation, ahem, lies.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
366. She deleted the spin off, I'm sure this one is next.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:34 PM
Oct 2013

Then she'll be whining in the lounge.

Texasgal

(17,240 posts)
367. She already did.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:37 PM
Oct 2013

tammywammy

(26,582 posts)
370. Her account has been flagged for review.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:53 PM
Oct 2013

I don't think she can delete this thread now. I went back and found trumad's thread about what happens when you're flagged for review. http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023902265

This notification is to inform you that your account has been automatically flagged for review. Usually when this happens it is because an account has had too many posts hidden in a relatively short period of time.

Please note: You have not been permanently banned from the site. However, some restrictions have been temporarily placed on your account until an an administrator can review it. We apologize for the inconvenience.

-- You are temporarily unable to post messages, recommend threads, or vote in polls.
-- You are temporarily unable to send Mail.
-- You are temporarily unable to send alerts.

These temporary restrictions will remain on your account until an administrator is able to review it. Typically, this account review occurs sometime over the next 24 hours, except on weekends and holidays when it may take longer. Please do not create another account in order to circumvent this review, which would be a violation of our Terms of Service.

Thank you for your patience and understanding.

The DU Administrators

dflprincess

(29,341 posts)
364. I really hate to be tacky and put this into a dollars & cents argument.
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 10:13 PM
Oct 2013

But healthy children cost all of us less - so it is to our benefit that women have access to good prenatal and post-partum care. And sometimes pregnancies happened when they weren't expected - no matter how careful the parents were being.

I suppose you also object to your tax money going to WIC.




Response to darkangel218 (Original post)

tandot

(6,671 posts)
382. WTF? Are you stupid? If you are really a nurse, I hope I'll never be in your care :(
Wed Oct 30, 2013, 12:27 AM
Oct 2013

Prostate exams are covered. Why do you lie about it?

People like you should NEVER be involved in patient care. You completely ignore facts, don't listen to sound medical advise, and don't seem to even know what you are talking about. Do some research ... and then apologize to his community. Holy fuck

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This message was self-del...