General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTexas Homeowner Battles $3 Million Defamation Lawsuit For Exposing Fracking Company’s Pollution
Lipsky sued Range Resources originally in 2011, prompted by an Environmental Protection Agency order that Range Resources endangered Texas residents health. His case was dismissed, because the presiding judge claimed there was no jurisdiction, but Range Resources took the unusual step of countersuing Lipsky for libel. It alleged that Lipsky and others conspired to get the EPA and the media to wrongly label and prosecute Range as a polluter of the environment. The company said that his public video of Lipsky lighting on fire a methane-filled hose escaping from his water well was an unfair portrayal, even though Lipsky maintains he can still set the water on fire in a video from October.
For Range Resources, its common practice to silence critics through settlement agreements or lawsuits. In Pennsylvania, it settled with a homeowner with one major caveat: The entire family, including two young children, could never speak publicly about their polluted home for the rest of their lives. These settlements mean there are an unknown number of times residents must choose between exposing a company and accepting compensation to relocate.
There are more threats facing homeowners in fracking territory, even beyond expensive libel lawsuits. At least 11 states have introduced anti-whistleblower ag-gag bills that could end up banning the public from filming fracking operations. By criminalizing watchdog actions, activists worry these bills will only contribute to the secrecy that surrounds contamination from the industry.
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2013/11/08/2913651/steve-lipsky-range-resources/
Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Pennsylvania mentioned in the article.
msongs
(67,394 posts)about who greases the campaign skids eh? and the judges who don't throw this crap out of court of course. after all, no lawsuits, no need to pay judges
freshwest
(53,661 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)on him. I hope he can pursue this to a higher court.
derby378
(30,252 posts)...where we have scored a decent victory in the City Council chambers against a company that wanted to start fracking within Dallas County limits, with some of the wells very close to neighborhoods and churches. Our City Planning Commission has instituted new setback rules that make it almost impossible to frack anywhere in the county, and the City Council couldn't muster enough votes to override the new rules.
However, this doesn't mean the saga is over. The drilling companies who leased the land from Dallas County are considering an expensive lawsuit, not to mention possible legal avenues around the new setback ordinances.
But I know of Lipsky's story, and I wish there was something we could do for him. Range Resources practically chased the EPA out of the courtroom, leaving Lipsky and his family all alone before the judge and a bunch of ravenous vultures who are sharpening their knives.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)I think the drillers only weapon is to try to wear people down through lawsuits. I hope both Lipsky and Dallas county prevail.