Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,366 posts)
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 01:23 PM Nov 2013

Failing to protect ‘irreplaceable’ areas threatens species' survival

http://theconversation.com/failing-to-protect-irreplaceable-areas-threatens-species-survival-20332

15 November 2013, 6.19am GMT

Failing to protect ‘irreplaceable’ areas threatens species' survival

Researchers working with the world’s most complete data on threatened species have pinpointed the most irreplaceable regions, whose existence is not only vital to species' survival, but which are also unprotected by law.

The report, drawn up by scientists from France, Switzerland, the UK, Australia, US and the United Arab Emirates, pored over the data to map areas where threatened or unique species were present. What, if any, protection they were afforded by being designated as National Parks, UNESCO World Heritage Sites, or other forms of recognition.

Using the IUCN’s World Database of Protected Areas, the report – published in the journal Science – examined all 173,461 protected areas and 2,059 proposed protected areas. The researchers then checked for the presence of 21,419 vertebrate species found on the IUCN’s Red List of Threatened Species data, which encompasses 6,240 species of amphibians, 5,263 non-marine mammals, and 9,916 birds.

The regions, largely concentrated in southern and central America, tropical Africa, and Indonesia, were ranked according to their “irreplaceability factor”. This was calculated by combining the number of species found in a protected area with a measure of how dependent each species is on it. Those regions that represented the only areas where certain species, or many species, were found would therefore rank as more highly irreplaceable than others.

..more..
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Failing to protect ‘irrep...