Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

hooverville29

(163 posts)
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:21 PM Nov 2013

TM should win in VA but let's be honest. If libertarians hadn't run Sarvis as a 3rd party candidate,

Cuccinelli would have won pretty easily. A few libertarians were siphoned from TM, but, as we all know, the vast majority would have voted for a GOP candidate. It's another instance where TP/libertarian hyper-advocacy simply led to their real targets, the Democrats, winning.

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TM should win in VA but let's be honest. If libertarians hadn't run Sarvis as a 3rd party candidate, (Original Post) hooverville29 Nov 2013 OP
I don't buy that for a second ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #1
Trouble is, they wouldn't all have stayed home, and you know it. hooverville29 Nov 2013 #2
Then they are not libertarians ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #6
The difference between a lot of Libertarians and Republicans is that Republicans merrily Nov 2013 #21
BS. But thanks for posting the RW talking point for us to laugh at. kestrel91316 Nov 2013 #3
the low post trolls dont even try hard... scheming daemons Nov 2013 #9
might want to wait until the final 500k votes come in scheming daemons Nov 2013 #4
Yes, AG race (2 way) shows this. godai Nov 2013 #5
what does the 2-way Lt. Governor race show? scheming daemons Nov 2013 #10
Crazy R candidate there. n/t godai Nov 2013 #15
LOL. Having a Kubler Ross moment? JaneyVee Nov 2013 #7
Why not wait for the final vote? brooklynite Nov 2013 #8
Looks like it'll be roughly 100,000+ shouldn't it? hooverville29 Nov 2013 #12
Based on comments on DU, wouldn't surprise me if liberal Dems voted 3rd party Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #11
I didn't say that, but the vast majority of libertarians voting would hooverville29 Nov 2013 #14
it's fucking frightening spanone Nov 2013 #13
he will win by close to 100k... relax scheming daemons Nov 2013 #16
i know that. just the fact that cucinnelli can get any numbers..frightening spanone Nov 2013 #18
That's a point. Where did these Cooch votes come from -- and why? hooverville29 Nov 2013 #23
Virginia is typically a red state. scheming daemons Nov 2013 #26
bullshit. where to you get this crap? bowens43 Nov 2013 #17
OP is a low post count troll scheming daemons Nov 2013 #19
Look at AG votes. n/t godai Nov 2013 #20
look at LtGov votes n/t scheming daemons Nov 2013 #22
Uhhhh....Jackson was unelectable. n/t godai Nov 2013 #24
in most years, someone as sleazy as McAuliffe would be too scheming daemons Nov 2013 #25
I love that story. Kingofalldems Nov 2013 #27
So basically all those old (r) voters are disgusted with their idiot party The Straight Story Nov 2013 #28
The hippies across the street voted for him. WCLinolVir Nov 2013 #29

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
1. I don't buy that for a second
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:22 PM
Nov 2013

They likely would have stayed home, there is no libertarian who could justify voting for a nut like Cooch unless they are a Republican and won't admit it.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
6. Then they are not libertarians
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:25 PM
Nov 2013

Libertarians have a tendency to reject the more odious candidate. That's Cooch. McAuliffe is just another guy.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
21. The difference between a lot of Libertarians and Republicans is that Republicans
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:45 PM
Nov 2013

like military spending while Libertarians don't like any spending.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
4. might want to wait until the final 500k votes come in
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:24 PM
Nov 2013

That's right... there are about half a million votes left to be counted, almost exclusively in NoVA.

McAuliffe will win by at least 100k.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
11. Based on comments on DU, wouldn't surprise me if liberal Dems voted 3rd party
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:27 PM
Nov 2013

Kind of ridiculous to assume all his votes would have gone for GOP.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
26. Virginia is typically a red state.
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:52 PM
Nov 2013

Any time a Dem wins south of the Mason Dixon line, it is a good win.

 

scheming daemons

(25,487 posts)
25. in most years, someone as sleazy as McAuliffe would be too
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:50 PM
Nov 2013

McAuliffe was a placeholder for "not Tea Party"

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
28. So basically all those old (r) voters are disgusted with their idiot party
Tue Nov 5, 2013, 10:56 PM
Nov 2013

and voted for someone else.

If that tells me anything it is that others are seeing the stupid in their party. And there is plenty of of stupid and hate flowing from their party these days (and yes, they do literally hate the US - which is probably another reason people are jumping ship to another party, to get away from being associated with their idiocy).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TM should win in VA but l...