Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:19 PM Nov 2013

On October 29th, something absolutely INSANE happened in the House of Representatives

To fully appreciate this insanity, we have to take an unpleasant but brief trip down memory lane — back to the darkest days of the 2008 financial crisis. Insurance giant American International Group (AIG) was on the verge of collapse, and the U.S. government stepped in with an $85 billion bailout. The risky behavior that drove AIG to the brink was largely fueled by a financial instrument known as derivatives trading.

In the wake of the financial crisis, many people were less than enthusiastic about the prospect of footing a multi-billion dollar bill every time Wall Street gambled its way into a corner. So, when Congress passed a new set of financial regulations known as Dodd-Frank in 2010, it included a provision that required banks to conduct some forms of derivatives trading in a more isolated way in an effort to reduce risk and make government bailouts less likely. Many reform advocates would have preferred much stronger protections, but given the $12.4 million in campaign contributions and $105 million in lobbying expenditures by Wall Street industry groups attempting to influence the law, it was certainly better than nothing.

This brings us to insane part: Now, the House has passed a bill that would roll back these derivative regulations and let banks go back to the same set of rules that let them break the economy in the first place. So, why is it that both parties have found a way to agree on a substantive regulatory change at a time when partisan bickering is supposedly making any progress impossible?

It’s certainly not because the public is up in arms about rolling back derivative regulations — most Americans have never heard of derivatives trading, let alone pressured their Member of Congress to deregulate it. No, this is happening for a very different reason: Big bank lobbyists wrote this bill.

That’s not a cute turn of phrase or an exaggeration — The New York Times reports that 70 of the 85 lines in the new House bill reflect recommendations made in a piece of model legislation drafted by lobbyists for Citigroup, another bank that played a major role in the 2008 crisis and also received billions of federal stimulus dollars. The same report also revealed “two crucial paragraphs, prepared by Citigroup in conjunction with other Wall Street banks, were copied nearly word for word.” You can even view the original documents and see how Citigroup’s lobbyists redrafted the House Bill, striking out ideas they didn’t like and replacing them with ones they did. Citigroup is quite literally writing its own rules.


THE REST of this disgusting story:

http://daily.represent.us/theres-something-absolutely-insane-happening-house-right-now/
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
On October 29th, something absolutely INSANE happened in the House of Representatives (Original Post) Triana Nov 2013 OP
It's true. K&R for exposure. 2naSalit Nov 2013 #1
Can we trust the Senate to stand against this nonsense? raging moderate Nov 2013 #2
with you there, Glass-Steagall worked, reinstate it. nt littlewolf Nov 2013 #4
No, we cannot trust the Senate to stand against this nonsense. Enthusiast Nov 2013 #14
k n r gopiscrap Nov 2013 #3
That is why we need to draft Elizabeth Warren for the Democratic nominee for president. JDPriestly Nov 2013 #5
+1 wtmusic Nov 2013 #6
This is not unexpected. truedelphi Nov 2013 #7
+1 cui bono Nov 2013 #13
Makes sense that they did it.. busterbrown Nov 2013 #8
"Make No Mistake™... only by deregulating the banks can we control the banks." MannyGoldstein Nov 2013 #9
Thanks for keeping up on this. Needs to keep kicked! Same old Tricks! KoKo Nov 2013 #10
Kick. woo me with science Nov 2013 #18
Time for the BillyRibs Nov 2013 #11
I won't pretend to really understand this davidthegnome Nov 2013 #12
Campaigns need to be publicly funded. This is ridiculous. octoberlib Nov 2013 #15
Damn. Almost unimaginably corrupt to the very core. Triana Nov 2013 #16
K&R CORRUPTION. woo me with science Nov 2013 #17

raging moderate

(4,304 posts)
2. Can we trust the Senate to stand against this nonsense?
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 10:23 PM
Nov 2013

Personally, I want Glass-Steagall reinstated. Listen up, Republicons, Dodd-Frank IS a compromise!

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
5. That is why we need to draft Elizabeth Warren for the Democratic nominee for president.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:21 PM
Nov 2013

The corruption in D.C. stinks. She isn't mired in it yet.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
7. This is not unexpected.
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:49 PM
Nov 2013

The moment that many of us heard that Obama was drafting Geithner to be his head man of the overall economy, and let the guy serve as Secretary of the Treasury, we knew we had been hoodwinked,.

Our elected officials are nothing more than the well paid, rubber-stamping puppets of the Top Financial Firms. Doesn't matter if they' re sitting in the House or in the Senate, or in the Oval Office.

98% of the friggin' "elected" henchmen and henchwomen are indeed working hard, but as Kucinich asked some time ago, what many of us want to know is exactly whom it is that they are working so hard for.

It certainly is not for us.

busterbrown

(8,515 posts)
8. Makes sense that they did it..
Sat Nov 2, 2013, 11:56 PM
Nov 2013

Destroy, tear apart, create chaos and then blame the innocent.. Sound Familiar?.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
9. "Make No Mistake™... only by deregulating the banks can we control the banks."
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 12:04 AM
Nov 2013

"Isn't that right Jamie? Isn't that right Lloyd?"

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
10. Thanks for keeping up on this. Needs to keep kicked! Same old Tricks!
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 12:23 AM
Nov 2013

They figure we out here are too dumb to keep up with Wall Street Lobby and Big Money going for a Second Bail Out! We have short memories. We are still at WAR 12 Years after 9/11...and most Americans don't give a flying ..........F!

davidthegnome

(2,983 posts)
12. I won't pretend to really understand this
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 12:56 AM
Nov 2013

But... 70 lines in this bill were written by lobbyists for Citigroup? Bi-partisan support... hmm. Yeah, even a mathematical imbecile like me can figure out people are going to get screwed again.

octoberlib

(14,971 posts)
15. Campaigns need to be publicly funded. This is ridiculous.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 09:05 PM
Nov 2013

CONGRESS’ ‘PARTY DUES’ PRACTICE CHARGES MEMBERS FOR COMMITTEE SPOTS

A study conducted by the Sunlight Foundation last year found that “when it comes to fundraising potential, not all committee assignments in the U.S. House are created equal. ” The study concluded that certain committee assignments afforded politicians an improved ability to solicit donations. According to the report,

In particular, Ways and Means, Financial Services, and Energy and Commerce are very good fundraising committees. And for good reason: Ways and Means has jurisdiction over tax policy, Financial Services over securities and banking policy, and Energy and Commerce over energy policy. In all three policy areas, a substantial number of corporations care very much about how policy gets made, and their employees are willing to contribute substantial sums – both through their PACs and individually – to make sure that they have access.

Committee assignments that give a politician the ability to directly affect the policies most important to monied interests are more likely to help those politicians reap the benefits of campaign contributions. Simply put, certain committees are more lucrative. How much more lucrative you might ask? Well, thanks to the Sunlight Foundation we have two very helpful tables at our disposal.Table 1 shows the estimated “bonus” in itemized contributions as well as “bonus” PAC fundraising totals. Relationships that are statistically significant are in bold.






http://daily.represent.us/party-dues-committee-spots/


http://sunlightfoundation.com/blog/2012/04/02/housecommittees/
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
16. Damn. Almost unimaginably corrupt to the very core.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 10:22 AM
Nov 2013

I agree. Gut Citizens United and all the rest of the "buy the gov't you want" bullshit and mandate that elections be publicly funded.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»On October 29th, somethin...