Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

xchrom

(108,903 posts)
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 07:51 AM Nov 2013

The 10 Giant Corporations That Have Taken Over Much of Our Economy

http://www.alternet.org/10-giant-corporations-have-taken-over-much-our-economy



There isn't much diversity in America's economic web of life.

An image that was first posted on Reddit last year, and was recently grabbed by the folks over at PolicyMic, shows just how out-of-control corporate America has become in the years since Ronald Reagan stopped enforcing the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.

Right now, there are 10 giant corporations that control, either directly or indirectly, virtually everything we buy.

These corporations are Kraft, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Nestle, Proctor and Gamble, General Mills, Kellogg's, Mars, Unilever, and Johnson & Johnson.

These 10 corporations in turn own, market, or distribute what people think of as the products of hundreds of other companies.

For example, Proctor and Gamble is best known for its cleaning and personal hygiene products, like Tide detergent, Ivory hand soap and Joy dishwashing liquid.

But the company also owns or markets other products, from IAMS dog food and Pepto-Bismol to Duracell batteries and Metamucil.
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The 10 Giant Corporations That Have Taken Over Much of Our Economy (Original Post) xchrom Nov 2013 OP
How much did the NSA help them and orpupilofnature57 Nov 2013 #1
I was thinking this thread NEEDS this image BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #2
Any charts showing how much of the GDP moves through their respective coffers annually? Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #6
haven't seen them - but it was reported that 147 companies control 40% of world GDP BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #10
So what's the problem we're trying to fix here ? CincyDem Nov 2013 #12
Well, who do you think the 600 corporate lobbyists involved in the TPP represent? BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #13
Google "competition" progressoid Nov 2013 #16
This is why we have "Too Big to Fail" Kermitt Gribble Nov 2013 #24
strong resemblence between that bank chart and a tournament rurallib Nov 2013 #17
I could have sworn we used to have anti-trust laws. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #3
doubleplusungood BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #4
No worries. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #5
Phew. I was afraid you were turning into an "adversary" BelgianMadCow Nov 2013 #8
There it is again - our problems of today are rooted in the Reagan era policies liberal N proud Nov 2013 #7
Reagan left office in 1989 Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #11
Clinton and Bush are both a result of the Reagan years. liberal N proud Nov 2013 #18
Clinton was despised by the Reaganites. Nuclear Unicorn Nov 2013 #20
We Have A Winner cantbeserious Nov 2013 #22
"The 10 Giant Corporations That Have Taken Over Much Of Our Government." FIXED. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #9
Add to the list the owners of the MSM, paints a very scary picture.... Thucydides Nov 2013 #14
The Oligarchs And Corporations Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us cantbeserious Nov 2013 #15
Well it is not surprise if you do the math. zeemike Nov 2013 #19
Conagra missed the cut? FarCenter Nov 2013 #21
Locking. Orsino Nov 2013 #23
And, you and I and pretty much everyone else on DU help them. bluestate10 Nov 2013 #25

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
2. I was thinking this thread NEEDS this image
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 07:59 AM
Nov 2013


and the article has it linked!

On edit: the bank pic is even more chilling:

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
10. haven't seen them - but it was reported that 147 companies control 40% of world GDP
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 08:35 AM
Nov 2013

and 60% of profits.

See here.

The Top 50 looks very, very financial:

1. Barclays plc
2. Capital Group Companies Inc
3. FMR Corporation
4. AXA
5. State Street Corporation
6. JP Morgan Chase & Co
7. Legal & General Group plc
8. Vanguard Group Inc
9. UBS AG
10. Merrill Lynch & Co Inc
11. Wellington Management Co LLP
12. Deutsche Bank AG
13. Franklin Resources Inc
14. Credit Suisse Group
15. Walton Enterprises LLC
16. Bank of New York Mellon Corp
17. Natixis
18. Goldman Sachs Group Inc
19. T Rowe Price Group Inc
20. Legg Mason Inc
21. Morgan Stanley
22. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc
23. Northern Trust Corporation
24. Société Générale
25. Bank of America Corporation
26. Lloyds TSB Group plc
27. Invesco plc
28. Allianz SE 29. TIAA
30. Old Mutual Public Limited Company
31. Aviva plc
32. Schroders plc
33. Dodge & Cox
34. Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc*
35. Sun Life Financial Inc
36. Standard Life plc
37. CNCE
38. Nomura Holdings Inc
39. The Depository Trust Company
40. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
41. ING Groep NV
42. Brandes Investment Partners LP
43. Unicredito Italiano SPA
44. Deposit Insurance Corporation of Japan
45. Vereniging Aegon
46. BNP Paribas
47. Affiliated Managers Group Inc
48. Resona Holdings Inc
49. Capital Group International Inc
50. China Petrochemical Group Company

CincyDem

(6,325 posts)
12. So what's the problem we're trying to fix here ?
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 08:53 AM
Nov 2013

I get the issue with the bank concentration and how it's concentrated wealth, restricted access to capital and pretty much f*ed the economy for a generation.

