Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

ZRT2209

(1,357 posts) Thu Nov 14, 2013, 12:57 PM Nov 2013

Under a "personhood" theory, would the RW then accept paying for maternity coverage?

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Under a "personhood" theory, would the RW then accept paying for maternity coverage? (Original Post) ZRT2209 Nov 2013 OP

They don't want to pay for food stamps for kids gollygee Nov 2013 #1

Right wing=fucking hypocrit!!! gopiscrap Nov 2013 #2

If the fetus becomes a person at the moment of conception ... zbdent Nov 2013 #3

gollygee

(22,336 posts)

1. They don't want to pay for food stamps for kids

Reply to ZRT2209 (Original post)

Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:00 PM

Nov 2013

Whose parents chose to have them despite financial difficulties. In fact they say that they shouldn't have to pay for people's bad choices.

gopiscrap

(23,726 posts)

2. Right wing=fucking hypocrit!!!

Reply to ZRT2209 (Original post)

Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:03 PM

Nov 2013

zbdent

(35,392 posts)

3. If the fetus becomes a person at the moment of conception ...

Reply to ZRT2209 (Original post)

Thu Nov 14, 2013, 01:22 PM

Nov 2013

and an insurance company refuses to pay full death benefits if a pregnancy naturally aborts itself ...

Will they go to bat for the grieving "parents" and demand the insurance company(ies) (and likely, their "constituents&quot pay them?

Reply to this discussion