Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Message auto-removed (Original Post) Name removed Nov 2013 OP
So you had a crap policy that wasn't up to ACA standards and the ins co has to replace it. valerief Nov 2013 #1
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #4
Is this a joke? What's the 89 percent and 4.9 percent thing? Having some fun here? valerief Nov 2013 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #13
What's it on the exchange? nt valerief Nov 2013 #16
Jon10 Agschmid Nov 2013 #75
'Cumulative' as in, elleng Nov 2013 #64
You should... Agschmid Nov 2013 #73
I've noticed a lot of these 'my premium went because of the ACA' posts Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2013 #2
They might come of their own free will. nt valerief Nov 2013 #5
True Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2013 #9
You lost me at "republicans with free will" Agschmid Nov 2013 #77
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #7
You haven't answered my questions yet. nt valerief Nov 2013 #10
you already know why the rates have gone up? Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2013 #22
why? valerief Nov 2013 #24
Insurance rates always go up, elleng Nov 2013 #68
And so has their coverage... Most likely. Agschmid Nov 2013 #78
And they seem to have low post numbers... KansDem Nov 2013 #18
45 post newbie - I'm thinking RW troll dballance Nov 2013 #91
They were going up at double digit rates before the ACA. NutmegYankee Nov 2013 #3
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #11
You should use imaginary money to pay for your imaginary increases XRubicon Nov 2013 #14
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #21
you can get blue cross on the exchange for about 100 to 300 a month Sunlei Nov 2013 #92
Lucky you. Most were seeing them for the last decade. NutmegYankee Nov 2013 #15
Exactly! kevinbgoode1 Nov 2013 #33
K & R JanT Nov 2013 #58
Serious question tkmorris Nov 2013 #25
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #35
will you accept Duckhunter935 Nov 2013 #42
IBTL: None of the past increase had anything to do with ACA. So the effect of ACA to you is 4.9% stevenleser Nov 2013 #6
Does the new policy include wambulance transport? nt Xipe Totec Nov 2013 #12
Is this an employer-sponsored policy nobodyspecial Nov 2013 #17
You understand that the ACA has slowed the increase of costs.. right? Motown_Johnny Nov 2013 #19
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #26
Before ACA, my premium went from completely-employer paid (in 2002)... Cooley Hurd Nov 2013 #32
Mine was somewhat similar too. . . kevinbgoode1 Nov 2013 #38
In 1982, my first over-the-counter job was bag boy at the local P&C... Cooley Hurd Nov 2013 #46
I wouldn't even give the OP a 'nice try'. This is 6th grade trolling effort. stevenleser Nov 2013 #41
True, Steven... Cooley Hurd Nov 2013 #50
so what can you get on the exchange? nt arely staircase Nov 2013 #20
Given the info posted, he wouldn't be eligible for the exchange. tkmorris Nov 2013 #27
What info? All I see is Blue Cross. nt valerief Nov 2013 #29
He has ACA compliant insurance through his employer tkmorris Nov 2013 #84
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #23
Next we'll get the "you're not nice" posts we've seen lately, complete with finger wagging. valerief Nov 2013 #28
Right? But I don't give a shit! Just like many others here posting how tired they are, ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2013 #30
I hate the RW disinformation campaign, too. nt valerief Nov 2013 #31
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #37
I have no idea what you're talking about since you offer NO details. Bye. nt valerief Nov 2013 #40
John 10 whttevrr Nov 2013 #34
My Anthem Blue Cross premiums went up at 20-50% every year DefenseLawyer Nov 2013 #36
Exactly, this person is deliberately disrupting with nonsense. stevenleser Nov 2013 #39
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #44
Post hoc ergo propter hoc nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #47
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #51
Right where you mention the increase in the same sentence as the ACA. stevenleser Nov 2013 #54
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #57
Once again, post hoc ergo propter hoc. nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #59
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #60
Those words mean nothing from you since you don't know their correct meaning. nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #61
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #67
LMAO, no, you don't know the meaning of the straw man and circular logic fallacies. nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #70
Since you keep such close watch... Agschmid Nov 2013 #87
the outrageous yearly increases were happening well before ACA. why are you letting insurance seabeyond Nov 2013 #43
P.S. MIRT, when you get done with the OP, check out who Recc'd it. nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #45
good call, heh. BootinUp Nov 2013 #48
Wow, a jury actually refused to hide this OP. stevenleser Nov 2013 #53
This is one of my main gripes with the jury system. trumad Nov 2013 #62
Yeah, something like this should live 5 minutes or less if posted during the middle of the day. stevenleser Nov 2013 #74
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #63
LOL, troll said what? nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #65
Yah... Ok... Bro. Agschmid Nov 2013 #81
What idiot juror said "Leave it alone, MIRT will kill it", why leave it alone then????? Logical Nov 2013 #93
F them then.... maced666 Nov 2013 #49
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #55
What state are you in ... Historic NY Nov 2013 #80
Not shocked to see how this turned out... hughee99 Nov 2013 #52
You're kidding right? I think you forgot the sarcasm tag. stevenleser Nov 2013 #56
What? hughee99 Nov 2013 #85
There is something wrong with the ACA... Agschmid Nov 2013 #83
There is plenty wrong with it, though THIS would have resolve most hughee99 Nov 2013 #88
Any chance that you can post some statements from your insurance company penultimate Nov 2013 #66
Don't expect an honest response. LAGC Nov 2013 #69
Yeah, I pretty figure that's how it will play out... penultimate Nov 2013 #76
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #72
You can block that stuff out penultimate Nov 2013 #90
So you never had an increase prior to ACA? ecstatic Nov 2013 #71
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #79
A single digit increase? Wow ecstatic Nov 2013 #86
Double digits after what... Agschmid Nov 2013 #89
My insurance rates were going up by leaps and bounds for YEARS before ACA. Arugula Latte Nov 2013 #82

