Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 01:57 AM Nov 2013

Exclusive: Snowden persuaded other NSA workers to give up passwords - sources

Former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden used login credentials and passwords provided unwittingly by colleagues at a spy base in Hawaii to access some of the classified material he leaked to the media, sources said.

A handful of agency employees who gave their login details to Snowden were identified, questioned and removed from their assignments, said a source close to several U.S. government investigations into the damage caused by the leaks.

Snowden may have persuaded between 20 and 25 fellow workers at the NSA regional operations center in Hawaii to give him their logins and passwords by telling them they were needed for him to do his job as a computer systems administrator, a second source said.

The revelation is the latest to indicate that inadequate security measures at the NSA played a significant role in the worst breach of classified data in the super-secret eavesdropping agency's 61-year history.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/08/net-us-usa-security-snowden-idUSBRE9A703020131108

lulz

52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: Snowden persuaded other NSA workers to give up passwords - sources (Original Post) Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 OP
Keep on enjoying Russia, I hear it's nice in the winter. TwilightGardener Nov 2013 #1
Can't be worse than 30+ years in a prison cell davidn3600 Nov 2013 #6
Oh yes it can. nt stevenleser Nov 2013 #21
Wow, I guess they really ARE hiring morons. MADem Nov 2013 #2
Yep. A bunch of people who didn't seem to have a clue. LisaL Nov 2013 #3
Fucking priceless! Even more priceless that enough morons keep defending NSA! idwiyo Nov 2013 #4
They trusted a cleared colleague. Who couldn't be trusted. And YOU believe everything DevonRex Nov 2013 #5
DP-101: You don't give ANYONE your personal password TheBlackAdder Nov 2013 #9
They were stupid. People who believe snowden NOIW are worse. nt DevonRex Nov 2013 #11
Snowden took a page from his bosses Fumesucker Nov 2013 #16
The NSA revelations aren't based on hearsay, they're based on classified documents. cui bono Nov 2013 #17
Only pure, unadulterated moron would EVER give his password to ANYONE. idwiyo Nov 2013 #22
And what do you think of anyone who believes a person who GOT the passwords? DevonRex Nov 2013 #25
Why shouldn't I trust the data Mr Snoweden provided? It is consistent with what I know about idwiyo Nov 2013 #43
+1 We are being surveilled by those who are comfortable Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #8
Sadly I agree with you. :( idwiyo Nov 2013 #44
Can't collect a paycheck if you're not shilling for the intelligence-industrial complex... n/t backscatter712 Nov 2013 #23
social engineering is easier than you want to admit Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #35
Those morons are working in IT. First thing one learns on the job is to NEVER reveal your password idwiyo Nov 2013 #45
People don't expect the system administrator to be the bad guy. gulliver Nov 2013 #7
I was at a retail company - The Loss Prevention Manager was arrested for trying to steal $$$ in furs TheBlackAdder Nov 2013 #10
Snowden violated HIS employment agreement and his oath. DevonRex Nov 2013 #12
So did every employee that gave him their passwords. Just as guilty. n/t TheBlackAdder Nov 2013 #13
I'm not letting them off the hook. DevonRex Nov 2013 #49
Millennials strongly believe in a life-work balance that sometimes self immolates their "careers". Jesus Malverde Nov 2013 #14
Oath to cover up crimes? Kudos! Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #15
Snowden is a whistle blower. Whistle blowers supposedly have protection. cui bono Nov 2013 #18
There is a difference between a leaker and a whistleblower. randome Nov 2013 #19
Evidence for your claim about the Admin? The opposite is true. cui bono Nov 2013 #30
Drake's charges were dropped by this administration. randome Nov 2013 #33
Eddie didn't even try to use that protection! treestar Nov 2013 #20
No, he would have been stupid to try to use that protection with this admin. cui bono Nov 2013 #29
whistle blowers don't "hustle" information out of others who are not in positions of power Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #36
Says you. n/t cui bono Nov 2013 #39
You took an oath to cover up crimes? And you intend to keep it? Says a lot... idwiyo Nov 2013 #46
That is the silliest thing ever said by anyone on DU ever. DevonRex Nov 2013 #50
I agree, your statement was the one of silliest ones I've read on DU so far idwiyo Nov 2013 #52
I expect my system administrator to have his own passwords Skittles Nov 2013 #26
We sign an agreement every year, as part of our yearly review woodsprite Nov 2013 #28
corporate password resets are often a problem Skittles Nov 2013 #48
Or, in this case, the Good Guy. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2013 #51
Amazing that some are still blaming Snowden for this mess. They're either complicit or stupid. Scuba Nov 2013 #24
Snowden is guilty. That's why he ran to Communist enemies of the U.S. Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #37
Enemies? Scuba Nov 2013 #40
we exported to the Soviets too Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #41
I consider the MIC a bigger enemy to the American People. Scuba Nov 2013 #42
Tell me again thats whistle blowing.... Historic NY Nov 2013 #27
Who thinks this story is even true? Snowden "may" have persueded? Anonymous sources? Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #31
It makes more sense than he's a master hacker who didn't understand what an FTP server is. randome Nov 2013 #32
Keep flogging that horse. Luminous Animal Nov 2013 #34
you mean the truth? Pretzel_Warrior Nov 2013 #38
Wouldn't be surprised if those morons had passwords written on post-it notes stuck on the monitor. idwiyo Nov 2013 #47

