Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:28 PM Nov 2013

Need help, but it's no biggie. How should one address a former Office holder?

Should Sarah Palin be addressed as "Governor"? Should Howard Dean? I know Howard Dean likes to still use the title, but my cousin posted this to me, and it made me think: if this is true, we shouldn't be calling former President "President because there is only one at a time.



http://www.formsofaddress.info/Governor_US_Former.html

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Need help, but it's no biggie. How should one address a former Office holder? (Original Post) LaydeeBug Nov 2013 OP
No, I think she forfeited that one when she bowed out after half a term Warpy Nov 2013 #1
how about "Disgraced Resigned Governor Palin"? dionysus Nov 2013 #4
Oh, *I*'d call her much worse than that, I just wanted to know whether she can be called that LaydeeBug Nov 2013 #5
Half governor, or half assed governor. NV Whino Nov 2013 #2
Probably, but I think "Grifter" better captures the real Palin rurallib Nov 2013 #3
I believe "Princess Dumbass Of The North Woods" is still the preferred title. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Nov 2013 #6
Her Maverickesty Enrique Nov 2013 #7
Nice 1000words Nov 2013 #14
Good one, Enrique! Which inspires another: Her Rogueness. nt pinboy3niner Nov 2013 #19
Maybe she doesn't want the title. Cleita Nov 2013 #8
I should really change my OP. This is getting cray. nt LaydeeBug Nov 2013 #9
Call her Vice President Palin. nyquil_man Nov 2013 #10
If I were ever so fortunate to meet her (/sarcasm), Staph Nov 2013 #11
"Why, how nice to meet-chew, Fox News Analyst Palin!!!" MADem Nov 2013 #13
The protocol I was taught was "highest rank held." MADem Nov 2013 #12
The protocol is that if the position has one holder at a time (president, governor) only the current Gormy Cuss Nov 2013 #15
I'm not arguing with the guidance in the book, but I can tell you that MADem Nov 2013 #16
There's protocol, and there's the laziness of our media. Gormy Cuss Nov 2013 #17
And there's "social protocol," and I've seen examples of this usage back in the 1960s. MADem Nov 2013 #21
GW needs to get some concealer to dab on that everlasting red nose of his. n/t Contrary1 Nov 2013 #20
For starters! Maybe ten layers of pan-stick to cover up those gin blossoms, too. nt MADem Nov 2013 #22
Emily Post agrees Sgent Nov 2013 #18

Warpy

(111,237 posts)
1. No, I think she forfeited that one when she bowed out after half a term
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:30 PM
Nov 2013

because the grifter couldn't pass up cash on the tour bus circuit.

I think the only form of address that is appropriate is "HEY TWIT!"

 

LaydeeBug

(10,291 posts)
5. Oh, *I*'d call her much worse than that, I just wanted to know whether she can be called that
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:32 PM
Nov 2013

Sub Howard Dean or any other Dem governor who didn't quit.

This was the link: http://www.formsofaddress.info/Governor_US_Former.html

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
8. Maybe she doesn't want the title.
Thu Nov 14, 2013, 10:39 PM
Nov 2013

She was close to being investigated for some corruption before she resigned so maybe she doesn't want people to be reminded about it.

Staph

(6,251 posts)
11. If I were ever so fortunate to meet her (/sarcasm),
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 12:36 AM
Nov 2013

I would call her Governor Palin in that way that we with a southern accent can pronounce a word, that makes that word the deadliest of insults. Just as "bless your heart" is one of the rudest things a southerner can say, and most folks outside the region have no idea they've been slammed.


MADem

(135,425 posts)
12. The protocol I was taught was "highest rank held."
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 01:16 AM
Nov 2013

That went for military or civilian folks. Of course, the context of this usage was "official-social," for events, like dinners, ceremonies, things like that.

General Schwartzkopf, Governor Dean, Secretary Clinton, Senator Feingold, etc.

And "Once a President, always a President." President Carter, President Clinton, Pretzeldunce Bush, etc....

This guidance is a major departure from the standards to which I have been accustomed.

Standards and mores change, but this is news to me. I think there will be a lot of push-back in the willingness of people to suddenly start calling former Presidents "Mister." To me, even "former President" grates on my ear. I mean, after all, I'm not stupid and neither are most people paying attention to any person who used to serve as our nation's Commander in Chief--we know who the current boss is, and using the title for an ex-Prez is an honorific. I think they've earned it.

That said, if this is the "new guidance," well, I guess we'll all have to adjust. I'll be an old curmudgeon, though, and say "Well, I don't like this kettle of fish one bit!!"

Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
15. The protocol is that if the position has one holder at a time (president, governor) only the current
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 01:36 AM
Nov 2013

holder is entitled to the honorific. Former holders may be referenced as such but should be introduced as the Honorable or Mr/Ms.

If the position has multiple holders (e.g. senator or general) it's acceptable to refer to former holders by that honorific.

This isn't new. I learned the rules of protocol decades ago.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
16. I'm not arguing with the guidance in the book, but I can tell you that
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 01:54 AM
Nov 2013

close to many thrones, it is not implemented in social circumstances, and hasn't been for many decades, either.

This isn't new as well--I've seen it with my own two eyes.

Here--you can, too.

A few media examples:

http://www.wired.com/business/2013/11/bill-gates-and-president-bill-clinton-on-american-exceptionalism/

http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article/mlb/national-college-baseball-hall-of-fame-to-honor-president-george-hw-bush?ymd=20131114&content_id=63927500&vkey=news_mlb



http://www.usatoday.com/story/theoval/2013/11/12/obama-bush-carter-clinton-ken-burns-gettysburg-address-film/3504735/

So, you see, one can talk 'protocol,' and one can see that common usage trumps it as often as not.


Gormy Cuss

(30,884 posts)
17. There's protocol, and there's the laziness of our media.
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 01:56 AM
Nov 2013

The latter being responsible for an erosion in knowledge of the former.

eta: I remember when our national print and TV media used to get it right, at least most of the time.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
21. And there's "social protocol," and I've seen examples of this usage back in the 1960s.
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 03:01 AM
Nov 2013

If you go into the newspaper archives (Google has some that are robust if cumbersome) you can see examples of "President Truman" and "President Eisenhower" into the sixties. There are some papers that are careful to do the "former" or "ex" and say "Mister" or "General" but there are others that didn't bother--even way back when.

People are unwilling to let go of a leader that they happened to like, and adherence to that writing style might very well depend upon the editorial lean of the paper as much as anything else.

And here's a little CBS thing about former President Johnson's library, filmed a year before he died, and in it a bunch of folks, including then-President Nixon, call LBJ "President Johnson."



Social usage--it's probably always going to butt up against official protocol. I don't think it'll ever change.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Need help, but it's no bi...