valerief

(53,235 posts)
1. So you had a crap policy that wasn't up to ACA standards and the ins co has to replace it.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:25 PM
Nov 2013

So what's on the exchange for you?

What are plan details (deductibles, single/family, etc.) and what state?

Response to valerief (Reply #1)

valerief

(53,235 posts)
8. Is this a joke? What's the 89 percent and 4.9 percent thing? Having some fun here?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:29 PM
Nov 2013

Response to valerief (Reply #8)

valerief

(53,235 posts)
16. What's it on the exchange? nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:33 PM
Nov 2013

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
75. Jon10
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:23 PM
Nov 2013

Is sure as hell not looking.

elleng

(141,926 posts)
64. 'Cumulative' as in,
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:16 PM
Nov 2013

4.9 percent increase over last month? Each month since ACA passed, years ago?? or what? Cumulative of what?

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
73. You should...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:23 PM
Nov 2013

You know...

Compare the actual policy documents. Might be a worthwhile thing to do.

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
2. I've noticed a lot of these 'my premium went because of the ACA' posts
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:27 PM
Nov 2013

are Republicans sent here?

valerief

(53,235 posts)
5. They might come of their own free will. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:28 PM
Nov 2013

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
9. True
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:29 PM
Nov 2013

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
77. You lost me at "republicans with free will"
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:24 PM
Nov 2013

Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Reply #2)

valerief

(53,235 posts)
10. You haven't answered my questions yet. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:29 PM
Nov 2013

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
22. you already know why the rates have gone up?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:36 PM
Nov 2013

valerief

(53,235 posts)
24. why?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:38 PM
Nov 2013

elleng

(141,926 posts)
68. Insurance rates always go up,
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:19 PM
Nov 2013

every year, happens to everyone, even those of us with the 'best' employer plan, Federal Employee Health Benefits Plan.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
78. And so has their coverage... Most likely.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:25 PM
Nov 2013

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
18. And they seem to have low post numbers...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:35 PM
Nov 2013

Like a number between 30 and 40...

