Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElizabeth Warren: Wall Street Can't Stop Her
Elizabeth Warren: Wall Street Can't Stop Her
By Jonathan Chait, New York Magazine
Noam Scheiber's must-read cover story in The New Republic lays out the emerging Warren phenomenon, explaining, among other things, why the likelihood of defeat by Clinton would not deter her. Ben White and Maggie Haberman have zeroed in on the most important ramification of her candidacy, which is the impact she would bring to bear on other candidates:
"The nightmare scenario for banks is to hear these arguments from a candidate on the far left and on the far right," said Jaret Seiberg, a financial services industry analyst at Guggenheim Partners. "Suddenly, you have Elizabeth Warren screaming about 'too big to fail' on one side and Rand Paul screaming about it on the other side, and then candidates in the middle are forced to weigh in."
"Far left" and "far right" are odd terms to describe this dynamic. If Warren's candidacy is so ideologically marginal, why would it force a juggernaut like Clinton to co-opt her ideas? And why would the "far right" follow suit? The answer is that her main policy idea, more stringent financial regulation, is not ideologically marginal. It's a popular, centrist, and even bipartisan notion that has been politically marginalized for temporary, idiosyncratic reasons.
Polling firms don't spend tons of time asking people about financial regulation, but the available data all point in the same rough direction. A September New York Times poll finds that Americans disapprove of the 2008 financial bailout by a 24-point margin, and believe that not enough "bankers and employees of financial institutions" were prosecuted by a staggering 70-point margin. Another poll (by a liberal advocacy group) from around the same time asked more directly about financial regulation, and found a 50-point advantage favoring tougher regulation of financial institutions.
It's odd that a staggeringly lopsided issue has played so little a role in national politics the last five years. The initial 2008 bailout vote took place in emergency conditions, with the cooperation of a Democratic House and a Republican president, and so close to the election that neither party had the chance to tailor its campaign message to take advantage of the public backlash. Republicans subsequently benefited from the backlash against the financial bailout merely by being the opposition party, but they never crafted a serious agenda against Wall Street. President Obama fought for and passed a legislative response, the Dodd-Frank regulations, which placed him in the position of defending the status quo. That, in turn, helped provoke a wild, paranoid backlash on Wall Street, memorably chronicled by Gabriel Sherman, that drove the industry into a full alliance with the GOP. By the 2012 cycle, Wall Street had titled its donations heavily to Republicans, who were pledging to repeal Dodd-Frank while nominating a financier at the top of the ticket.
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/20448-elizabeth-warren-wall-street-cant-stop-her
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 1212 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (12)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Elizabeth Warren: Wall Street Can't Stop Her (Original Post)
Jackpine Radical
Nov 2013
OP
Interesting--and yet the banks have just gotten Gramm-Rudman mangled by Congress
Jackpine Radical
Nov 2013
#2
She's in territory that makes the Big Money guys & the political Establishment uncomfortable,
Jackpine Radical
Nov 2013
#6
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)1. The big Wall Street players are no longer the banks
The big money has moved to the private equity funds, hedge funds, etc.
Warren seems focused on the "too big to fail banks", of which there are relatively few and which are heavily regulated.
The real action has moved elsewhere.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)2. Interesting--and yet the banks have just gotten Gramm-Rudman mangled by Congress
so they can do their derivatives trading again under cover of Federal insurance.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)7. Banks are "heavily regulated"???????
Care to back that up with something?
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)10. The big ones are regulated by the Fed, OCC, CFTC, SEC and state regulators.
An index to Fed regulations is at http://www.federalreserve.gov/bankinforeg/reglisting.htm
Scuba
(53,475 posts)11. I'll take that as a "no".
Laelth
(32,017 posts)3. k&r for Elizabeth Warren. n/t
-Laelth
Wilms
(26,795 posts)4. ^
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)5. Warren isn't "far left". n/t
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)6. She's in territory that makes the Big Money guys & the political Establishment uncomfortable,
Therefore she's "far left."
Somewhere between Truman & Eisenhower.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)8. Love to see her run for POTUS!
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)9. Warren, Sanders, Grayson....Keep 'em coming.
Let the revolution begin!
Get the MONEY OUT of politics, and the PEOPLE IN.