Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPresident of Turd Way's Think Tank accuses Obama of 'demoting liberty,' wants MORE useless war
Editors note: Will Marshall is the president of the Progressive Policy Institute. The views expressed are his own.
Since he took office, Obama has displayed deep ambivalence about using U.S. power to advance the nations liberal ideals. Early on, he was at pains to distance himself from George W. Bushs Freedom Agenda, which unwisely conflated U.S. support for democracy with military intervention. In 2009, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told Congress the new administrations foreign policy would revolve around diplomacy, defense, and development, pointedly omitting a fourth D democracy.
Now Obama wants to test President Hassan Rouhanis professed desire to negotiate an end to the nuclear confrontation, and hastens to reassure Iran that the United States is not interested in regime change. But what happens if talks collapse again, or simply buy time for Iran to enrich enough uranium to make nuclear bombs? Over the long-term, our best hope for better relations with Iran rest on internal political change that gives rise to a more representative and less outwardly aggressive government.
But such is the lot of a superpower. In any case, it makes little sense for Washington to ignore or downgrade the values dimension of American power. Like Europe a century ago, the broad Muslim crescent from Afghanistan to Morocco is convulsed by ethnic, religious and national feuds. It is hatching virulent ideological rivalries and most of its governments lack solid foundations of political legitimacy. (Hereditary monarchies seem the most stable).
Obama is right that the United States ought to be humble about our ability to shape events in the Middle East. But we should always throw Americas weight behind popular hopes for greater economic and political freedom. And for democracy too, because as a means of sharing power, enabling compromises and trade-offs, and managing social pluralism, its the only plausible alternative to the regions zero-sum politics of guns, rockets and car-bombs.
http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2013/10/03/obama-has-demoted-liberty/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1768 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President of Turd Way's Think Tank accuses Obama of 'demoting liberty,' wants MORE useless war (Original Post)
BluegrassStateBlues
Oct 2013
OP
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)1. I wasn't aware that Third Way was so similar to Neo-Con.
I guess that is something they really don't want us to be aware of.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)2. There's radiation in the Pacific Ocean, and he's worried about Iran?
bemildred
(90,061 posts)3. "But such is the lot of a superpower."
I love the whiney tone. The White Man's Burden they used to call it.
And then:
"Obama is right that the United States ought to be humble about our ability to shape events in the Middle East."
All that is the bait before the hook:
But we should always throw Americas weight behind popular hopes for greater economic and political freedom. And for democracy too, because as a means of sharing power, enabling compromises and trade-offs, and managing social pluralism, its the only plausible alternative to the regions zero-sum politics of guns, rockets and car-bombs.
Like much of that was not our doing.