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
91. 45 post newbie - I'm thinking RW troll
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:36 PM
Nov 2013

read his other posts. all negative about Obama.

NutmegYankee

(16,477 posts)
3. They were going up at double digit rates before the ACA.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:27 PM
Nov 2013

I expect there was a minimal impact on that.

Response to NutmegYankee (Reply #3)

XRubicon

(2,241 posts)
14. You should use imaginary money to pay for your imaginary increases
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:32 PM
Nov 2013

You are welcome!

Response to XRubicon (Reply #14)

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
92. you can get blue cross on the exchange for about 100 to 300 a month
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:37 PM
Nov 2013

NutmegYankee

(16,477 posts)
15. Lucky you. Most were seeing them for the last decade.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:33 PM
Nov 2013

kevinbgoode1

(166 posts)
33. Exactly!
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:47 PM
Nov 2013

One of the things that irritates me the most is the whining coming from conservatives who apparently suddenly discovered that insurance premiums RISE. . .except none of them every opened their mouths for the last 30 years while our entire health care system became subjugated by a cabal of profit-hungry "insurance" corporations whose goals are to minimize payouts on any claims.

This country didn't get to a point where 18% of our national wealth goes into the pockets of health care providers and the corporate "insurance" middlemen because of the ACA - and if conservatives had been willing to DO anything about this problem for the last 30 years (besides try to line the pockets of the do-nothing profiteering private "socialized" insurance corporations) there wouldn't be so many issues with the system today.

It is a national embarrassment that the leading cause of bankruptcies in this nation are due to staggering health care costs - and that the American people are held hostage by the everchanging whims of big insurance companies which Republicans strongly refused to regulate (after all, THEY are entitled to make a profit, the working American is (apparently) NOT) And it is so outrageous for me to see whining conservatives suddenly discovering they have to actually PAY for something.

I am increasingly beginning to believe that Republicans themselves are the ultimate "welfare queens."

JanT

(229 posts)
58. K & R
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:10 PM
Nov 2013

you said it so eloquently-nothing more i need to add. thank you for saying it like it is.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
25. Serious question
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:38 PM
Nov 2013

What was it in the ACA that you believe caused your rates to increase so dramatically? What specifically was the mechanism?

Response to tkmorris (Reply #25)

 

Duckhunter935

(16,974 posts)
42. will you accept
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:55 PM
Nov 2013

the refund check when they overcharge on the premium having covered more than the 80% maximum. I have heard quite a few rebate check have been sent out as part of the ACA.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
6. IBTL: None of the past increase had anything to do with ACA. So the effect of ACA to you is 4.9%
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:28 PM
Nov 2013

And that is pretty good considering that Health Insurance premiums rose more than that on average every year for the past 10 years.

Oh, and welcome to DU

and in before the lock and in before the PPR

Xipe Totec

(44,554 posts)
12. Does the new policy include wambulance transport? nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:31 PM
Nov 2013

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
17. Is this an employer-sponsored policy
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:34 PM
Nov 2013

or an individual policy? Is this purchased through a spouse's plan? Have you checked rates on the exchange?

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
19. You understand that the ACA has slowed the increase of costs.. right?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:35 PM
Nov 2013

Health insurance costs were skyrocketing before it passed. That is a big reason it was passed.

How about posting the increases for the 3-4 years before ACA passed?


Response to Motown_Johnny (Reply #19)

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
32. Before ACA, my premium went from completely-employer paid (in 2002)...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:44 PM
Nov 2013

...to my employer having to (reluctantly) ask for an employee contribution (2003). It jumped double-digits YEARLY UNTIL ACA, jon...

Nice try.

kevinbgoode1

(166 posts)
38. Mine was somewhat similar too. . .
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:52 PM
Nov 2013

EVERY year my "contributions" went up. . .and this year (before ACA was actually instituted) my premium went up 60%, and I'm saddled with more co-pays, etc. And hell, last year my CAR insurance went up 50% and I have never had a claim or a speeding ticket in at least a dozen years!

