Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
10 Corporations Control Nearly Everything You Buy, 6 Media Corporations Control Nearly Everything... (Original Post) Fantastic Anarchist Nov 2013 OP
As for the trend in media ownership, this was predicted in the mid-eighties by Ben Bagdikian LanternWaste Nov 2013 #1
Thank you for the additional information ... Fantastic Anarchist Nov 2013 #2
Diversity in media ownership had been shrinking in the 80s Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #4
If I correctly recall him from radio interviews back then... JHB Nov 2013 #9
The media giants have to maintain the "buying mood" for the advertisers. bemildred Nov 2013 #18
.....And then there was ONE. bvar22 Nov 2013 #3
Yep ... Fantastic Anarchist Nov 2013 #7
but goliath had his david ... hopefully there is a david out there MichaelSoE Nov 2013 #17
If the rules of Monopoly allowed for the killing of The ONE.... bvar22 Nov 2013 #20
But the real question is who sits on the boards of those companies. OffWithTheirHeads Nov 2013 #5
Board of Directors list (GE - NEWS-CORP - DISNEY - VIACOM - TIME WARNER - CBS) The Wielding Truth Nov 2013 #12
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Nov 2013 #6
Thank you, Uncle Joe for the K&R! Fantastic Anarchist Nov 2013 #8
Same thing with the banks... KansDem Nov 2013 #10
I'd forgotten about so many of those names... Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #22
and that have never have been alllowed to happen gopiscrap Nov 2013 #11
If we could build enough momentum with protests, voting etc., to get Publicly Funded Elections Dustlawyer Nov 2013 #13
Excellent post malaise Nov 2013 #14
Bookmarking. City Lights Nov 2013 #15
K&R woo me with science Nov 2013 #16
And they can all be broken up by the government. bemildred Nov 2013 #19
Teddy Roosevelt!....Teddy Roosevelt!..... bvar22 Nov 2013 #21
 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
1. As for the trend in media ownership, this was predicted in the mid-eighties by Ben Bagdikian
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 02:06 PM
Nov 2013

As for the trend in media ownership, this was predicted in the mid-eighties by Ben Bagdikian in his prescient book, The Media Empire. One wonders if even he thought at the time though, that the ring of owners would be so small... especially given the advent of the internet.

It was when I read that book that I concluded that media is neither left nor right, it's simply green. Sometimes demographics will compel a netwrk to lean one way or the other, but Bagdikian argues that that shift isn't ideological, but predicated solely on profit and sponsorship demands.

GE, Disney, Viacom & Time Warner were all on the original list of his Big Owners That Will Only Get Bigger. He was right.

Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
2. Thank you for the additional information ...
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 02:11 PM
Nov 2013

I will say this, to your point about ideology; media for profit is inherently conservative, no matter the ideological bent displayed by the talking heads.

So, for MSNBC and for FOX News, though different in their ideological analyses, are both inherently conservative by their profit motive. Also, the range of ideas are still narrow and confined to pre-approved editorializing and information.

Chomsky and Herman go into detail in the Propaganda Model.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
4. Diversity in media ownership had been shrinking in the 80s
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 02:19 PM
Nov 2013

because of Reagan-era chiseling of ownership laws, but the Telecom Act of '96 really started the avalanche...

The scary part was when Colin Powell's son was heading the FCC and seriously thought the ownership laws weren't loose enough(!), so he was lobbying for MORE deregulation before being replaced...

JHB

(37,160 posts)
9. If I correctly recall him from radio interviews back then...
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 03:13 PM
Nov 2013

...yes, he did, or at least saw it heading that way and was trying to spur resistance to this extreme consolidation.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
18. The media giants have to maintain the "buying mood" for the advertisers.
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:05 AM
Nov 2013

Not upset anybody or make them think. And that is why our media is a vast wasteland of sentimental slop.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
3. .....And then there was ONE.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 02:18 PM
Nov 2013

....the inevitable end of the board game Monopoly.
Lots of fun and excitement when there are many players,
but ultimately, one player winds up with everything.

American Capitalism (Free Market NeoLiberalism) is a lot like that,
and we are witnessing the "game" in the final stages.
But unlike the Board Game, in America, there is no end and reset.
This "game" doesn't STOP when the ONE owns everything.

The "game" becomes hopeless for all the players, except the ONE,
but the "players" are required to keep endlessly circuiting the board and giving everything to the ONE,
over and over.
No chance for a New Player.
No chance for a reset.

Kinda sucks unless you are the ONE.



You will know them by their [font size=3]WORKS.[/font]


Fantastic Anarchist

(7,309 posts)
7. Yep ...
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 03:08 PM
Nov 2013

... and one thing, never confuse an actual free and fair market with capitalism. The two are mutually exclusive and can never happen if there are laborers and capitalists who extract their surplus value.

I'm not favoring one tendency over another, but Mutualism (free-market socialism) is compatible with a free-market due to its reliance, on a large scale, of labor collectively controlling the means of production through cooperatives and free associations of labor - think Mondragon.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
20. If the rules of Monopoly allowed for the killing of The ONE....
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 01:31 PM
Nov 2013

...I would have already done it.

Perhaps that is the reason behind the building of our current Police/Surveillance/Security State...to protect The ONE (percent).

 

OffWithTheirHeads

(10,337 posts)
5. But the real question is who sits on the boards of those companies.
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 02:53 PM
Nov 2013

I would bet the farm that it is predominitly a small handfull of the same people.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
13. If we could build enough momentum with protests, voting etc., to get Publicly Funded Elections
Mon Nov 4, 2013, 08:20 PM
Nov 2013

passed, we could get politicians in that are responsive to the people. Then bust up the banks and the media conglomerates and clean house on the MIC. Mthe U.S. Chamber of Commerce planned this out during Reagan and it has worked like a charm. They have also stacked the courts, buy up local and state elections, and got tort reform passed. They control our government, our money, and are taking away our rights while we are distracted blaming Republicans for everything. Both sides are owned by these companies, wake up!
All that I said here is true, but I honestly think that we will not be able to do what is necessary to throw off the yoke until things get a lot worse.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
19. And they can all be broken up by the government.
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:07 AM
Nov 2013

And that is why they fear and hate the government, and also fear and hate us.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»10 Corporations Control N...