Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 01:08 PM Nov 2013

If the Khyber Pass route is blocked, it will seriously complicate withdrawal from Afghanistan

Imran vows to block Nato supplies in KP


LAHORE: Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf (PTI) chief Imran Khan vowed Saturday to block Nato supplies from crossing through Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in response to the US drone strike that killed Pakistani Taliban chief Hakimullah Mehsud and 'sabotaged' peace talks.

Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is one of two key routes Nato supplies move in and out of Afghanistan and is seen as crucial as US-led allied forces prepare to drawdown from the war-torn country in 2014.

Opposition parties in Pakistan have accused the US of using the drone strike to stymie the peace process before talks proper had even started.

Khan, whose party leads the provincial government in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, said: “Even if we lose our provincial government, we will not let Nato supplies pass through as long as drone strikes do not stop.”


http://www.dawn.com/news/1053624/imran-vows-to-block-nato-supplies-in-kp
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If the Khyber Pass route is blocked, it will seriously complicate withdrawal from Afghanistan (Original Post) FarCenter Nov 2013 OP
Has nobody read Rudyard Kipling? longship Nov 2013 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #2
Yeah, destroy that Afghan Navy. Comrade Grumpy Nov 2013 #9
You know Khyber is an overland route, right? NuclearDem Nov 2013 #10
"seriously complicate" bemildred Nov 2013 #3
For years I have been saying.... Bigmack Nov 2013 #4
There is still the other route via rail to the Baltic Sea FarCenter Nov 2013 #6
Waist deep in the big sandy. - With apologies to Pete Seegar Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2013 #5
Fly out what they can, blow up the rest so it's unusable. KentuckyWoman Nov 2013 #7
Khan!!!!!!!!!! dionysus Nov 2013 #8

longship

(40,416 posts)
1. Has nobody read Rudyard Kipling?
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 02:40 PM
Nov 2013

During Queen Victoria's colonial period the British learned how futile it was to tread militarily into Afghanistan. The Soviet Union learned the same, with some help from the USA via Democratic Rep. Charlie Wilson.

Military adventures in Afghanistan have always been a dodgy, often failing, enterprise. Why the USA would ever stay there with aspirations to fix things, astounds me. To stay there for a decade goes far beyond rationality, let alone sensibility.

It boggles the mind why anybody would argue that staying there serves any purpose other than to merely keep ones head above the level of the quicksand.

Response to FarCenter (Original post)

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
4. For years I have been saying....
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 03:12 PM
Nov 2013

..If we can fly it out, do so NOW.

If we can't... blow it in place and GTFO of that place.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Khyber Pass route ...