Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear President Obama, This Is Why Judges Matter
Its been a day of body blows for reproductive rights. On Thursday night, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reversed a lower courts decision to temporarily block a provision of the omnibus Texas abortion law that requires doctors performing abortions to have admitting privileges at a local hospital. The appeals court found that its constitutionally OK for the requirement to trigger the closure of fully one-third of the reproductive health clinics in the state, because the Supreme Court has found that the incidental effect of making it more difficult or more expensive to procure an abortion cannot be enough to invalidate it. The ruling will be catastrophic, measured in access for women to a procedure they have the constitutional right to obtain. The decision was written by Judge Priscilla R. Owen, a George W. Bush appointee, and joined by two other judges who are womenoh how the right is crowingand also Bush appointees.
Similar admitting privileges provisions have been struck down by courts in Alabama, Mississippi, North Dakota, and Wisconsin. Judges in each of those cases saw these abortion restrictions for what they areunconstitutional burdens on the right to accessand blocked them.
On Friday, morning, it was the turn of another extremely conservative woman chosen for the bench by Bush, Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Brown handed down a similarly dramatic decision holding that the provision in the Affordable Care Act that requires companies to provide health care coverage that includes contraception "trammels" the religious freedom of an Ohio-based food service company, Freshway Foods, through its two owners, who claimed that the mandate violated its Catholic faith. This is a company we are talking about, not its owners. But following headlong in the wake of the Supreme Courts wrongheaded finding in Citizens United that corporations are people, too, Brown found that the mandate violates the companys strongly held religious convictions. To make the company provide a health care planfrom an outside insurerthat offers contraceptive coverage is a compel[led] affirmation of a repugnant belief, Brown wrote. The argument that a for-profit secular company has a religious conscienceseparate and apart from the religious beliefs of its ownersis a notion that vaults the concept of personhood from the silly (corporations are people, my friend) to the sublime (also they pray).
Similar admitting privileges provisions have been struck down by courts in Alabama, Mississippi, North Dakota, and Wisconsin. Judges in each of those cases saw these abortion restrictions for what they areunconstitutional burdens on the right to accessand blocked them.
On Friday, morning, it was the turn of another extremely conservative woman chosen for the bench by Bush, Janice Rogers Brown of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Brown handed down a similarly dramatic decision holding that the provision in the Affordable Care Act that requires companies to provide health care coverage that includes contraception "trammels" the religious freedom of an Ohio-based food service company, Freshway Foods, through its two owners, who claimed that the mandate violated its Catholic faith. This is a company we are talking about, not its owners. But following headlong in the wake of the Supreme Courts wrongheaded finding in Citizens United that corporations are people, too, Brown found that the mandate violates the companys strongly held religious convictions. To make the company provide a health care planfrom an outside insurerthat offers contraceptive coverage is a compel[led] affirmation of a repugnant belief, Brown wrote. The argument that a for-profit secular company has a religious conscienceseparate and apart from the religious beliefs of its ownersis a notion that vaults the concept of personhood from the silly (corporations are people, my friend) to the sublime (also they pray).
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2013/11/texas_abortion_restrictions_and_the_obamacare_contraception_mandate_bush.single.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 769 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dear President Obama, This Is Why Judges Matter (Original Post)
boston bean
Nov 2013
OP
OffWithTheirHeads
(10,337 posts)1. Prey, not pray.
Jasana
(490 posts)2. I swear I am going to have a meltdown before this week is over!
At this point I am so enraged, I don't dare say anything else or this whole freakin' board may melt down.
TheDebbieDee
(11,119 posts)3. Lol! I love your signature and gif. Welcome to DU!
frazzled
(18,402 posts)4. Shouldn't this be "Dear Harry Reid"?
No president has had more judicial nominees blocked by Senate Republicans. The vacancies are staggering. He nominates them. They block them. There's no way for Obama to "fight" for his nominees. The Senate Democrats must threaten the nuclear option (and carry through). Obama does not run the Senate.