General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Getting drunk without the hangover or health risks..."
Sounds like a great idea to me. Never mind it's non-addictive, wonder how many lives can be saved, crimes not committed, adults and children lives not ruined by living with an alchoholic.
Getting drunk without the hangover or health risks scientist seeks investment for alcohol substitute drug
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/getting-drunk-without-the-hangover-or-health-risks--scientist-seeks-investment-for-alcohol-substitute-drug-8931946.html
It targets neurotransmitters in the brain directly, giving the taker feelings of pleasure and disinhibition that are in some cases indistinguishable from the effects of drinking. Yet because it acts directly, it can also be immediately blocked by taking an antidote with drinkers potentially able to then drive or return to work straight away.
Prof Nutt is one of the countrys leading neuropsychopharmacologists, but he and his team at Imperial College London have hit a stumbling block perhaps unsurprisingly, no one in the drinks industry is willing to fund the drugs development.
...
One of the biggest benefits to Prof Nutts alcohol substitute would be to remove addiction as a drinking problem. The scientist said 10 per cent of drinkers become addicted, and that addicts account for most of the one and a half million people killed by alcohol every year.
...
Edited to add: Wiki page for David Nutt: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Nutt
warrior1
(12,325 posts)Xipe Totec
(43,888 posts)idwiyo
(5,113 posts)rurallib
(62,382 posts)take a pill and go back to work. Strange.
No surprise the alky industry wouldn't fund the study for a product that could wipe them out.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)and yet no one seems to be interested. WTF?
rurallib
(62,382 posts)alcohol ain't cheap and they advertise and employ bunches.
Besides - what would tailgating be without getting sloshed?
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)UK makes about £16 billion a year on it in form of value-added tax and VAT.
Never mind of course, how much it costs in ruined lives, one way or another. Who gives a shit.
joshcryer
(62,266 posts)But it wouldn't hurt the home brewers or small time brewers.
What bugs me is that they should want to adapt their company, provide refreshing beer tasting beverages, with this drug in it. It wouldn't hurt them one bit.
But companies tend to be reactionary rather than revolutionary.
I'm just sayin...
Electric Monk
(13,869 posts)of your alcoholism forever. Just one pill and you'll never want a drink again!"
A voice from the back of the room asks, meekly, "What happens if I take two?"
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Come on, really???
arthritisR_US
(7,283 posts)the aid of a substance?