MADem

(135,425 posts)
2. Wow, I guess they really ARE hiring morons.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 02:04 AM
Nov 2013

Talk about stupid--and amazing that no one reported him for even ASKING.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
5. They trusted a cleared colleague. Who couldn't be trusted. And YOU believe everything
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 02:41 AM
Nov 2013

he says, too? How many people here believe everything Snowden has said? And people here call Snowden"s colleagues morons, when at that time he hadn't (to their knowledge) committed a crime.

He sure has now. Committed crimes, that is. I'm pretty much thinking anyone who believed him then was stupid and anyone who believes him now is worse. Duh.

TheBlackAdder

(28,183 posts)
9. DP-101: You don't give ANYONE your personal password
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 02:57 AM
Nov 2013

I'm sure each employee signed papers stating that their passwords would be secured and not distributed to anyone.

I've been in the computer industry for about 30 years, and of the multitude of sites I were employed or contracted to... NOT ONE allowed the sharing of an ID with anyone... even with Loss Prevention, the External Security Department (the ones who assign you your security rights and privileges) or someone as lowly as a System Administrator.

Folks somehow confuse a SysAdmin with someone who is granted superuser rights. If they were, they wouldn't need other people's userids and passwords.

The employees screwed up... that's why they were reassigned.

===

Any normal employee would have been fired for violating code like that, unless the government is afraid of the damage these folks could do too.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
16. Snowden took a page from his bosses
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:25 AM
Nov 2013

He was the least untruthful he could be while testifying to Congress.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
17. The NSA revelations aren't based on hearsay, they're based on classified documents.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:02 AM
Nov 2013

It's not about believing what Snowden says, there are journalists going through the leaked docs and releasing factual information.

Duh.

Whistle blowers often commit crimes in order to get an important truth out. That's why there are (supposedly, not so much under this administration) whistle blower protection laws.

Duh.

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
22. Only pure, unadulterated moron would EVER give his password to ANYONE.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 08:30 AM
Nov 2013

There is no excuse. This is single most stupid thing and it should be more than enough to get one's stupid arse fired on the spot.

/me shakes head

RE: Snowden
I guess you missed latest Al Gore's statement about Snowden's revelations?

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
25. And what do you think of anyone who believes a person who GOT the passwords?
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 03:52 PM
Nov 2013

And STOLE the classified documents? And DIVULGED the TS/SCI information to our enemies? Do you think they are wonderful and do you trust them?