But I look at the top pic and think about getting up in the morning brushing my teeth with Crest, washing my hair with Furctis, pitting up with some Old Spice and grabbing a quick bowl of Quaker Oats for breakfast with a glass of Minute Maid orange juice. I pack up some leftover Kraft Mac'n'Cheese and mix in some Starkist Tuna (yep, I know it's not in the pic but it's my weakness) for lunch. On the way out the door I sneak a mini Nestles Cruch bar from the kids halloween booty and tell my wife I love the look with her new L'Oreal mascara. At lunch, someone brings in some KFC and I grab a Coke to go with it. I know I shouldn't but I grab a handful (small I promise) of M&M's as I pass the receptionist's desk. My calls in the afternoon and asks me to bring home some Ben & Jerry's to celebrate my daughter getting a part in the school play that she really wanted. At dinner, I spill some chocolate ice cream on my shirt. I wipe it up with some Bounty (because the Koch's own Brawny) and I toss the shirt in the wash with some Tide and Snuggle. I fall asleep wondering if we have any Eggo's for breakfast.

I don't know - to me it doesn't sound like that's the same as the cartel that "destroyed the world economy".

Can someone put it in perspective.

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
13. Well, who do you think the 600 corporate lobbyists involved in the TPP represent?
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 09:15 AM
Nov 2013

If not these mega-corps?

I do agree with you that, say, the banking cartel, Big Pharma, Big Oil and the MIC are bigger problems. Hence my edit to include the second picture.

Personally, I find the graph of concentration insightful because it helps dispell the illusion of choice when one walks down the isle.

What we're trying to "solve" here is that power corrupts, and such concentrated power will therefore corrupt very strongly.

Kermitt Gribble

(1,855 posts)
24. This is why we have "Too Big to Fail"
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 08:23 PM
Nov 2013

I would also guess that all of these products concentrated in only a handful of corporations all but eliminates competition, which leads to higher prices.

rurallib

(62,371 posts)
17. strong resemblence between that bank chart and a tournament
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 10:16 AM
Nov 2013

except one is for games and one is real life.
Can you say "monopoly?"

BelgianMadCow

(5,379 posts)
8. Phew. I was afraid you were turning into an "adversary"
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 08:27 AM
Nov 2013

As in, adversary.

It should hardly be surprising that our intelligence agencies seek ways to counteract our adversaries’ use of encryption,” the response states.

However, the document clearly refers to the general consumer as an adversary.

“These design changes make the systems in question exploitable through Sigint [signals intelligence] collection […] with foreknowledge of the modification,” the document states. “To the consumer and other adversaries, however, the systems’ security remains intact.”

liberal N proud

(60,331 posts)
7. There it is again - our problems of today are rooted in the Reagan era policies
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 08:25 AM
Nov 2013

"When Ronald Reagan became president, the Sherman Anti-Trust Act became a thing of the past. " referring to the Sherman Act which prevented such bullshit.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
11. Reagan left office in 1989
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 08:42 AM
Nov 2013

That was 24 years ago. Since then we've have 4 years of Bush, 8 years of Clinton, 8 years of other Bush and 5/8 years of Obama. Any subsequent president can pre-empt a predecessor's policies and nowhere have I heard of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act being repealed by Congress.

Blame-shifting has an expiration date.

 

Thucydides

(212 posts)
14. Add to the list the owners of the MSM, paints a very scary picture....
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 09:41 AM
Nov 2013

Massive corporations dominate the U.S. media landscape. Through a history of mergers and acquisitions, these companies have concentrated their control over what we see, hear and read. In many cases, these companies are vertically integrated, controlling everything from initial production to final distribution. In the interactive charts below we reveal who owns what.

http://www.freepress.net/ownership/chart

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
19. Well it is not surprise if you do the math.
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 10:38 AM
Nov 2013

Something that grows by a percentage every year unchecked will eventually devour it all...it is not a question of whether but when.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
23. Locking.
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 11:55 AM
Nov 2013

Mr. Bartholomew regretfully announces the OP's retirement, and thanks him for his years of devotion to The Game.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
25. And, you and I and pretty much everyone else on DU help them.
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 09:00 PM
Nov 2013

There are small companies around that make environmentally sensitive, healthy products. But they largely get fucking ignored. The prices for their products are high because most people would rather buy chocolates from Mars or Nestle, or soda pop from Coca-Cola or Pepsi, or soap from Proctor and Gamble, or cereal from Kellogg's. This is no strike at the OP in particular because I see this same pattern from other DU members, but when I see a thread start with a litany of ills then gives the implicit implication that we are powerless to reign in those ills, I get a slow boil that starts in my gut and consumes me with barely concealed rage. We can control a large part of who we buy stuff from if we really give a fuck and are willing to go farther than just complain.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The 10 Giant Corporations...