Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

no_hypocrisy

(46,026 posts)
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 08:21 AM Nov 2013

What Christie "Landslide"? What "Mandate"?

http://www.northjersey.com/news/politics/Low_turnout_helped_propel_lopsided_Christie_victory_over_Buono.html

This past election cycle concluded with one of the lowest voter turn-outs in the state.

38% total.

Do the math.

If Christie got 60% of the total vote (38%), that means only 22.8% of the registered voters in the state thought enough of him to vote for him.

Less than one-quarter of the voters "elected" Chris Christie to another term.

And less than one-quarter of NJ voters endorsing a candidate doesn't have any significant national implications no matter what the media says otherwise.
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Christie "Landslide"? What "Mandate"? (Original Post) no_hypocrisy Nov 2013 OP
The voters were also apathetic enough to allow him to win berni_mccoy Nov 2013 #1
Too many jokes. Atman Nov 2013 #2
No coattails Freddie Nov 2013 #3
It's a "media mandate", brought to you by people who don't do math or fact-checking. n/t winter is coming Nov 2013 #4
well, he certainly strengthened the resolve of pro-choice women in the state... CTyankee Nov 2013 #5
So, no mandate for Bill de Blasio then.... brooklynite Nov 2013 #6
He "won big" with limited numbers. no_hypocrisy Nov 2013 #7
Bottom line is: NJ is screwed! ananda Nov 2013 #8
Good News/Bad News no_hypocrisy Nov 2013 #9
That's a miserable argument cthulu2016 Nov 2013 #10
shhhhh...don't tell the media, they are drooling over the guy spanone Nov 2013 #11
 

berni_mccoy

(23,018 posts)
1. The voters were also apathetic enough to allow him to win
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 08:25 AM
Nov 2013

You can look at that number both ways.

People don't vote when they don't care. That can mean more than one thing.

Freddie

(9,257 posts)
3. No coattails
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 09:39 AM
Nov 2013

All of the other races in the state went overwhelmingly D, plus the minimum wage referendum that Christie opposed passed by a wide margin.

brooklynite

(94,358 posts)
6. So, no mandate for Bill de Blasio then....
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 09:47 AM
Nov 2013

24% turnout in NYC.

You could just as easily argue that Votefs knew they were going to win big and were happy wth the outcome so they didn't feel the need to vote.

Look, we can disparage Christie's politics all we want. Bottom line is he won and won big.

no_hypocrisy

(46,026 posts)
9. Good News/Bad News
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 10:24 AM
Nov 2013

Good News: NJ is stuck with Christie (meaning, no real chance of him becoming president)

Bad News: That means NJ is stuck with Christie.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
10. That's a miserable argument
Sat Nov 9, 2013, 12:06 PM
Nov 2013

It applies to almost all American elections so trotting it out for one case is pathetic.

Is it an awesome argument when Republicans point out what percentage of the American people voted for Obama or Clinton?

I never found it so.

What % of New Jersey just voted for Cory Booker?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Christie "Lands...