Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Tue Oct 29, 2013, 03:02 PM Oct 2013

In Case You Missed This... On The NSA, The Media May Tilt Right - CJR

On the NSA, the media may tilt right
An inquiry finds a pro-surveillance bias in the language

By Albert Wong and Valerie Belair-Gagnon - CJR
10/23/13

<snip>

Since June 6, the world has been roiled by an ongoing series of disclosures based on Edward Snowden’s document leaks, with coverage led by the Guardian and the Washington Post, about clandestine mass surveillance conducted, with little oversight, by the NSA and its international partners.

Public perceptions of these surveillance revelations are affected not only by the NSA’s actual actions, but also by the news coverage of the government’s spying programs. Previous studies have shown that the latter factor can have a profound effect on public opinion. Given the importance of this issue, we decided to analyze major US newspapers’ “post-Snowden” coverage of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) to determine if there was an overall bias in either a pro- (traditionally conservative) or anti-surveillance (traditionally liberal) direction.

The results were unexpected, and quite remarkable.

Our analysis of total press coverage of FISA and FISC between July 1 and July 31 (July was the first full calendar month after the initial disclosures in June) revealed that the widely held assumption that major media outlets uniformly tilt to the left does not match reality. In fact, if anything, the media appears to tilt to the right, at least on this issue.

We did a LexisNexis search of four of the largest US newspapers by circulation: The New York Times, USA Today, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post. Of the 30 traditionally pro- or anti-surveillance terms we examined (15 each, listed below) in all four newspapers, key words generally used to justify increased surveillance, such as security or terrorism, were used much more frequently than terms that tend to invoke opposition to mass surveillance, such as privacy or liberty.

USA Today led the pack...

<snip>

More: http://www.cjr.org/the_kicker/news_media_pro_surveillance_bi.php?page=all



5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Case You Missed This... On The NSA, The Media May Tilt Right - CJR (Original Post) WillyT Oct 2013 OP
What, if anything, does the media tilt left on? ( n/t ) Make7 Oct 2013 #1
"The results were unexpected" Fumesucker Oct 2013 #2
Doesn't the notion the results were unexpected hootinholler Oct 2013 #3
Gee. Who benefits from a strong rightward tilt of mass surveillance? Octafish Oct 2013 #4
D'oh! grasswire Oct 2013 #5
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In Case You Missed This.....