Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How do you interpret this ACA sign? (Original Post) madville Nov 2013 OP
That could be their policy...haven't seen a thing about the ACA forcing that... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2013 #1
I Interpret it That Hospitals Will No Longer Treat Colds and Flu Etc Unless You Have Coverage Indykatie Nov 2013 #2
Hospitals are required to stabilize patients in medical emergencies - Ms. Toad Nov 2013 #6
Two things. StrayKat Nov 2013 #3
Yes. It's Dec. 15th. Drunken Irishman Nov 2013 #5
Interesting twist - lynne Nov 2013 #4
Anyone who doesn't go through the emergency doors will need insurance Lifelong Dem Nov 2013 #7
Informative? TroglodyteScholar Nov 2013 #8
Now that's a big law suit waiting to happen alfie Nov 2013 #9
 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
1. That could be their policy...haven't seen a thing about the ACA forcing that...
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 10:31 PM
Nov 2013

the ACA is just Health Insurance Regulation....

Indykatie

(3,696 posts)
2. I Interpret it That Hospitals Will No Longer Treat Colds and Flu Etc Unless You Have Coverage
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 10:34 PM
Nov 2013

I'm not sure this is a change in policy if emergency rooms hospitals are currently required to only provide care for true emergency diagnoses or those that appear to be emergencies. The good news is that you can enroll at the hospital and apparently be treated. Much of the care provided in the ER are for conditions that could be treated in a doctor's office if the patient had a family physician.

Ms. Toad

(34,066 posts)
6. Hospitals are required to stabilize patients in medical emergencies -
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 02:09 AM
Nov 2013

regardless of ability to pay - but that is all, and have been for years.

I am surprised they are connecting it to insurance though (rather than ability to pay).

StrayKat

(570 posts)
3. Two things.
Wed Nov 13, 2013, 11:28 PM
Nov 2013

I imagine that soon many places will opt not to take patients without insurance except in emergencies.

Isn't the deadline to enroll Dec 15 (not Nov 30 as they say) for coverage effective Jan 1?

lynne

(3,118 posts)
4. Interesting twist -
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:52 AM
Nov 2013

- and it's not reflected on their website that I can find. Must be only posted at the hospitals.
http://www.arh.org/our_services/all_services/emergency.aspx

I suspect it's a temporary situation. They must first determine who is and is not an emergency in order for a patient to be seen without insurance. The first time a patient without insurance is turned away as a non-emergency when it actually was an emergency and the patient is disabled or dies because of it, the sign will come down.

Unfortunately for someone, it won't take long.

 

Lifelong Dem

(344 posts)
7. Anyone who doesn't go through the emergency doors will need insurance
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 02:16 AM
Nov 2013

Once you go through those doors... and the emergency is taken care of, and they give you a followup appointment for one of their services then you will need insurance. So if you come back with another emergency you will now have insurance. Sounds like this can catch on.

alfie

(522 posts)
9. Now that's a big law suit waiting to happen
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 06:39 AM
Nov 2013

I worked for years in an ER and have triaged many, many patients. Some are easy to recognize as emergencies...person with crushing chest pain, gray, sweaty...heart attack! Listless child with fever...maybe a common viral illness that will resolve on it's own or may be meningitis. Sprained ankle just needs first aid ...Rest...Ice...Compression...Elevation. Broken ankle, now that's a different issue and you can't necessarily tell the difference without an x-ray. On the outside, both look the same.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How do you interpret this...