When the hell did insurance premiums EVER go down under the old system (before ACA)? All I ever saw was double digit premium increases from EVERY insurance policy, and never a peep from the Republicans that they needed any kind of regulation.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
46. In 1982, my first over-the-counter job was bag boy at the local P&C...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:58 PM
Nov 2013

Part time. I was 16. I had full BC/BS coverage. Since then, premiums have gone up incrementally. (FYI - I'm not bagging groceries anymore ).

You want to point the blame at someone or something? LACK OF REGULATION on the lobbyist-laden insurance industry.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
41. I wouldn't even give the OP a 'nice try'. This is 6th grade trolling effort.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:54 PM
Nov 2013

I would expect most junior high schoolers to be more sophisticated than this.

 

Cooley Hurd

(26,877 posts)
50. True, Steven...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:01 PM
Nov 2013

My guess is that such people answered a telemarketing ad, thinking they were going to cold-call people into switching phone carriers. Once in the call center, they instructed them to do this instead.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
20. so what can you get on the exchange? nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:35 PM
Nov 2013

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
27. Given the info posted, he wouldn't be eligible for the exchange.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:39 PM
Nov 2013

valerief

(53,235 posts)
29. What info? All I see is Blue Cross. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:41 PM
Nov 2013

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
84. He has ACA compliant insurance through his employer
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:30 PM
Nov 2013

Hence he is ineligible for the exchange.

Response to Name removed (Original post)

valerief

(53,235 posts)
28. Next we'll get the "you're not nice" posts we've seen lately, complete with finger wagging.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:40 PM
Nov 2013
 

ChisolmTrailDem

(9,463 posts)
30. Right? But I don't give a shit! Just like many others here posting how tired they are,
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:41 PM
Nov 2013

so am I and I'm to the point of being fighting pissed!

valerief

(53,235 posts)
31. I hate the RW disinformation campaign, too. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:43 PM
Nov 2013

Response to valerief (Reply #31)

valerief

(53,235 posts)
40. I have no idea what you're talking about since you offer NO details. Bye. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:53 PM
Nov 2013

whttevrr

(2,347 posts)
34. John 10
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:47 PM
Nov 2013

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+10&version=NIV

10 “Very truly I tell you Pharisees, anyone who does not enter the sheep pen by the gate, but climbs in by some other way, is a thief and a robber. 2 The one who enters by the gate is the shepherd of the sheep. 3 The gatekeeper opens the gate for him, and the sheep listen to his voice. He calls his own sheep by name and leads them out. 4 When he has brought out all his own, he goes on ahead of them, and his sheep follow him because they know his voice. 5 But they will never follow a stranger; in fact, they will run away from him because they do not recognize a stranger’s voice.” 6 Jesus used this figure of speech, but the Pharisees did not understand what he was telling them.

7 Therefore Jesus said again, “Very truly I tell you, I am the gate for the sheep. 8 All who have come before me are thieves and robbers, but the sheep have not listened to them. 9 I am the gate; whoever enters through me will be saved.[a] They will come in and go out, and find pasture. 10 The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.


So uhm... are you the Robber or the Shepherd?

 

DefenseLawyer

(11,101 posts)
36. My Anthem Blue Cross premiums went up at 20-50% every year
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:48 PM
Nov 2013

for about 10 years before the ACA, til it got so expensive that I had to switch providers. Are you saying your premiums weren't going up before?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
39. Exactly, this person is deliberately disrupting with nonsense.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:52 PM
Nov 2013

They're not even being particularly slick about it.

Response to stevenleser (Reply #39)

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
47. Post hoc ergo propter hoc nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:58 PM
Nov 2013

Response to stevenleser (Reply #47)

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
54. Right where you mention the increase in the same sentence as the ACA.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:06 PM
Nov 2013

Did you not read what you wrote? Did someone else write it for you.