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
43. Why shouldn't I trust the data Mr Snoweden provided? It is consistent with what I know about
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:17 PM
Nov 2013

surveillance, how easy it is to intercept and collect the data, data analysis, and databases. The validity of the data has nothing to do with Mr Snowden himself, his character, or what he did to obtain that data. Never mind even your VP agrees that Mr Snowden revealed wrongdoing by NSA.

I don't look at Russia, China, entire South America, and the rest of the world as my enemies. But thank you for letting me know you consider me, a British citizen, to be your enemy.

Unlike you, I consider Mr Snowden a whistle-blower. How he obtained the data is irrelevant to me.




 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
35. social engineering is easier than you want to admit
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:31 PM
Nov 2013

if he's a Sys Admin, there are people who would have no reason to suspect he's asking for nefarious reasons.

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
45. Those morons are working in IT. First thing one learns on the job is to NEVER reveal your password
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:21 PM
Nov 2013

to anyone, under any circumstances.

gulliver

(13,180 posts)
7. People don't expect the system administrator to be the bad guy.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 02:48 AM
Nov 2013

It's a blind spot. When you call a cop to come to your house because you think you might have a burglar, you don't expect the cop to come in and steal your iPad. Snowden probably told his unfortunate co-workers that he needed their passwords for valid reasons. They paid the price.

TheBlackAdder

(28,183 posts)
10. I was at a retail company - The Loss Prevention Manager was arrested for trying to steal $$$ in furs
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 03:01 AM
Nov 2013

You don't trust anyone with your userid and password, not anyone.

The employees knew they were violating their employment agreements.

They should be happy they weren't fired for doing so, like most companies would.

===

A SysAdmin is not some superuser job. Sure, they are 'superusers' for defining the servers and storage, etc.. It's the guy managing the servers, not the confidential data within it. That's where the individual userid access rights come into play.

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)
49. I'm not letting them off the hook.
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 12:59 AM
Nov 2013

Not at all. Stupidity and trusting a snake like Snowden is a violation they were warned about over and over again. In briefing after briefing. I agree.

I would never have done it in a million years. I do wonder what methods he used get the information. I find it hard to believe that many people trusted him or just fell for his BS. I've never seen or heard of anything like it in all my time in

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
14. Millennials strongly believe in a life-work balance that sometimes self immolates their "careers".
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 04:25 AM
Nov 2013

Work is over rated and lets not forget he was working for a private for profit corporation.

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
15. Oath to cover up crimes? Kudos!
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:01 AM
Nov 2013

Now is the time for all good persons to come to the aid of the country.

Oaths are for suckers. Employment agreements are for the trembling.

My employment agreement has sat in my desk drawer for 5 years. I've never signed it, I never will.

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
18. Snowden is a whistle blower. Whistle blowers supposedly have protection.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:05 AM
Nov 2013

But this administration chooses to prosecute them more than any other.

Better to have a whistle blower violate his agreement and oath than have rampant spying on citizens and govts all over the world. Thankfully he did and now, finally, congress is working on changing how the NSA operates.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
19. There is a difference between a leaker and a whistleblower.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 08:12 AM
Nov 2013

The Administration has prosecuted leakers and has added protections for whistleblowers.

None of the documents that Snowden stole reveal illegality so how can you say he is a whistleblower?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
30. Evidence for your claim about the Admin? The opposite is true.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:21 PM
Nov 2013
Obama Whistleblower Prosecutions Lead To Chilling Effect On Press

“I can tell you that people who normally would meet with me, sort of in a more relaxed atmosphere, are on pins and needles,” Landay said of the reporting climate during the Obama years, a period of unprecedented whistleblower prosecutions. The crackdown on leaks, he added, seems “deliberately intended to have a chilling effect.”

<snip>

“The Obama administration's been extremely aggressive in trying to root out whistleblowers within the government,” NBC News investigative reporter Michael Isikoff says in the film. The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, describing the secrecy required in her reporting for a profile of whistleblower Thomas Drake amid government prosecution, said the experience didn’t “feel [like] America, land of the free press.”

