Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn Case You Missed This... On The NSA, The Media May Tilt Right - CJR
On the NSA, the media may tilt rightAn inquiry finds a pro-surveillance bias in the language
By Albert Wong and Valerie Belair-Gagnon - CJR
10/23/13
<snip>
Since June 6, the world has been roiled by an ongoing series of disclosures based on Edward Snowdens document leaks, with coverage led by the Guardian and the Washington Post, about clandestine mass surveillance conducted, with little oversight, by the NSA and its international partners.
Public perceptions of these surveillance revelations are affected not only by the NSAs actual actions, but also by the news coverage of the governments spying programs. Previous studies have shown that the latter factor can have a profound effect on public opinion. Given the importance of this issue, we decided to analyze major US newspapers post-Snowden coverage of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to determine if there was an overall bias in either a pro- (traditionally conservative) or anti-surveillance (traditionally liberal) direction.
The results were unexpected, and quite remarkable.
Our analysis of total press coverage of FISA and FISC between July 1 and July 31 (July was the first full calendar month after the initial disclosures in June) revealed that the widely held assumption that major media outlets uniformly tilt to the left does not match reality. In fact, if anything, the media appears to tilt to the right, at least on this issue.
We did a LexisNexis search of four of the largest US newspapers by circulation: The New York Times, USA Today, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post. Of the 30 traditionally pro- or anti-surveillance terms we examined (15 each, listed below) in all four newspapers, key words generally used to justify increased surveillance, such as security or terrorism, were used much more frequently than terms that tend to invoke opposition to mass surveillance, such as privacy or liberty.
USA Today led the pack...
<snip>
More: http://www.cjr.org/the_kicker/news_media_pro_surveillance_bi.php?page=all
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 970 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Case You Missed This... On The NSA, The Media May Tilt Right - CJR (Original Post)
WillyT
Oct 2013
OP
Make7
(8,543 posts)1. What, if anything, does the media tilt left on? ( n/t )
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)2. "The results were unexpected"
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)3. Doesn't the notion the results were unexpected
Show acceptance of the RW "liberal press" meme?
Octafish
(55,745 posts)4. Gee. Who benefits from a strong rightward tilt of mass surveillance?
grasswire
(50,130 posts)5. D'oh!