Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 04:35 PM Nov 2013

Don Huber, controversial activist scientist promoting mysterious GMO superbug scare, has no data

http://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2013/11/14/don-huber-controversial-activist-scientist-promoting-mysterious-gmo-superbug-scare-revealed-as-fraud/#.UoUzX_mkop9

"Don Huber, a retired scientist from the Plant Pathology faculty of Purdue University and a favorite on the anti-GMO lecture circuit, claims he discovered years ago a novel pathogenic microbe caused by agricultural genetic engineering–a GMO time bomb of sorts that is wreaking havoc on humans and animals. It not only causes plant disease, he alleges, but also spontaneous abortions at the rate of 20-50% in animals fed the “Roundup Ready” crops and can destroy our stomachs. He describes the organism as fungal but with a size in the range of a plant virus.

One problem: there is not a shred of empirical evidence to back up his scare claims, no peer reviewed paper, and he has refused to make this ‘explosive’ data available to any other scientist in the world to confirm–or debunk.

The mainstream consensus is that Huber has no data to back up his questionable claims–scientists at his former university have challenged him, writing that there is no evidence to support his allegations, but that’s not stopped activists from featuring Huber at events and promoting his patented scare talk on websites when there is no respectable scientists to engage him. In response to these wild claims, University of Florida scientist Kevin Folta has launched a petition at Change.org to demand that Huber either release his study material to the scientific community or stop misinformation.

Folta also attended an event in Tallahasee to listen to Huber speak, and all did not go very well for the activist scientist.

..."



What is he hiding? Hmm.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
2. So you claim a critic is being occult about the massively OCCULT GMO, Inc. industry
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 04:51 PM
Nov 2013

Everybody's got something to hide, I guess.

Reckon I will just avoid the GMO shit until the industry decides to stop being OCCULT about all it's doings, and the single critic you cite comes, clean too.

Better safe than sorry. That's the Precautionary Principle -- not that the Occult GMO Mega-Industry, Inc. gives a shit about it.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
4. If you're going to use the precautionary principle with GMOs, then you really shouldn't be eating.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 04:54 PM
Nov 2013

Uh, you shouldn't be eating anything.

What this guy is doing is ugly and unethical. Why would you defend him?

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
9. It sad to see Mother Jones fail to follow the science.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 06:57 PM
Nov 2013

That doesn't mean their red herring hack job is worth a dime.

Also, there's this called content. Debunk any of the content at Genetic Literacy Project. Just try, with actual science. Thanks.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
7. Aren't you embarrassed to post such shit? Seriously, you should be ashamed...
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 05:06 PM
Nov 2013

A site run and financed by Monsanto...disgusting.

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
8. Aren't you embarrassed that you offered up something that has nothing to with the content of the OP,
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 06:55 PM
Nov 2013

Last edited Thu Nov 14, 2013, 09:40 PM - Edit history (1)

... and isn't even true?

Also, if you can't debunk the content of the website using actual science-based, peer reviewed evidence, well, what's your point again? Spend some time at the website, and tell me what's wrong with the content, other than it goes against the anti-science BS that is becoming all too prevalent at DU and elsewhere.

Seriously, Huber should be called out. Why would you post such a response? WOW!


--------

PS:

ARGUMENTUM AD MONSANTIUM
http://www.skepticblog.org/2012/11/08/argumentum-ad-monsantium/

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
10. Yep, I figured such.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 07:22 PM
Nov 2013

Now I gotta wonder what the climate doomsters like McPherson, Wasdell & Anderson are hiding themselves.....

Good find, HuckleB. I'm no fan of GMOs, and there are some issues that need to be addressed, but as with so many other things(yes, including the TPP & climate change as well), Huber-style fearmongering hasn't exactly been helpful.

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
12. Occultism in these mutant matters is despicable, for sure
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 11:01 PM
Nov 2013

But since the "source" in the OP is an odious corporate wanker, it may well be that Huber does in fact have the evidence that remains deliberately OCCULTED by the GMO Corps & their various & sundry PR sockpuppets.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Don Huber, controversial ...