General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExclusive: Snowden persuaded other NSA workers to give up passwords - sources
Former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden used login credentials and passwords provided unwittingly by colleagues at a spy base in Hawaii to access some of the classified material he leaked to the media, sources said.
A handful of agency employees who gave their login details to Snowden were identified, questioned and removed from their assignments, said a source close to several U.S. government investigations into the damage caused by the leaks.
Snowden may have persuaded between 20 and 25 fellow workers at the NSA regional operations center in Hawaii to give him their logins and passwords by telling them they were needed for him to do his job as a computer systems administrator, a second source said.
The revelation is the latest to indicate that inadequate security measures at the NSA played a significant role in the worst breach of classified data in the super-secret eavesdropping agency's 61-year history.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/11/08/net-us-usa-security-snowden-idUSBRE9A703020131108
lulz
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)davidn3600
(6,342 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Talk about stupid--and amazing that no one reported him for even ASKING.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Snooping around on everybody else.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)he says, too? How many people here believe everything Snowden has said? And people here call Snowden"s colleagues morons, when at that time he hadn't (to their knowledge) committed a crime.
He sure has now. Committed crimes, that is. I'm pretty much thinking anyone who believed him then was stupid and anyone who believes him now is worse. Duh.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)I'm sure each employee signed papers stating that their passwords would be secured and not distributed to anyone.
I've been in the computer industry for about 30 years, and of the multitude of sites I were employed or contracted to... NOT ONE allowed the sharing of an ID with anyone... even with Loss Prevention, the External Security Department (the ones who assign you your security rights and privileges) or someone as lowly as a System Administrator.
Folks somehow confuse a SysAdmin with someone who is granted superuser rights. If they were, they wouldn't need other people's userids and passwords.
The employees screwed up... that's why they were reassigned.
===
Any normal employee would have been fired for violating code like that, unless the government is afraid of the damage these folks could do too.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)He was the least untruthful he could be while testifying to Congress.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)It's not about believing what Snowden says, there are journalists going through the leaked docs and releasing factual information.
Duh.
Whistle blowers often commit crimes in order to get an important truth out. That's why there are (supposedly, not so much under this administration) whistle blower protection laws.
Duh.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)There is no excuse. This is single most stupid thing and it should be more than enough to get one's stupid arse fired on the spot.
/me shakes head
RE: Snowden
I guess you missed latest Al Gore's statement about Snowden's revelations?
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)And STOLE the classified documents? And DIVULGED the TS/SCI information to our enemies? Do you think they are wonderful and do you trust them?
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)surveillance, how easy it is to intercept and collect the data, data analysis, and databases. The validity of the data has nothing to do with Mr Snowden himself, his character, or what he did to obtain that data. Never mind even your VP agrees that Mr Snowden revealed wrongdoing by NSA.
I don't look at Russia, China, entire South America, and the rest of the world as my enemies. But thank you for letting me know you consider me, a British citizen, to be your enemy.
Unlike you, I consider Mr Snowden a whistle-blower. How he obtained the data is irrelevant to me.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)with saying Jawhol!
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)if he's a Sys Admin, there are people who would have no reason to suspect he's asking for nefarious reasons.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)to anyone, under any circumstances.
gulliver
(13,180 posts)It's a blind spot. When you call a cop to come to your house because you think you might have a burglar, you don't expect the cop to come in and steal your iPad. Snowden probably told his unfortunate co-workers that he needed their passwords for valid reasons. They paid the price.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)You don't trust anyone with your userid and password, not anyone.
The employees knew they were violating their employment agreements.
They should be happy they weren't fired for doing so, like most companies would.
===
A SysAdmin is not some superuser job. Sure, they are 'superusers' for defining the servers and storage, etc.. It's the guy managing the servers, not the confidential data within it. That's where the individual userid access rights come into play.
DevonRex
(22,541 posts)I took that oath myself.
TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)Not at all. Stupidity and trusting a snake like Snowden is a violation they were warned about over and over again. In briefing after briefing. I agree.
I would never have done it in a million years. I do wonder what methods he used get the information. I find it hard to believe that many people trusted him or just fell for his BS. I've never seen or heard of anything like it in all my time in
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)Work is over rated and lets not forget he was working for a private for profit corporation.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Now is the time for all good persons to come to the aid of the country.
