Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

agent46

(1,262 posts)
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 02:04 PM Nov 2013

By the way, the security state really is here

San Diego quietly slips facial recognition into the hands of law enforcers

by Lisa Vaas on November 12, 2013 | 11 Comments
Filed Under: Featured, Law & order, Privacy

Facial recognition image courtesy of ShutterstockThe US immigration agent had a hunch.

So while he was taking part in a warrant sweep in the Oceanside neighborhood of the US city of San Diego, in California, he whipped out his Android smartphone and snapped a quick photo.

He didn't have to ask his subject's name. He didn't need to check the man's identification. And he certainly didn't need a warrant.

The facial recognition software on the mobile phone confirmed the agent's suspicion about the immigration status of a neighbor of the person he was pursuing: the neighbor was in the country illegally and had been convicted in 2003 of driving under the influence in San Diego.

It's easy to see why law enforcement agents rave about this new, mobile facial recognition technology - called the Tactical Identification System (TACIDS) - which has been quietly rolled out in a pilot program in San Diego this year, according to a report published on Thursday by The Center for Investigative Reporting.

http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2013/11/12/san-diego-quietly-slips-facial-recognition-into-the-hands-of-law-enforcers/

Pretty good site for people keeping up on security issues.
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
By the way, the security state really is here (Original Post) agent46 Nov 2013 OP
Wouldn't the fourth amendment apply here? truebrit71 Nov 2013 #1
4th Amendment? That old thing? agent46 Nov 2013 #3
It's been around for awhile Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #2
Yes been around for awhile agent46 Nov 2013 #4
My question is who's getting rich off of developing this stuff? Blue_Tires Nov 2013 #5
Who got rich agent46 Nov 2013 #7
Why do people think you're not supposed to smile geek tragedy Nov 2013 #6
 

truebrit71

(20,805 posts)
1. Wouldn't the fourth amendment apply here?
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 02:09 PM
Nov 2013

I'm thinking of the right to be 'secure in their persons'...?

This seems to me to be an end-run around constitutional protections...

Thoughts?

agent46

(1,262 posts)
3. 4th Amendment? That old thing?
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 02:23 PM
Nov 2013

We're talking big business here. Money. The corporate security state is walking the beat on your block now.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
2. It's been around for awhile
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 02:22 PM
Nov 2013

I know a local university professor who got an immense grant to refine and improve the technology about a decade ago...

agent46

(1,262 posts)
4. Yes been around for awhile
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 04:04 PM
Nov 2013

And now it's advanced enough to be man packable and deployable. Next will come automated real time crowd facial recog in every public/private space.

agent46

(1,262 posts)
7. Who got rich
Tue Nov 12, 2013, 09:21 PM
Nov 2013

Who got rich off those huge, toxic naked scanners they installed at all the airports after the 9/11 scare? They were designed, tested and ready for mass manufacture within months after the DHS was established.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»By the way, the security ...