Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 03:21 PM Nov 2013

White House, Lawmakers Reject Clemency For Edward Snowden - AP/SFExaminer

White House, lawmakers reject clemency for Edward Snowden
By The Associated Press/SFExaminer
11/3/13



<snip>

The White House and the heads of the intelligence committees in Congress are rejecting a plea for clemency by National Security Agency-contractor-turned-fugitive Edward Snowden.

White House adviser Dan Pfeiffer says no such offers are being discussed. He tells ABC's "This Week," that Snowden should return to the U.S. and face charges, which include leaking classified information.

That sentiment is echoed by the committee chairmen, Sen. Dianne Feinstein of California and Rep. Mike Rogers of Michigan.

Rogers calls clemency for Snowden a "terrible idea." Feinstein says Snowden broke the law, when he could have privately reported his revelations to her committee.

<snip>

Link: http://www.sfexaminer.com/sanfrancisco/white-house-lawmakers-reject-clemency-for-edward-snowden/Content?oid=2618757




28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House, Lawmakers Reject Clemency For Edward Snowden - AP/SFExaminer (Original Post) WillyT Nov 2013 OP
Report privately to her committee? That is hilarious... Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #1
Yes...under the Intelligence Community Whistleblower's Protection Act msanthrope Nov 2013 #2
Proper does not equal effective. Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #3
Indeed..for justice delayed is justice denied. Of course, the patriot who wrote that wrote it from msanthrope Nov 2013 #11
Yeah, Snowden witnessed Thomas Drake's justice. Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #12
Don't You See... We Are All Supposed To Sacrifice Our Lives And Fortunes For The 1%... WillyT Nov 2013 #14
Yeah. Appeal to DiFi. The very person who has introduced legislation to Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #16
+1000 FirstLight Nov 2013 #28
Sure... And It Would All Have Been Quietly Swept Under The Rug... WillyT Nov 2013 #4
Possibly...but we will never know, since Snowden failed to follow the law. nt msanthrope Nov 2013 #10
He "failed to follow the law" because he saw the consequences of those before him... Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #15
One should not follow the law because one doesn't like the consequences of the law? msanthrope Nov 2013 #17
George Bush And Dick Cheney Are Your Clients ??? WillyT Nov 2013 #18
Hahaha!!! Nice! Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #20
If a law is unjust yes. I suppose you'd be the type of lawyer that would support Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #19
MLK broke unjust laws....and still took his punishment. nt msanthrope Nov 2013 #21
I Forget... How Long Was MLK Stripped Naked And Held In Solitary Confinement ??? WillyT Nov 2013 #22
And you would have supported that punishment because he "broke the law." Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #23
MLK didn't release classified information or expose the surveillance state. NuclearDem Nov 2013 #27
70 (That is SEVENTY) rights groups warn UK government reaction to NSA leaks eroding freedom Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #26
difi -- you remain an insult to thinking americans every where. xchrom Nov 2013 #5
Going to DiFi would've been like a mafioso going to the Godfather with complaints about crime. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2013 #6
Yes, indeed! Love this! Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #24
... woo me with science Nov 2013 #7
Love your little cartoon, there Demeter Nov 2013 #9
How convenient for us all that the criminals Snowden has exposed are all in US Demeter Nov 2013 #8
But Cheney and the banksters are good to go. polichick Nov 2013 #13
Di Fi is a failure RobertEarl Nov 2013 #25

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
1. Report privately to her committee? That is hilarious...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 03:34 PM
Nov 2013

The poster woman for the surveillance state would have us and Snowden believe that her NSA spying enabling committee would have lifted a finger to curtail the NSA's activities.

What a sick joke.

What is likely is that he would have ended up persecuted and prosecuted ala Thomas Drake with his career and life ruined. It was just such prosecution of whistleblowers like Drake that led Snowden to take the path that he did.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
11. Indeed..for justice delayed is justice denied. Of course, the patriot who wrote that wrote it from
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 05:03 PM
Nov 2013

his jail cell. He didn't avoid discomfort. And he didn't run to Russia.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
12. Yeah, Snowden witnessed Thomas Drake's justice.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:23 PM
Nov 2013

Why do we insist that the best amongst us suffer? Do you think that Thomas Drake deserved a ruined life for going through the proper channels? He doesn't think so and has championed Snowden's decision for avoiding his fate.

 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
14. Don't You See... We Are All Supposed To Sacrifice Our Lives And Fortunes For The 1%...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:26 PM
Nov 2013

At least that's what I'm getting out of the current times we're in.




Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
16. Yeah. Appeal to DiFi. The very person who has introduced legislation to
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:31 PM
Nov 2013

make NSA illegal activities legal.

DiFi, "Well that is a very interesting story that you are telling us. We will take it under consideration. You are dismissed."

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
15. He "failed to follow the law" because he saw the consequences of those before him...
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:27 PM
Nov 2013

who attempted to follow the law. He was aware of the fate of Binney and Drake. You are not stupid, look them up and see what happened to them when they tried to "follow the law".

This is no nuance here.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
17. One should not follow the law because one doesn't like the consequences of the law?
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:36 PM
Nov 2013

I have many clients who feel that way.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
19. If a law is unjust yes. I suppose you'd be the type of lawyer that would support
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:43 PM
Nov 2013

Jim Crow merely because it "was the law".

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
23. And you would have supported that punishment because he "broke the law."
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 11:57 PM
Nov 2013

If his punishment was life in prison, you would have supported it because he "broke the law."

MLK not once ever faced decades in prison but if he had, you would not have advocated for his freedom or clemency, because he "broke the law."

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
27. MLK didn't release classified information or expose the surveillance state.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 12:20 AM
Nov 2013

Civil disobedience of segregation laws nowhere nears in punishment to what intelligence community whistleblowers get.

The "proper" avenues involve reporting to the same corrupt officials who likely gave the violation their rubber stamp in the first place. They're a joke.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
26. 70 (That is SEVENTY) rights groups warn UK government reaction to NSA leaks eroding freedom
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 12:13 AM
Nov 2013

I know what side of history I was on during the civil rights movement and I know what side of history I am now.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/03/uk-reaction-nsa-leaks-human-rights

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
5. difi -- you remain an insult to thinking americans every where.
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 03:55 PM
Nov 2013

what a useless waste of space she is.

 

Demeter

(85,373 posts)
8. How convenient for us all that the criminals Snowden has exposed are all in US
Sun Nov 3, 2013, 04:15 PM
Nov 2013

I'm sure, just as soon as Holder is done with prosecuting the banksters, he'll get right on it....

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
25. Di Fi is a failure
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 12:07 AM
Nov 2013

She was in the Senate before 9/11, too.

She is the one we expected to uncover the agencies meanderings. She either willfully or negligently failed to do her basic job. She has failed this country. She needs to go.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House, Lawmakers Re...