Oaths are for suckers. Employment agreements are for the trembling.
My employment agreement has sat in my desk drawer for 5 years. I've never signed it, I never will.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)But this administration chooses to prosecute them more than any other.
Better to have a whistle blower violate his agreement and oath than have rampant spying on citizens and govts all over the world. Thankfully he did and now, finally, congress is working on changing how the NSA operates.
randome
(34,845 posts)The Administration has prosecuted leakers and has added protections for whistleblowers.
None of the documents that Snowden stole reveal illegality so how can you say he is a whistleblower?
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I can tell you that people who normally would meet with me, sort of in a more relaxed atmosphere, are on pins and needles, Landay said of the reporting climate during the Obama years, a period of unprecedented whistleblower prosecutions. The crackdown on leaks, he added, seems deliberately intended to have a chilling effect.
<snip>
The Obama administration's been extremely aggressive in trying to root out whistleblowers within the government, NBC News investigative reporter Michael Isikoff says in the film. The New Yorkers Jane Mayer, describing the secrecy required in her reporting for a profile of whistleblower Thomas Drake amid government prosecution, said the experience didnt feel [like] America, land of the free press.
Drake, a former senior executive of the National Security Agency, says in the film, "it's extremely dangerous in America right now to be right as a whistleblower when the government is so wrong." He adds: "speaking truth to power is now a criminal act."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/obama-whistleblower-prosecutions-press_n_3091137.html
The Obama administration has been cruelly and unusually punishing in its use of the 1917 Espionage Act to stomp on governmental leakers, truth-tellers, and whistleblowers whose disclosures do not support the president's political ambitions. As Thomas Drake, himself a victim of Obama's crusade against whistleblowers, told me, "This makes a mockery of the entire classification system, where political gain is now incentive for leaking and whistleblowing is incentive for prosecution."
The Obama administration has charged more people (six) under the Espionage Act for the alleged mishandling of classified information than all past presidencies combined. (Prior to Obama, there were only three such cases in American history, one being Daniel Ellsberg, of Nixon-era Pentagon Papers fame.) The most recent Espionage Act case is that of former CIA officer John Kiriakou, charged for allegedly disclosing classified information to journalists about the horrors of waterboarding. Meanwhile, his evil twin, former CIA officer Jose Rodriguez, has a best-selling book out bragging about the success of waterboarding and his own hand in the dirty work.
Obama's zeal in silencing leaks that don't make him look like a superhero extends beyond the deployment of the Espionage Act into a complex legal tangle of retaliatory practices, life-destroying threats, on-the-job harassment, and firings. Lots of firings.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/06/obamas-whistleblowers-stuxnet-leaks-drones
Amid the Obama administration's crackdown against whistleblowers, Change.gov, the 2008 website of the Obama transition team laying out the candidate's promises, has disappeared from the internet.
The Sunlight Foundation notes that it last could be viewed on June 8, which was two days after the first revelations from Edward Snowden (who had then not yet revealed himself) about the NSA's phone surveillance program. One of the promises Obama made on the website was on "whistleblower protections:"
Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.
The White House did not respond to multiple requests for comment on why the page was deleted. The site had offered a way to compare Obama's promises and administration actions and still can be viewed on the Wayback archive.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/26/obama-whistleblower-website_n_3658815.html
The legality of the NSA's actions is arguable. It can't really be tried in court due to all the secrecy laws. Their actions are unconstitutional when you look at the 4th Amendment. This has been argued on DU countless times, by people who can say it all better than I. I'm sure you've seen it all.
If there were no problem with what is being done by the NSA then why are there so many esteemed journalists etc... writing about how terrible it is? Why is congress working on passing laws to reign them in?
Snowden revealed the extent of what was going on. And now we've been finding out that our govt is spying on citizens of other countries. Not just suspected terrorists, but millions of random people. Are you really defending that?
Snowden is a whistleblower. Period.
randome
(34,845 posts)Maybe not soon enough but they were dropped.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
treestar
(82,383 posts)That's why he's a criminal.
And now look at him, he's trying desperately to get attention again!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I can tell you that people who normally would meet with me, sort of in a more relaxed atmosphere, are on pins and needles, Landay said of the reporting climate during the Obama years, a period of unprecedented whistleblower prosecutions. The crackdown on leaks, he added, seems deliberately intended to have a chilling effect.