Drake, a former senior executive of the National Security Agency, says in the film, "it's extremely dangerous in America right now to be right as a whistleblower when the government is so wrong." He adds: "speaking truth to power is now a criminal act."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/obama-whistleblower-prosecutions-press_n_3091137.html


On the Other Side of the Mirror

The Obama administration has been cruelly and unusually punishing in its use of the 1917 Espionage Act to stomp on governmental leakers, truth-tellers, and whistleblowers whose disclosures do not support the president's political ambitions. As Thomas Drake, himself a victim of Obama's crusade against whistleblowers, told me, "This makes a mockery of the entire classification system, where political gain is now incentive for leaking and whistleblowing is incentive for prosecution."

The Obama administration has charged more people (six) under the Espionage Act for the alleged mishandling of classified information than all past presidencies combined. (Prior to Obama, there were only three such cases in American history, one being Daniel Ellsberg, of Nixon-era Pentagon Papers fame.) The most recent Espionage Act case is that of former CIA officer John Kiriakou, charged for allegedly disclosing classified information to journalists about the horrors of waterboarding. Meanwhile, his evil twin, former CIA officer Jose Rodriguez, has a best-selling book out bragging about the success of waterboarding and his own hand in the dirty work.

Obama's zeal in silencing leaks that don't make him look like a superhero extends beyond the deployment of the Espionage Act into a complex legal tangle of retaliatory practices, life-destroying threats, on-the-job harassment, and firings. Lots of firings.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/06/obamas-whistleblowers-stuxnet-leaks-drones


Obama Promises, Including Whistleblower Protections, Disappear From Website

Amid the Obama administration's crackdown against whistleblowers, Change.gov, the 2008 website of the Obama transition team laying out the candidate's promises, has disappeared from the internet.

The Sunlight Foundation notes that it last could be viewed on June 8, which was two days after the first revelations from Edward Snowden (who had then not yet revealed himself) about the NSA's phone surveillance program. One of the promises Obama made on the website was on "whistleblower protections:"

Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.

The White House did not respond to multiple requests for comment on why the page was deleted. The site had offered a way to compare Obama's promises and administration actions and still can be viewed on the Wayback archive.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/26/obama-whistleblower-website_n_3658815.html


The legality of the NSA's actions is arguable. It can't really be tried in court due to all the secrecy laws. Their actions are unconstitutional when you look at the 4th Amendment. This has been argued on DU countless times, by people who can say it all better than I. I'm sure you've seen it all.

If there were no problem with what is being done by the NSA then why are there so many esteemed journalists etc... writing about how terrible it is? Why is congress working on passing laws to reign them in?

Snowden revealed the extent of what was going on. And now we've been finding out that our govt is spying on citizens of other countries. Not just suspected terrorists, but millions of random people. Are you really defending that?

Snowden is a whistleblower. Period.
 

randome

(34,845 posts)
33. Drake's charges were dropped by this administration.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:26 PM
Nov 2013

Maybe not soon enough but they were dropped.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

treestar

(82,383 posts)
20. Eddie didn't even try to use that protection!
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 08:26 AM
Nov 2013

That's why he's a criminal.

And now look at him, he's trying desperately to get attention again!

cui bono

(19,926 posts)
29. No, he would have been stupid to try to use that protection with this admin.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:12 PM
Nov 2013
Obama Whistleblower Prosecutions Lead To Chilling Effect On Press

“I can tell you that people who normally would meet with me, sort of in a more relaxed atmosphere, are on pins and needles,” Landay said of the reporting climate during the Obama years, a period of unprecedented whistleblower prosecutions. The crackdown on leaks, he added, seems “deliberately intended to have a chilling effect.”

<snip>

“The Obama administration's been extremely aggressive in trying to root out whistleblowers within the government,” NBC News investigative reporter Michael Isikoff says in the film. The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer, describing the secrecy required in her reporting for a profile of whistleblower Thomas Drake amid government prosecution, said the experience didn’t “feel [like] America, land of the free press.”