Response to stevenleser (Reply #54)

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
59. Once again, post hoc ergo propter hoc. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:10 PM
Nov 2013

Response to stevenleser (Reply #59)

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
61. Those words mean nothing from you since you don't know their correct meaning. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:13 PM
Nov 2013

Response to stevenleser (Reply #61)

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
70. LMAO, no, you don't know the meaning of the straw man and circular logic fallacies. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:21 PM
Nov 2013

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
87. Since you keep such close watch...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:33 PM
Nov 2013

Show the cost growth percentages for the past ten years... Let's see what is really up.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
43. the outrageous yearly increases were happening well before ACA. why are you letting insurance
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:55 PM
Nov 2013

companies making a sucker out of you believing their greed has anything to do with ACA? are you really gonna let these companies get away with this? hubby owned a business. i saw the yearly increases. had nothing to do with ACA. be pissed at the insurance companies for so manipulatively playing you

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
45. P.S. MIRT, when you get done with the OP, check out who Recc'd it. nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:57 PM
Nov 2013

BootinUp

(51,271 posts)
48. good call, heh.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:59 PM
Nov 2013
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
53. Wow, a jury actually refused to hide this OP.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:05 PM
Nov 2013

This is a classic case of what is wrong with the jury system.
___________________________________________________________
Got my latest Blue Cross Premium notice, now up 89 percent since ACA
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023971354

REASON FOR ALERT:

This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.

YOUR COMMENTS:

This new 20 or so post troll is trying to claim that before anything went into effect with ACA that would have had an effect on his health insurance premiums, it caused his rates to increase by around 85%.

He is deliberately disrupting with ridiculous suggestions. It's one thing to examine changes in premiums and health care policies that will go into effect in 2014, but to claim that last year and the year before that was the fault of ACA is ridiculous and disrupting poorly.

JURY RESULTS

A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sun Nov 3, 2013, 01:01 PM, and voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT ALONE.

Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: In spite of the lengthy alert reason, I suspect the real reason for alert is disagreement with the claim, and an attempt to close the discussion. Sorry. No hide.
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Leave it alone, MIRT will kill it.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: argue it. it is an absurd statement. insurance was increasing at the same rate prior to ACA. insurance is creating sucker to believe their outrageous increase is due to ACA, but they had these outrageous yearly increase prior to ACA. all about greed.
Juror #4 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Obv a republican good for nothing troll...go back to your RW dumbass shit site you fool
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Of course this guy is a troll, but since we're liberals we'll give him the benefit of the doubt until he starts spouting racist gibberish by Tuesday or something.

Thank you.

 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
62. This is one of my main gripes with the jury system.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:14 PM
Nov 2013

They could care less if the Op is bullshit. So--- it lives.

Where the fuck is the group hosts with this?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
74. Yeah, something like this should live 5 minutes or less if posted during the middle of the day.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:23 PM
Nov 2013

This is obvious disruptive trolling. It doesnt get much more obvious than this.

Response to stevenleser (Reply #53)

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
65. LOL, troll said what? nt
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:16 PM
Nov 2013

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
81. Yah... Ok... Bro.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:29 PM
Nov 2013
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
93. What idiot juror said "Leave it alone, MIRT will kill it", why leave it alone then?????
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:37 PM
Nov 2013
 

maced666

(771 posts)
49. F them then....
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:00 PM
Nov 2013

You are better off, crap plans - being EXPOSED by Affordable Heath Care Act.
That's what the push back is all about make NO mistake.

Response to maced666 (Reply #49)

Historic NY

(40,003 posts)
80. What state are you in ...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:25 PM
Nov 2013

and when you say ACA was passed exactly what year do you mean?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
52. Not shocked to see how this turned out...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:04 PM
Nov 2013

apparently, there's a minimum number of posts required before you can post something that portrays the ACA in a less than optimal light. I don't know what that number is, but you aren't there yet.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
56. You're kidding right? I think you forgot the sarcasm tag.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:09 PM
Nov 2013

Or, are we now going to blame the Lindbergh baby kidnapping on the Affordable Care Act too?