<snip>
The Obama administration's been extremely aggressive in trying to root out whistleblowers within the government, NBC News investigative reporter Michael Isikoff says in the film. The New Yorkers Jane Mayer, describing the secrecy required in her reporting for a profile of whistleblower Thomas Drake amid government prosecution, said the experience didnt feel [like] America, land of the free press.
Drake, a former senior executive of the National Security Agency, says in the film, "it's extremely dangerous in America right now to be right as a whistleblower when the government is so wrong." He adds: "speaking truth to power is now a criminal act."
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/16/obama-whistleblower-prosecutions-press_n_3091137.html
The Obama administration has been cruelly and unusually punishing in its use of the 1917 Espionage Act to stomp on governmental leakers, truth-tellers, and whistleblowers whose disclosures do not support the president's political ambitions. As Thomas Drake, himself a victim of Obama's crusade against whistleblowers, told me, "This makes a mockery of the entire classification system, where political gain is now incentive for leaking and whistleblowing is incentive for prosecution."
The Obama administration has charged more people (six) under the Espionage Act for the alleged mishandling of classified information than all past presidencies combined. (Prior to Obama, there were only three such cases in American history, one being Daniel Ellsberg, of Nixon-era Pentagon Papers fame.) The most recent Espionage Act case is that of former CIA officer John Kiriakou, charged for allegedly disclosing classified information to journalists about the horrors of waterboarding. Meanwhile, his evil twin, former CIA officer Jose Rodriguez, has a best-selling book out bragging about the success of waterboarding and his own hand in the dirty work.
Obama's zeal in silencing leaks that don't make him look like a superhero extends beyond the deployment of the Espionage Act into a complex legal tangle of retaliatory practices, life-destroying threats, on-the-job harassment, and firings. Lots of firings.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/06/obamas-whistleblowers-stuxnet-leaks-drones
Amid the Obama administration's crackdown against whistleblowers, Change.gov, the 2008 website of the Obama transition team laying out the candidate's promises, has disappeared from the internet.
The Sunlight Foundation notes that it last could be viewed on June 8, which was two days after the first revelations from Edward Snowden (who had then not yet revealed himself) about the NSA's phone surveillance program. One of the promises Obama made on the website was on "whistleblower protections:"
Often the best source of information about waste, fraud, and abuse in government is an existing government employee committed to public integrity and willing to speak out. Such acts of courage and patriotism, which can sometimes save lives and often save taxpayer dollars, should be encouraged rather than stifled. We need to empower federal employees as watchdogs of wrongdoing and partners in performance. Barack Obama will strengthen whistleblower laws to protect federal workers who expose waste, fraud, and abuse of authority in government. Obama will ensure that federal agencies expedite the process for reviewing whistleblower claims and whistleblowers have full access to courts and due process.
The White House did not respond to multiple requests for comment on why the page was deleted. The site had offered a way to compare Obama's promises and administration actions and still can be viewed on the Wayback archive.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/26/obama-whistleblower-website_n_3658815.html
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)this guy is more and more showing the marks of a spy with an agenda.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)DevonRex
(22,541 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Skittles
(153,150 posts)OR if he is helping me with an issue, I LOG IN WITH MY OWN PASSWORD
woodsprite
(11,911 posts)that we understand and *agree to* the security measures and PNPI restrictions. You sign it during the face-to-face interview with your manager. If you decline, you're terminated, as well as all system and key card access immediately revoked. And we work for a freakin school -- not a corporate or govt. entity. We are also very upfront and constantly letting employees, students and families know that at no time should anyone associated with the school ever ask you for your password or pin, and to immediately report anyone who does.
For our secure systems that may require sr. admins to help the users, we have a role defined that they can "view as user XXXX" (without needing a password). They can see the same views the user sees, but nothing can be changed and in some cases, sensitive data will be blanked out.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)they used to be taken care of very quickly but with offshore they can take days
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)In January of this year we exported goods valued at $741,000,000 to Russia and $9,384,000,000 to China.
Source: http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c4621.html
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)But that's just me.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)hope he enjoys beet soup.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]There is nothing you can't do if you put your mind to it.
Nothing.[/center][/font][hr]
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)Or used their date of birth as a password.