Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:19 PM Nov 2013

Three Important Graphics: War On The Poor





A person making a $50,000 salary pays 10 cents a day in taxes for food stamps while corporate welfare costs every American family $6,000 per year.

1. Food stamps: read http://www.thomhartmann.com/forum/2012/09/person-making-50000-dollars-year-pays-10-cents-day-taxes-food-stamps

2. Corporate welfare: read https://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/09/23






Today is the day. The GOP/Tea Party cuts to food stamps are now in effect and millions of Americans will have to make do with less.

FULL STORY: read https://aattp.org/poor-americans-face-a-holiday-season-with-less-food-on-their-tables-compliments-of-teapublicans/
(thanks to I Acknowledge Class Warfare Exists)



https://www.facebook.com/NoTeaParty


edit: new graphic








19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

indepat

(20,899 posts)
1. So corporate welfare costs every American family $6,000 a year, but some have not come to
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:36 PM
Nov 2013

grips with the fact that the government of, by, and for the people is, in actuality, a corporatist government almost solely beholden to the interests of large corporations rather than we the people.

 

Old Union Guy

(738 posts)
2. Good graphics, but here's another point ...
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 06:36 PM
Nov 2013

To a degree, "food stamps" are a corporate subsidy, too.

Why JPMorgan Wants to See More Americans on Food Stamps
http://moneymorning.com/2013/04/09/why-jpmorgan-wants-to-see-more-americans-on-food-stamps/]

The point being, not merely that they are being paid to do the IT for the EBT program, but that it is structured in a way that is in effect a bounty per recipient.

Lucky Luciano

(11,252 posts)
6. I was wondering the same thing. Useless without
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:26 PM
Nov 2013

...the calculation methodology. I bet the $6000 includes infrastructure construction contracts - but that is not a pure subsidy since we get something for that.

rwsanders

(2,596 posts)
10. Also depends on the definition of "subsidy"...
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:56 PM
Nov 2013

Some people only include direct payments, while others include tax breaks, credits, refunds.
But I'd bet neither includes just plain dependency on government contracts.

Its a shame we can't select where it goes. I'd bet if we could there'd be a lot less corporate welfare, defense spending, etc. even from the red states. I'd triple my contribution if it would eliminate hunger in the U.S.

Curmudgeoness

(18,219 posts)
5. I am not sure who that "average taxpayer" is.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:19 PM
Nov 2013

My tax burden is not $6000 total, and I am not too far below the average income that is usually reported.

Response to napkinz (Original post)

niyad

(113,213 posts)
8. and how long do you figure that will take? people are hungry right now.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 08:51 PM
Nov 2013

cutting food waste is fine, but I don't think those who are suffering food insecurity (such a lovely phrase) really want my vegetable peelings and the broths made from them.

welcome to DU--enjoy your stay.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
11. OR, we will save food, corporate profits will increase because they will need less employees, more
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 09:00 PM
Nov 2013

people will be on food stamps, and more people will be hungry.

I suspect as long as we are increasing our population by a million or two every year, all dependent on massive amounts of petroleum to grow, ship, and store most of it, it will be a while before the benevolent corps drop their prices. And a cold day in hell when you find more than a handful of benevolent corporations.
 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
15. And many of those food stamp recipients (or their children) will have the pleasure of
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:18 AM
Nov 2013

fighting in a war to secure greater profits for those corporations someday. Quite a system.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Three Important Graphics:...