Drake, a former senior executive of the National Security Agency, says in the film, "it's extremely dangerous in America right now to be right as a whistleblower when the government is so wrong." He adds: "speaking truth to power is now a criminal act."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/obama-whistleblower-prosecutions-press_n_3091137.html


On the Other Side of the Mirror

The Obama administration has been cruelly and unusually punishing in its use of the 1917 Espionage Act to stomp on governmental leakers, truth-tellers, and whistleblowers whose disclosures do not support the president's political ambitions. As Thomas Drake, himself a victim of Obama's crusade against whistleblowers, told me, "This makes a mockery of the entire classification system, where political gain is now incentive for leaking and whistleblowing is incentive for prosecution."

The Obama administration has charged more people (six) under the Espionage Act for the alleged mishandling of classified information than all past presidencies combined. (Prior to Obama, there were only three such cases in American history, one being Daniel Ellsberg, of Nixon-era Pentagon Papers fame.) The most recent Espionage Act case is that of former CIA officer John Kiriakou, charged for allegedly disclosing classified information to journalists about the horrors of waterboarding. Meanwhile, his evil twin, former CIA officer Jose Rodriguez, has a best-selling book out bragging about the success of waterboarding and his own hand in the dirty work.

Obama's zeal in silencing leaks that don't make him look like a superhero extends beyond the deployment of the Espionage Act into a complex legal tangle of retaliatory practices, life-destroying threats, on-the-job harassment, and firings. Lots of firings.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/06/obamas-whistleblowers-stuxnet-leaks-drones


Obama Promises, Including Whistleblower Protections, Disappear From Website

Amid the Obama administration's crackdown against whistleblowers, Change.gov, the 2008 website of the Obama transition team laying out the candidate's promises, has disappeared from the internet.

The Sunlight Foundation notes that it last could be viewed on June 8, which was two days after the first revelations from Edward Snowden (who had then not yet revealed himself) about the NSA's phone surveillance program. One of the promises Obama made on the website was on "whistleblower protections:"

Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.

The White House did not respond to multiple requests for comment on why the page was deleted. The site had offered a way to compare Obama's promises and administration actions and still can be viewed on the Wayback archive.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/26/obama-whistleblower-website_n_3658815.html
 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
36. whistle blowers don't "hustle" information out of others who are not in positions of power
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:33 PM
Nov 2013

this guy is more and more showing the marks of a spy with an agenda.

Skittles

(153,150 posts)
26. I expect my system administrator to have his own passwords
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 03:56 PM
Nov 2013

OR if he is helping me with an issue, I LOG IN WITH MY OWN PASSWORD

woodsprite

(11,911 posts)
28. We sign an agreement every year, as part of our yearly review
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:01 PM
Nov 2013

that we understand and *agree to* the security measures and PNPI restrictions. You sign it during the face-to-face interview with your manager. If you decline, you're terminated, as well as all system and key card access immediately revoked. And we work for a freakin school -- not a corporate or govt. entity. We are also very upfront and constantly letting employees, students and families know that at no time should anyone associated with the school ever ask you for your password or pin, and to immediately report anyone who does.

For our secure systems that may require sr. admins to help the users, we have a role defined that they can "view as user XXXX" (without needing a password). They can see the same views the user sees, but nothing can be changed and in some cases, sensitive data will be blanked out.

Skittles

(153,150 posts)
48. corporate password resets are often a problem
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:36 PM
Nov 2013

they used to be taken care of very quickly but with offshore they can take days

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
32. It makes more sense than he's a master hacker who didn't understand what an FTP server is.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 05:25 PM
Nov 2013

[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.
[/center][/font][hr]

idwiyo

(5,113 posts)
47. Wouldn't be surprised if those morons had passwords written on post-it notes stuck on the monitor.
Fri Nov 8, 2013, 07:28 PM
Nov 2013

Or used their date of birth as a password.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Exclusive: Snowden persua...