Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:34 PM Nov 2013

WaPo's Richard Cohen: to gag at the idea of biracial families "not racist."

http://www.salon.com/2013/11/12/in_new_column_washington_posts_richard_cohen_makes_bizarre_racist_statement_about_bill_de_blasios_family/

Writing about the GOP, which Cohen insists “is not racist” but rather is merely “deeply troubled,” Cohen seemingly attempts to explain the logic behind Republican cultural panic by pointing to the example of NYC mayor-elect Bill de Blasio’s biracial family. The results are not pretty (emphasis added):

Today’s GOP is not racist, as Harry Belafonte alleged about the tea party, but it is deeply troubled — about the expansion of government, about immigration, about secularism, about the mainstreaming of what used to be the avant-garde. People with conventional views must repress a gag reflex when considering the mayor-elect of New York — a white man married to a black woman and with two biracial children. (Should I mention that Bill de Blasio’s wife, Chirlane McCray, used to be a lesbian?) This family represents the cultural changes that have enveloped parts — but not all — of America. To cultural conservatives, this doesn’t look like their country at all.

As Cohen’s colleague, Wonkblog’s Ezra Klein, notes, however, Cohen’s conflation of “conventional” with “racist” is confused and mistaken. Support for interracial marriage is a widely held, majority position, varying little by region or age. To put it simply, the only people gagging are those reading Cohen’s columns.


Why does this guy get to excuse racism at one of the most important newspapers in the U.S.?

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WaPo's Richard Cohen: to gag at the idea of biracial families "not racist." (Original Post) RainDog Nov 2013 OP
Cohen's a racist. n/t Chan790 Nov 2013 #1
It's kind of sad el_bryanto Nov 2013 #2
racism vs. classism RainDog Nov 2013 #5
This is now what passes for responsible, intellectual, opinion? PCIntern Nov 2013 #3
can you believe this guy gets paid for this sort of "thinking"??? RainDog Nov 2013 #8
This is just a poorly hidden "I"m not racist but...." article. /nt Drale Nov 2013 #4
How is that not racist? Iggo Nov 2013 #6
It's entirely racist RainDog Nov 2013 #7
Wait..... "not racist".... "gag reflex"..... "white man married to a black woman"? Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #9
"They're not racist, but..." KamaAina Nov 2013 #10
economic conservatism is racist RainDog Nov 2013 #11
Sounds pretty openly racist to me............ Marrah_G Nov 2013 #12
According to Gallup inter-racial marriage wasn't accepted by most Americans until 1998 Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Nov 2013 #13
this is so strange to me RainDog Nov 2013 #14
biracial families are "avant-garde"? LOL he's an asshole. elehhhhna Nov 2013 #15
He better not ever come to California Le Taz Hot Nov 2013 #21
Cohen has a long history of racism. Long. Calls himself a liberal too nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #16
When are all this people w/ "conventional views" MissMillie Nov 2013 #17
Richard's usually not such an asshole...disappointing...very...knr joeybee12 Nov 2013 #18
Oh god...when is this guy finally going to move to that town in North Dakota bullwinkle428 Nov 2013 #19
It's 2013 shawn703 Nov 2013 #20

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
2. It's kind of sad
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:38 PM
Nov 2013

There is a good exploration to be had about how much of the Right wing is motivated by racism vs classism - but his piece is just terrible.

Particularly when you talk about the Tea Party and, what he references, the loss of a bygone era when White Christian Males ran everything.

Bryant

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
5. racism vs. classism
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:45 PM
Nov 2013

is an excellent topic.

my pov is that racism flourishes in a society with little social mobility - like the U.S. now compared to other western democracies... yes, Denmark and the UK have more social mobility than the U.S. does.

The reason we have less social mobility is because we do not tax wealth enough to create social mobility. That's what it all comes down to, and no one with political power will make the case for taxes because the financial class controls the political conversation in all sectors of society beyond the left.

To even talk of tax increases is to be a commie/marxist, etc. etc. - even Eisenhower, no commie marxist - but labeled this by some Republicans at the time - saw the value of infrastructure investment with the interstate hwy system (but he also justified this with a military reason - to get troops around the states quickly in the case of a communist invasion/attack.)

In this nation, it seems you have to appeal to fear, not smart actions for good reasons that have shown, empirically, that they improve economic outlooks.

but I don't think that solves every problem as far as racism, or sexism, or homophobia, etc. goes.

however, it's a lot easier to discuss those issues when there is more economic stability among a population.

PCIntern

(25,491 posts)
3. This is now what passes for responsible, intellectual, opinion?
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:40 PM
Nov 2013

What a bastard! And devastatingly wrong on all counts.

He's a bigger dope than I ever thought he was, and that's going a "fur piece".

RainDog

(28,784 posts)
7. It's entirely racist
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 12:52 PM
Nov 2013

But too many people who call themselves conservative seem to think racism is part of conservatism, as we've seen over and over.


RainDog

(28,784 posts)
11. economic conservatism is racist
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 01:46 PM
Nov 2013

whether the person who touts it is aware of this reality or not.

it's also sexist.

when you have groups in society that are routinely discriminated against in the job market, for hundreds of years, this inequity is not solved by reducing taxes on the rich and lying to yourself and your fellow racists/sexists that this economic boost to the wealthy will "trickle down."

Nevertheless, this explanation continues to provide cover for conservatism.

In spite of evidence that "trickle down" is a myth.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
21. He better not ever come to California
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 02:51 PM
Nov 2013

he's going to get more "avant-garde" than he can possibly handle. My guess is this is true in most of the rest of the country (OK, maybe not in the not-the-sharpest-knife-in-the-drawer states).

Avant-garde? Did he really say that?

MissMillie

(38,533 posts)
17. When are all this people w/ "conventional views"
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 02:07 PM
Nov 2013

going to hold the conventional view that he doesn't need to "consider" the family life of the mayor-elect--or anyone else for that matter?

shawn703

(2,702 posts)
20. It's 2013
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 02:27 PM
Nov 2013

People with conventional views must repress a gag reflex when considering what Richard Cohen considers to be conventional views.

Unfortunately, I'm unable to repress mine.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»WaPo's Richard Cohen: to ...