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
85. What?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:32 PM
Nov 2013

I'm not sure what you're talking about unless you misinterpreted my comments.

Have you seen any posts from new members that didn't get a bunch of replies similar to "cool story, bro" or "I don't believe you"? Hell, even people talking about website glitches were getting this, even though the administration was admitting that the website had glitches.

What I'm saying is this. If a person posts something that suggests they aren't happy with insurance changes, prices or the ACA web interface, and their post count is a relatively low number, it won't matter if their statement amounts to "water is wet", they'll be accused of trolling.

At least if you've been around the DU long enough, you'll instead get accused of other things.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
83. There is something wrong with the ACA...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:30 PM
Nov 2013

It did not go far enough it is NOT single payer.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
88. There is plenty wrong with it, though THIS would have resolve most
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:34 PM
Nov 2013

of those issues.

penultimate

(1,110 posts)
66. Any chance that you can post some statements from your insurance company
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:17 PM
Nov 2013

to validate your claim? I'm not saying you're lying, but if people see they some proof, they will probably be less skeptical. It would also move the discussion away from people trying to prove you're telling untruths, and more toward discussing the actual issues that may exist.

Seems pretty simple to snap some photos or scan your statements, right?

Who is your insurance company and what are the details of the plan?

LAGC

(5,330 posts)
69. Don't expect an honest response.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:21 PM
Nov 2013

Just like almost all of these anti-ACA posts by low-count "concerned" newbies, they make their wild claims with no evidence backing them up whatsoever.

"What can be alleged without evidence, can be dismissed without evidence."

penultimate

(1,110 posts)
76. Yeah, I pretty figure that's how it will play out...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:24 PM
Nov 2013

But I like to at least give it a try.

Response to penultimate (Reply #66)

penultimate

(1,110 posts)
90. You can block that stuff out
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:35 PM
Nov 2013

If I was in the same situation as you, and I found myself paying that much of any increase because of a law, I'd have little issue with taking the time to sanitize my stuff so it can safely be posted online to support my argument. It would just make sense for my own cause to do that, because I'd be trying to convince people to see things from my point of view.

So I find it difficult to simply swallow all these claims that don't come with any sort of backing. Particularly since my personal experiences do not suggest massive increases like some claim. I will have a slight increase in my premium, but it will be for significantly better coverage than what I have now. The few others I spoke to seem to have similar stories too. I know someone who hasn't had insurance for years because they had pre-existing issues and their employer didn't offer health insurance. In his case, he couldn't get private health insurance that he could possibly afford. He can finally get something he can afford and he knows he will be covered.

But if you're being screwed, you should have every right to express your frustration, but you should also be willing to show us some documented proof of your claim.

ecstatic

(35,066 posts)
71. So you never had an increase prior to ACA?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:21 PM
Nov 2013

We both know better than that (unless you JUST signed up for the first time earlier this year). When on the individual market, my premium increased by $100+ every year, with the final notice stating that my rate would go up to $450 a month (for just me!). Luckily, that notice came just as I was switching to my employer's new group insurance.

Response to ecstatic (Reply #71)

ecstatic

(35,066 posts)
86. A single digit increase? Wow
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:32 PM
Nov 2013

Well, good luck.

By the way, welcome and enjoy your stay at DU.

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
89. Double digits after what...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:34 PM
Nov 2013
 

Arugula Latte

(50,566 posts)
82. My insurance rates were going up by leaps and bounds for YEARS before ACA.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 02:29 PM
Nov 2013

We had to keep dumping policies in search of something cheaper, and then those went up as well. I've been with Kaiser, Blue Cross, Providence, you name it.

Now, we are going to be able to get a policy at about half of what we're paying currently. Thank you ACA!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Message auto-removed